The efficacy and safety of apixaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, as thromboprophylaxis in patients following total knee replacement.

BACKGROUND: Heparins and warfarin are currently used as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in surgery. Inhibition of factor (F) Xa provides a specific mechanism of anticoagulation and the potential for an improved benefit-risk profile. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban, a potent, direct, oral inhibitor of FXa, in patients following total knee replacement (TKR), and to investigate dose-response relationships. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 1238 patients were randomized to one of six double-blind apixaban doses [5, 10 or 20 mg day(-1) administered as a single (q.d.) or a twice-daily divided dose (b.i.d.)], enoxaparin (30 mg b.i.d.) or open-label warfarin (titrated to an International Normalized Ratio of 1.8-3.0). Treatment lasted 10-14 days, commencing 12-24 h after surgery with apixaban or enoxaparin, and on the evening of surgery with warfarin. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of VTE (mandatory venography) and all-cause mortality during treatment. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 1217 patients were eligible for safety and 856 patients for efficacy analysis. All apixaban groups had lower primary efficacy event rates than either comparator. The primary outcome rate decreased with increasing apixaban dose (P = 0.09 with q.d./b.i.d. regimens combined, P = 0.19 for q.d. and P = 0.13 for b.i.d. dosing).A significant dose-related increase in the incidence of total adjudicated bleeding events was noted in the q.d. (P = 0.01) and b.i.d. (P = 0.02) apixaban groups; there was no difference between q.d. and b.i.d. regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban in doses of 2.5 mg b.i.d. or 5 mg q.d. has a promising benefit-risk profile compared with the current standards of care following TKR.

Long-term (2 year) beneficial effects of beta-adrenergic blockade with bucindolol in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Beta-adrenergic blockade represents a promising therapeutic approach to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Bucindolol, a new beta-blocker, showed favorable effects in a short-term (3 month) trial in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. To assess long-term response, 20 study patients (7 of 9 patients previously assigned to the placebo group and 13 of 14 patients previously assigned to bucindolol therapy) received long-term bucindolol therapy and were followed up for a mean of 23 +/- 4 months (range 17 to 30). The mean patient age was 49 years (range 29 to 66) and the median duration of disease was 11 months (range 1 to 190). Ten patients were in functional class II and 10 were in class III; 15 patients were men. At the end of the common follow-up time, all 20 patients were alive, 17 continued to receive bucindolol (mean dose 176 mg/day, range 25 to 200), and 2 underwent cardiac transplantation. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from a baseline value of 25 +/- 8% to 35 +/- 13% (n = 19 pairs, p less than 0.001). Functional class improved in 12, was unchanged in 5 and deteriorated in 3 (p = 0.056). Exercise time was maintained (9.4 +/- 3.1 versus 9.1 +/- 3.5 min, n = 19, p = NS), as was maximal oxygen uptake (19.2 +/- 4.9 versus 18.8 +/- 5.7 ml/kg per min, n = 19, p = NS). Thus, long-term bucindolol therapy leads to substantial increases in ejection fraction and to improved functional class while stable exercise performance is maintained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term beta-blocker vasodilator therapy improves cardiac function in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a double-blind, randomized study of bucindolol versus placebo.

PURPOSE: Bucindolol is a potent nonselective beta-blocking agent with vasodilatory properties. In this study, we evaluated the effects of long-term bucindolol therapy in the treatment of heart failure from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible for enrollment if they had symptomatic heart failure, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.40. All patients received an initial test dose of 12.5 mg bucindolol orally every 12 hours for two or three doses. Patients tolerating the test dose were randomly assigned (double-blind) to receive bucindolol or placebo in a 3:2 ratio. Study medication was begun at a dose of 12.5 mg orally every 12 hours and gradually increased over a 1-month period until either a maximum tolerated dose or a target dose of 100 mg every 12 hours was reached. Study medication was then continued for an additional 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were enrolled into the study. Twenty-three patients tolerated bucindolol test challenge; 14 were randomized to receive bucindolol, and nine were randomly assigned to receive placebo. The placebo group (age 56 +/- 2 years) was significantly older than the bucindolol group (46 +/- 3 years), but by all other clinical and hemodynamic parameters the two groups were comparable. Twenty-two of 23 patients completed the study. Patients treated with bucindolol had significant improvements in clinical heart failure symptoms and in resting hemodynamic function, including an increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (0.26 +/- 0.02 to 0.35 +/- 0.09, p = 0.003), cardiac index (2.2 +/- 0.1 to 2.5 +/- 0.4 L/minute/m2, p = 0.014), and left ventricular stroke work index (25 +/- 3 to 35 +/- 7 g.m/m2, p = 0.002) and a decrease in pulmonary artery wedge pressure (17 +/- 3 to 10 +/- 5 mm Hg, p = 0.005) and heart rate (86 +/- 3 to 75 +/- 9 beats/minute, p = 0.012). Patients treated with bucindolol also had a significant increase in exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (0.26 +/- 0.03 to 0.32 +/- 0.14, p = 0.015) and reduction in questionnaire-measured symptoms (p = 0.007) and New York Heart Association functional class (p less than 0.001). However, total treadmill exercise duration and maximal oxygen consumption with exercise did not change. No changes in rest or exercise parameters were observed in the placebo-treated group. Central venous plasma norepinephrine concentration decreased significantly in the bucindolol-treated group (423 +/- 79 to 212 +/- 101 pg/mL, p = 0.010), but was unchanged in the placebo-treated group. CONCLUSION: Bucindolol is well tolerated in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure, and therapy for 3 months is associated with improved resting cardiac function, improved heart failure symptoms, and a reduction in venous norepinephrine concentration.

Antihypertensive indole derivatives of phenoxypropanolamines with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist and vasodilating activity.

A series of 25 aryloxypropanolamines containing the 3-indolyl-tert-butyl [i.e., 1,1-dimethyl-2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl] or substituted 3-indolyl-tert-butyl moiety as the N substituent is reported. These compounds have been tested for antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist action in conscious normotensive rats, vasodilating activity in ganglion-blocked rats with blood pressure maintained by angiotensin II infusion, and for intrinsic sympathomimetic action (ISA) in reserpinized rats. Some of the compounds exhibit antihypertensive activity in combination with beta adrenergic receptor antagonist and vasodilating action. The structure--activity relationships in these tests are discussed.

Clinical safety profile of sotalol in the treatment of arrhythmias.

The safety of sotalol was evaluated in 3,257 patients treated for cardiac arrhythmias in double-blind and open-label clinical trials that support United States registration of the drug. In this composite population, 80% of patients had structural heart disease and 42% had life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, i.e., ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). Proarrhythmia was reported in 141 patients (4.3%). Of these, 78 (2.4%) had torsades de pointes and 26 (0.8%) had sustained VT or VF. The overall incidence was higher in patients treated for sustained VT or VF (6.5%). In these patients, serious proarrhythmia was predominantly torsades de pointes (4.1%) and was more prevalent in patients with congestive heart failure and low ejection fraction. Torsades de pointes was observed early in the course of treatment, and its occurrence was related to dose. The overall mortality in patients treated with sotalol was 4.3% (139 patients); in patients with life-threatening arrhythmias, cardiac mortality was 4.8%. In only 27 patients (0.8%) was the death thought to be potentially drug-related. The deaths were not related to dose. Data from a previously reported placebo-controlled postmyocardial infarction trial indicated no significant difference in mortality between sotalol and placebo. Heart failure was reported in 3.3% of patients and was most prevalent in those with a previous history of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or structural heart disease. The occurrence of heart failure was unrelated to dose or time on drug; in more than half of the patients, sotalol treatment was continued. On average, there was no decrease in ejection fraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of oral sotalol on systemic hemodynamics and programmed electrical stimulation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and structural heart disease.

We explored the central hemodynamic responses to oral sotalol during dose titration in patients with ventricular arrhythmias who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Twelve patients were included in the study, 9 with a history of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (6 postmyocardial infarction and 3 with cardiomyopathy) and 3 with a history of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia postmyocardial infarction. Left ventricular ejection fractions were < 45% in 10 patients, and < 35% in 5; the mean ejection fraction was 37% (range 20-51%). Sotalol prevented the induction of ventricular tachycardia in each of 3 patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and in 6 of 9 with sustained ventricular tachycardia at baseline study. At peak action (2 hours) after sotalol loading (mean dose, 167 mg orally twice daily), the hemodynamic effects included bradycardia, decreased cardiac index, increased left ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance, and no change in stroke volume or stroke work index. One patient was not continued on sotalol, owing to an excessive increase in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, despite the lack of symptomatic heart failure. Congestive heart failure in association with marked bradycardia developed in another patient, who had suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia after sotalol loading; this patient was managed with a reduction in the dose of sotalol and a regimen of digoxin and furosemide, and has been well compensated and without a recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia for more than 4 years. Ventricular tachycardia has been controlled with sotalol, without hemodynamic deterioration, in 6 of these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of bucindolol in systemic hypertension.

The hemodynamic effects of oral bucindolol, a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocking agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and direct vasodilating properties, were studied at rest and during handgrip exercise with a flotation-directed pulmonary artery catheter in 12 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After the initial dose of 150 mg of bucindolol, blood pressure (BP) was significantly reduced and cardiac output was increased (from 5.9 +/- 0.8 to 6.8 +/- 1.6 liters/min) in the supine position and during exercise (p less than 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance was reduced (from 1,555 +/- 339 to 1,311 +/- 467 dynes s cm-5, p less than 0.01) at rest and without significant changes during exercise. There were increases in heart rate (13 +/- 13%, p less than 0.01) and right atrial (69 +/- 77%, p less than 0.05), pulmonary arterial (38 +/- 24 %, p less than 0.001) and pulmonary artery wedge pressures (62 +/- 46%, p less than 0.001) during exercise. Bucindolol did not change these variables at rest or during exercise. Bucindolol increased plasma norepinephrine levels both at rest (from 330 +/- 151 to 588 +/- 320 ng/liter, p less than 0.01) and during exercise (from 468 +/- 220 to 685 +/- 390 ng/liter, p less than 0.05). After 4 weeks of bucindolol with doses of 50 to 200 mg 3 times daily, BP was reduced in both supine and standing positions (mean arterial BP of 11 +/- 7% [p less than 0.001] and 11 +/- 6% [p less than 0.001], respectively), without changes in cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance or plasma norepinephrine level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of bucindolol on neurohormonal activation in congestive heart failure.

To examine the effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on neurohormonal activation in patients with congestive heart failure, 15 men had assessments of hemodynamics and supine peripheral renin and norepinephrine levels before and after 3 months of oral therapy with bucindolol, a nonselective beta antagonist. At baseline, plasma renin activity did not correlate with any hemodynamic parameter. However, norepinephrine levels had a weak correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (r = 0.74, p less than 0.01), stroke volume index (r = 0.61, p less than 0.02) and pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.54, p less than 0.05). Plasma renin decreased with bucindolol therapy, from 11.6 +/- 13.4 to 4.3 +/- 4.1 ng/ml/hour (mean +/- standard deviation; p less than 0.05), whereas plasma norepinephrine was unchanged, from 403 +/- 231 to 408 +/- 217 pg/ml. A wide diversity of the norepinephrine response to bucindolol was observed with reduction of levels in some patients and elevation in others. Although plasma norepinephrine did not decrease, heart rate tended to decrease (from 82 +/- 20 vs 73 +/- 11 min-1, p = 0.059) with beta-adrenergic blockade, suggesting neurohormonal antagonism at the receptor level. No changes in I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake occurred after bucindolol therapy, suggesting unchanged adrenergic uptake of norepinephrine with beta-blocker therapy. Despite reductions in plasma renin activity and the presence of beta blockade, the response of renin or norepinephrine levels to long-term bucindolol therapy did not predict which patients had improved in hemodynamic status (chi-square = 0.37 for renin, 0.82 for norepinephrine).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic effects during rest and exercise of bucindolol in hypertensive men.

Bucindolol is an investigational beta-adrenergic blocking agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic and vasodilatory activity in animals. In a double-blind, six-way, crossover study of six mild-to-moderate hypertensive men, the effects of bucindolol 100, 200, and 300 mg/d on resting blood pressure, heart rate, forearm blood flow, and vascular resistance measured by pneumoplethysmography, and blood pressure and heart rate after cycle and handgrip exercise were compared with those of propranolol 160 and 320 mg/d and placebo after q12h administration for five doses. Both bucindolol and propranolol significantly suppressed heart rate after cycle exercise in comparison with placebo (-33 to -48 beats/min), demonstrating beta blockade. Suppression of resting heart rate by propranolol (-20 beats/min) was significantly (P less than .05) greater than bucindolol (-7 to -8 beats/min); a similar treatment difference in heart rate was noted after handgrip exercise (-18 to -19 vs -1 to -8 beats/min, respectively). Bucindolol and propranolol decreased resting blood pressure to the same extent (in comparison with placebo; P less than .05 at peak activity, 2 hr postdose). Bucindolol tended to increase forearm blood flow and decrease forearm vascular resistance (P less than .05 at 4 hr postdose) in comparison with placebo. The effect of propranolol on forearm blood flow and forearm vascular resistance was not significant compared with placebo. These data are consistent with intrinsic sympathomimetic and vasodilatory activity of bucindolol in hypertensive men.

Digital assessment of the epicardial electrocardiogram: novel methodology for a core laboratory for clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: The epicardial electrocardiogram (ECG) is a sensitive marker for cardiac ischemia and has been used as a measure of ischemia in clinical trials. We sought to examine the utility of a central ECG laboratory for determining ischemic-type ST-segment shifts from epicardial ECG recordings obtained from multiple clinical sites. HYPOTHESIS: We speculated that an operator-assisted digital ECG core laboratory is feasible, reliable, and efficient, with the ability for rapid and accurate interpretation of the epicardial ECG. METHODS: The epicardial ECG was recorded via an angioplasty guidewire placed in a coronary artery of a patient undergoing angioplasty. Site investigators visually determined the time-to-onset of 0.1 and 0.3 mm ST-segment elevation, and the maximal ST-segment elevation during balloon inflation, and then compared the measurements with those made at an operator-assisted digital ECG core laboratory. RESULTS: Agreement between the two methods occurred in 78% of the time-to-onset measurements, but in only 39% of the maximal ST-segment measurements. Overall, the visual measurements of the clinical investigators of time-to-onset differed from the digital core laboratory by 11.8 +/- 11.6 s for 0.1 mV, and 15.8 +/- 20.6 s for 0.3 mV. Recorded maximal ST-segment shifts differed by a mean of 0.47 +/- 0.69 mV. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of inconsistency between the ECG core laboratory results using an operator-assisted digital method and the interpretations of clinical investigators using manual caliper-type analysis was surprisingly large. These results support the need for an ECG core laboratory in clinical trials where ECG ST-segment shifts are used as a response variable.

A randomized phase II trial of apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk for thrombosis. Apixaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, is oral and does not require laboratory monitoring. OBJECTIVES: A pilot study was conducted to evaluate whether apixaban would be well tolerated and acceptable in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. PATIENTS/METHODS: Subjects receiving either first-line or second-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic lung, breast, gastrointestinal, bladder, ovarian or prostate cancers, cancer of unknown origin, myeloma or selected lymphomas were randomized to 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg once daily of apixaban or placebo in a double-blind manner for 12 weeks. Use of the study drug began within 4 weeks of the start of chemotherapy. The primary outcome was either major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Secondary outcomes included venous thromboembolism (VTE) and grade III or higher adverse events related to the study drug. Thirty-two patients received 5 mg, 30 patients 10 mg, 33 patients 20 mg, and 30 patients placebo. In these groups, there were 0, 0, 2 and 1 major bleeds, respectively. The corresponding data for CRNM bleeds were 1, 1, 2, and 0. The rate of major bleeding in the 93 apixaban patients was 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.26-7.5%). There were no fatal bleeds. Three placebo patients had symptomatic VTE. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban was well tolerated in our study population. These results support further study of apixaban in phase III trials to prevent VTE in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of the oral direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban for symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. The Botticelli DVT dose-ranging study.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban, an oral potent reversible direct inhibitor of activated factor X, has shown promise in the prevention of venous thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery. We conducted a dose-ranging study in patients with deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis were included and randomized to receive 84-91 days of apixaban 5 mg twice-daily, 10 mg twice-daily, or 20 mg once-daily, or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and asymptomatic deterioration of bilateral compression ultrasound or perfusion lung scan. The principal safety outcome was the composite of major and clinically relevant, non-major bleeding. RESULTS: The mean age of the 520 included patients was 59 years, and 62% were male. The primary outcome occurred in 17 of the 358 apixaban-treated patients [4.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-7.5%] and in five of the 118 LMWH/VKA-treated patients (4.2%, 95% CI 1.4-9.6%) who were evaluable. The incidence in all three apixaban groups was low and comparable without evidence of a dose response. The principal safety outcome occurred in 28 (7.3%) of the 385 apixaban-treated patients and in 10 (7.9%) of the 126 LMWH/VKA-treated patients. No dose response for apixaban was observed. CONCLUSION: These observations warrant further evaluation of apixaban in phase III studies. The attractive fixed-dose regimen of this compound may meet the demand to simplify anticoagulant treatment in patients with established venous thromboembolism.

Beneficial effects of bucindolol in a canine model of pentobarbital-induced heart failure.

Heart failure was induced in barbital-anesthetized dogs by administering high doses of pentobarbital. This procedure depresses cardiac function as indicated by a reduction in right ventricular contractile force (RVCF), left ventricular dp/dt and aortic blood flow. Bucindolol (0.1 mg/kg and 0.1 mg/kg/hr) elicited a pronounced and prolonged stimulant effect on these depressed indicators of cardiac function. Both RVCF and aortic blood flow returned to pre-failure levels, left ventricular dp/dt increased 43% but heart rate was elevated only slightly (14%). Total peripheral resistance was lowered 36% by bucindolol. The combination of myocardial stimulation and vasodilatation which contributed to the positive results in this acute model of pump failure suggests a possible role for bucindolol in the clinical management of congestive heart failure. Further these results suggest that bucindolol, in contrast to propranolol, could also be used in a sub-group of hypertensive patients with depressed cardiac function.