Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 24(6): e13931, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35980197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyoma virus (BKV) infection following kidney transplantation have been associated with allograft dysfunction and allograft loss. Reduction in immunosuppression is a mainstay of management yet has been associated with increased risk of rejection. According to international consensus guidelines, one approach to management of these viral infections is to discontinue the antimetabolite. Little is known surrounding long-term outcomes in these patients, and it remains unclear if consideration should be given to resuming the antimetabolite as variable re-escalation strategies have been reported. The objective was to describe episodes of rejection and identify risk factors for rejection following antimetabolite withdrawal after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review evaluated adult kidney transplant recipients with a serum CMV or BKV DNA PCR ≥500 copies/ml who underwent antimetabolite discontinuation. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Overall, 14 patients (8.8%) experienced BPAR at a median of 1.6 years after antimetabolite discontinuation. Compared to CMV, discontinuation after BKV DNAemia was associated with a higher incidence of BPAR. Characteristics observed more frequently in patients with BPAR included younger age, female sex, higher initial viral load, and development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that antimetabolite discontinuation after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients is a reasonable and safe approach. Further prospective studies investigating optimal immunosuppression management following CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Virus BK , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Infecciones por Polyomavirus , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Citomegalovirus/genética , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Antimetabolitos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/complicaciones , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 55(12): 1447-1454, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813908

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No clear association between standard vasopressin doses and body mass index exists, despite potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability among patients with septic shock. It is unknown if higher doses may alter hemodynamic response. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of vasopressin dose on hemodynamic response in obese patients with septic shock. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult, obese patients with septic shock receiving catecholamine vasopressors and vasopressin. Patients were analyzed according to vasopressin dose received: standard dose (≤0.04 U/min) and high dose (>0.04 U/min). The primary outcome was percentage change in norepinephrine equivalent (NEQ) dose. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included in the analysis, with 136 in the standard-dose vasopressin group and 46 in the high-dose vasopressin group. There was no difference in percentage change in NEQ dose at 6 hours after standard- or high-dose vasopressin attainment (-28.6% vs -19.1%; P = 0.166). A greater increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 6 hours was observed with receipt of high-dose vasopressin (23.3% vs 15.3%; P = 0.023). Duration of shock and length of stay were significantly longer in patients who received high-dose vasopressin, with no difference in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This represents the first analysis comparing standard and higher doses of vasopressin in obese patients with septic shock. Receipt of high-dose vasopressin was not associated with a difference in catecholamine requirement or improved outcomes. Further studies are warranted to provide guidance on the use of high-dose vasopressin in septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Choque Séptico , Adulto , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Norepinefrina/farmacología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Vasopresinas/farmacología
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(5): e2315908, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252739

RESUMEN

Importance: While the COVID-19 pandemic enters a new phase and the proportion of individuals with a previous COVID-19 diagnosis increases, the national patterns in kidney use and medium-term kidney transplant (KT) outcomes among patients receiving kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate the patterns in kidney use and KT outcomes among adult recipients of kidneys from deceased donors with active or resolved COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using national US transplant registry data from 35 851 deceased donors (71 334 kidneys) and 45 912 adult patients who received KTs from March 1, 2020, to March 30, 2023. Exposure: The exposure was donor SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) results, with positive NAT results within 7 days before procurement defined as active COVID-19 and positive NAT results 1 week (>7 days) before procurement defined as resolved COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were kidney nonuse, all-cause kidney graft failure, and all-cause patient death. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection (ie, rejection in the first 6 months after KT), transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS), and delayed graft function (DGF). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for kidney nonuse, rejection, and DGF; multivariable linear regression analyses were performed for LOS; and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed for graft failure and all-cause death. All models were adjusted for inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: Among 35 851 deceased donors, the mean (SD) age was 42.5 (15.3) years; 22 319 (62.3%) were men and 23 992 (66.9%) were White. Among 45 912 recipients, the mean (SD) age was 54.3 (13.2) years; 27 952 (60.9%) were men and 15 349 (33.4%) were Black. The likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time. Overall, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.76) and kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.48) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from COVID-19-negative donors. From 2020 to 2022, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (2020: AOR, 11.26 [95% CI, 2.29-55.38]; 2021: AOR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.58-2.79]; 2022: AOR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.28-1.70]) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from donors without COVID-19. Kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors had a higher likelihood of nonuse in 2020 (AOR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.26-11.90) and 2021 (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54-2.45) but not in 2022 (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28). In 2023, kidneys from both active COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.75-1.63) and resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80-1.73) were not associated with higher odds of nonuse. No higher risk of graft failure or death was found in patients receiving kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78-1.37]; patient death: AHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.84-1.66]) or resolved COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: AHR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.88-1.39]; patient death: AHR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.70-1.28]). Donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with longer LOS, higher risk of acute rejection, or higher risk of DGF. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time, and donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with worse KT outcomes within 2 years after transplant. These findings suggest that the use of kidneys from donors with active or resolved COVID-19 is safe in the medium term; further research is needed to assess longer-term transplant outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Supervivencia de Injerto , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Riñón
4.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900231213699, 2023 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37923307

RESUMEN

Background: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is responsible for a multitude of physiological functions, including immunological effects such as promotion of TGF-ß and upregulation of IL-6 and IL-8 which are also implicated in the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Blockade of the RAAS pathway in pre-clinical models has demonstrated a decrease in these cytokines and pulmonary neutrophil recruitment. Objective: This study sought to evaluate whether use of RAAS inhibitor (RAASi) in lung transplant recipients impacted CLAD-free survival. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, 35 lung transplant recipients who received a RAASi post-transplant were compared to 70 lung transplant recipients not exposed to a RAASi and were followed for up to 5 years post-transplant. Results: The incidence of CLAD did not differ based on RAASi treatment (34.3% in RAASi vs 38.6%, P-value .668). This was confirmed with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with RAASi initiation as a time-varying covariate (RAASi hazard ratio of 1.01, P-value .986). Incidence of hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury were low in the RAASi group. Conclusions: This study demonstrated no association between post-transplant RAASi use and decreased risk of CLAD development. RAASi were also well tolerated in this patient population.

5.
J Clin Med ; 12(15)2023 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568318

RESUMEN

Despite the advances in immunosuppressive medications, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to be a major cause of kidney allograft failure and remains a barrier to improving long-term allograft survival. Recently, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological process of AMR, along with the development of new therapeutic options. Additionally, surveillance protocols with donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene profile testing have been established, leading to the early detection of AMR. A multitude of clinical trials are ongoing, opening numerous opportunities for improving outcome in kidney transplant recipients. In this brief review, we discuss the emerging therapies for managing both active and chronic active AMR and highlight the ongoing clinical trials.

6.
Pharmacogenomics ; 24(14): 771-780, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37732393

RESUMEN

The early detection of acute rejection in the allograft is important as it provides an opportunity for timely therapeutic intervention in order to preserve graft function and achieve longer graft survival. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a new biomarker in the field of kidney transplantation. In this review, we used data from various studies to examine the role of dd-cfDNA in comparison to creatinine and donor-specific antibodies in the early detection of transplant rejection. We also reviewed the use of dd-cfDNA in other organ transplants as well as the challenges and potential future direction for dd-cfDNA as a diagnostic tool.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA