Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 24(7): 208, 2023 Oct 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37817001

RESUMEN

Although nasal inhalation products are becoming more and more important for the delivery of medicines, characterization of these products for quality control and assessment of bioequivalence is complicated. Most of the problems encountered are associated with the assessment of aerodynamic droplet/particle size distribution (APSD). The droplets produced by the various nasal devices are large, and for suspension products, individual droplets may contain multiple drug particles or none at all. Assessment of suspension products is further complicated by the presence of solid excipient particles. These complications make it imperative that the limitations of the instruments used for characterization as well as the underlying assumptions that govern the interpretation of data produced by these instruments are understood. In this paper, we describe various methodologies used to assess APSD for nasal inhalation products and discuss proper use, limitations, and new methodologies on the horizon.


Asunto(s)
Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Tamaño de la Partícula , Aerosoles , Administración por Inhalación , Suspensiones
2.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 21(7): 239, 2020 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32827121

RESUMEN

Multi-stage cascade impactors (CI) are accepted for the determination of metrics of the drug mass aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). This is particularly important for products where the drug to excipient ratio or particle density may not be the same in each aerodynamic size fraction; examples of such products are carrier-containing dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and suspension pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). CI measurements have been used as the "gold standard" for acceptance of alternative methods of APSD assessment, such as laser diffraction for nebulized solutions. Although these apparatus are labor-intensive, they are accepted in regulatory submissions and quality control assessments because the mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) in the aerosol can be quantified by chemical assay and measured particle size is based on the aerodynamic diameter scale that is predictive of deposition in the respiratory tract. Two of the most important factors that modify the ideal operation of an impactor are "particle bounce," that is often accompanied by re-entrainment in the air flow passing the stage of interest, and electrostatic charge acquired by the particles during the preparation and aerosolization of the formulation when the inhaler is actuated. This article reviews how both factors can lead to biased APSD measurements, focusing on measurements involving pMDIs and DPIs, where these sources of error are most likely to be encountered. Recommendations are provided for the mitigation of both factors to assist the practitioner of these measurements.


Asunto(s)
Tamaño de la Partícula , Electricidad Estática , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Administración por Inhalación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Control de Calidad , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio
3.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 20(5): 206, 2019 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147791

RESUMEN

The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/normas , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/métodos , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Control de Calidad , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Aerosoles/química , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/instrumentación , Humanos , Polvos , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/normas , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos
4.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 18(5): 1585-1594, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624069

RESUMEN

The full-resolution next generation impactor (NGI) and three abbreviated impactor systems were used to obtain the apparent aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) and other quality measures for marketed dry powder inhalers (DPIs) using the compendial method and efficient data analysis (EDA). APSD for the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in Spiriva® Handihaler®, Foradil® Aerolizer®, and Relenza® Diskhaler® was obtained using a full-resolution NGI at 39, 60, and 90 L/min, respectively. Two reduced NGI (rNGI) configurations, the filter-only configuration (rNGI-f) and the modified-cup configuration (rNGI-mc), and the fast-screening impactor (FSI) with appropriate inserts to provide a 5-µm cut size were evaluated. The fine particle dose (FPD) obtained using the FSI for Spiriva was statistically similar to that obtained using the full NGI. However, the FPD for both Foradil and Relenza obtained using the FSI was significantly different from that obtained using the full NGI. Despite this, no significant differences were observed for the fine particle fraction (FPF) obtained using the FSI relative to that obtained from the full NGI for any of the DPIs. The use of abbreviated impactor systems appears promising with good agreement observed with the full-resolution NGI, except for small differences observed for the rNGI-mc configuration. These small differences may be product- and/or flow rate-specific, and further evaluation will be required to resolve these differences.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/métodos , Fumarato de Formoterol , Bromuro de Tiotropio , Zanamivir , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/química , Aerosoles/farmacología , Fumarato de Formoterol/administración & dosificación , Fumarato de Formoterol/química , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Tamaño de la Partícula , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Bromuro de Tiotropio/administración & dosificación , Bromuro de Tiotropio/química , Zanamivir/administración & dosificación , Zanamivir/química
5.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 14(3): 1004-11, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780781

RESUMEN

Abbreviated impactors have been developed recently to allow more rapid evaluation of inhalation products as alternates to the eight-stage Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI) which has been widely used in the pharmaceutical industry for assessing aerodynamic particle size distribution. In this paper, a two-stage abbreviated impactor, Westech Fine Particle Dose Impactor (WFPD), was used to characterize the aerodynamic particle size of metered dose inhaler (MDI) products, and the results were compared with those obtained using the standard eight-stage ACI. Seven commercial MDI products, with different propellants (chlorofluorocarbon/hydrofluoroalkane) and formulation types (suspension/solution, dry/normal/wet), were tested in this study by both WFPD and ACI. Substantially equivalent measures of fine particle fraction were obtained for most of the tested MDI products, but larger coarse particle fraction and extra-fine particle fraction values were measured from WFPD relative to those measured using the ACI. Use of the WFPD also produced more wall loss than the ACI. Therefore, it is recommended that the system suitability be evaluated on a product-by-product basis to establish substantial equivalency before implementing an abbreviated impactor measurement methodology for routine use in inhaler product characterization.


Asunto(s)
Diseño de Equipo , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Administración por Inhalación , Tamaño de la Partícula
6.
Pharm Res ; 29(11): 3122-30, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22752252

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if cascade impactor (CI) measurement of drug in small particles from aqueous nasal sprays, described in FDA's 2003 draft Nasal Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Guidance, can be optimized to reduce measurement variability. To examine the influence of flow rate configurations and number of impactor stages on CI deposition and explore the importance of inlet volume. METHODS: A total of eight assemblies and manual vs. automatic actuation were tested for deposition on the sum of all stages of the CI, and for Group 2 total drug mass per the Guidance. Mean deposition and variance about the mean were determined for each assembly. RESULTS: The path length for a spherical 1 l inlet was too short to allow adequate aerosol formation. Data variance was reduced by a factor of two or more by using an automatic actuator relative to manual actuation. Impactor assembly modification did not improve variance over the standard assembly. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a spherical inlet (≥ 2 l volume) and automatic actuation are recommended for comparative measurements of drug in small particles arising from aqueous nasal sprays. The standard (8-stage) 28.3 lpm CI flow rate configuration is recommended when using the Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI), as no other assembly showed a distinct advantage.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/química , Química Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/instrumentación , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Rociadores Nasales , Soluciones Farmacéuticas/química , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Disponibilidad Biológica , Tamaño de la Partícula , Soluciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química
7.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm ; 37(10): 1217-24, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21438703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complaints from healthcare providers that the adhesive on the Daytrana™ methylphenidate transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) adhered to the release liner to such an extent that the release liner could not be removed prompted this study. Daytrana™ has a packaging system consisting of a moisture-permeable pouch contained within a sealed tray containing a desiccant; the tray is impermeable to ambient moisture. The objective of this project was to determine if the Daytrana™ packaging system influenced the difficulty in removing the release liner. METHOD: Both a sealed tray and an open tray containing sealed pouches were placed into an environmental chamber at 25°C and 60% relative humidity for 30 days; afterwards, release liner removal testing using a peel angle of 90° and a peel speed of 300 mm/min was performed. RESULTS: TDDS from open chamber trays required less force to remove the release liner than did TDDS from closed chamber trays. For the 10 mg/9 h TDDS and the 15 mg/9 h TDDS (the dosages examined), there were substantial differences in release liner removal force between an old lot and a new lot for closed chamber trays but not for open chamber trays. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that for this particular TDDS, storage conditions such as humidity influence release liner adhesion. This project also demonstrates that, to ensure adequate product quality, adhesion needs to become an important design parameter, and the design of a TDDS should consider the ability to remove the release liner under anticipated storage conditions.


Asunto(s)
Administración Cutánea , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Embalaje de Medicamentos , Metilfenidato/administración & dosificación , Parche Transdérmico , Adhesividad , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales
8.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 12(1): 337-43, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21286880

RESUMEN

Droplet velocity is an important parameter that can be used to characterize nasal spray products. In this study, a phase-Doppler anemometry (PDA) system was used to measure the droplet velocities of nasal sprays. A survey of seven commercial nasal spray products showed a range of droplet velocities from 6.7 to 19.2 m/s, all significantly different from each other. A three-level, four-factor Box-Behnken design of experiments (DOE) methodology were applied to investigate the influences of actuation parameters and formulation properties on nasal spray droplet velocity using a set of placebo formulations. The DOE study shows that all four input factors (stroke length, actuation velocity, concentration of the gelling agent, and concentration of the surfactant) have significant influence on droplet velocity. An optimized quadratic model generated from the DOE results describes the inherent relationships between the input factors and droplet velocity thus providing a better understanding of the input factor influences. Overall, PDA provides a new in vitro characterization method for the evaluation of inhalation drugs through assessment of spray velocity and may assist in product development to meet drug delivery equivalency requirements.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Rociadores Nasales , Proyectos de Investigación , Tecnología Farmacéutica , Administración Intranasal , Celulosa/análisis , Excipientes , Geles , Humanos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Tamaño de la Partícula , Polisorbatos , Tensoactivos/metabolismo , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Viscosidad
9.
Pharm Res ; 26(6): 1344-52, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19229594

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To understand and evaluate the stability and skin permeation profiles of fentanyl reservoir systems as a function of patch age. METHODS: Drug release and skin permeation studies were performed using a modified USP apparatus 5 with a novel sample preparation technique. RESULTS: The amount of fentanyl present in the EVA/adhesive layer (EAL) increased from about 17% of label claim (LC) at 5 months to 25% LC at 22 months. The increase in the drug concentration was mainly observed in the peripheral EAL. Simultaneously, the alcohol content of the patch decreased as a function of patch age. A significant effect of patch age on the drug content in the EAL and the drug release from the system was observed; however, skin permeation studies did not indicate an increase in drug delivery rate. CONCLUSIONS: Novel sample preparation technique with USP Apparatus 5 allowed determination of in vitro skin permeation rates for fentanyl transdermal patches with different designs. Permeation rates with cadaver skin as substrate were found not to change with patch age despite changing drug concentration in the EAL.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Anestésicos/farmacocinética , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Fentanilo/farmacocinética , Piel/metabolismo , Administración Cutánea , Alcoholes/química , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Membranas Artificiales , Absorción Cutánea , Solubilidad , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm ; 35(10): 1180-9, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19555241

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There has been some apprehension expressed in the scientific literature that nanometer-sized titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) and other nanoparticles, if able to penetrate the skin, may cause cytotoxicity. In light of a lack of data regarding dermal penetration of titanium dioxide from sunscreen formulations, the Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research initiated a study in collaboration with the National Center for Toxicology Research using minipigs to determine whether nanoscale TiO(2) in sunscreen products can penetrate intact skin. Four sunscreen products were manufactured. METHOD: The particle size distribution of three TiO(2) raw materials, a sunscreen blank (no TiO(2)) and three sunscreen formulations containing uncoated nanometer-sized TiO(2), coated nanometer-sized TiO(2) or sub-micron TiO(2) were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to determine whether the formulation process caused a change in the size distributions (e.g., agglomeration or deagglomeration) of the TiO(2). RESULTS: SEM and XRD of the formulated sunscreens containing nanometer TiO(2) show the TiO(2) particles to have the same size as that observed for the raw materials. This suggests that the formulation process did not affect the size or shape of the TiO(2) particles. CONCLUSION: Because of the resolution limit of optical microscopy, nanoparticles could not be accurately sized using LSCM, which allows for detection but not sizing of the particles. LSCM allows observation of dispersion profiles throughout the sample; therefore, LSCM can be used to verify that results observed from SEM experiments are not solely surface effects.


Asunto(s)
Nanopartículas , Protectores Solares/química , Titanio/química , Química Farmacéutica/métodos , Microscopía Confocal , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Tamaño de la Partícula , Permeabilidad , Absorción Cutánea , Protectores Solares/efectos adversos , Protectores Solares/farmacocinética , Titanio/efectos adversos , Titanio/farmacocinética , Difracción de Rayos X
11.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 35(5): 417-26, 2008 Dec 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18832029

RESUMEN

The purpose of the research was to investigate the influences of actuation parameters and formulation physical properties on nasal spray delivery performance using design of experiment (DOE) methodology. A 3-level, 4-factor Box-Behnken design with a total of 27 experimental runs was used in this study. Nine simulated aqueous formulations with different viscosities and surface tensions were prepared using carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC, gelling agent) and Tween80 (surfactant) each at three concentration levels. Four factors, actuation stroke length, actuation velocity, concentration of gelling agent, and concentration of surfactant were investigated for their influences on measured responses of shot weight, spray pattern, plume geometry and droplet size distribution (DSD). The models based on data from the DOE were then optimized by eliminating insignificant terms. Pfeiffer nasal spray pump units filled with the simulated formulations were used in the study. Nasal pump actuation stroke length exerts a strong, independent influence on shot weight, and also slightly affects spray pattern and plume geometry. Actuation velocity and concentration of gelling agent have significant effects on spray pattern, plume geometry and DSD, in a complicated manner through interaction terms. Concentration of surfactant has little, if any, influence on nasal spray characteristics. Results were fitted to quadratic models describing the inherent relationships between the four factors evaluated and nasal spray performance. The DOE study helped us to identify the source of variability in nasal spray product performance, and obtained better understanding in how to control the variability. Moreover, the quadratic models developed from the DOE study quantitatively describe the inherent relationships between the factors and nasal spray performance characteristics. With the assistance of the response surfaces developed from the DOE model, the time and labor in designing a nasal spray product to achieve desired product performance characteristics can be reduced.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intranasal , Aerosoles , Química Farmacéutica/métodos , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Proyectos de Investigación , Carboximetilcelulosa de Sodio/química , Excipientes/química , Modelos Estadísticos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Tamaño de la Partícula , Polisorbatos/química , Análisis de Regresión , Programas Informáticos , Tensión Superficial , Tensoactivos/química , Viscosidad
12.
J Pharm Sci ; 96(7): 1794-801, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17252609

RESUMEN

In this study, gauge repeatability and reproducibility (gauge R&R) was used to analyze variability for USP apparatus 2 dissolution measurement systems. Experiments were designed to assess the variability due to apparatus, operator, and sample tablet. Since dissolution testing is a destructive test, a nested model was used for data analysis. Additionally, perturbation tests with both disintegrating and nondisintegrating tablets were performed to study the variability due to sample position within the dissolution vessel. For the gauge R&R study, two well-trained chemists used two mechanically calibrated USP apparatus 2 units. Six tests were performed by each operator on each apparatus. Evaluation of dissolution test results at 30 min using an internal DPA calibrator tablet NCDA#2 (10 mg prednisone) indicates that the main contribution to the total variance, approximately 70%, is due to the sample tablets, approximately 25% is from the apparatus and approximately 5% is due to the operators. There is no significant difference between operators and apparatuses as shown by the gauge R&R studies. In addition, dissolution results can be strongly affected by the position of the tablet within the vessel. Similarity (f1) and dissimilarity (f2) factors were calculated to statistically evaluate differences between perturbed and normal dissolution tests.


Asunto(s)
Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/química , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Calibración , Modelos Estadísticos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Prednisona/química , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Solubilidad , Comprimidos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Factores de Tiempo
13.
J Pharm Sci ; 96(6): 1451-67, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17238204

RESUMEN

This document provides information for the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the selection of suitable particle-size analysis techniques, development and validation of particle-size methods, and the establishment of acceptance criteria for the particle size of drug substances used in oral solid-dosage forms. The document is intended for analysts knowledgeable in the techniques necessary to conduct particle-size characterization (a table of acronyms is provided at the end of the document). It is acknowledged that each drug substance, formulation, and manufacturing process is unique and that multiple techniques and instruments are available to the analyst.


Asunto(s)
Tamaño de la Partícula , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/química , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Administración Oral , Artefactos , Industria Farmacéutica , Microscopía , Dispersión de Radiación , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
14.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 8(4): E90, 2007 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18181550

RESUMEN

The purpose of this article is to report final results of the evaluation of a chi-square ratio test proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for demonstrating equivalence of aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) profiles of nasal and orally inhaled drug products. A working group of the Product Quality Research Institute previously published results demonstrating some limitations of the proposed test. In an effort to overcome the test's limited discrimination, the group proposed a supplemental test, a population bioequivalence (PBE) test for impactor-sized mass (ISM). In this final report the group compares the chi-square ratio test to the ISM-PBE test and to the combination of both tests. The basis for comparison is a set of 55 realistic scenarios of cascade impactor data, which were evaluated for equivalence by the statistical tests and independently by the group members. In many instances, the combined application of these 2 tests appeared to increase the discriminating ability of the statistical procedure compared with the chi-square ratio test alone. In certain situations the chi-square ratio test alone was sufficient to determine equivalence of APSD profiles, while in other situations neither of the tests alone nor their combination was adequate. This report describes all of these scenarios and results. In the end, the group did not recommend a statistical test for APSD profile equivalence. The group did not investigate other in vitro tests, in vivo issues, or other statistical tests for APSD profile comparisons. The studied tests are not intended for routine quality control of APSD.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/química , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Academias e Institutos , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Intranasal , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Diseño de Equipo , Guías como Asunto , Tamaño de la Partícula , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Control de Calidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
15.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv ; 30(6): 399-410, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28846482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors may influence the performance of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) when used with a valved holding chamber (VHC or "spacer"). METHODS: Andersen Cascade Impactor measurements were conducted for three MDI products and two different VHCs using a specially designed system that accommodated variable delay times between MDI actuation and introduction of the aerosol into the impactor, and allowed reduced flow through the VHC while the impactor was operated at 28.3 L/min. Deposited drug mass and aerodynamic particle size distribution were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. A two-level, three-factor full-factorial design of experiments (DOE) design was applied to assess the influences of VHC type, flow rate, and inhalation delay on a total of seven performance characteristics for each MDI product. An experiment without a VHC was added to assess the influence of VHC presence. RESULTS: DOE study shows the presence and type of VHC are the major influences on emitted dose and respirable fraction. Following the VHC effect, the inhalation delay has the most significant influence on most MDI performance metrics-emitted dose, respirable particle dose and fraction (aerosols between 1.1 and 4.7 µm), and fine particle dose and fraction (aerosols under 4.7 µm). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the use of DOE analysis to effectively assess the effects of patient handling parameters (flow rate and inhalation delay) on the performance of MDI drugs when used with a VHC. The results of this study will inform Food and Drug Administration reviewers, the pharmaceutical industry, and healthcare practitioners as to safe and effective use of MDI products when used in conjunction with spacer devices.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Espaciadores de Inhalación , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Tamaño de la Partícula
17.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 64(1): 1-8, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16797171

RESUMEN

Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS), also known as "patches," are dosage forms designed to deliver a therapeutically effective amount of drug across a patient's skin. The adhesive of the transdermal drug delivery system is critical to the safety, efficacy and quality of the product. In the Drug Quality Reporting System (DQRS), the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received numerous reports of "adhesion lacking" for transdermal drug delivery systems. This article provides an overview of types of transdermals, their anatomy, the role of adhesion, the possible adhesion failure modes and how adhesion can be measured. Excerpts from FDA reports on the lack of adhesion of transdermal system products are presented. Pros and cons of in vitro techniques, such as peel adhesion, tack and shear strength, in vivo techniques used to evaluate adhesive properties are discussed. To see a decrease in "adhesion lacking" reports, adhesion needs to become an important design parameter and suitable methods need to be available to assess quality and in vivo performance. This article provides a framework for further discussion and scientific work to improve transdermal adhesive performance.


