Associations of geriatric nutrition risk index and other nutritional risk-related indexes with sarcopenia presence and their value in sarcopenia diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Standard modalities recommended for sarcopenia diagnosis may be unavailable in primary care settings. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate and compare associations of some better popularized nutritional risk-related indexes with sarcopenia presence and their value in sarcopenia diagnosis in community-dwelling middle-aged and elderly adults, including geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI), albumin (ALB), calf circumference (CC), mid-arm circumference (MAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TST) and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Based on the West China Health and Aging Trend study, the current study included participants aged 50 or older who were recruited in 2018. Sarcopenia-related assessment and diagnosis were in line with Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. For each single index, we assessed its association with sarcopenia presence by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis; we also computed diagnostic measures including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity, specificity, accuracy at the optimal cut-off value determined according to Youden's index. RESULTS: A total of 3829 subjects were included, consisting of 516 and 3313 subjects in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, respectively. Regarding the risk for sarcopenia presence, the fully adjusted odds ratios of GNRI, ALB, CC, MAC, TST and BMI per standard deviation decrease were 2.95 (95% CI 2.51-3.47, P < 0.001), 1.01 (95% CI 0.90-1.15, P = 0.816), 4.56 (95% CI 3.82-5.44, P < 0.001), 4.24 (95% CI 3.56-5.05, P < 0.001), 1.67 (95% CI 1.92-1.45, P < 0.001) and 4.09 (95% CI 3.41-4.91, P < 0.001), respectively. Regarding the value in sarcopenia diagnosis in the entire study population, their AUCs could be ordered as MAC (0.85, 95% CI 0.83-0.86) > GNRI (0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.82), CC (0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85), BMI (0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.83) > TST (0.72, 95% CI 0.70-0.74) > ALB (0.62, 95% CI 0.60-0.65). At the relevant optimal cut-off values, the sensitivity was the highest for CC (0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.87) and MAC (0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.84), while GNRI showed the highest specificity (0.79, 95% CI 0.78-0.81) and accuracy (0.78, 95% 0.76-0.79). CONCLUSION: Overall diagnostic performance was the best for MAC, followed by GNRI, CC, BMI, and the worst for TST, ALB in distinguishing sarcopenia from non-sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly adults in community-based settings. CC or MAC might do better in reducing missed diagnosis, while GNRI was superior in reducing misdiagnosis.

Pain as a risk factor for incident sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: A 1-year prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pain-related muscle disuse and inflammatory reactions may increase the risk of sarcopenia among older adults with pain. Although several studies have examined the association between pain and sarcopenia, the findings are mixed. In the present study, we examined the association of pain as well as pain intensity and location with incident sarcopenia among community-dwelling older adults and explored whether this association differed between men and women. METHODS: Pain characteristics, including the presence of pain, intensity (mild, moderate, and severe), and location (multisite, low back, joint, and chest), were self-reported at baseline. Sarcopenia was identified according to the consensus of the Asin Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 at baseline and 1 year later. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine the association of pain status, intensity, and location with incident sarcopenia, respectively. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-three participants (67.1 ± 4.9 years, 524 female) who were free of sarcopenia at baseline were included, of which 64 (7.3%) developed sarcopenia in the follow-up. The presence of pain was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident sarcopenia in older adults (adjusted RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.16-2.89), with a significant risk accumulation in incident sarcopenia upon higher pain intensity. Older adults with multisite pain, low back pain, or joint pain were more likely to develop sarcopenia. Although older men reported a lower prevalence and intensity of pain, their risk of sarcopenia during follow-up was generally more pronounced than older women. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with pain had a significantly higher risk of incident sarcopenia, with a significant risk accumulation in sarcopenia development upon higher pain intensity and specific pain location. Additional attention is needed to identify older adults with pain and to implement timely pain interventions to prevent sarcopenia. High-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to verify the clinical significance of the present study.

Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Pain Patients and Correlation Between the Two Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Sarcopenia is a generalized and progressive skeletal muscle disorder and has been proven to be associated with many diseases; however, the correlation between sarcopenia and pain has not yet been systematically clarified. This review aimed to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with pain and to ascertain whether pain is independently associated with sarcopenia. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A systematic literature search was performed from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, In-Data-Review, and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions for observational studies from inception until February 2021, and our search was updated on December 31, 2021. METHODS: Sarcopenia prevalence was calculated according to the corresponding number of patients with sarcopenia and pain. We performed meta-analyses with random effects models to calculate the pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in pain and its correlations. Subgroup analyses were also performed based on pain classification, pain location, and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. Heterogeneity between the studies was described using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Fourteen observational studies (13,953 participants, 44% women, and mean age from 40.1 to 76.6 years) were included. Study quality was rated moderate to high. The overall sarcopenia prevalence in patients with pain was 0.11 (95% CI 0.07-0.15, P < .001; I2 = 92.3%). People with pain were independently associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia than those without pain [odds ratio (OR) 1.35; 95% CI 1.17-1.56; P = .025; I2 = 51.1%]. Subgroup analyses showed that the cumulative prevalence and effect measures of sarcopenia were increased when individuals suffered secondary musculoskeletal pain (Prevalence = 12%; OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.19-1.78) and low back pain (Prevalence = 21%; OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.22-3.12). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with pain is relatively high, and pain is significantly associated with sarcopenia in older adults. Attention is needed to screen sarcopenia among patients with pain and optimize its early detection and management in clinical practice.

Risk Factors for Delirium in the Palliative Care Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Delirium is common and highly distressing for the palliative care population. Until now, no study has systematically reviewed the risk factors of delirium in the palliative care population. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate delirium risk factors among individuals receiving palliative care. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database to identify relevant observational studies from database inception to June 2021. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. We estimated the pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for individual risk factors using the inverse variance method. Results: Nine studies were included in the review (five prospective cohort studies, three retrospective case-control studies and one retrospective cross-section study). In pooled analyses, older age (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, I 2 = 37%), male sex (aOR:1.80, 95% CI: 1.37-2.36, I 2 = 7%), hypoxia (aOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.99, I 2 = 0%), dehydration (aOR: 3.22, 95%CI: 1.75-5.94, I 2 = 18%), cachexia (aOR:3.40, 95% CI: 1.69-6.85, I 2 = 0%), opioid use (aOR: 2.49, 95%CI: 1.39-4.44, I 2 = 0%), anticholinergic burden (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.30, I 2 = 9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.56-4.14, I 2 = 21%) were statistically significantly associated with delirium. Conclusion: The risk factors identified in our review can help to highlight the palliative care population at high risk of delirium. Appropriate strategies should be implemented to prevent delirium and improve the quality of palliative care services.

Effects of five types of selenium supplementation for treatment of Kashin-Beck disease in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of five kinds of selenium supplementation for the treatment of patients with Kashin-Beck disease, and rank these selenium supplementations based on their performance. DESIGN: We searched for all publications between 1 January 1966 and 31 March 2017 using seven electronic databases. GRADE system to network meta-analyses (NMAs) was applied to rate the quality of the evidence. We conducted a random effects model NMA in STATA 12.1 to determine comparative effectiveness of each intervention. Rankings were obtained by using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and mean ranks. RESULTS: A total of 15 randomised controlled trials involving 2931 patients were included. After assessment of the overall quality of the evidence, we downgraded our primary outcomes from high to low or very low quality. NMAs showed that all five kinds of selenium supplementation had higher metaphysis X-ray improvement which were superior to placebo. Ranking on efficacy indicated that selenium salt was ranked the highest, followed by sodium selenite + vitamin E, selenium enriched yeast, sodium selenite and then sodium selenite + vitamin C. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of NMA, all five types of selenium supplements are more effective than placebo and so that selenium supplementation is of help in repairing metaphyseal lesions. Since the overall quality of the evidence was low or very low, the SUCRA values may be misleading and should be considered jointly with the The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) confidence in the estimates for each comparison. The quality of the evidence is insufficient to draw a conclusion about what method of selenium supplementation is most effective. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051874.

The incidence of delirium after cardiac surgery in the elderly: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery in the elderly. Future studies aimed at preventing postoperative delirium will need an accurate estimate of incidence. However, there are no available systematic reviews on the incidence, and reports of incidence of postoperative delirium after a cardiac operation vary widely with significant heterogeneity. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the most accurate incidence possible of postoperative delirium in individuals aged >65 years after cardiac surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSES: We will undertake a comprehensive literature search among PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and CINAHL, from their inception to January 2017. Prospective cohort and cross sectional studies that described the incidence of delirium will be eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome will be the incidence of delirium. Risk of bias and methodological quality for the included studies will be assessed using a risk of bias tool for prevalence studies and the Cochrane guidelines. Heterogeneity of the estimates across studies will be assessed. Incidence data will be pooled by selective or emergency surgery. This systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data, and thus there is no requirement for ethics approval. The study will provide an up to date and accurate incidence of postoperative delirium among the older population after cardiac surgery, which is necessary for future research in this area. The findings of this study will be presented at conferences and disseminated through publication in a peer reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016047773.