Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Med J Aust ; 220(5): 249-257, 2024 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493353

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the annual numbers of first ICD insertions in New South Wales during 2005-2020; to examine health outcomes for people who first received ICDs during this period. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked administrative health data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All first insertions of ICDs in NSW, 2005-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual numbers of first ICD insertions, and of emergency department presentations and hospital re-admissions 30 days, 90 days, 365 days after first ICD insertions; all-cause and disease-specific mortality (to ten years after ICD insertion). RESULTS: During 2005-2020, ICDs were first inserted into 16 867 people (18.5 per 100 000 population); their mean age was 65.7 years (standard deviation, 13.5 years; 7376 aged 70 years or older, 43.7%), 13 214 were men (78.3%). The annual number of insertions increased from 791 in 2005 to 1256 in 2016; the first ICD insertion rate increased from 15.5 in 2005 to 18.9 per 100 000 population in 2010, after which the rate was stable until 2019 (19.8 per 100 000 population). Of the 16 778 people discharged alive from hospital after first ICD insertions, 54.4% presented to emergency departments within twelve months, including 1236 with cardiac arrhythmias (7.4%) and 434 with device-related problems (2.6%); 56% were re-admitted to hospital, including 1944 with cardiac arrhythmias (11.5%) and 2045 with device-related problems (12.1%). A total of 5624 people who received first ICDs during 2005-2020 (33.3%) died during follow-up (6.7 deaths per 100 person-years); the survival rate was 94.4% at one year, 76.5% at five years, and 54.2% at ten years. CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of new ICDs inserted in NSW has increased since 2005. A substantial proportion of recipients experience device-related problems that require re-admission to hospital. The potential harms of ICD insertion should be considered when assessing the likelihood of preventing fatal ventricular arrhythmia.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Desfibriladores Implantables , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicaciones , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Corazón , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología
2.
Med J Aust ; 218(9): 418-425, 2023 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087692

RESUMEN

Clinicians must make decisions amid the uncertainty that is ubiquitous to clinical practice. Uncertainty in clinical practice can assume many forms depending on its source, such as insufficient personal knowledge or scientific evidence, limited practical understanding or competence, challenging interpersonal relationships, and complexity and ambiguity in clinical encounters. The level and experience of uncertainty varies according to personal traits, clinical context, affective factors and sociocultural norms. Clinicians vary in their tolerance of uncertainty, and maladaptive responses may adversely affect patient care and clinician wellbeing. Various strategies can be used to minimise and manage, but not eliminate, uncertainty and to share uncertainty with patients without compromising the clinician-patient relationship or clinician credibility.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Humanos , Incertidumbre , Toma de Decisiones
11.
PLoS Med ; 10(8): e1001500, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23966841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Financial ties between health professionals and industry may unduly influence professional judgments and some researchers have suggested that widening disease definitions may be one driver of over-diagnosis, bringing potentially unnecessary labeling and harm. We aimed to identify guidelines in which disease definitions were changed, to assess whether any proposed changes would increase the numbers of individuals considered to have the disease, whether potential harms of expanding disease definitions were investigated, and the extent of members' industry ties. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We undertook a cross-sectional study of the most recent publication between 2000 and 2013 from national and international guideline panels making decisions about definitions or diagnostic criteria for common conditions in the United States. We assessed whether proposed changes widened or narrowed disease definitions, rationales offered, mention of potential harms of those changes, and the nature and extent of disclosed ties between members and pharmaceutical or device companies. Of 16 publications on 14 common conditions, ten proposed changes widening and one narrowing definitions. For five, impact was unclear. Widening fell into three categories: creating "pre-disease"; lowering diagnostic thresholds; and proposing earlier or different diagnostic methods. Rationales included standardising diagnostic criteria and new evidence about risks for people previously considered to not have the disease. No publication included rigorous assessment of potential harms of proposed changes. Among 14 panels with disclosures, the average proportion of members with industry ties was 75%. Twelve were chaired by people with ties. For members with ties, the median number of companies to which they had ties was seven. Companies with ties to the highest proportions of members were active in the relevant therapeutic area. Limitations arise from reliance on only disclosed ties, and exclusion of conditions too broad to enable analysis of single panel publications. CONCLUSIONS: For the common conditions studied, a majority of panels proposed changes to disease definitions that increased the number of individuals considered to have the disease, none reported rigorous assessment of potential harms of that widening, and most had a majority of members disclosing financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
12.
BMC Med Educ ; 13: 2, 2013 Jan 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23294479

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Burnout and intolerance of uncertainty have been linked to low job satisfaction and lower quality patient care. While resilience is related to these concepts, no study has examined these three concepts in a cohort of doctors. The objective of this study was to measure resilience, burnout, compassion satisfaction, personal meaning in patient care and intolerance of uncertainty in Australian general practice (GP) registrars. METHODS: We conducted a paper-based cross-sectional survey of GP registrars in Australia from June to July 2010, recruited from a newsletter item or registrar education events. Survey measures included the Resilience Scale-14, a single-item scale for burnout, Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, Personal Meaning in Patient Care scale, Intolerance of Uncertainty-12 scale, and Physician Response to Uncertainty scale. RESULTS: 128 GP registrars responded (response rate 90%). Fourteen percent of registrars were found to be at risk of burnout using the single-item scale for burnout, but none met the criteria for burnout using the ProQOL scale. Secondary traumatic stress, general intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety due to clinical uncertainty and reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients were associated with being at higher risk of burnout, but sex, age, practice location, training duration, years since graduation, and reluctance to disclose uncertainty to physicians were not.Only ten percent of registrars had high resilience scores. Resilience was positively associated with compassion satisfaction and personal meaning in patient care. Resilience was negatively associated with burnout, secondary traumatic stress, inhibitory anxiety, general intolerance to uncertainty, concern about bad outcomes and reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients. CONCLUSIONS: GP registrars in this survey showed a lower level of burnout than in other recent surveys of the broader junior doctor population in both Australia and overseas. Resilience was also lower than might be expected of a satisfied and professionally successful cohort.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Médicos Generales/psicología , Resiliencia Psicológica , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Psicológicas , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Incertidumbre , Adulto Joven
13.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 49(8): 488-494, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance (NVDPA) guidelines were published in 2012, many individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are not prescribed preventive medication or have CVD risk factors recorded. Better use of CVD risk prediction tools and targeting of medication could reduce CVD. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review recent developments in CVD risk prediction, including calculators developed in the USA, UK and New Zealand, and non-traditional tests for cardiovascular risk assessment. DISCUSSION: The Framingham Risk Equation explains much of the risk variance in the population but overestimates risk for a contemporary Australian population. Newer risk calculators show improvement in calibration. Individuals vary greatly in terms of whether they will find the potential benefits of taking medication worthwhile, and shared decision-making tools can help to clarify decision making.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Australia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
14.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 28(7): 547-555, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30455177

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: 'Nudges' are subtle cognitive cues thought to influence behaviour. We investigated whether embedding nudges in a general practitioner (GP) clinical decision support display can reduce low-value management decisions . METHODS: Australian GPs completed four clinical vignettes of patients with low back pain. Participants chose from three guideline-concordant and three guideline-discordant (low-value) management options for each vignette, on a computer screen. A 2×2 factorial design randomised participants to two possible nudge interventions: 'partition display' nudge (low-value options presented horizontally, high-value options listed vertically) or 'default option' nudge (high-value options presented as the default, low-value options presented only after clicking for more). The primary outcome was the proportion of scenarios where practitioners chose at least one of the low-value care options. RESULTS: 120 GPs (72% male, 28% female) completed the trial (n=480 vignettes). Participants using a conventional menu display without nudges chose at least one low-value care option in 42% of scenarios. Participants exposed to the default option nudge were 44% less likely to choose at least one low-value care option (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.85; p=0.006) compared with those not exposed. The partition display nudge had no effect on choice of low-value care (OR 1.08, 95%CI 0.72 to 1.64; p=0.7). There was no interaction between the nudges (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.15; p=0.89). INTERPRETATION: A default option nudge reduced the odds of choosing low-value options for low back pain in clinical vignettes. Embedding high value options as defaults in clinical decision support tools could improve quality of care. More research is needed into how nudges impact clinical decision-making in different contexts.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 44(3): 391-401, 2007 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17205447

RESUMEN

A review was performed to determine the evidence base for scrub typhus indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) methodologies and the criteria for positive results. This review included a total of 109 publications, which comprised 123 eligible studies for analysis (14 publications included 2 substudies). There was considerable underreporting of the IFA methodology and seropositivity criteria used, with most studies using a defined cutoff titer rather than an increase in the titer in paired samples. The choice of positivity cutoff titer varied by country and purpose of the IFA test. This variation limits the comparability of seroprevalence rates between studies and, more seriously, raises questions about the appropriateness of the cutoffs for positive IFA results chosen for diagnosis of acute scrub typhus infection. We suggest that the diagnosis of scrub typhus using IFA should be based on a > or =4-fold increase in the titer in paired serum samples and should only be based on a single sample titer when there is an adequate local evidence base.


Asunto(s)
Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente Indirecta/métodos , Orientia tsutsugamushi/inmunología , Tifus por Ácaros/diagnóstico , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Humanos , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tifus por Ácaros/sangre , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Pruebas Serológicas/normas
16.
Diagn Progn Res ; 1: 13, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31093542

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are worthwhile if they improve patient outcomes or provide benefits such as reduced resource use, without harming patients. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effects of diagnostic CPRs on patient and process of care outcomes. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and a trial registry and performed citation and reference checks, for randomised trials comparing a diagnostic strategy with and without a CPR. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias and similar studies meta-analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies evaluating diagnostic CPRs for 14 conditions were included. A clinical management decision was the primary outcome in the majority of studies. Most studies were judged to be at high or uncertain risk of bias on ≥3 of 6 domains. Details of study interventions and implementation were infrequently reported.For suspected Group A Streptococcus throat infection, diagnostic CPRs reduced symptoms (1 study) and antibiotic prescriptions (5 studies, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). For suspected cardiac chest pain, diagnostic strategies incorporating a CPR improved early discharge rates (1 study), decreased objective cardiac testing (1 study) and decreased hospitalisations (1 study). For ankle injuries, Ottawa Ankle Rules reduced radiography when used with clinical examination (1 study) but had no effect on length of stay as a triage test (1 study). For suspected acute appendicitis, CPRs had no effect on rates of perforated appendix (1 study) or the number of non-therapeutic operations (5 studies, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.08). For suspected pneumonia, CPRs reduced antibiotic prescribing without unfavourable outcomes (3 studies). For children with possible serious bacterial infection, diagnostic CPRs did not improve process of care outcomes (3 studies). CONCLUSION: There are few randomised trials of diagnostic CPRs, and patient outcomes are infrequently reported. Diagnostic CPRs had a positive effect on process outcomes in some clinical conditions; however, many studies were at unclear or high risk of bias and the results may be context specific. Future studies should seek to detail how the CPR might alter the diagnostic pathway, report effects on both patient and process outcomes, and improve reporting of the study interventions and implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review was not registered with PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic review protocols. The review was conceived and protocol prepared prior to the launch of PROSPERO in February 2011.

19.
Arch Intern Med ; 164(18): 1978-84, 2004 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15477431

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure is difficult, with both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis occurring commonly in practice. Natriuretic peptides have been proposed as a possible test for assisting diagnosis. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), including a comparison with atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted of MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1994 to December 2002 and handsearches of reference lists of included studies. We included studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of BNP against echocardiographic or clinical criteria or that compared the diagnostic accuracy of BNP with ANP. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion and quality and extracted the relevant data. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling the diagnostic odds ratios for studies that used a common reference standard. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. For the 8 studies (n = 4086) that measured BNP against the criterion of left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less (or equivalent), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 11.6 (95% confidence interval, 8.4-16.1). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was greater, 30.9 (95% confidence interval, 27.0-35.4), in the 7 studies (n = 2374) that measured BNP against clinical criteria (generally a consensus view using all other clinical information). The diagnostic odds ratio was similar in studies conducted in general practice and in hospital settings. Three studies compared BNP with N-terminal-ANP, a precursor form of ANP, and pooling of the results of these studies showed BNP to be a more accurate marker of heart failure than NT-ANP. CONCLUSIONS: Brain natriuretic peptide is an accurate marker of heart failure. Use of a cutoff value of 15 pmol/L achieves high sensitivity, and BNP values below this exclude heart failure in patients in whom disease is suspected. As the diagnostic odds ratio for BNP is greater when assessed against clinical criteria than against left ejection fraction alone, BNP may also be detecting patients with "diastolic" heart failure.


Asunto(s)
Factor Natriurético Atrial/biosíntesis , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/metabolismo , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/biosíntesis , Factor Natriurético Atrial/análisis , Humanos , Miocardio/metabolismo , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA