Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(5): 998-1001, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310074

RESUMEN

We surveyed women with a recent live birth who resided in 16 US states and 1 city during the 2016 Zika outbreak. We found high awareness about the risk of Zika virus infection during pregnancy and about advisories to avoid travel to affected areas but moderate levels of discussions with healthcare providers.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Infección por el Virus Zika , Virus Zika , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Viaje , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control
2.
Fertil Steril ; 109(4): 691-697, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29580644

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare indications and trends in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) use for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles among residents of states with and without insurance mandates for IVF coverage. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System from 2011 to 2015 for the main outcome and from 2000 to 2015 for trends. SETTING: IVF cycles performed in U.S. fertility clinics. PATIENT(S): Fresh IVF cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Residency in a state with an insurance mandate for IVF (n = 8 states) versus no mandate (n = 43 states, including DC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): ICSI use by insurance coverage mandate status stratified by male-factor infertility diagnosis. RESULT(S): During 2000-2015, there were 1,356,377 fresh IVF cycles, of which 25.8% (n = 350,344) were performed for residents of states with an insurance coverage mandate for IVF. ICSI use increased significantly during 2000-2015 in states both with and without a mandate; however, for non-male-factor infertility cycles, the percentage increase in ICSI use was greater among nonmandate states (34.6% in 2000 to 73.9% in 2015) versus mandate states (39.5% in 2000 to 63.5% in 2015). For male-factor infertility cycles, this percentage increase was ∼7.3% regardless of residency in a state with an insurance mandate for IVF. From 2011 to 2015, ICSI use was lower in mandate versus nonmandate states, both for cycles with (91.5% vs. 94.5%), and without (60.3% vs. 70.9%) male-factor infertility. CONCLUSION(S): Mandates for IVF coverage were associated with lower ICSI use for non-male-factor infertility cycles.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Infertilidad Masculina/terapia , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Programas Obligatorios/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/tendencias , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Femenina/economía , Infertilidad Femenina/fisiopatología , Infertilidad Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Masculina/economía , Infertilidad Masculina/fisiopatología , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Masculino , Programas Obligatorios/economía , Embarazo , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 26(6): 605-608, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586255

RESUMEN

Disparities in infertility and access to infertility treatments, such as assisted reproductive technology (ART), by race/ethnicity, have been reported. However, identifying disparities in ART usage may have been hampered by missing race/ethnicity information in ART surveillance. We review infertility prevalence and treatment disparities, use recent data to examine ART use in the United States by race/ethnicity and residency in states with mandated insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization (IVF), and discuss approaches for reducing disparities. We used 2014 National ART Surveillance System (NASS) data to calculate rates of ART procedures per million women 15-44 years of age, a proxy measure of ART utilization, for Census-defined racial/ethnic groups in the United States; rates were further stratified by the presence of insurance mandates for IVF treatment. Missing race/ethnicity data (35.6% of cycles) were imputed. Asian/Pacific Islander (A/PI) women had the highest rates of ART utilization at 5883 ART procedures per million women 15-44 years of age in 2014, whereas American Indian/Alaska Native non-Hispanic women had the lowest rates at 807 per million, compared with other racial/ethnic groups. In each racial/ethnic category, ART utilization rates were higher for women in states with an insurance mandate for IVF treatment versus those without. In 2014, A/PI women had the highest rates of ART utilization. ART utilization for all racial/ethnic groups was higher in states with insurance mandates for IVF than those without, although disparities were still evident. Although mandates may increase access to infertility treatments, they are not sufficient to eliminate these disparities.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Infertilidad/etnología , Cobertura del Seguro , Vigilancia de la Población , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Seguro de Salud , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA