Cleft closure (the Bascom cleft lift) for 714 patients-treatment of choice for complex and recurrent pilonidal disease (a cohort study).

AIM: Pilonidal disease is a benign condition that affects mainly the young. In existing literature, there is no consensus for best treatment, with multiple operative techniques described, some complex, resulting in a high proportion of failure and/or morbidity. The cleft closure (or cleft lift) described by Bascom and Bascom (Arch Surg, 137, 2002, 1146-50), by comparison, is a simple operation, resulting in healing in the majority and good cosmesis. METHOD: This is a single surgeon series, with the aim of evaluating outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent cleft closure surgery at two centres (St Mark's Hospital, London, and Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth) between 1995 and 2021 for either extensive, complex or recurrent pilonidal disease. Primary study outcomes that were measured included rate of primary healing, time to complete healing and rate of recurrence. RESULTS: Some 714 patients had a cleft closure of whom 656 had documented follow-up. Primary healing occurred in 60.7% (n = 398) rising to 88.5% by 12 weeks (n = 562) and 91.8% by 16 weeks. The remaining patients healed over the following weeks with only 19 wounds failing to heal completely (3%), requiring further surgery to achieve healing. After complete healing 5.3% of patients developed recurrent disease at a median of 12 months. CONCLUSION: Cleft closure is an effective operation for pilonidal disease. Overall, 97% of patients healed without further surgery. A 3% failure rate and 5.3% recurrence rate were observed. This technique could be considered as an alternative procedure to complex flaps or midline excision, in extensive, recurrent and unhealed pilonidal disease.

Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancers has traditionally been an open procedure. Surgical adoption of minimal access CME remains limited due to the technical challenges, training gaps and lack of level-1 data for proven benefits. Currently there is limited published data regarding the clinical results with the use of robotic CME surgery. Aim To report our experience, results and techniques, highlighting a clinical and oncological results and midterm oncological outcomes for robotic CME. AIM: To report our experience, results and techniques, highlighting a clinical and oncological results and midterm oncological outcomes for robotic CME. METHODS: All patients undergoing standardised robotic CME technique with SMV first approach between January 2015 and September 2019 were included in this retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Patient demographics, operative data and clinical and oncological outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven robotic CME resections for right colonic cancers were performed over a 4-year period. Median operative time was 180 (128-454) min and perioperative blood loss was 10 (10-50) ml. There were 25 patients who had previous abdominal surgery. Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (3-18) days. There was no conversion to open surgery in this series. Median lymph node count was 30 (10-60). Three (4%) patients had R1 resection. There was one (1%) local recurrence in stage III disease and 4(5%) distal recurrence in stage II and stage III. There was no 30- or 90-day mortality. Three-year disease-free survival was 100%, 91.7% and 92% for stages I, II and III, respectively. Overall survival was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic CME is feasible, effective and safe. Good oncological results and improved survival are seen in this cohort of patients with a standardised approach to robotic CME.

Whole-colon investigation vs. flexible sigmoidoscopy for suspected colorectal cancer based on presenting symptoms and signs: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) usually undergo colonoscopy. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) may be preferred if proximal cancer risk is low. We investigated which patients could undergo FS alone. METHODS: Cohort study of 7375 patients (≥55 years) referred with suspected CRC to 21 English hospitals (2004-2007), followed using hospital records and cancer registries. We calculated yields and number of needed whole-colon examinations (NNE) to diagnose one cancer by symptoms/signs and subsite. We considered narrow (haemoglobin <11 g/dL men; <10 g/dL women) and broad (<13 g/dL men; <12 g/dL women) anaemia definitions and iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven proximal and 429 distal CRCs were diagnosed. A broad anaemia definition identified 80% of proximal cancers; a narrow definition with IDA identified 39%. In patients with broad definition anaemia and/or abdominal mass, proximal cancer yield and NNE were 4.8% (97/2022) and 21. In patients without broad definition anaemia and/or abdominal mass, with rectal bleeding or increased stool frequency (41% of cohort), proximal cancer yield and NNE were 0.4% (13/3031) and 234. CONCLUSION: Most proximal cancers are accompanied by broad definition anaemia. In patients without broad definition anaemia and/or abdominal mass, with rectal bleeding or increased stool frequency, proximal cancer is rare and FS should suffice.

A positive proximal resection margin is associated with anastomotic complications following primary ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease.

PURPOSES: Bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) has a high reported rate of postoperative complications and surgical recurrence. A macroscopically normal resection margin is recommended in CD surgery as wider margins do not translate in reduced recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between resection margin status and anastomotic complications following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. METHODS: All patients treated with ileocaecal resection for primary CD from 2010 to 2018 were included in this retrospective observational study. Emergency operations and recurrent CD were excluded. Patients in whom an anastomosis was not fashioned at the time of the surgery were also excluded. Histopathology data collected included macroscopic description, presence of macroscopic and microscopic involvement of the proximal and distal resection margins. The primary outcome was the rate of positive resection margin in patients who developed anastomotic complications (anastomotic leaks and intra-abdominal collections), and the secondary outcomes were overall complications rate, length of hospital stay, reoperations and rehospitalisation within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included. The proximal resection margin was microscopically involved in 19 patients (18.2%). Ten patients (9.6%) developed intra-abdominal anastomotic related complications, with 5 patients out of 10 (50%) in the group of postoperative anastomotic complications having a positive microscopic proximal margin at histology, compared to 14 patients (14.9%) in the group that did not develop anastomotic complications (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic involvement of the proximal resection margin is more frequent in patients who develop postoperative anastomotic complications following elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD.

High risk of septic complications following surgery for Crohn's disease in patients with preoperative anaemia, hypoalbuminemia and high CRP.

AIM: Bowel resection in Crohn's disease still has a high rate of complications due to risk factors including immune suppression, malnutrition and active inflammation or infection at the time of operating. In this study, we use serological levels and inflammatory markers to predict the potential of complications in patients undergoing resections for complicated Crohn's disease. METHODS: All patients undergoing laparoscopic bowel resection for Crohn's disease from 5th of November 2012 to 11th of October 2017 were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients were divided into 4 groups scoring 0, 1, 2 or 3 depending on their pre-operative haemoglobin concentration (Hb), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin (Alb) where 1 point was given for an abnormal value in each as detailed in the definitions. They were then grouped into a low risk group comprised of those scoring 0 and 1, and a high risk group for those scoring 2 and 3 and data was collected to compare outcomes and the incidence of septic complications. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. Eleven (13.9%) and 2 (2.5%) patients had 2 or 3 abnormal values of CRP, Alb and Hb and were categorized as high risk. High risk patients had a significantly higher rate of post-operative septic complications (30.7%) compared with low risk patients (10.6%) p value < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative CRP, haemoglobin and albumin can serve as predictors of septic complications after surgery for Crohn's disease and can therefore be used to guide pre-operative optimisation and clinical decision-making.

Laparoscopic surgical treatment of ileocecal Crohn's disease: Impact of obesity on short term results. / Cirugía laparoscópica en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Crohn del área ileocecal: impacto de la obesidad en los resultados postoperatorios inmediatos.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to analyse the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for a no medical responding ileocolic Cohn's disease in a single centre according to the presence of obesity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease from November 2006 to November 2015. Patients were divided according to body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 in order to study influence of obesity in the short-term outcomes. The following variables were studied: characteristics of patients, surgical technique and postoperative results (complications, reintervention, readmission and mortality) during first 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included (42 males) with a mean age of 39.7±15.2 years (range 18-83). The overall complication rate was 20% and only 3 patients had an anastomotic leak. Seven patients needed reoperation in the first 30 days postop (7%). The median postoperative length of hospitalization was 5.0 days. Operative time was significantly longer in patients with obesity (130 vs. 165minutes, P=.007) but there were no significant differences among the postoperative results in patients with and without obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that laparoscopic approach for ileocecal Cohn's disease is a safety and feasible technique in patients with obesity. In this last group of patients we only have to expect a longer operative time.

