Neuroradiologic characteristics of astroblastoma and systematic review of the literature: 2 new cases and 125 cases reported in 59 publications.

BACKGROUND: Astroblastoma is a rare tumor of uncertain origin most commonly presenting in the cerebrum of children and young adults. The literature contains only case reports and small series regarding its radiologic features. This systematic review is the largest study of imaging findings of astroblastoma to date and serves to identify features that might differentiate it from other neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the imaging features of astroblastoma based on a systematic review of the literature and two new cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a PubMed and Google Scholar database search that identified 59 publications containing 125 cases of pathology-confirmed astroblastoma, and we also added two new cases from our own institution. Data collected include patient age, gender, tumor location, morphology, calcifications and calvarial changes. We recorded findings on CT, MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy, positron emission tomography (PET) and catheter angiography. RESULTS: Age at diagnosis ranged 0-70 years (mean 18 years; median 14 years). Female-to-male ratio was 8:1. Of 127 cases, 66 reported CT, 78 reported MRI and 47 reported both findings. Not all authors reported all features, but the tumor features reported included supratentorial in 96% (122/127), superficial in 72% (48/67), well-demarcated in 96% (79/82), mixed cystic-solid in 93% (79/85), and enhancing in 99% (78/79). On CT, 84% (26/31) of astroblastomas were hyperattenuated, 73% (27/37) had calcifications and 7 cases reported adjacent calvarial erosion. Astroblastomas were hypointense on T1-W in 58% (26/45) and on T2-W in 50% (23/46) of MRI sequences. Peritumoral edema was present in 80% (40/50) of cases but was typically described as slight. Six cases included DWI findings, with 100% showing restricted diffusion. On MR spectroscopy, 100% (5/5) showed nonspecific tumor spectra with elevated choline and decreased N-acetylaspartate (NAA). PET revealed nonspecific reduced uptake of [F-18] 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) and increased uptake of [11C]-Methionine in 100% (3/3) of cases. Catheter angiography findings (n=12) were variable, including hypervascularity in 67%, arteriovenous shunting in 33% and avascular areas in 25%. CONCLUSION: Astroblastomas occur most often in adolescent girls. Imaging often shows a supratentorial, superficial, well-defined, cystic-solid enhancing mass. On CT, most are hyperattenuated, have calcifications, and may remodel adjacent bone if superficial. MRI characteristically reveals a hypointense mass on T1-W and T2-W sequences with restricted diffusion. MR spectroscopy, PET and catheter angiography findings are nonspecific.

Bridging the Radiology-Pediatrics Interaction Gap by Incorporating a PGY4 Radiology Resident into the General Pediatrics Team.

To bridge the gap between clinicians and radiologists, radiology residents rounded with inpatient pediatric medicine teams to present and interpret daily imaging studies, as well as assist with decisions and indications for radiologic exams. Surveys were sent to team members who rotated with radiology residents, and the consensus strongly favored having radiology residents on future rotations. Team members responded that they benefitted from a better understanding of radiology exams, their indications and limitations.

Proton Whole-Lung Irradiation: Initial Report of Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Whole-lung irradiation is typically used in pediatric patients to decrease the risk of future lung metastases, but radiation dose to normal tissue is associated with long-term risks. Proton whole-lung irradiation (PWLI) provides an opportunity to decrease radiation dose to normal tissue and potentially decrease late toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included patients treated with spot-scanning PWLI at a single institution. Toxicity and oncologic outcomes were reviewed. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were created prospectively or retrospectively for dosimetric comparisons. Simple paired t tests were performed to assess differences between IMRT and PWLI dosimetric parameters. RESULTS: Twelve patients treated with PWLI were included in this study. Median age was 15 years (range, 3-34). Most (75%) had Ewing sarcoma. Most (92%) received 15 Gy in 10 fractions PWLI, and 3 (25%) received a focal pulmonary boost. Median follow-up was 16.5 months (range, 0-40.4 months). At last follow-up, 1 patient died of disease, while 11 were still alive (7 without disease, 4 with ongoing disease). During and immediately after treatment, 5 patients developed fatigue, 2 patients developed cough, and 1 patient developed nausea. Each treatment-related adverse event was Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) grade 1 and resolved within 3 weeks of treatment completion. No patients have experienced clinical or radiographic pneumonitis or evidence of clinically apparent cardiac toxicity. Compared with IMRT plans, PWLI decreased mean dose to the heart, coronary artery, cardiac valve, left ventricle, aorta, breast, esophagus, kidney, liver, pancreas, thyroid, stomach, and spleen (all P < .001), without sacrificing target coverage. CONCLUSIONS: PWLI is feasible to deliver, decreases dose to normal tissue compared with IMRT, and appears to be well-tolerated. PWLI provides potential for decreased late toxicity and merits further investigation.

