MR imaging of the anatomy of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus.

Background In cadaveric and arthroscopic studies different insertion locations of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus (AHMM) have been described. Purpose To investigate if the different insertion locations of the AHMM, as described in cadaveric studies, can be determined on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods MR images of 100 patients without meniscal tears on MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Two observers classified the AHMM insertion based on its position relative to the anterior tibial edge and the medial tibial spine. The association between AHMM insertion and tibial plateau slope, meniscal radial displacement, and anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIL) presence was investigated. Results The AHMM inserted posterior to the anterior tibial edge in 93 knees and anterior to the tibial edge in seven knees (= type III). Of the 93 knees with AHMM insertion posterior to the anterior tibial edge, 63 inserted lateral to the medial tibial spine (= type I) and 30 medial (= type II). The AHMMs inserting anterior to the tibial edge had a significantly ( P < 0.05) steeper anterior tibial plateau slope and a significantly ( P < 0.05) higher presence of the AIL. No significant difference in radial displacement was observed between the three insertion types ( P > 0.05). A strong inter- and intra-observer agreement was observed. Conclusion Three different bony insertion locations of the AHMM, as described in cadaveric studies, could be identified on MRI. All AHMMs inserting anterior to the tibial edge displayed an AIL. Whether there is a clinical correlation with these insertion patterns remains unclear.

Imaging the Glenoid Labrum and Labral Tears.

The shoulder joint is the most unstable articulation in the entire human body. While this certainly introduces vulnerability to injury, it also confers the advantage of broad range of motion. There are many elements that work in combination to offset the inherent instability of the glenohumeral joint, but the glenoid labrum is perhaps related most often. Broadly, clinical unidirectional instability can be subdivided into anterior and posterior instability, which usually raise concern for anteroinferior and posteroinferior labral lesions, respectively. In the special case of superior labral damage, potential dislocation is blocked by structures that include the acromion; hence, while damage elsewhere commonly manifests as clinical instability, damage to the superior labrum is often described by the term microinstability. In this particular case, one of the radiologist's main concerns should be classic superior labral anteroposterior lesions. The glenoid labrum is also subject to a wide range of normal variants that can mimic labral tears. Knowledge of these variants is central to interpreting an imaging study of the labrum because misdiagnosis of labral variants as tears can lead to superfluous surgical procedures and decreased shoulder mobility. This article reviews labral anatomy and normal labral variants, describes their imaging features, and discusses how to discriminate normal variants from labral tears. Specific labral pathologic lesions are described per labral quadrant (anteroinferior, posteroinferior, and superior), and imaging features are described in detail. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2016.

Open versus arthroscopic meniscus allograft transplantation: magnetic resonance imaging study of meniscal radial displacement.

PURPOSE: In this imaging study, the radial displacement of meniscal allograft transplants (MATs), inserted with 2 different techniques, namely open soft-tissue fixation and arthroscopic bone tunnel fixation, was compared 1 year postoperatively. METHODS: In this study, 37 patients received MATs: 16 MATs (10 lateral and 6 medial) were inserted by an open soft-tissue technique (open MATs), whereas 21 MATs (14 lateral and 7 medial) were implanted by an arthroscopic bone tunnel procedure (arthroscopic MATs). Radial displacement, in millimeters, was evaluated 1 year postoperatively on 1.5-T magnetic resonance images. The number of MATs with radial displacement larger or smaller than 3 mm was determined. To compare radial displacement of open versus arthroscopic MATs, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. RESULTS: The radial displacement of open lateral and medial MATs was significantly larger (all reported P < .02) than that of arthros-copic MATs. In all cases, both open and arthroscopic, the radial displacement of MATs was significantly larger (all reported P < .007) than that of normal menisci. Radial displacement of less than 3 mm was found in 0 of 6 patients with open medial MATs versus 6 of 7 patients with arthroscopic MATs and was found in 1 of 10 patients with open lateral MATs versus 4 of 14 patients with arthroscopic MATs. CONCLUSIONS: The radial displacement of MATs arthroscopically inserted with bone tunnel fixation is significantly less than the radial displacement of MATs inserted with open soft-tissue fixation. In addition, normal menisci displace significantly less than meniscal allografts. The clinical importance of radial displacement remains to be determined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Subscapularis release in shoulder replacement determines structural muscular changes.