Predictive factors for extraction site hernia after laparoscopic right colectomy.

PURPOSE: Incisional hernia at the extraction site (ESIH) is a common complication after laparoscopic colorectal resections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and potential risk factors for ESIH in a large cohort study having standardized technique. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed including all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic right or extended right colectomy for cancer from November 2006 to October 2013 using a standard technique. All patients have been followed up for a minimum of 1 year with abdominal CT scan. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were included with a median follow-up of 42 months. Twenty patients (6.8 %) developed ESIH. Obesity (odds ratio (OR) = 3.76, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.39-10.15; p = 0.009) and incision length (OR 2.86, 95 % CI 1.077-7.60; p = 0.035) significantly predisposed to the development of ESIH. CONCLUSION: This study identified that the risk of ESIH is significant after colonic resections and there are several risk factors responsible for the development of ESIH.

Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the short- and intermediate-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancer. METHODS: Elective open and laparoscopic APRs were identified in a prospective database and were 1:1 propensity score-matched for age, ASA grade, tumour stage and type of neoadjuvant therapy. The short- and intermediate-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: From January 2003 until June 2013, a total of 135 APRs (87 open, 48 laparoscopic) were identified and matched (n = 96, standardised mean difference of covariates <0.25). The thirty-day mortality, R0 rate, lymph nodes harvested and reoperations were similar. The length of the hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group [10 versus 14 days, p = 0.004 (Mann-Whitney U test), Bonferroni-corrected significance level = 0.0083]. The median follow-up was 4.6 (IQR: 2.0-6.0) years. The overall and recurrence-free 3-year survival rate estimates (Kaplan-Meier method; 95 % CI in brackets) were 71 % (59-86) and 57 % (44-73) in the open group versus 78 % (66-92) and 72 % (60-87) in the laparoscopic group, respectively [p = 0.167 and p = 0.186 (log-rank test), respectively]. The 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 27 % (15-40) in the open group and 16 % (8-29) in the laparoscopic group [p = 0.359 (Gray's test)]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to open APR, laparoscopic APR provided a shorter length of hospital stay while showing no intermediate-term differences in the survival or cumulative incidence of recurrence.

Urogenital function following laparoscopic and open rectal cancer resection: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Sexual and urinary dysfunction is an established risk after pelvic surgery. Studies examining sexual and urinary function following laparoscopic and open rectal surgery give conflicting evidence for outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of the surgical technique on functional outcomes following laparoscopic or open resection for rectal cancer patients in a high-volume laparoscopic unit. METHODS: All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer between September 2006 and September 2009 were identified from a prospectively collated database. Validated standardized postal questionnaires were sent to surviving patients to assess their postoperative sexual and urinary function. The functional data were then quantified using previously validated indices of function. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were identified from the database, of whom 144 (83 %) responded to the questionnaire-based study. Seventy-eight respondents had undergone laparoscopic rectal resection (49 men and 29 women), and 65 had an open procedure (41 men and 24 women). Both open surgery and laparoscopic surgery were associated with deterioration in urinary and sexual function. With regard to urinary function, there was no difference in the deterioration in open and laparoscopic groups in either gender. With regard to sexual function, in males one component of sexual function, namely, the incidence of successful penetration, showed less deterioration in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.04). However, in females, laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly better outcomes in all aspects of sexual activity, specifically sexual arousal (p = 0.005), lubrication (p = 0.001), orgasm (p = 0.04), and the incidence of dyspareunia (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with significantly less deterioration in sexual function compared with open surgery. This effect is particularly pronounced in women.

Impact of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery on training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees.

BACKGROUND: There is growing concern that the recently introduced National Training Programme for consultants in laparoscopic colorectal surgery will have a negative impact on the training of senior colorectal trainees by minimizing the opportunities available. This study aimed to determine the impact that local implementation of the National Training Programme has had on the operating experience of senior colorectal trainees. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at a designated national training center for laparoscopic colorectal surgery based in a large district general hospital in England, United Kingdom. All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our unit between October 2006-September 2008 and October 2008-September 2010 were included in the study. The study variables included number and type of procedure, patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, body mass index, conversion rates, previous abdominal surgery, and median operating time. The main outcome measure was the number of procedures performed by senior colorectal trainees before and after commencement of National Training Programme training in October 2008. RESULTS: A total of 746 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed. Senior colorectal trainees performed 175 cases before commencement of the National Training Programme and 184 cases afterward. The difference was not significant. National Training Programme consultants performed 126 cases. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. The study groups were found to be well matched. The median operating time was significantly longer after commencement of the National Training Programme. The study was limited in terms of ability to extrapolate results to smaller units wishing to participate in training programs. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the National Training Programme in our hospital has not had a negative impact on the training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees. However, any unit wishing to participate in the National Training Programme must ensure that an adequate operative caseload and extra resources for operative lists are available for training.

Data analytics and artificial intelligence in predicting length of stay, readmission, and mortality: a population-based study of surgical management of colorectal cancer.

Data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) have been used to predict patient outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. A prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database was used, covering 4336 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between 2003 and 2019. The 47 patient parameters included demographics, peri- and post-operative outcomes, surgical approaches, complications, and mortality. Data analytics were used to compare the importance of each variable and AI prediction models were built for length of stay (LOS), readmission, and mortality. Accuracies of at least 80% have been achieved. The significant predictors of LOS were age, ASA grade, operative time, presence or absence of a stoma, robotic or laparoscopic approach to surgery, and complications. The model with support vector regression (SVR) algorithms predicted the LOS with an accuracy of 83% and mean absolute error (MAE) of 9.69 days. The significant predictors of readmission were age, laparoscopic procedure, stoma performed, preoperative nodal (N) stage, operation time, operation mode, previous surgery type, LOS, and the specific procedure. A BI-LSTM model predicted readmission with 87.5% accuracy, 84% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. The significant predictors of mortality were age, ASA grade, BMI, the formation of a stoma, preoperative TNM staging, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, curative resection, and LOS. Classification predictive modelling predicted three different colorectal cancer mortality measures (overall mortality, and 31- and 91-days mortality) with 80-96% accuracy, 84-93% sensitivity, and 75-100% specificity. A model using all variables performed only slightly better than one that used just the most significant ones.

Changing patterns of multidisciplinary team treatment, early mortality, and survival in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study reports early mortality and survival from colorectal cancer in relation to the pattern of treatments delivered by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting at a high-volume institution in England over 14 years. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and discussed during MDT meetings from 2003 to 2016 at a single institution were reviewed. Three time intervals (2003-2007, 2008-2012, and 2013-2016) were compared regarding initial surgical management (resection, local excision, non-resection surgery, and no surgery), initial oncological therapy, 90-day mortality, and crude 2-year survival for the whole cohort. Sub-analyses were performed according to age greater or less than 80 years. RESULTS: The MDT managed 4617 patients over 14 years (1496 in the first interval and 1389 in the last). Over this time, there was a reduction in emergency resections from 15.5 per cent to 9.0 per cent (P < 0.0001); use of oncological therapies increased from 34.6 per cent to 41.6 per cent (P < 0.0001). The 90-day mortality after diagnosis of colorectal cancer dropped from 14.8 per cent to 10.7 per cent (P < 0.001) and 2-year survival improved from 58.6 per cent to 65 per cent (P < 0.001). Among patients aged 80 years or older (425 and 446, in the first and last intervals respectively) there was, in addition, a progressive increase in 'no surgery' rate from 33.6 per cent to 50.2 per cent (P < 0.0001) and a reduction in elective resections from 42.4 per cent to 33.9 per cent (P = 0.010). The 90-day mortality after elective resection fell from 10.0 per cent (18 of 180) to 3.3 per cent (5 of 151; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Survival from colorectal cancer improved significantly over 14 years. Among patients aged ≥80 years, major changes in the type of treatment delivered were associated with a decrease in postoperative mortality.

Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly proposed as the gold standard technique for colorectal resections and is offered to greater numbers of patients. To meet the rising service demands, more trainees and established consultants need to learn the technique. We sought to establish whether it is feasible and safe to train on a large proportion of patients without adversely affecting clinical outcome or smooth running of clinical service. METHODS: Between September 2006 and July 2008, four senior trainees of the Wessex Specialist Registrar training rotation were involved in training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Major colorectal resections were separated into clearly defined modules for training purposes. Right and left hemicolectomies each comprised two modules, and low anterior resection comprised three modules. Prospective data on consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were collected. Data included type of surgery, module of procedure performed by trainee or trainer, body mass index (BMI), conversion rates, median operative time, complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period 227 colorectal resections were attempted laparoscopically. Of these, 216 (96%) proved suitable for training and 97% were completed laparoscopically. Some 23% of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA)≥3; 35% had a BMI≥28; 38% had a history of previous laparotomy. Trainees performed 96% (142/148) of right hemicolectomy modules, 99% (154/156) of left hemicolectomy modules, and 67% (128/192) of rectal resection modules. Each trainee was competent to do right and left hemicolectomy at the end of the training period. Four patients (2%) required further surgery for postoperative complications. Of the procedures completed by the trainees, 155/171 (91%) cancer resections were potentially surgically curative, and R0 resections were achieved in 99%. The readmission rate was 10% (22/216) and median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Postoperative mortality was zero. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modular approach it is possible to provide effective training during almost all laparoscopic colorectal resections while achieving good clinical outcomes for the patients.

A Case Series of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction and Systematic Literature Review.

Background Minimal access surgery is associated with improved cosmetic and other short-term outcomes. Conventionally, an abdominal incision is made for specimen extraction. We assessed the feasibility of specimen extraction through one of the natural orifices and analyzed its impact on short-term outcomes. Methods A prospectively collected data were reviewed on consecutive patients who underwent natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The results were compared with a matched group who had transabdominal extraction (TAE) of the specimens. A systematic literature review was performed to compare our results. Results The combined median operating time for right and left colectomies was significantly higher in the NOSE group as compared with TAE group (260 vs. 150). There was no mortality in either group and no conversions to TAE in the NOSE group. No local metastasis or major iatrogenic injuries were reported at the time of retrieval. The results were comparable to those of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Conclusion The results of NOSE are comparable to those of TAEs. The absence of a minilaparotomy for specimen extraction may lead to a speedy recovery and better cosmesis.

