Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic problems in clinical practice in Serbia.

Making diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging since it can mimic a multitude of disorders, and is misdiagnosed in at least 50% of cases. We sought to determine the frequency of CIDP misdiagnosis in clinical practice in Serbia, to uncover CIDP mimics, and to identify factors that may aid in CIDP diagnosis. Our longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 86 eligible adult patients referred to the Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, with a diagnosis of CIDP. We also included 15 patients referred to us with different diagnoses that ended up having CIDP as their final diagnosis. Exactly half of patients referred as CIDP failed to meet the established diagnostic criteria (non-CIDP) and were given an alternative diagnosis at the first hospitalization. At the 1-year follow-up, the diagnosis was further revised in four subjects. Confirmed CIDP patients usually had their initial diagnosis based on the nerve conduction studies (NCS), a typical presentation with symmetrical involvement of all four limbs, as well as higher frequencies of elevated protein levels and albuminocytologic dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CIDP patients also responded better to immune therapy. We found that 52% of the patients initially referred to our Clinic as CIDP were given other diagnoses after a 1-year follow-up. Out of all CIDP cases, 27% had been unrecognized prior to referral to our Center. Utilization of clear and objective indicators - conclusive NCS, improvement on therapy, and elevated CSF proteins may provide greater certainty in diagnosing CIDP.

Cognitive assessment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder. Previous studies conducted on small cohorts of DM2 patients indicated presence of a cognitive dysfunction. We aimed to assess cognitive functions in a larger cohort of Serbian DM2 patients using an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests. The study included 76 patients with a genetically confirmed DM2, 68 of whom had all tests for different cognitive domains performed. Patients underwent clinical and neuropsychological testing, including cognitive screening and assessment of general intellectual level, attention, executive and visuospatial abilities, memory, and language functions. Only 6% of patients achieved a below-average score on the general intellectual level test. Cognitive screening tests indicated presence of cognitive deficits in 5.5% of patients according to the Mini Mental State Examination test and 25.8% according to the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised test. Twenty-four (35.3%) patients had a cognitive impairment (being two standard deviations out of norm in at least two cognitive domains). Around one quarter of DM2 patients had a significant cognitive impairment that interfered with their everyday functioning. Patients with significant cognitive impairment were older at testing and at disease onset, less educated, and had more severe muscle weakness.