BACKGROUND: Osteotomy of the lesser tuberosity in shoulder arthroplasty allows bony healing of the subscapularis tendon but does not prevent fatty degeneration in its muscle. Occurrence or increase in fatty degeneration may depend on the surgical technique. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) assessed fatty degeneration in the subscapularis muscle and its cross-sectional area after a C-block osteotomy of the lesser tuberosity with minimal mobilization of the subscapularis muscle, and (2) determined whether this technique had any adverse effect on function, fatty degeneration, and cross-sectional area of the subscapularis muscle. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 36 patients with shoulder replacements who had C-block osteotomies. Constant-Murley scores and clinical signs of subscapularis insufficiency were recorded. We radiographically assessed prosthetic placement. On CT scans, lesser tuberosity healing, fatty degeneration, and cross-sectional area of the subscapularis muscle were determined. The minimum followup was 13 months (mean, 18 months; range, 13-33 months). RESULTS: The mean absolute Constant-Murley score was 71.2. Two patients had weakness of the subscapularis muscle without loss of active motion. All tuberosities healed anatomically. A normal glenohumeral relationship was found in all cases. Fatty degeneration was Grade 0 in 44%, Grade 1 in 39%, Grade 2 in 14%, and Grade 3 in 3%. The subscapularis muscular cross-sectional area decreased from 16.7 cm(2) preoperatively to 14.5 cm(2) postoperatively (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The C-block osteotomy with minimal dissection of the subscapularis is associated with a low incidence of fatty degeneration in the subscapularis muscle after shoulder arthroplasty although the muscular cross-sectional area of the subscapularis decreased. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Imaging Features of Morel-Lavallée Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To review the imaging characteristics of Morel-Lavallée lesions with both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients (mean age = 46 years), diagnosed with a Morel-Lavallée lesion, on ultrasound (n = 15) or MRI (n = 16). On ultrasound the echogenicity, internal septations, hyperechoic fat globules, compressibility and Doppler signal were evaluated. On MRI, T1- and T2-signal intensity, capsule presence, internal septations, enhancement, mass-effect and fluid-fluid levels were assessed. The MR images were classified according to the classification of Mellado and Bencardino. RESULTS: Most of the lesions were situated peritrochanteric, around the knee or the lower leg. The majority of the lesions had a heterogeneous hypoechoic appearance with septations and intralesional fat globules. On MRI, most of the collections were hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Half of the collections were encapsulated, and most collections demonstrated septations. The collections were classified as seroma (n = 10), subacute hematoma (n = 2) and chronic organizing hematoma (n = 5). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is the imaging method of choice to diagnose Morel-Lavallée lesions. MRI can be of use in selected cases (extension in different compartments, large collections, superinfection). Characteristic imaging features include a fusiform fluid collection between the subcutaneous fat and the underlying fascia with internal septations and fat globules. On MRI, six types of ML lesion can be differentiated, with the seroma, the subacute hematoma, and the chronic organizing hematoma being the most frequently observed lesions.

MR-Imaging of Meniscal Substitution.

More than a century ago, the menisci were considered to be the functionless remains of a leg muscle. Gradually the usefulness and function of the meniscus was investigated and proven, and the link between total meniscectomy, radiographic osteoarthritis and reduced knee function was made. Subsequently, partial meniscectomy was introduced in the clinical practice. However, the frequency of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis was not substantially lowered. Therefore, meniscal repair was introduced for younger individuals with traumatic meniscus lesions with a good healing potential. Later on in the development process, the quest for meniscal replacement strategies arose. The introduction of allogenic, xenogenic and artificial materials followed in research and clinical settings. Nowadays, a lot of research is conducted on meniscal substitutes, because meniscal injuries are a very common problem in the general population. The imaging of the meniscus is running parallel to this evolution. With the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the meniscus could be perfectly visualized. A lot of studies were published on imaging of the normal meniscus, and subsequently meniscal pathology on MRI was investigated. In the current literature, a growing number of papers describe the MRI findings in artificial meniscus replacements.