Comparing Oncologic Outcomes and Toxicity for Combined Modality Therapy vs. Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Previously Irradiated Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

No standard treatment paradigm exists for previously irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer (PILRRC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may improve oncologic outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with combined modality therapy (CMT). Eighty-five patients treated at Institution A with CIRT alone (70.4 Gy/16 fx) and eighty-six at Institution B with CMT (30 Gy/15 fx chemoradiation, resection, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT)) between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively compared. Overall survival (OS), pelvic re-recurrence (PR), distant metastasis (DM), or any disease progression (DP) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier model, with outcomes compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Acute and late toxicities were compared, as was the 2-year cost. The median time to follow-up or death was 6.5 years. Median OS in the CIRT and CMT cohorts were 4.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (p ≤ 0.01). No difference was seen in the cumulative incidence of PR (p = 0.17), DM (p = 0.39), or DP (p = 0.19). Lower acute grade ≥ 2 skin and GI/GU toxicity and lower late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities were associated with CIRT. Higher 2-year cumulative costs were associated with CMT. Oncologic outcomes were similar for patients treated with CIRT or CMT, although patient morbidity and cost were lower with CIRT, and CIRT was associated with longer OS. Prospective comparative studies are needed.

Optimal management of brainstem metastases: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Brainstem metastases comprise fewer than 7% of all brain metastases. Nonetheless, they present clinicians with unique clinical challenges in symptom management and treatment. No comprehensive review summarizing the management of brainstem metastases exists. This review aims to summarize epidemiology, anatomy, clinical correlation, prognosis, options for management of symptoms, treatment, treatment toxicity, and dose and fractionation for brainstem stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as reported in the literature. METHODS: In July 2021, we searched PubMed and Embase for retrospective studies of brainstem metastasis treatment, as well as case series and case reports describing diagnosis and clinical management of brainstem metastasis. Keywords and MeSH terms searched included "brainstem metastasis", "symptomatic brainstem metastasis", "brain metastasis", "stereotactic radiosurgery brainstem", "whole brain radiation brainstem", "brainstem metastasis resection", "brainstem radiation toxicity", "brainstem radiosurgery toxicity", "brainstem radiosurgery dose", and "radiosurgery dose tolerance". Titles and abstracts were screened for relevant articles and studies. References from full-text articles were screened for additional studies. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Single-institution studies and multicenter retrospective analyses from 1993 to 2021 reflect a shift from reliance on whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to SRS for primary treatment of brainstem metastases. Recent multicenter retrospective analyses and single-institution case series support the safety and efficacy of SRS of brainstem metastases in symptom management and preservation of quality of life. Incidence of radiation-induced toxicity following SRS of brainstem metastases is comparable to that of SRS for other brain metastases. Complications following brainstem SRS are most strongly associated with prior WBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncologists play a central role in the treatment of brainstem metastases due to reliance on SRS. Dose and fractionation of brainstem SRS remain largely institution-dependent. The field would benefit from inclusion of brainstem metastases in prospective trials of SRS and studies of adverse effects of salvage WBRT after prior SRS of brainstem metastases.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

PURPOSE: This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations addressing recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases, including advanced radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and the emergence of systemic therapies with central nervous system activity. METHODS: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the radiotherapeutic management of intact and resected brain metastases from nonhematologic solid tumors. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS: Strong recommendations are made for SRS for patients with limited brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Multidisciplinary discussion with neurosurgery is conditionally recommended to consider surgical resection for all tumors causing mass effect and/or that are greater than 4 cm. For patients with symptomatic brain metastases, upfront local therapy is strongly recommended. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases eligible for central nervous system-active systemic therapy, multidisciplinary and patient-centered decision-making to determine whether local therapy may be safely deferred is conditionally recommended. For patients with resected brain metastases, SRS is strongly recommended to improve local control. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases receiving whole brain radiation therapy, hippocampal avoidance and memantine are strongly recommended. For patients with poor prognosis, early introduction of palliative care for symptom management and caregiver support are strongly recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of radiation therapy for brain metastases with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care.