Continuous positive airway pressure treatment of sleepy patients with milder obstructive sleep apnea: results of the CPAP Apnea Trial North American Program (CATNAP) randomized clinical trial.

RATIONALE: Twenty-eight percent of people with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea experience daytime sleepiness, which interferes with daily functioning. It remains unclear whether treatment with continuous positive airway pressure improves daytime function in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure treatment to improve functional status in sleepy patients with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Patients with self-reported daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score >10) and an apnea-hypopnea index with 3% desaturation and from 5 to 30 events per hour were randomized to 8 weeks of active or sham continuous positive airway pressure treatment. After the 8-week intervention, participants in the sham arm received 8 weeks of active continuous positive airway pressure treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Total score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire was the primary outcome measure. The adjusted mean change in the Total score after the first 8-week intervention was 0.89 for the active group (n = 113) and -0.06 for the placebo group (n = 110) (P = 0.006). The group difference in mean change corresponded to an effect size of 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.67). The mean (SD) improvement in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire Total score from the beginning to the end of the crossover phase (n = 91) was 1.73 ± 2.50 (t[90] = 6.59; P < 0.00001) with an effect size of 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous positive airway pressure treatment improves the functional outcome of sleepy patients with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

Evaluation of sham-CPAP as a placebo in CPAP intervention studies.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of sham-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment as a placebo intervention. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of polysomnograms performed in fixed order without sham-CPAP and on the first night of the sham-CPAP intervention in participants in the CPAP Apnea Trial North American Program (CATNAP), a randomized, placebo controlled trial evaluating the effects of CPAP treatment on daytime function in adults with newly diagnosed mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (apnea hypopnea index (AHI) 5-30). PARTICIPANTS: The first 104 CATNAP participants randomized to the sham-CPAP intervention arm. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compared to the polysomnographic measures without sham-CPAP, the study on the first night with sham-CPAP had statistically significant differences that suggested a decrease in sleep quality: decreased sleep efficiency, increased arousal index, increased time in stage 1 NREM sleep, and prolonged latency to REM sleep. However, all of these differences had a relatively small effect size. Compared to the polysomnogram without sham-CPAP, the number of hypopneas on the sham-CPAP polysomnogram was significantly increased and the number of apneas significantly decreased. Relatively minor differences in AHI with and without sham-CPAP were present and were dependent on the criteria used to score hypopneas. CONCLUSION: Comparison of polysomnograms with and without sham-CPAP revealed differences that, although statistically significant, were small in magnitude and had relatively low effect sizes suggesting minimal clinical significance. The results support the use of sham-CPAP as a placebo intervention in trials evaluating the effects of CPAP treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: This paper was a secondary analysis of clinical trial data. CATNAP: CPAP Apnea Trial North American Program, the trial from which the data were obtained, is registered with clinicaltrial.gov. Registration #NCT00089752.

Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review.

We conducted an evidence-based review of literature regarding use of oral appliances (OAs) in the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) from 1995 until the present. Our structured search revealed 141 articles for systematic scrutiny, of which 87 were suitable for inclusion in the evidence base, including 15 Level I to II randomized controlled trials and 5 of these trials with placebo-controlled treatment. The efficacy of OAs was established for controlling OSA in some but not all patients with success (defined as no more than 10 apneas or hypopneas per hour of sleep) achieved in an average of 52% of treated patients. Effects on sleepiness and quality of life were also demonstrated, but improvements in other neurocognitive outcomes were not consistent. The mechanism of OA therapy is related to opening of the upper airway as demonstrated by imaging and physiologic monitoring. Treatment adherence is variable with patients reporting using the appliance a median of 77% of nights at 1 year. Minor adverse effects were frequent whereas major adverse effects were uncommon. Minor tooth movement and small changes in the occlusion developed in some patients after prolonged use, but the long-term dental significance of this is uncertain. In comparison to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), OAs are less efficacious in reducing the apnea hypopnea index (AHI), but OAs appear to be used more (at least by self report), and in many studies were preferred over CPAP when the treatments were compared. OAs have also been compared favorably to surgical modification of the upper airway (uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, UPPP). Comparisons between OAs of different designs have produced variable findings. The literature of OA therapy for OSA now provides better evidence for the efficacy of this treatment modality and considerable guidance regarding the frequency of adverse effects and the indications for use in comparison to CPAP and UPPP.

The role of oral appliance therapy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

The development of oral appliance treatment for OSA represents an important step in the management of this disease. Randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown them to be an effective treatment option for snoring and OSA in some patients, particularly patients with less severe OSA or simple snoring and patients who have failed other treatment modalities. Although oral appliances are not as effective as CPAP therapy, they work in most patients to relieve symptoms and apnea and are well tolerated by patients. Most patients report improvements in sleep quality and excessive daytime sleepiness. Short-term side effects are generally minor and are related to excessive salivation, jaw and tooth discomfort, and occasional joint discomfort. These symptoms may lead to discontinuation of appliance therapy but usually improve in most patients over time. Serious complications are not common, but occlusal changes are more common than previously believed.

Position paper by Canadian dental sleep medicine professionals on the role of different health care professionals in managing obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with oral appliances.

The present Canadian position paper contains recommendations for the management by dentists of sleep-disordered breathing in adults with the use of oral appliances (OAs) as a treatment option for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The recommendations are based on literature reviews and expert panel consensus. OAs offer an effective, first-line treatment option for patients with mild to moderate OSA who prefer an OA to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, or for severe OSA patients who cannot tolerate CPAP, are inappropriate candidates for CPAP or who have failed CPAP treatment attempts. The purpose of the present position paper is to guide interdisciplinary teamwork (sleep physicians and sleep dentists) and to clarify the role of each professional in the management of OA therapy. The diagnosis of OSA should always be made by a physician, and OAs should be fitted by a qualified dentist who is trained and experienced in dental sleep medicine. Follow-up assessment by the referring physician and polysomnography or sleep studies are required to verify treatment efficacy. The present article emphasizes the need for a team approach to OA therapy and provides treatment guidelines for dentists trained in dental sleep medicine. Many of the dentists and sleep physicians who contributed to the preparation of the present article are members of the Canadian Sleep Society and the authors reached a consensus based on the current literature.

Effect of a titration polysomnogram on treatment success with a mandibular repositioning appliance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) therapy is a treatment option for patients with mild to moderate sleep apnea and for patients who do not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure. Titration of MRAs consists of sequential mandibular advancement guided by symptom improvement. The goal of the study was to determine if patients with an elevated apnea hypopnea index (AHI), despite the use of a subjectively optimized MRA, could achieve better results with additional titration during polysomnography (PSG). METHODS: Patients were enrolled if they had an AHI > or = 15/h and were referred for MRA therapy. The MRAwas advanced until symptoms improved. During the PSG, the technologist monitored the patient's sleep and increased mandibular protrusion until the AHI was improved. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in AHI, minimum oxygen saturation, and total sleep time with the MRA before further advancement. At the final PSG, 65.2% of patients had an AHI < or = 10 associated with at least a 50% reduction in AHI. The incomplete responders had their appliance further titrated, and this improved the results of MRA therapy by 30.4% to a total success rate of 95.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that it is possible to improve the results of MRA therapy by further advancing the appliance during a titration PSG in patients with an incomplete response. The titration night improved the results of the usual clinical advancement of the MRA with substantially more patients achieving a successful outcome.

Physiologic pacing in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective, randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the impact of prevention of bradycardia with physiologic pacing on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. BACKGROUND: Apneic episodes during sleep are associated with slowing of the heart rate during apnea and tachycardia with subsequent arousal. Patients with permanent pacemakers may have reduced episodes of sleep apnea when their pacemaker rate is set faster than their spontaneous nocturnal heart rate. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover trial of temporary atrial pacing in obstructive sleep apnea to reduce the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Fifteen patients (age 60 +/- 13 years, 12 men) with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (AHI 34 +/- 14) underwent insertion of an externalized atrial permanent pacing system via the left subclavian vein. Patients underwent overnight respiratory sleep studies in hospital, during atrial pacing at 75 beats/min, and with pacing turned off. The order of pacing mode was randomized, with crossover the subsequent night to the other mode. Patients were blinded to pacing mode, and the analysis of sleep recordings was blind to pacing mode. RESULTS: Pacing was tolerated without complications in all patients. Overnight physiologic pacing did not affect the AHI (pacing 39 +/- 21/h vs. control 42 +/- 21/h, p = 0.23, 95% confidence interval -9.3 to 2.5 for difference), desaturation time (pacing 3.8 +/- 6.0% vs. control 3.5 +/- 4.3%, p = 0.70), or the minimum SaO(2) (pacing 75 +/- 10% vs. control 77 +/- 11%, p = 0.38). There was a borderline significant reduction in circulatory time with pacing (pacing 23.4 +/- 3.2 s vs. control 25.5 +/- 4.4 s, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary atrial pacing does not appear to improve respiratory manifestations of obstructive sleep apnea. Permanent atrial pacing in this patient population does not appear to be justified.

A randomized trial of laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty in the treatment of mild obstructive sleep apnea.

Laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP) is an outpatient surgical treatment for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but to date, no controlled trials have been published. Forty-five subjects with mild OSA (apnea/hypopnea index [AHI], 10-27 per hour) were randomized to LAUP or to no treatment (control group). The AHI post-LAUP was reduced by 21% overall and to 10 or less per hour in 5 of 21 subjects (24%). Four of 24 subjects in the control group (16.7%) had an AHI of 10 or less per hour at outcome. The AHI decreased with the LAUP compared with no change with the control group at outcome. Ten subjects (48%) reported significantly improved snoring after the LAUP. There was no improvement in excessive daytime sleepiness, but there was a small improvement in quality of life (unless side effects were included in the quality of life score). Side effects were common, but serious complications did not occur. LAUP surgery is effective in some subjects with mild OSA for the treatment of snoring, but the reduction in AHI and the level of symptomatic improvement were minor overall.

Heart rate variability in obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective study and frequency domain analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cyclic variation of the heart rate is observed during apneic spells in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesized that autonomic changes would affect frequency-domain measures of heart rate variability (HRV). METHODS: We studied 20 patients (15 men, 5 women, mean age 47.2 +/- 12.2 years) with suspected OSA undergoing overnight polysomnography, and five patients (4 men, 1 woman, mean age 49.2 +/- 8.6 years) with recently diagnosed sleep apnea undergoing polysomnography while wearing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Holter monitors were applied during sleep studies and data were analyzed in 5-minute blocks over the course of the night. Using spectral analysis, low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) powers were calculated for each interval. Overall mean and standard deviation (SD) for LF power, HF power, and the LF:HF ratio were recorded for each patient. Comparisons were made between patients with severe OSA (apnea hypopnea index (AHI) > 30, n = 8), moderate OSA (AHI 1-30, n = 5), without OSA (AHI < 10, n = 7), and patients wearing CPAP (n = 5). RESULTS: Assessment of overnight LF or HF power revealed no significant difference between the four groups. The LF:HF ratio, which represents sympathovagal balance, was higher among those with moderate disease compared to normals and those with severe OSA (both P = 0.037). The standard deviation of the LF:HF ratio was higher among those with moderate disease compared to normals (P = 0.0064) and those with severe OSA (P = 0.0006). OSA patients receiving CPAP behaved like patients with moderate OSA, with increased SD of the LF:HF ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The observed changes in the LF:HF ratio and its SD suggest an increased sympathetic tone and discordance in sympathovagal activity in moderate OSA, which is blunted in severe OSA. CPAP may restore autonomic defects, characteristic of severe OSA, to moderate levels.