RESUMEN
Linkage analyses of genetic diseases and quantitative traits generally are performed using family data. These studies assume the relationships between individuals within families are known correctly. Misclassification of relationships can lead to reduced or inappropriately increased evidence for linkage. Boehnke and Cox (1997) presented a likelihood-based method to infer the most likely relationship of a pair of putative sibs. Here, we modify this method to consider all possible pairs of individuals in the sample, to test for additional relationships, to allow explicitly for genotyping error, and to include X-linked data. Using autosomal genome scan data, our method has excellent power to differentiate monozygotic twins, full sibs, parent-offspring pairs, second-degree (2 degrees ) relatives, first cousins, and unrelated pairs but is unable to distinguish accurately among the 2 degrees relationships of half sibs, avuncular pairs, and grandparent-grandchild pairs. Inclusion of X-linked data improves our ability to distinguish certain types of 2 degrees relationships. Our method also models genotyping error successfully, to judge by the recovery of MZ twins and parent-offspring pairs that are otherwise misclassified when error exists. We have included these extensions in the latest version of our computer program RELPAIR and have applied the program to data from the Finland-United States Investigation of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (FUSION) study.
Asunto(s)
Mapeo Cromosómico/métodos , Análisis por Apareamiento , Alelos , Simulación por Computador , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes/genética , Ligamiento Genético/genética , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Genotipo , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Modelos Genéticos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Núcleo Familiar , Linaje , Proyectos de Investigación , Programas Informáticos , Gemelos Monocigóticos , Cromosoma X/genéticaRESUMEN
For complex diseases, underlying etiologic heterogeneity may reduce power to detect linkage. Thus, methods to identify more homogeneous subgroups within a given sample in a linkage study may improve detection of putative susceptibility loci. In this study we describe an ordered subsetting approach that utilizes disease-related quantitative trait data to complement traditional linkage analysis. This approach uses family-based lod scores derived from the initial genome screen and a family-based descriptor of the trait of interest. The goal of the approach is to identify more homogeneous subgroups of the data by ranking families based on their quantitative trait data. Permutation testing is used to assess statistical significance. This approach can be adapted to a variety of linkage methods and may provide a means to dissect some of the underlying heterogeneity in complex disease genetics.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/genética , Ligamiento Genético , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Genoma , Humanos , Escala de Lod , Carácter Cuantitativo HeredableRESUMEN
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex disorder encompassing multiple metabolic defects. We report results from an autosomal genome scan for type 2 diabetes-related quantitative traits in 580 Finnish families ascertained for an affected sibling pair and analyzed by the variance components-based quantitative-trait locus (QTL) linkage approach. We analyzed diabetic and nondiabetic subjects separately, because of the possible impact of disease on the traits of interest. In diabetic individuals, our strongest results were observed on chromosomes 3 (fasting C-peptide/glucose: maximum LOD score [MLS] = 3.13 at 53.0 cM) and 13 (body-mass index: MLS = 3.28 at 5.0 cM). In nondiabetic individuals, the strongest results were observed on chromosomes 10 (acute insulin response: MLS = 3.11 at 21.0 cM), 13 (2-h insulin: MLS = 2.86 at 65.5 cM), and 17 (fasting insulin/glucose ratio: MLS = 3.20 at 9.0 cM). In several cases, there was evidence for overlapping signals between diabetic and nondiabetic individuals; therefore we performed joint analyses. In these joint analyses, we observed strong signals for chromosomes 3 (body-mass index: MLS = 3.43 at 59.5 cM), 17 (empirical insulin-resistance index: MLS = 3.61 at 0.0 cM), and 19 (empirical insulin-resistance index: MLS = 2.80 at 74.5 cM). Integrating genome-scan results from the companion article by Ghosh et al., we identify several regions that may harbor susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes in the Finnish population.