Sphincter preservation in patients with low rectal cancer: striking the right oncological balance.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment options for low rectal cancer patients include the Abdominoperineal Resection and the sphincter saving Low Anterior Resection. There is growing evidence towards better outcomes for patients being treated with a Low Anterior Resection compared to an Abdominoperineal Resection. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short term and oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer treatment. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Rectal cancer patients from a single center in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS: Patients included all low rectal cancer patients (≤ 6 cm from the anal verge) undergoing Low Anterior Resection or Abdominoperineal Resection between 2006 and 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: To identify differences in postoperative complications and disease free and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included for analysis (Low Anterior Resection n = 170, Abdominoperineal Resection n = 92). Abdominoperineal Resection patients were significantly older (69 versus 66 years), had lower tumours (3 versus 5 cm), received more neo-adjuvant radiation, had longer hospital stay and more complications (wound infections and wound dehiscence). Low Anterior Resections had a significantly higher number of harvested lymph nodes (17 versus 12) however there was no difference in nodal involvement and R0 resection rate. No significant difference was found for recurrence, overall survival and disease free survival. LIMITATION: Retrospective review of cancer database and single center data. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of low rectal cancer Abdominoperineal Resection is associated with higher rates of postoperative complications and longer hospital stay compared to the Low Anterior Resection, with similar oncological outcomes.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The excellent outcomes reported for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in selected patients could also be potentially advantageous for high risk patients. This prospective study was designed to examine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection in high risk patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer were stratified into high and low risk groups. High risk was defined as >or=80 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists >or=3, preoperative radiotherapy, T4 tumor and BMI >or=30. Outcomes included median length of stay, lymph node yield, resection margins, 30-day hospital readmission, postoperative mortality and major postoperative complications requiring reoperation within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 424 patients underwent elective laparoscopic (224) and open (200) resections. Overall mortality rate for laparoscopic resection was 1 of 224 (0.4%) versus 4 of 200 (2%) for open resection. Median length of stay was 4 (2-33) versus 10 (1-69) days (P < 0.0001), and rate of complications requiring reoperation was 2 of 224 (0.8%) compared with 10 of 200 (5%) (P = 0.02).Among the 280 (66%) "high risk" patients, 146 had laparoscopic resection (8 conversions; 5%) and 134 had open resections. Median hospital stay was 4 (2-33) days in the laparoscopic group versus 11 (1-69) days in the open group (P < 0.0001). Complications requiring reoperation were 2 of 146 (1.4%) after laparoscopic resection versus 7 of 134 (5.2%) after open resection (P < 0.09). Readmission rate after laparoscopic resection was 12.3% versus 5.2% after open resection (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer can achieve excellent results even in "high risk" patients and is associated with significant reductions in length of stay compared with open resection.

Increased Postoperative Use of Computed Tomography Following Emergency Surgery for Ileocaecal Crohn Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple imaging modalities are often required for the relapsing nature of Crohn disease (CD). Computed tomography (CT) offers a rapid acquisition of images and shows high specificity and sensitivity. However, CT imaging exposes to a higher dose of ionizing radiation than other abdominal imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to compare the use of preoperative and postoperative CT scan in patients undergoing emergency and elective surgery for CD. METHODS: All patients undergoing emergency and elective surgery for ileocaecal CD January 2014 to December 2018 were included in this prospective observational study. The study objective was to evaluate the frequency of use of CT scan perioperatively with the number and findings of preoperative and postoperative CT being the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes were operating time, length of hospital stay, reoperations, and rehospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included, 33 in the emergency group (43%) and 44 in the elective group (57%). There was a higher use of preoperative CT scan in the emergency surgery group, with 14 patients (42%) having a CT scan before surgery compared with 2 (5%) in the elective group (P=0.14). Thirteen patients (39.4%) had a postoperative CT scan in the emergency surgery group, compared with 10 patients (23.8%) in the elective surgery group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing emergency surgery for CD are at increased risk of exposure to ionizing radiations due to high perioperative use of CT scan.

The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TME) remains technically challenging due to poor maneuverability within the pelvis, which makes extremely difficult to introduce a laparoscopic stapler (LS) for the rectal transection. We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic TME after the use of robotic stapler (RS) or LS after robotic TME. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Database. Participants who underwent robotic anterior resection were considered following these criteria: (1) studies comparing RS and LS; (2) studies reporting the rate of anastomotic leakage (AL). The primary outcome was the risk of AL. Secondary outcomes included the number of firings of stapler needed. A meta-analysis based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement was performed. A total of 4 studies including 391 patients (LS = 251, RS = 140) were included for analysis. Regarding the number of firings, overall results suggest that the rectal stapling was achieved with less firings in the RS group, but the difference is not significant [risk difference, (95% CI) 0.42 (- 0.13, 0.97)]. There was a 56% increased odds of AL for LS compared with RS; however, this was not statistically significant (OR: 1.56; 95% CI 0.59, 4.14). With the current literature evidence, the present study could not demonstrate a clear benefit of the RS over the LS. Although the development of an AL is multifactorial and unpredictable, our data may suggest that the use of the RS could help reducing the risk of AL. There is a need of future randomized clinical trial to assess the possible benefits of the RS.

Stepwise Training in Laparoscopic Surgery for Complex Ileocolonic Crohn's Disease: Analysis of 127 Training Episodes.

INTRODUCTION: The inflammation encountered in Crohn's disease makes a minimally invasive approach challenging due to a thickened mesentery, fistulas, abscesses, and large phlegmons with high reported rates of conversion and septic complications. Aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a stepwise approach to training in laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohn's disease. METHODS: Every surgical procedure was divided in 4 different training tasks: access and exposure, bowel mobilization, division of the mesentery, anastomosis. Extensive adhesiolysis and division and repair of fistulae were considered as additional tasks when present. The laparoscopic competence assessment tool was used to evaluate the safety and proficiency of the surgical performance. The primary outcome was the rate of training tasks successfully completed by surgical trainees. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty seven training episodes were included and 86 were performed by trainees (67.7%). Fistula division was the less commonly performed training task (25%), while mobilisation and anastomosis were performed by the supervised trainee in 90% and 85% of the cases. Safety and proficiency scores were significantly higher for senior trainees compared to junior trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohn's disease can be safely performed in a supervised setting with acceptable operating time, postoperative length of hospital stay, and 30 day morbidity.

Is whole-colon investigation by colonoscopy, computerised tomography colonography or barium enema necessary for all patients with colorectal cancer symptoms, and for which patients would flexible sigmoidoscopy suffice? A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: For patients referred to hospital with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC), it is current standard clinical practice to conduct an examination of the whole colon and rectum. However, studies have shown that an examination of the distal colorectum using flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) can be a safe and clinically effective investigation for some patients. These findings require validation in a multicentre study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the links between patient symptoms at presentation and CRC risk by subsite, and to provide evidence of whether or not FS is an effective alternative to whole-colon investigation (WCI) in patients whose symptoms do not suggest proximal or obstructive disease. DESIGN: A multicentre retrospective study using data collected prospectively from two randomised controlled trials. Additional data were collected from trial diagnostic procedure reports and hospital records. CRC diagnoses within 3 years of referral were sourced from hospital records and national cancer registries via the Health and Social Care Information Centre. SETTING: Participants were recruited to the two randomised controlled trials from 21 NHS hospitals in England between 2004 and 2007. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged ≥ 55 years referred to secondary care for the investigation of symptoms suggestive of CRC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnostic yield of CRC at distal (to the splenic flexure) and proximal subsites by symptoms/clinical signs at presentation. RESULTS: The data set for analysis comprised 7380 patients, of whom 59% were women (median age 69 years, interquartile range 62-76 years). Change in bowel habit (CIBH) was the most frequently presenting symptom (73%), followed by rectal bleeding (38%) and abdominal pain (29%); 26% of patients had anaemia. CRC was diagnosed in 551 patients (7.5%): 424 (77%) patients with distal CRC, 122 (22%) patients with cancer proximal to the descending colon and five patients with both proximal and distal CRC. Proximal cancer was diagnosed in 96 out of 2021 (4.8%) patients with anaemia and/or an abdominal mass. The yield of proximal cancer in patients without anaemia or an abdominal mass who presented with rectal bleeding with or without a CIBH or with a CIBH to looser and/or more frequent stools as a single symptom was low (0.5%). These low-risk groups for proximal cancer accounted for 41% (3032/7380) of the cohort; only three proximal cancers were diagnosed in 814 low-risk patients examined by FS (diagnostic yield 0.4%). LIMITATIONS: A limitation to this study is that changes to practice since the trial ended, such as new referral guidelines and improvements in endoscopy quality, potentially weaken the generalisability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom profiles can be used to determine whether or not WCI is necessary. Most proximal cancers were diagnosed in patients who presented with anaemia and/or an abdominal mass. In patients without anaemia or an abdominal mass, proximal cancer diagnoses were rare in those with rectal bleeding with or without a CIBH or with a CIBH to looser and/or more frequent stools as a single symptom. FS alone should be a safe and clinically effective investigation in these patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis of symptom-based tailoring of diagnostic investigations for CRC is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95152621. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 66. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.