Image Exchange in the Middle East: a Survey.

Developing an enterprise approach to imaging technology rather than a radiology focus has recently increased. The communicator needs to be aware of this shift.The Middle East countries participated in the survey have confirmed the following major benefits of Medical Image Exchange: ✔ Fast access to both image and report ✔ Enable tele-services for second opinion, consulting and reporting ✔ Improve patient journey, workflow and diagnosis ✔ Allowed more patient engagement to be in place The Middle East countries that participated in this survey have agreed on the following shared challenges regarding Medical Imaging Exchange: ✔ Lack of enterprise imaging governance at the early stage of implementation. It will organize the who, when, and how. In addition, any fees and or payment involved for physicians ✔ Infrastructure availability to handle such large volume of data. Growing from mega-byte to petabyte per year is challenge for infrastructure. Cloud against On Premises-Installation implementation model ✔ Interoperability and integration to connect multi specialties from different systems. In addition, how far existing systems are ready for that. A standard-based framework is mature for image exchange, but what follows for other domains? There is a need to move beyond radiology images so as to include images from pathology, ophthalmology, and dermatology There are other countries in the region requiring guidance, support, and funding to move forward from the compact disc into internet-based interoperable image exchange. This should be considered part of the World Health Organization and the United Nation development to the region in the healthcare sector.

Interactive Multimedia Reporting Technical Considerations: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Despite technological advances in the analysis of digital images for medical consultations, many health information systems lack the ability to correlate textual descriptions of image findings linked to the actual images. Images and reports often reside in separate silos in the medical record throughout the process of image viewing, report authoring, and report consumption. Forward-thinking centers and early adopters have created interactive reports with multimedia elements and embedded hyperlinks in reports that connect the narrative text with the related source images and measurements. Most of these solutions rely on proprietary single-vendor systems for viewing and reporting in the absence of any encompassing industry standards to facilitate interoperability with the electronic health record (EHR) and other systems. International standards have enabled the digitization of image acquisition, storage, viewing, and structured reporting. These provide the foundation to discuss enhanced reporting. Lessons learned in the digital transformation of radiology and pathology can serve as a basis for interactive multimedia reporting (IMR) across image-centric medical specialties. This paper describes the standard-based infrastructure and communications to fulfill recently defined clinical requirements through a consensus from an international workgroup of multidisciplinary medical specialists, informaticists, and industry participants. These efforts have led toward the development of an Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) profile that will serve as a foundation for interoperable interactive multimedia reporting.

Multispecialty Enterprise Imaging Workgroup Consensus on Interactive Multimedia Reporting Current State and Road to the Future: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Diagnostic and evidential static image, video clip, and sound multimedia are captured during routine clinical care in cardiology, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, physiatry, radiation oncology, radiology, endoscopic procedural specialties, and other medical disciplines. Providers typically describe the multimedia findings in contemporaneous electronic health record clinical notes or associate a textual interpretative report. Visual communication aids commonly used to connect, synthesize, and supplement multimedia and descriptive text outside medicine remain technically challenging to integrate into patient care. Such beneficial interactive elements may include hyperlinks between text, multimedia elements, alphanumeric and geometric annotations, tables, graphs, timelines, diagrams, anatomic maps, and hyperlinks to external educational references that patients or provider consumers may find valuable. This HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community workgroup white paper outlines the current and desired clinical future state of interactive multimedia reporting (IMR). The workgroup adopted a consensus definition of IMR as "interactive medical documentation that combines clinical images, videos, sound, imaging metadata, and/or image annotations with text, typographic emphases, tables, graphs, event timelines, anatomic maps, hyperlinks, and/or educational resources to optimize communication between medical professionals, and between medical professionals and their patients." This white paper also serves as a precursor for future efforts toward solving technical issues impeding routine interactive multimedia report creation and ingestion into electronic health records.

Report of the HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Data Standards Evaluation Workgroup: Anatomic Ontology Assessment.

Previously, the lack of a standard body part ontology has been identified as a critical deficiency needed to enable enterprise imaging. This whitepaper aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of anatomical ontologies with the aim of facilitating enterprise imaging. It offers an overview of the process undertaken by the Health Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) and Society for Imaging Informatics in medicine (SIIM) Enterprise Imaging Community Data Standards Evaluation workgroup to assess the viability of existing ontologies for supporting cross-disciplinary medical imaging workflows. The report analyzes the responses received from representatives of three significant ontologies: SNOMED CT, LOINC, and ICD, and delves into their suitability for the complex landscape of enterprise imaging. It highlights the strengths and limitations of each ontology, ultimately concluding that SNOMED CT is the most viable solution for standardizing anatomy terminology across the medical imaging community.

Assessment of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) at three of ministry of health hospitals in Riyadh region - Content analysis.

BACKGROUND: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) are management information systems used for distributing, viewing and archiving digital images by integrating different types of modalities through communication networks. PACS have many advantages that can lead to improving health care quality. PACS has been widely used in hospitals in Saudi Arabia for the past 10 years. However, an extensive review of literature in the field of PACS, among physicians and radiologists in Saudi Arabia, showed lack of local studies of this costly and newly implemented technology. Therefore, this assessment is very important to provide an insightful study of PACS in Saudi Arabia to provide proper recommendations for the PACS projects implementation nationwide. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to, firstly, assess the perceived benefits of PACS among physicians and radiologists specifically in quality of care, secondly, assess the perceived challenges of PACS implementation and adoption inside and outside the radiology department, and thirdly, to compare between physicians' and radiologists' perceptions toward PACS. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study at three of Ministry of Health (MOH) Hospitals in the Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. The researchers used two separate surveys questionnaires, for administration to the physicians and radiologists at the three hospitals. Apart from the questionnaire, included is feedback as responses to open-ended questions. Content analysis was used to analyze the feedback under two themes: benefits or challenges. RESULTS: The response rate was 46% (84/183) physicians and 88% (15/17) radiologists have participated in this study. The result showed that 70% physicians' views affirms that PACS improved physicians' efficiency. On the other hand, all radiologists who responded affirmed that PACS improved efficiency. For questions on the ability to make decisions, 69% of views have affirmed that PACS improved physician's abilities to make decisions regarding patient care. Using PACS has led to a reduction in patients' length of stay in hospital (LOS) question, 79% of total views were positive. In contrast, only 18% of physicians talked about PACS positively in summary views and 82% talked about the challenges of PACS whereas 20% of radiologists talked about PACS positively. CONCLUSIONS: The results in the present study conclude that PACS was well perceived due to its numerous benefits among physicians and radiologists. However, radiologists showed more focus on the benefits of PACS than physicians. The main disadvantages are that PACS has resulted in difficulty in finding images, recurrent downtime and insufficient training.