[Correlation of back pain and magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in elite horse vaulters]. / Zusammenhang zwischen Rückenschmerzen und kernspintomografischen LWS-Befunden bei Hochleistungsvoltigierern.

INTRODUCTION: A connection between morphologic lesions of the spine and specific sport disciplines incorporating torsional and hyperextension forces has been found. Although vaulting incorporates a significant amount of figures known from gymnastics, little is known about the influence of this sport on the lower back. The aim of our study was to assess to what extent vaulters suffer from back pain and whether these symptoms correlate to findings in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine. METHODS: 20 high level vaulters ( [see text] age 21.95 [15 - 36] years) were included in the study. Using a standardised questionnaire biometric data, training intensity, localisation as well as intensity of back pain (VAS) was assessed. 12 of these vaulters agreed to an MRI scan of their lumbar spine. Scans were evaluated for morphologic changes using a semiquantative score and the results were correlated to clinical symptoms. RESULTS: 17 / 20 (85 %) reported of back pain of which 15 (75 %) had daily pain, the remaining 2 only occasionally. The average pain intensity on the visual analogue scale (VAS) was reported to be 3.76 +/- 0.53. The MRI scans revealed only slight degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. Statistical analysis of the data (Spearman's rank test) could not show a significant correlation between clinical symptoms and morphologic MRI-changes. CONCLUSION: Vaulters, compared to riders of other disciplines, seem to suffer from recurrent back pain to a greater extent. Despite the fact that the lumbar spine is confronted with repetitive torsional and hyperextension forces, vaulters do not show undue early degenerative changes or marked lesions of the lumbar spine. Recurrent back pain in the vaulter is most likely due to functional problems. It seems unlikely that is based on manifest morphologic changes of the lower back.

Is the body-coil at 3 Tesla feasible for the MRI evaluation of the painful knee? A comparative study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the in-built body coil of the 3.0-Tesla (T) scanner with a dedicated surface coil of a 1.5 T system regarding knee imaging. We performed an intraindividual prospective clinical trial on 17 patients with knee pain using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 and 3.0 T systems equipped with identical gradient systems. Proton-density-weighted turbo spin echo sequences with the same spatial resolution and comparable contrast parameters were used. A quantitative measurement of signal to noise ratio (SNR), relative contrast (RC) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and bone marrow was performed, followed by a qualitative assessment of anatomic/pathologic structures and the extent of artefacts. At 3.0 T, 30 lesions (91%) compared to 33 lesions at 1.5 T were detected. The SNR/CNR/RC were moderately reduced at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T (muscle 42 vs 47 and bone 83 vs 112/46 vs 69/0.33 vs 0.43). Motion artefacts from the pulsating popliteal artery were significantly increased at 3.0 T. A visible and measurable signal loss occurred at 3.0 T using the built-in body coil compared with the dedicated 1.5 T knee coil, but nearly all clinically important information could be obtained.

Clinical evaluation of a speed optimized T2 weighted fast spin echo sequence at 3.0 T using variable flip angle refocusing, half-Fourier acquisition and parallel imaging.

This paper aims to demonstrate the capabilities of a speed optimized T(2) weighted single-shot turbo spin echo sequence, using parallel imaging, variable flip angle refocusing and half-Fourier acquisition (FAS-TSE), in comparison with a standard TSE (sTSE) sequence in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). 33 patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS were prospectively examined on a 3.0 T MR system using FAS-TSE and a sTSE sequence. The FAS-TSE (scan time 11 s) and the sTSE (scan time 122 s) were compared regarding lesion detectability, lesion contrast, grey/white matter contrast, overall image quality and artefacts. Scanning parameters affecting image contrast and spatial resolution were kept identical. 208 lesions were detected using the sTSE sequence compared with 183 lesions (88%) using the FAS-TSE. The FAS-TSE was rated inferior regarding lesion contrast. The mean value/range/standard deviation of the lesion/white matter contrast were 0.26/0.06-0.49/0.089, respectively, with the sTSE vs 0.21/0.04-0.40/0.081 with the FAS-TSE. The FAS-TSE was rated inferior regarding overall image quality, but superior regarding motion artefacts. The grey/white matter contrast was qualitatively judged as comparable for both sequences. FAS-TSE provides sufficient T2-SE contrast and diagnostic image quality for whole brain studies in 11 s. It is suited to reduce motion artefacts in restless patients and for fast acquisition of additional scanning planes.