RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To analyze the safety and long-term result of bariatric surgery in patients with psychiatric disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2018, n = 961 patients underwent bariatric surgery in a tertiary center. Among them, two groups of patients were created: a group of patients with psychiatric disorders (PG) and a group without psychiatric disorders (CG), using a propensity score matched (PSM). Primary endpoint was long-term outcomes and secondary endpoints were the postoperative morbidity 90 days after surgery, late morbidity, occurrence of psychiatric adverse events, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. RESULTS: Analysis with PSM permitted to compare 136 patients in each group, with a ratio 1:1. TWL% at 2 years in the PG was 32.7% versus 36.6% in the CG (p = 0.002). Overall surgical morbidity was higher in the PG than the CG (28% vs 17%, p = 0.01). Severe surgical complications were not statistically significant (4% vs 3%, p = 0.44). Psychiatric adverse events were significantly more frequent in the PG than in the CG. The resolution of obesity comorbidities was equivalent for both groups at 2 years. CONCLUSION: Substantial weigh loss was reported among patients with psychiatric disorders receiving bariatric surgery at the cost of more non-severe surgical complications. Further, a psychiatric postoperative follow-up visit may be warranted for patients with preoperative psychiatric disorders, given the incidence of psychiatric adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Trastornos Mentales , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/psicología , Obesidad/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was first to compare the kinematic parameters of imposed ankle mobilizations measured during Ashworth or isokinetic tests and, second, to better understand why the stretch reflex was more or less easily elicited by one method or the other. METHODS: Passive dorsiflexions were applied on eight adult patients with plantarflexor spasticity in two conditions: (i) manually, using the Ashworth test where passive dorsiflexions were performed freely by seven rehabilitation clinicians, and (ii) instrumentally, using an isokinetic device (Cybex Norm) and a dorsiflexion velocity at 300 degrees /s. Mean values of initial ankle position, maximal angular velocity (theta;'(max)), maximal angular acceleration (theta;''(max)) and plantarflexor reflex responses obtained with each method were compared. RESULTS: During the Ashworth test, all the patients presented reflex activities in the triceps surae while, during the isokinetic mobilization, only three out of the eight patients tested shown reflex responses. theta;'(max) values were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the manual test (308+/-80 degrees /s vs 216+/-5.5 degrees /s for the isokinetic test). The most marked difference concerned the theta;''(max) values (5046+/-2181 degrees /s(2) for the Ashworth test vs 819+/-18 degrees /s(2) for the isokinetic test, P<0.001). This parameter was significantly correlated with the mean rms-EMG values of the gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and the soleus (SOL). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that passive dorsiflexions imposed during Ashworth and isokinetic tests largely differ in velocity and acceleration, and the higher dynamic parameters evaluated during the Ashworth test could mainly explain that the stretch reflex was more easily elicited during this manual testing. SIGNIFICANCE: If isokinetic devices offer numerous advantages in the assessment of passive resistance to spastic muscle stretch, they cannot be used to simulate the manual test.
Asunto(s)
Espasticidad Muscular/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Parálisis/fisiopatología , Reflejo de Estiramiento/fisiología , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/métodos , Electromiografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Cinética , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Parálisis/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Restricción Física/métodos , Estadísticas no ParamétricasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies revealed that isokinetic dynamometers were valuable tools for assessing spastic hypertonia, no standard methodology using such devices is currently widespread in clinical setting. The aim of this study was to standardize a protocol to assess spastic hypertonia in the triceps surae. METHODS: The passive resistance during dorsiflexions imposed from 10 to 300 degrees /s with an isokinetic dynamometer was measured at the neutral position in 15 patients with spastic hypertonia and 12 healthy subjects. The normalized passive resistance was obtained by expressing raw passive resistance as a percent of the values measured at the lowest velocity (10 degrees /s). EMG signals from plantar and dorsiflexors were also recorded. FINDINGS: While no significant difference between spastic patients and control subjects was observed in raw passive resistance values, the difference was significant for each tested velocity when considering the normalized values. Furthermore, the Ashworth score was significantly correlated with the normalized passive resistance for each velocity whereas no correlation was observed with the raw passive resistance. For the patients, except at the highest velocity, the normalized passive resistance was not affected by the fact that reflex responses in the triceps surae were elicited or not. INTERPRETATION: The normalized passive resistance, expressed with respect to the initial one, i.e., measured at very low velocity, seems a very effective parameter to quantify the velocity-dependent increase in resistance to passive stretch in spastic plantarflexors. However, while the simplicity of the isokinetic tests and the reduced time of data treatment seems to support the clinical use of this methodology, further investigations are required to definitely standardize the protocol.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Movimiento , Contracción Muscular , Espasticidad Muscular/diagnóstico , Espasticidad Muscular/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Articulación del Tobillo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Hipertonía Muscular/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadística como Asunto , TorqueRESUMEN
The present study assessed whether the first and the second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) were dependent on the muscle groups solicited when spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates are used. 20 physical education male students (22 +/- 2.2 yr.) performed two maximal incremental tests randomly assigned using an increment of 15 and 30 W every minute for arm and leg exercises, respectively. These tests were used to measure the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) and to identify VT1 and VT2. The absolute oxygen uptake (VO2) values measured at VT1, VT2, and at maximal workload were significantly (p < .05) lower during arm and leg exercises. However, VT1 and VT2 expressed in percent of VO2 max were not significantly different between arm and leg exercises (54.1 +/- 8.2 vs 57.2 +/- 11.4%; and 82.5 +/- 6.4 vs 84.6 +/- 5.1% at VT1 and VT2, respectively). In addition, at the two thresholds, none of the variables measured during arm and leg exercises were significantly correlated with the exception of spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates (p < .01; r = .75 and r = .69 for VT1 and VT2, respectively). Probably due to the different training status and skill level, no extrapolation can be made to specify the arm thresholds from the leg. These results underline the need to specify the ventilatory thresholds from specific arm ergometer measures obtained from tests performed with spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates and, thus, close to sport and recreational activities, when they are used for training and rehabilitation programs.
Asunto(s)
Brazo/fisiología , Conducta de Elección , Ejercicio Físico , Extremidad Inferior/fisiología , Ventilación Pulmonar , Adulto , Umbral Diferencial/fisiología , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Masculino , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Distribución AleatoriaRESUMEN
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine to what extent the protocol (incremental and constant load exercises) affects the ratings of perceived exertion for a given submaximal intensity on a cycle ergometer. 10 healthy and well-trained male students (M age=23 yr., SD=2.9) performed an incremental exercise to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), maximal aerobic power, and the ratings of perceived exertion (CR10) corresponding to 70% and 75% VO2 max (CR10(70i) and CR10(75i)). Two 30-min. constant load exercises set at these intensities were performed to establish the corresponding CR10 values. CR10(70i) (5.6 +/- 1.9) and CR10(75i) (6.2 +/- 1.9) were significantly higher than all CR10 values collected at Minutes 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 of the constant load exercises. These results indicate that, for a given exercise intensity (70% and 75% VO2 max), subjects are rated higher during an incremental exercise than during a 30-min. submaximal constant load test. Therefore, when coaches and physiotherapists want to use CR10 values reported during an incremental standard exercise to set training loads, they have to be prudent since the same relative exercise intensity does not seem to be perceived identically during a submaximal constant exercise as during an incremental one.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de Esfuerzo , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Consumo de Oxígeno , Esfuerzo Físico , Adulto , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory and efficiency responses between upper (T(UBE)) and lower (T(LBE)) body exercises at the same relative power outputs and with spontaneously chosen crank (SCCR) or pedal (SCPR) rates. Twelve participants performed exercise bouts set at 20, 40, 60 and 80% of maximal power (MP) separated by passive recovery periods. Oxygen uptake, ventilation, gross and work efficiencies during T(LBE) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than during T(UBE). These results suggest that these responses were not directly related to the relative intensities. However, no significant difference was found for delta efficiency and heart rate values. During T(UBE) and T(LBE), gross efficiency increased significantly (P < of MP for T(UBE) and T(LBE) and the same SCCR and SCPR could explain these results. The present results confirm that the cardiorespiratory and efficiency responses between arm and leg exercises are not always similar, although the power output are normalized in relation to MP and add to the understanding of differences between upper and lower body.