Asunto(s)
Administración Cutánea , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Química Farmacéutica , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Humanos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Control de Calidad , Seguridad , Absorción Cutánea , Estados Unidos
18.
J Pharm Sci ; 95(9): 2029-40, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16865693

RESUMEN

Nasal spray drug products are normally characterized via measurement of shot weight, spray pattern, plume geometry, and droplet size distribution (DSD). In this project, the actuation parameters, such as stroke length, actuation velocity, and actuation acceleration, were investigated to ascertain how they affect nasal spray characteristics. Pfeiffer nasal spray pump units filled with water were used in the study. Actuation parameters were adjusted using an electronic automated actuation system, SprayVIEW NSx. Spray pattern and plume geometry measurements were carried out using a high speed optical spray characterization system, SprayVIEW NSP, and DSD analysis was performed using a Malvern 2600 laser diffraction system. Our results show that different actuation parameters affect the nasal spray characteristics in different ways and to different degrees. Among all the actuation parameters, stroke length and actuation velocity have significant effects on the nasal spray characteristics, while the other actuation parameters have little, if any, effect. Compared to spray pattern, plume geometry and DSD, shot weight provides very little characterization information. The findings from this work suggest that, for in vitro bioavailability (BA) and bioequivalence (BE) studies of nasal spray products, the actuation parameters, stroke length, and velocity must be carefully selected. Spray pattern, plume geometry, and DSD appear to provide critical data for assessment of nasal pump performance.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Química Farmacéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Intranasal , Disponibilidad Biológica , Tamaño de la Partícula , Equivalencia Terapéutica
19.
J Pharm Sci ; 95(7): 1606-13, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16732563

RESUMEN

Dissolution testing is a critical method for the determination of pharmaceutical product quality and bioequivalence. For some products, dissolved gases in the dissolution medium affect dissolution results thus requiring degassing of the medium prior to use. In this study, we use a total dissolved gas and oxygen meter to measure both oxygen and total gases in dissolution media before and after application of a variety of deaeration methods. Dissolution testing results using a 10 mg Prednisone tablet (NCDA #2) are compared with the percent saturation of oxygen and total gases found in the medium. Reaeration of the medium during different stirring rates was also measured. This study confirms that measurement of total gases and not just oxygen in the medium is necessary to assess adequacy for dissolution testing. For those deaeration techniques that are performed at room temperature, the percent saturation of the total dissolved gases must be well below 100% to prevent outgassing once medium is brought to dissolution test method temperature, typically 37 degrees C.


Asunto(s)
Química Farmacéutica/métodos , Gases/análisis , Oxígeno/análisis , Prednisona/química , Química Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/instrumentación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Solubilidad , Temperatura , Agua/química
20.
J Pharm Sci ; 103(11): 3648-3656, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25228114

RESUMEN

As a result of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, manufacturers of metered dose inhalers began reformulating their products to use hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs) as propellants in place of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Although the new products are considered safe and efficacious by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a large number of complaints have been registered via the FDA's Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS)-more than 7000 as of May 2013. To develop a better understanding of the measurable parameters that may, in part, determine in vitro performance and thus patient compliance, we compared several CFC- and HFA-based products with respect to their aerodynamic performance in response to changes in actuator cleaning interval and interactuation delay interval. Comparison metrics examined in this study were: total drug delivered ex-actuator, fine particle dose (<5 µm), mass median aerodynamic diameter, plume width, plume temperature, plume impaction force, and actuator orifice diameter. Overall, no single metric or test condition distinguishes HFA products from CFC products, but, for individual products tested, there were a combination of metrics that differentiated one from another.


Asunto(s)
Propelentes de Aerosoles/química , Clorofluorocarburos/química , Hidrocarburos Fluorados/química , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Satisfacción del Paciente , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Administración por Inhalación , Propelentes de Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Propelentes de Aerosoles/efectos adversos , Aerosoles , Química Farmacéutica , Clorofluorocarburos/administración & dosificación , Clorofluorocarburos/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Hidrocarburos Fluorados/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Fluorados/efectos adversos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Solventes/química , Temperatura
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA