RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Appropriate and timely care is essential in the management of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). We hypothesized that transferred patients with SAP undergoing procedural intervention would have higher mortality compared to those managed directly at academic centers. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of Maryland's statewide claims database from 2009 to 2022 of adult patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of SAP (acute pancreatitis with organ failure). Patients were divided into three groups: those admitted directly from the emergency room to academic facilities (AD), non-academic facilities (NA), or transferred to academic facilities (TR). Procedural intervention included endoscopic, percutaneous image-guided, or surgical. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were admission costs, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: There were 7,648 (48.9%) in the NA group, 6,682 (42.7%) in the AD group and 1,316 (8.4%) in the TR group. On regression analysis, odds of death were 0.57x lower in the NA group and 0.67x lower in the AD group compared to transfers (<0.001). Procedural intervention was not associated with increased mortality. Transferred patients had longer median LOS (11 vs NA = 5, AD = 6, p < 0.001), increased median cost of admission ($41k vs NA = $12k, AD = $17k, p < 0.001) and greater ICU admission (45.6% vs NA = 20.6%, AD = 23.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Transferred patients have greater burden of illness and cost of care without evidence of improved outcomes in the management of SAP regardless of procedural intervention. Transfer criteria for patients with SAP must be further refined to reduce unnecessary transfers.
Asunto(s)
Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Pancreatitis , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedad Aguda , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/economíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with worse outcomes in individuals with multicompartmental injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective trauma registry was performed for adult blunt trauma patients (aged ≥ 18 y) with Injury Severity Score ≥ 15 and radiographic evidence of rib fractures (2015-2020). Individuals without concomitant head, abdomen/pelvis, or lower extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale scores ≥ 3 were excluded. Propensity match on demographic and clinical variables was performed comparing patients treated nonoperatively (NO) to those undergoing SSRF. A chart review was performed for additional data. Primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit LOS, and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred ninety three patients fit the inclusion criteria (NO = 1,951, SSRF = 42). After matching, there were 98 in the NO group and 42 in the SSRF group. Mean age was 51 y, 61.4% were male, and 71.4% were of White race. Median time to fixation was 5 d. The SSRF group had more severe chest trauma as evidenced by a higher RibScore (3.2 versus 1.7, P < 0.001) and had a longer LOS (18 versus 9 d, P < 0.001), intensive care unit LOS (13 versus 3 d, P = 0.007), and duration of mechanical ventilation (8 versus 2 d, P = 0.013) on univariate analysis. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated no association between SSRF and these short-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite delayed average time to intervention, SSRF in a trauma-patient population with multicompartmental injuries and competing management priorities is not associated with worse short-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the current utilization patterns of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta (REBOA) for hemorrhage control in nontrauma patients. METHODS: Data on REBOA use in nontrauma emergency general surgery patients from six centers, 2014-2019, was pooled for analysis. We performed descriptive analyses using Fisher's exact, Student's t, chi-squared, or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with acute hemorrhage from nontrauma sources were identified. REBOA placement was primarily performed by trauma attendings (20/37, 54%) and vascular attendings (13/37, 35%). In seven patients (19%), balloons were positioned prophylactically but never inflated. In 24 (65%) of 37 patients, REBOA was placed in the operating room. 28/37 balloons (76%) were advanced to zone 1, 8/37 (22%) were advanced to zone 3, and there was one REBOA use in the inferior vena cava. Most common indications were gastrointestinal and peripartum bleeding. In the 30 cases of balloon inflation, 24 of 30 (80%) resulted in improved hemodynamics. Eleven of 30 patients (37%) died before discharge. One patient developed a distal embolism, but there were no reports of limb loss. Twelve patients (40% of all REBOA inflations and 63% of survivors) were discharged to home. CONCLUSIONS: REBOA has been used in a range of acutely hemorrhaging emergency general surgery patients with low rates of access-related complications. Mortality is high in this patient population and further research is needed; however, appropriate patient selection and early use may improve survival in these life-threatening cases.
Asunto(s)
Aorta/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Hemorrágico/diagnóstico , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the frequent occurrence of interhospital transfers in emergency general surgery (EGS), rates of transfer of complications are undescribed. Improved understanding of hospital transfer patterns has a multitude of implications, including quality measurement. The objective of this study was to describe individual hospital transfer rates of mortal encounters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken from 2013 to 2015 of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database. Two groups of EGS encounters were identified: encounters with death following transfer and encounters with death without transfer. The percentage of mortal encounters transferred was defined as the percentage of EGS hospital encounters with mortality initially presenting to a hospital transferred to another hospital before death at the receiving hospital. RESULTS: Overall, 370,242 total EGS encounters were included, with 17,003 (4.6%) of the total EGS encounters with mortality. Encounters with death without transfer encompassed 15,604 (91.8%) of mortal EGS encounters and encounters with death following transfer 1399 (8.2%). EGS disease categories of esophageal varices or perforation, necrotizing fasciitis, enterocutaneous fistula, and pancreatitis had over 10% of these total mortal encounters with death following transfer. For individual hospitals, percentage of mortal encounters transferred ranged from 0.8% to 35.2%. The percentage of mortal encounters transferred was inversely correlated with annual EGS hospital volume for all state hospitals (P < 0.001, r = -0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Broad variability in individual hospital practices exists for mortality transferred to other institutions. Application of this knowledge of percentage of mortal encounters transferred includes consideration in hospital quality metrics.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermo Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with acute vascular disease frequently need specialized management that may require transfer to a vascular referral center. Although transfer may be medically necessary, it can delay definitive care and is an indicator of incorrect triage to the initial hospital. Regionalization of acute vascular care could improve patient triage and subsequent outcomes. To evaluate the potential benefit from regionalization, we analyzed outcomes of patients treated for acute vascular disease at vascular referral centers. METHODS: Using a statewide database capturing all inpatient admissions in Maryland during 2013-2015, patients undergoing noncardiac vascular procedures on an acute basis were identified. Patients admitted to a vascular referral center were stratified by admission status as direct or transfer. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcome was resource use. Patient groups were compared by univariable analyses, and the effect of admission status on mortality was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 4,873 patients with acute vascular disease managed at vascular referral centers, 2,713 (56%) were admitted directly, whereas 2,160 (44%) were transferred. Transfers to referral centers accounted for 71% of all interhospital transfers. The transfer-group patients were older, had more comorbidities, and higher illness severities. Patients who were transferred had higher mortality (14% vs. 9%, P < 0.0001), longer hospital lengths of stay, greater critical care-resource utilization, and higher costs. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and illness severity, transfer status was independently associated with higher inpatient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Primary treatment at a referral center is independently associated with improved outcomes for patients with acute vascular disease. Direct admission or earlier triage to a specialty center may improve patient and system outcomes and could be facilitated by standardization and regionalization of complex acute vascular care.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Centralizados de Hospital , Transferencia de Pacientes , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital/economía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Transferencia de Pacientes/economía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/economía , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The paradigm of acute care surgery has revolutionized nonelective general surgery. Similarly, nonelective vascular surgery may benefit from specific management and resource capabilities. To establish the burden and scope of vascular acute care surgery, we analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for vascular surgical procedures in Maryland. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a statewide inpatient database was performed to identify patients undergoing noncardiac vascular procedures in Maryland from 2009 to 2013. Patients were stratified by admission acuity as elective, urgent, or emergent, with the last two groups defined as acute. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, and secondary outcomes were critical care and hospital resource requirements. Groups were compared by univariate analyses, with multivariable analysis of mortality based on acuity level and other potential risk factors for death. RESULTS: Of 3,157,499 adult hospital admissions, 154,004 (5%) patients underwent a vascular procedure; most were acute (54% emergent, 13% urgent), whereas 33% were elective. Acute patients had higher rates of critical care morbidity and required more hospital resource utilization. Admission for acute vascular surgery was independently associated with mortality (urgent odds ratio, 2.1; emergent odds ratio, 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of inpatient vascular care in Maryland is for acute vascular surgery, which is an independent risk factor for mortality. Acute vascular surgical care entails greater critical care and hospital resource utilization and-similar to emergency general surgery-may benefit from dedicated training and practice models.
Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Cirujanos/tendencias , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Benchmarking/tendencias , Cuidados Críticos/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Predicción , Recursos en Salud/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is the most effective method for producing sustained weight loss, improving obesity-associated comorbidities and reducing inflammation in the morbidly obese population. The red cell distribution width (RDW) is a novel marker of inflammation that is usually reported as part of a complete blood count. In this study, we tested our hypothesis that red cell distribution width might represent a novel biomarker predictive of excess body-mass index loss (EBMIL) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: Five hundred and forty-seven LRYGB patients included from a single institution were individually reviewed, noting both preoperative RDW and percent excess BMI loss at 6 months and 1 year post-LRYGB (%EBMIL180 and %EBMIL365, respectively). Bivariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted between age, gender, initial body-mass index (BMI0) and RDW and each of the two endpoints, to assess the independence of RDW as a predictor of postoperative success. RESULTS: The median RDW was 13.9 (13.3-14.6) %, and median EBMIL180 and EBMIL365 were 55.4 (45.2-66.7) % and 71.3 (58.9-87.8) %, respectively. After controlling for age, gender and BMI0, RDW was associated with %EBMIL365 (B = -1.4 [-2.8 to -0.002] %, P = .05), but not %EBMIL180 (B = -0.6 [-1.6 to 0.5] %, P = .30. Upon Kruskal-Wallis analysis, patients with a preoperative RDW > 15.0 % had significantly lower %EBMIL than those in the <13.0 % (P < .001) and 13.0-15.0 % (P < .01) strata. CONCLUSIONS: RDW is predictive of EBMIL at 1 year following LRYGB. This represents a novel preoperative biomarker that may provide clinically useful prognostic information.
Asunto(s)
Índices de Eritrocitos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Obesidad Mórbida/sangre , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: ICU needs of nontrauma emergency general surgery patients are poorly described. This study was designed to compare ICU utilization of emergency general surgery patients admitted to an acute care emergency surgery service with other general surgery patients. Our hypothesis is that tertiary care emergency general surgery patients utilize more ICU resources than other general surgical patients. DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care, nontrauma surgical ICU. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the surgical ICU over age 18 between March 2004 and June 2012. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Six thousand ninety-eight patients were evaluated: 1,053 acute care emergency surgery, 1,964 general surgery, 1,491 transplant surgery, 995 facial surgery/otolaryngology, and 595 neurosurgery. Acute care emergency surgery patients had statistically significantly longer ICU lengths of stay than other groups: acute care emergency surgery (13.5 ± 17.4 d) versus general surgery (8.7 ± 12.9), transplant (7.8 ± 11.6), oral-maxillofacial surgery (5.5 ± 4.2), and neurosurgery (4.47 ± 9.8) (all p< 0.01). Ventilator usage, defined by percentage of total ICU days patients required mechanical ventilation, was significantly higher for acute care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery 73.4% versus general surgery 64.9%, transplant 63.3%, oral-maxillofacial surgery 58.4%, and neurosurgery 53.1% (all p < 0.01). Continuous renal replacement therapy usage, defined as percent of patients requiring this service, was significantly higher in acute care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery 10.8% versus general surgery 4.3%, transplant 6.6%, oral-maxillofacial surgery 0%, and neurosurgery 0.5% (all p < 0.01). Acute care emergency surgery patients were more likely interhospital transfers for tertiary care services than general surgery or transplant (24.5% vs 15.5% and 8.3% respectively, p < 0.001 for each) and more likely required emergent surgery (13.7% vs 6.7% and 3.5%, all p < 0.001). Chronic comorbidities were similar between acute care emergency surgery and general surgery, whereas transplant had fewer. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency general surgery patients have increased ICU needs in terms of length of stay, ventilator usage, and continuous renal replacement therapy usage compared with other services, perhaps due to the higher percentage of transfers and emergent surgery required. These patients represent a distinct population. Understanding their resource needs will allow for better deployment of hospital resources.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , APACHE , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Respiración Artificial , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies on nonoperative management (NOM) of acute appendicitis (AA) indicated comparable outcomes to surgery, but the effect of COVID-19 infection on appendicitis outcomes remains unknown. Thus, we evaluate appendicitis outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine the effect of COVID-19 infection status and treatment modality. We hypothesized that active COVID-19 patients would have worse outcomes than COVID-negative patients, but that outcomes would not differ between recovered COVID-19 and COVID-negative patients. Moreover, we hypothesized that outcomes would not differ between nonoperative and operative management groups, regardless of COVID-19 status. METHODS: We queried the National COVID Cohort Collaborative from 2020 to 2023 to identify adults with AA who underwent operative or NOM. COVID-19 status was denoted as follows: COVID-negative, COVID-active, or COVID-recovered. Intention to treat was used for NOM. Propensity score-balanced analysis was performed to compare outcomes within COVID groups, as well as within treatment modalities. RESULTS: A total of 37,868 patients were included: 34,866 COVID-negative, 2,540 COVID-active, and 460 COVID-recovered. COVID-active and recovered less often underwent operative management. Unadjusted, there was no difference in mortality between COVID groups for operative management. There was no difference in rate of failure of NOM between COVID groups. Adjusted analysis indicated, compared with operative, NOM carried higher odds of mortality and readmission for COVID-negative and COVID-active patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates higher odds of mortality among NOM of appendicitis and near equivalent outcomes for operative management regardless of COVID-19 status. We conclude that NOM of appendicitis is associated with worse outcomes for COVID-active and COVID-negative patients. In addition, we conclude that a positive COVID test or recent COVID-19 illness alone should not preclude a patient from appendectomy for AA. Surgeon clinical judgment of a patient's physiology and surgical risk should, of course, inform the decision to proceed to the operating room. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , Apendicectomía , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Firearm-related death rates continue to rise in the US. As some states enact more permissive firearm laws, we sought to assess the relationship between a change to permitless open carry (PLOC) and subsequent firearm-related death rates, a currently understudied topic. STUDY DESIGN: Using state-level data from 2013 to 2021, we performed a linear panel analysis using a state fixed-effects model. We examined total firearm-related death, suicide, and homicide rates separately. If a significant association between OC law and death rate was found, we then performed a difference-in-difference (DID) analysis to assess for a causal relationship between changing to PLOC and increased death rate. For significant DID results, we performed confirmatory DID separating firearm and nonfirearm death rates. RESULTS: Nineteen states maintained a no OC or permit-required law, whereas 5 changed to permitless and 26 had a PLOC before 2013. The fixed-effects model indicated more permissive OC law that was associated with increased total firearm-related deaths and suicides. In DID, changing law to PLOC had a significant average treatment effect on the treated of 1.57 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.09) for total suicide rate but no significant average treatment effect for the total firearm-related death rate. Confirmatory DID results found a significant average treatment effect on the treated of 1.18 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.46) for firearm suicide rate. CONCLUSIONS: OC law is associated with total firearm-related death and suicide rates. Based on our DID results, changing to PLOC is indeed strongly associated with increased suicides by firearm.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Suicidio , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , HomicidioRESUMEN
Pre-existing cirrhosis is associated with increased mortality in blunt liver injury. Despite widespread use of nonoperative management (NOM) for blunt liver injury, there is a relative paucity of data regarding how pre-existing cirrhosis impacts the success of NOM. Herein, we perform a retrospective cohort study using ACS TQIP 2017-2020 data to assess the relationship between cirrhosis and failure of NOM for adult patients with blunt liver injury. 37,176 patients were included (342 cirrhosis and 36,834 without cirrhosis). After propensity-score matching, patients with pre-existing cirrhosis had higher rates of failure of NOM (32.2 vs 14.1%, p < 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (36.3 vs 10.8%, p < 0.01) than patients without cirrhosis. Hesitancy to operate on patients with pre-existing cirrhosis and trauma, as well as significant underlying coagulopathy, may explain these findings.
Asunto(s)
Cirrosis Hepática , Hígado , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Hígado/lesiones , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Puntaje de Propensión , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented new work-hour rules for all U.S. residency programs beginning on July 1, 2003. The ACGME-mandated work-hour reform may have affected operative trauma case volumes of general surgery residents. METHODS: Using ACGME aggregate data collected from general surgery residency programs from 1990 to 2010, we examined the effect of the 2003 work-hour reform on resident operative trauma case volumes. RESULTS: Overall trauma cases per year declined from 78.28 in 1990 to 38.73 in 2010. From 1990 to 2003, laparotomy, burn, and upper-gastrointestinal trauma cases fell at least 50%, from 9.97 to 4.85 cases/resident by 0.46 cases/y (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.456-0.459), 10.05 to 3.30 cases/resident by 0.61 cases/y (95% CI, 0.609-0.617), and 3.34 to 1.01 cases/resident by 0.189 cases/y (95% CI, 0.188-0.189), respectively. After 2003, laparotomy and burn cases began to rise by 0.23 cases/y (95% CI, 0.228-0.231) and 0.36 cases/y (95% CI, 0.358-0.368). Vascular trauma cases continued to decline from 8.63 cases/resident by 0.197 (95% CI, 0.196-0.198) pre-reform, but by 0.102 (95% CI, 0.099-0.105) post-reform. Junior surgical residents were increasingly involved in trauma operative cases from 67% in 1990 to 79% in 2010. Cardiac, pancreatic, genitourinary, and neurosurgical cases did not peak more than 1.95 cases/resident pre-reform. CONCLUSIONS: Secular trends before the 2003 work-hour reform caused a 50% decrease in operative trauma experience among general surgery residents. Since 1990, junior residents have increasingly performed operative trauma. Rare trauma subspecialty cases remain rare. Post work-hour reform, operative trauma volumes have stabilized.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Carga de Trabajo/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Tolerancia al Trabajo ProgramadoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we assessed the bending strength of two surgical repairs of rib fracture using RibLoc® U Plus system made by Acute Innovations and the anterior plate by Synthes. METHODS: After a rib fracture was created in seven pairs of cadaveric rib specimens, one side was repaired with the anterior plate and the other side repaired with the RibLoc U Plus® plate. Each of the rib is loaded using a custom device over 360,000 bending cycles to simulate in vivo fatiguing related to respiration. Upon completion of the cyclic loading, the specimens were compressively loaded to failure and the failure bending moment was determined. RESULTS: The ribs repaired with the RibLoc U Plus® system showed 79% higher failure bending moment than that of the anterior plate, with a p value of 0.033. The ribs repaired with RibLoc U Plus® showed a trend of less stiffness reduction over the 360,000 loading cycles. CONCLUSION: The biomechanical study showed that the RibLoc U Plus® system is stronger in the bending moment loading of repaired ribs, possibly due to the U-shape structure supporting both the inner and outer cortices of a repaired rib.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas , Humanos , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Costillas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta , Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de FracturasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge on pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) management has mostly involved large database analysis, which limits understanding of a complex and heterogeneous disease. We aimed to review the clinical course and outcomes of PP and acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC) that require intervention at 1 high-volume center. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with APFC and PP undergoing drainage (2011-2018) was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on initial intervention: surgical (SR), percutaneous (PC), or endoscopic (EN) drainage. Primary outcome was mortality by initial intervention type. Secondary outcomes included subsequent interventions required, length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, 40 (46.1%) underwent SR, 40 (44.9%) PC, and 8 (9.0%) EN. No patients in EN group had APACHE II scores>20. Pancreatic necrosis was higher in SR (80.5%) and PC (62.5%) groups (P = .006). There were no differences in mortality, LOS, or readmission rates. Ten patients in the PC group underwent subsequent surgical intervention, of which 9 were due to bowel ischemia. The PC group was 3.4 times more likely to be discharged to rehabilitation over home when compared to the other 2 groups (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgical or percutaneous drainage of APFC and PP have a greater burden of illness and more local complications requiring intervention compared to endoscopic drainage. The heterogeneity in presentation of peripancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis must be considered when evaluating the benefits of each intervention.
