Effect of Suture Length on the Incidence of Incisional Hernia and Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Midline Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The development of an incisional hernia is a common complication of midline laparotomy. Improper fascial closure techniques have a significant role in its development. It can also lead to poor wound healing and increase the risk of developing surgical site infections (SSI). Upon conducting a thorough literature review, various studies have been conducted on closing abdominal wounds. However, there is a dearth of studies portraying the role of suture length in the prevention of incisional hernia and SSI. The effect of using a greater suture-to-wound length ratio on postoperative outcomes was not clearly analyzed or described. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of using a suture length to wound length ratio ≥4:1 versus a ratio <4:1 in preventing postoperative complications such as incisional hernia and SSI. This study is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on abdominal wound closure using a suture length to wound length ratio of ≥4:1 and <4:1. published in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. The relevant studies identified from 1991 to 2017, were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernia, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of SSI. This meta-analysis considered five randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of using different suture length to wound length ratios during abdominal closure on incisional hernia and SSI. Participants ranged in size from 100 to 363. The trial follow-up period ranged from a minimum of 10 months to five years. The outcomes studied in the two groups were incisional hernia and SSI. The relative risk of the occurrence of incisional hernia if the suture length to wound length ratio was ≥4:1 was 0.42 with a p-value of <0.001 which was considered significant. This implied that using a suture length of more than four times that of the wound i.e., 4:1, significantly decreases the risk of developing an incisional hernia by more than half. The relative risk of developing a SSI was 0.98 with a p-value of 0.966. Thus, this method of abdominal closure uing a longer suture length to wound length ratio does not contribute to an increased incidence or significant change in the risk of developing SSI.

Serum Lipase Amylase Ratio as an Indicator to Differentiate Alcoholic From Non-alcoholic Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A lipase/amylase (L/A) ratio of more than three may be a tool for differentiating alcoholic pancreatitis from non-alcoholic pancreatitis. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify published studies. A thorough data search of various databases was conducted using keywords. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 survey. Data were extracted under the following headings: country, sample size, baseline characteristics, specificity, and sensitivity of the L/A ratio. Studies were analyzed using a bivariate random-effects model, and the sensitivity and specificity of the L/A ratio were pooled separately. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted using the hierarchical method. A total of nine studies with 1,825 patients were identified for inclusion. SROC showed estimates of the area under the curve to be 0.75 (confidence interval (CI) = 0.71-0.79). Forest plots for sensitivity and specificity showed pooled estimates of sensitivity to be 74% (95% CI = 62-83%) while that of specificity was 63% (95% CI = 47-77%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was estimated to be 5 (95% CI = 3-9), the pooled positive likelihood ratio was estimated at 2.0, and the pooled negative likelihood ratio was estimated to be 0.41. We concluded that an L/A ratio of more than 3 has moderate accuracy for the diagnosis of alcoholic pancreatitis.

Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topical mupirocin alone, in terms of healing rates. METHODS: This open-labeled randomized study was conducted on 108 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate and mupirocin combination, compared to topical mupirocin alone. The patients were administered the same parenteral antibiotic, and wounds were subjected to daily dressing. The healing rates (determined by the percentage reduction in wound area) in the two groups were calculated. The mean healing rates in both groups were expressed in percentage and compared using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The incidence of diabetic foot was the highest (50.9%) in the age group of 50-59 years. The mean age of the study population was 51 years. The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers was highest in the months of July-August (42%). A total of 71.2% patients had random blood sugar levels between 150-200 mg/dL, and 72.2% patients had diabetes for five to 10 years. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the healing rates in the sucralfate and mupirocin combination group and the control group were 16.2±7.3% and 14.5±6.6%, respectively. Comparison of the means by Student's t-test failed to show a statistical difference in healing rates between the two groups (p=0.201). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the addition of topical sucralfate does not show any obvious benefits in terms of healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers as compared to mupirocin alone.

Evaluation of Clinical and Venous Blood Parameters as Surrogate Indicators in Assessing the Need for Fasciotomy in Lower Limb Compartment Syndrome.

Acute compartment syndrome in the lower limb, a surgical emergency, may cause ischemic damage to muscles and neurological deficits leading to loss of function of the limb which may even require amputation, thus drastically affecting the quality of life of a patient. Fasciotomy for decompression is suggested when the differential pressure in the compartment of the leg is ≤30 mm Hg. However, compartment pressure measurement is not always feasible. Surgeons often find themselves in a dilemma in deciding the right treatment option for the patient: fasciotomy or conservative management. Since there is no universally accepted reference standard for the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome at present, there is a need for definitive diagnostic variables so as to not delay fasciotomy in patients who need it, as well as to avoid unnecessary fasciotomies, especially when compartment pressures cannot be measured. In this observational study including 71 patients, based on the compartment pressures of the affected limb, treatment was done either with fasciotomy or conservative approach, and various clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated in between these two groups. Statistically significant difference was found in the venous blood gas parameters between patients managed conservatively and with fasciotomy (MANOVA, P = .001). The results revealed the association of lower venous blood bicarbonate levels (independent sample t test, P = .021) and the presence of paresthesia (Fisher exact test, P = .0016) with the fasciotomy group. Also, pain on passive stretching of the affected limb was found to be significantly associated with a delta pressure of ≤30 mm Hg in any compartment (Fisher exact test, P = .002). These variables may thus be used as an alternative to the measurement of compartment pressure to assess the requirement of fasciotomy.

Comparative Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Topical Nifedipine and Diltiazem in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic anal fissure is a common condition which is classically treated by surgery which may lead to incontinence. Recently medical treatment in form of calcium channel blockers (CCB) has gained interest. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of local Nifedipine and Diltiazem with lignocaine as control. We also aimed to observe the clinical pattern of chronic anal fissure. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients of chronic anal fissure were divided into three groups. First group received topical Nifedipine, second received topical Diltiazem, and the control group received only local lignocaine for 1 month. Their clinical data was recorded. The intensity of pain and bleeding was assessed from a visual analogue score (VAS). On the 4th week patients were examined for healing. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was done by Medcalc statistical software v14. Student's t-test and Chi-square test was used accordingly. RESULTS: Mean age was 35.89 with a male female ratio of 1.7:1. Most common clinical feature was pain (100%), followed by constipation, bleeding, and pruritus. Most common location was posterior. VAS scores for pain of the Nifedipine group and Diltiazem group was significantly better than control group (P < 0.0001). VAS scores for bleeding in the Nifedipine group (P = 0.0091) and Diltiazem group (P = 0.0045) was significantly better than control group. The healing rate for NFD group was 93.33% (P < 0.0001), that of DTZ group was 86.67% (P = 0.0002), which was statistically better than control group (36.67%). There was no significant difference between the two CCBs. CONCLUSION: Adding topical Nifedipine or Diltiazem in the treatment of anal fissure is far superior to treatment with only topical Lignocaine.