In-vivo evaluation of the kinematic behavior of an artificial medial meniscus implant: A pilot study using open-MRI.

BACKGROUND: In this pilot study we wanted to evaluate the kinematics of a knee implanted with an artificial polycarbonate-urethane meniscus device, designed for medial meniscus replacement. The static kinematic behavior of the implant was compared to the natural medial meniscus of the non-operated knee. A second goal was to evaluate the motion pattern, the radial displacement and the deformation of the meniscal implant. METHODS: Three patients with a polycarbonate-urethane implant were included in this prospective study. An open-MRI was used to track the location of the implant during static weight-bearing conditions, within a range of motion of 0° to 120° knee flexion. Knee kinematics were evaluated by measuring the tibiofemoral contact points and femoral roll-back. Meniscus measurements (both natural and artificial) included anterior-posterior meniscal movement, radial displacement, and meniscal height. FINDINGS: No difference (P>0.05) was demonstrated in femoral roll-back and tibiofemoral contact points during knee flexion between the implanted and the non-operated knees. Meniscal measurements showed no significant difference in radial displacement and meniscal height (P>0.05) at all flexion angles, in both the implanted and non-operated knees. A significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) in anterior-posterior movement during flexion was observed between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: In this pilot study, the artificial polycarbonate-urethane implant, indicated for medial meniscus replacement, had no influence on femoral roll-back and tibiofemoral contact points, thus suggesting that the joint maintains its static kinematic properties after implantation. Radial displacement and meniscal height were not different, but anterior-posterior movement was slightly different between the implant and the normal meniscus.

Two-year follow-up study on clinical and radiological outcomes of polyurethane meniscal scaffolds.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about radial displacement (RD) of polyurethane (PU) scaffolds, intended for partial meniscus defect substitution; no data are available on whether rim thickness influences RD and whether RD correlates with clinical outcome scores. HYPOTHESES: The meniscus is not extruded preoperatively, but RD occurs after scaffold implantation. A thicker rim will limit RD, and there is no correlation between RD and clinical outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were implanted with a PU scaffold (8 lateral, 18 medial). Radial displacement (mm) was evaluated on magnetic resonance images preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. At each time point, it was determined whether a correlation existed between the rim and RD. Clinical outcome was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as well as the Lysholm knee scoring scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. RESULTS: Radial displacement of lateral scaffolds was not significantly different (P = .178) either preoperatively (mean ± SD, 3.42 ± 0.99 mm) or at 3 months (4.82 ± 0.59 mm), 1 year (4.55 ± 0.87 mm), or 2 years postoperatively (4.10 ± 0.93 mm). No correlation was observed between the rim and lateral RD at all time points. Medial scaffold RD increased significantly (P < .001) from preoperative values (2.17 ± 0.84 mm) to those at 3 months (4.25 ± 0.89 mm), 1 year (4.43 ± 1.01 mm), and 2 years postoperatively (4.41 ± 0.96 mm). A strong negative correlation between medial RD and the rim was observed at all time points. There was no significant correlation between clinical outcome scores and RD, either preoperatively or postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that limited medial meniscal RD was present preoperatively but increased by 2 mm after scaffold implantation. Lateral RD was also present preoperatively but did not increase after scaffold implantation. Importantly, a strong negative correlation was found between the rim and postoperative medial RD; a thicker rim limited RD. However, in the lateral compartment, rim thickness did not correlate with RD because RD was already strongly present preoperatively. Finally, no correlations were observed between scaffold RD and clinical outcome scores, either preoperatively or postoperatively.