Asunto(s)
Seudoquiste Pancreático , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Seudoquiste Pancreático/cirugía , Seudoquiste Pancreático/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical rescue (SR) is the recovery of patients with surgical complications. Patients transferred (TP) for surgical diagnoses to higher-level care or inpatients (IP) admitted to nonsurgical services may develop intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and require emergency surgery (ES). The aims were to characterize the SR population by the site of ES consultation, open abdomen (OA), and risk of mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multi-institutional prospective observational study of patients requiring ES for IAI. Laparotomy before the transfer was an exclusion criterion. Patients were divided into groups: clinic/ED (C/ED), IP, or TP. Data collected included demographics, the severity of illness (SOI), procedures, OA, and number of laparotomies. The primary outcome was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed. RESULTS: There were 752 study patients (C/ED 63.8% vs TP 23.4% and IP 12.8%), with a mean age of 59 years and 43.6% women. IP had worse SOI scores (Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). The most common procedures were small and large bowel (77.3%). IP and TP had similar rates of OA (IP 52.1% and TP 52.3 %) vs C/ED (37.7%, p < 0.001), and IP had more relaparotomies (3 or 4). The unadjusted mortality rate was highest in IP (n = 24, 25.0%) vs TP (n = 29, 16.5%) and C/ED (n = 68, 14.2%, p = 0.03). Adjusting for age and SOI, only SOI had an impact on the risk of mortality (area under the curve 86%). CONCLUSIONS: IP had the highest unadjusted mortality after ES for IAI and was followed by the TP; SOI drove the risk of mortality. SR must be extended to IP for timely recognition of the IAI.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Laparotomía , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Hospitalización , Abdomen , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Over the past 30 years, surgical specialties have introduced and expanded the role of open abdominal management in complicated operative cases, necessitating an intensivist's understanding of the indications and unique intensive care unit (ICU) issues related to the open abdomen. When presented with the open abdomen, resuscitation to correct shock is of primary concern. This is accomplished by correction of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy in trauma and adequate resolution of intra-abdominal hypertension or source control in general surgery. These patients typically require deep sedation and often paralysis and benefit from low-volume ventilatory strategies to prevent and treat acute lung injury. Antibiotics must be tailored to the clinical situation, but in most cases, 24 hours of perioperative treatment is all that is required. In cases of gross contamination and peritonitis, a 5- to 7-day course of broad-spectrum antibiotics may be of benefit.Adequate source control has been demonstrated to have the greatest impact on outcome and when the patient's clinical milieu dictates, bedside washouts. Enteral nutrition should be instituted as early as possible after intestinal continuity has been reestablished. Additional protein is required to account for losses from the open abdomen. Reconstruction may require staging, but in general, should proceed following resolution of shock and control of sepsis. Elevated multiorgan dysfunction score, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and a rise in peak inspiratory pressure portend poor source control and could result in failure of fascial closure. If unable to proceed to fascial closure, then considerations should be made for planned ventral hernia and subsequent abdominal wall reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/prevención & control , Adulto , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Sedación Profunda , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resucitación/métodos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia has emerged as a barrier to the practice of intensive insulin therapy. Current literature suggests that hypoglycemia occurs at variable rates and has different effects on outcomes in surgical and medical populations. We sought to determine the incidence, independent predictors, and effect on outcome of severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dl) in a surgical population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all critically ill surgical patients treated with IIT from October 2004 to February 2007. Euglycemia (goal 80-110 mg/dl) was maintained using automated computerized titration of an insulin infusion. The primary outcome of interest was any episode of severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dl). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors of developing severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 60,298 data entries (1,118 patients) for glucose were analyzed. There were 64 severe hypoglycemic episodes in 52 patients (4.6% of the patients). There was a significant increase in deaths among patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia when compared with those who did not (26.9% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.03). Logistic regression revealed that the time spent on the protocol was the best predictor of developing a hypoglycemic event when controlling for other known risk factors of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy can be implemented with a low percentage of patients (4.6%) experiencing severe hypoglycemia. Mortality rate was higher for patients experiencing hypoglycemia. The duration of the time spent on the protocol was the best predictor of hypoglycemia, suggesting that hypoglycemia is a mathematic probability of prolonged illness, not a reflection of illness severity or demographic features.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/mortalidad , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We investigated whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected rates of interpersonal violence (IV). A retrospective study was performed using city-wide crime data and the trauma registry at one high-volume trauma center pre-pandemic [PP] (March-October 2019) and during the pandemic [PA] (March-October 2020). The proportion of trauma admissions attributable to IV remained unchanged from PP to PA, but IV increased as a proportion of overall crime (34% to 41%, p<0.001). Assaults decreased, but there was a proportionate increase in penetrating trauma which was mostly attributable to firearms. Despite a reduction in admissions due to IV in the first 4 months of the pandemic, the rates of violence subsequently exceeded that of the same months in 2019. The cause of the observed increase of IV is multi-factorial. Future studies aimed at identifying the root causes are essential to mitigate violence during this ongoing health crisis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , ViolenciaRESUMEN
Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) can result in life-threatening illness requiring surgery. Surgical options for managing severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile colitis include total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy or creation of a diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade vancomycin lavage. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee convened to develop guidelines for summarizing the current SIS recommendations for total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade lavage for severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile colitis. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for pertinent studies. Severe infection was defined as laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection with leukocytosis (white blood cell count of ≥15,000 cells/mL) or elevated creatinine (serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL). Fulminant infection was defined as laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection with hypotension or shock, ileus, or megacolon. Perforation was defined as complete disruption of the colon wall. Total abdominal colectomy was defined as resection of the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon with end ileostomy. For the purpose of the guideline, the terms subtotal colectomy, total abdominal colectomy, and rectal-sparing total colectomy were used interchangeably. Diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade enema was defined as creation of both a diverting loop ileostomy with intra-operative colonic lavage and post-operative antegrade vancomycin unless otherwise specified. Evaluation of the published evidence was performed using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: We recommend that total abdominal colectomy be the procedure of choice for definitive therapy of severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile colitis. In select patients, colon preservation using diverting loop ileostomy with intra-colonic vancomycin may be associated with higher rates of ostomy reversal and restoration of gastrointestinal continuity but may lead to development of recurrent C. difficile colitis. Conclusions: This guideline summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society recommendations regarding use of total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade lavage for adults with severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile infection.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Colitis , Clostridioides , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Colitis/cirugía , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Older adults (OAs) ≥ 65 years of age, representing the fastest growing segment in the United States, are anticipated to require a greater percentage of emergency general surgery procedures (EGSPs) with an associated increase in health care costs. The aims of this study were to identify the frequency of EGSP and charges incurred by OA compared to their younger counterparts in the state of Maryland. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2009 to 2018 was undertaken. Patients undergoing urgent or emergent ESGP were divided into 2 groups (18-64 years and ≥65 years). Data collected included demographics, APR-severity of illness (SOI), APR-risk of mortality (ROM), the EGSP (partial colectomy [PC], small bowel resection [SBR], cholecystectomy, operative management of peptic ulcer disease, lysis of adhesions, appendectomy, and laparotomy), length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges. P-values (P < .05) were significant. RESULTS: Of the 181,283 patients included in the study, 55,401 (38.1%) were ≥65 years of age. Older adults presented with greater APR-SOI (major 37.7% vs 21.3%, extreme 5.2% vs 9.3%), greater APR-ROM (major 25.3% vs 8.7%, extreme 22.3% vs 5.3%), underwent PC (24.5% vs 10.9%) and SBR (12.8% vs 7.0%) more frequently, and incurred significantly higher median hospital charges for every EGSP, consistently between 2009 and 2018 due to increased LOS and complications when compared to those ≤65 years of age. CONCLUSION: These findings stress the need for validated frailty indices and quality improvement initiatives focused on the care of OAs in emergency general surgery to maximize outcomes and optimize cost.