Views of breast and colorectal cancer survivors on their routine follow-up care.

OBJECTIVE: Our understanding of optimum health care delivery for cancer survivors is limited by the lack of a patient-centred perspective. The objectives of the present study were to explore the views of breast and colorectal cancer survivors on their routine follow-up care, with respect to needs, preferences, and quality of follow-up, and their views on cancer specialist- compared with family physician (fp)-led follow-up care. METHODS: In Nova Scotia, Canada, 23 cancer survivors (13 breast, 10 colorectal) participated in either a focus group or a one-on-one interview. Participants were asked to reflect upon their lives as cancer survivors and on the type and quality of care and support they received during the follow-up period. Each focus group or interview was transcribed verbatim, and the transcripts were audited and subjected to a thematic analysis. RESULTS: SIX THEMES WERE IDENTIFIED: My care is my responsibilityHow I receive information on follow-up careI have many care needsI want to be prepared and informedThe role of my fp in my cancer experience and follow-up careThe role of media Survivors often characterized the post-primary treatment experience as lacking in information and preparation for follow-up and providing inadequate support to address many of the care needs prevalent in survivor populations. Despite valuing fp participation in follow-up care, many survivors continued to receive comfort and reassurance from specialist care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to the need to implement strategies that better prepare breast cancer and colorectal cancer survivors for post-treatment care and that reassure survivors of the ability of their fp to provide quality care during this period.

The role of scientific evidence in decisions to adopt complex innovations in cancer care settings: a multiple case study in Nova Scotia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Health care delivery and outcomes can be improved by using innovations (i.e., new ideas, technologies, and practices) supported by scientific evidence. However, scientific evidence may not be the foremost factor in adoption decisions and is rarely sufficient. The objective of this study was to examine the role of scientific evidence in decisions to adopt complex innovations in cancer care. METHODS: Using an explanatory, multiple case study design, we examined the adoption of complex innovations in five purposively sampled cases in Nova Scotia, Canada. Data were collected via documents and key informant interviews. Data analysis involved an in-depth analysis of each case, followed by a cross-case analysis to develop theoretically informed, generalizable knowledge on the role of scientific evidence in innovation adoption that may be applied to similar settings and contexts. RESULTS: The analyses identified key concepts alongside important caveats and considerations. Key concepts were (1) scientific evidence underpinned the adoption process, (2) evidence from multiple sources informed decision-making, (3) decision-makers considered three key issues when making decisions, and (4) champions were essential to eventual adoption. Caveats and considerations related to the presence of urgent problems and short-term financial pressures and minimizing risk. CONCLUSIONS: The findings revealed the different types of issues decision-makers consider while making these decisions and why different sources of evidence are needed in these processes. Future research should examine how different types of evidence are legitimized and why some types are prioritized over others.

Once weekly irradiation for carcinoma of the bladder.

PURPOSE: A dose-searching study was carried out treating selected elderly patients or patients with poor performance with bladder cancer with once weekly fractionation to determine an effective dose per fraction, and to evaluate acute and late effects resulting from this schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were entered in the study. The dose used was 36-39 Gy in six fractions over 35 days in 27 patients (Group 1). The remaining 43 patients were treated with 34.5 Gy in six fractions over 39 days (Group 2). RESULTS: Six patients developed Grade 1-2 European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) bowel reaction. Three patients in Group 1 developed Grade 3 late bowel reaction and a fourth patient developed Grade 4 reaction requiring colostomy. However, only one patient in Group 2 developed Grade 3 reaction. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (chi 2 = 3.794, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The acute and late reaction as well as the 5-year free survival for patients in Group 2 compare favorably with daily treatment. We conclude that 34.5 Gy given over 39 days is a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with bladder cancer.

A comparison of doxorubicin, epirubicin and mitozantrone as single agents in advanced breast carcinoma.

Between July 1985 and December 1987, 87 patients with advanced breast carcinoma were randomized to receive single agent doxorubicin (70 mg/m2), epirubicin (70 mg/m2) or mitozantrone (14 mg/m2) at 3-weekly intervals. The patients had received no previous chemotherapy for their advanced disease but 91% had received prior hormonal therapy. The response rates were 36% with doxorubicin, 32% with epirubicin and 26% with mitozantrone, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. The median survival of all patients was 8.3 months. There was no significant difference in response rates or survival according to menopausal status. The toxicities of the three agents are compared. Nausea, vomiting and alopecia were more severe in patients treated with doxorubicin or epirubicin than those treated with mitozantrone. Myelosuppression and infective episodes occurred more frequently with mitozantrone. Two cardiac complications were reported. This study shows that the toxicity and low efficacy of all three agents limit their use as single agents in advanced breast carcinoma. The role of single agent chemotherapy and the relative toxicities of these drugs are discussed.

Systemic irradiation in multiple myeloma: a report on nineteen cases.

Nineteen patients with relapsed or resistant multiple myeloma were treated with sequential half-body irradiation (12) and half-body irradiation only (seven). This treatment proved acceptable to the majority of patients and required one night's stay in hospital. Gastro-intestinal toxicity was transient and self limiting. Haematological toxicity was acceptable and recovery was complete in all but two of the 19 patients following half-body irradiation. However, only six of the 12 patients who subsequently had the remaining half irradiated completely recovered. Blood transfusions were required to correct anaemia in six patients, a platelet transfusion was given to one and a further patient required both platelet and blood transfusions. We observed no serious haematological complications. Six of the 13 patients who received upper half-body irradiation of probable chest infection, while one patient of the six who received lower half-body irradiation died of this complication. Some of the seven deaths may have been due to radiation pneumonitis. Two patients developed brain secondaries, which is a very rare occurrence in this disease. This may indicate a change in the natural history of myeloma produced by this new treatment. Subjective improvement was observed in 17 patients and relief of pain usually occurred within the first 24 h. Objective responses were noted in six patients. The median survival for all patients was 6 months with five patients alive 11-28 months at the time of this report. This treatment compares favourably to second line chemotherapy. It is perhaps more economical and better tolerated by patients. Further assessment in a larger number of patients with either untreated or relapsed disease is warranted.

Radiotherapy for Paget's disease of the nipple: a conservative alternative.

The case records of 28 patients with Paget's disease of the nipple treated by radio-therapy alone were reviewed retrospectively. 16 of 19 patients who had no palpable underlying tumour and who were mammographically normal at the time of original treatment remain free of disease with a median follow-up of 5 years 3 months. In this selected group, radical radiotherapy with small fields localised to the involved skin is an effective alternative to mastectomy.

Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of a series of diketopiperazine inhibitors of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.

We have synthesized and evaluated a series of diketopiperazine-based inhibitors of PAI-1. These studies resulted in the identification of 34 which inhibited PAI-1 in vitro with an IC(50)=0.2 microM. The synthesis and SAR of these compounds are described.

Aminoglutethimide therapy for advanced carcinoma of the prostate.

The results of aminoglutethimide treatment of 12 patients with advanced progressive metastatic carcinoma of the prostate are reported. As judged by performance status and analgesic requirements, there were subjective improvements in 75% of the group and side effects were minimal. No consistent objective improvements were observed but decrease in plasma androstenedione and testosterone was associated with subjective improvement in most responders. Mean survival of patients following introduction of aminoglutethimide was 6.5 months. Aminoglutethimide "medical adrenalectomy" appears safe and effective in management of advanced carcinoma of the prostate.

Reversal of P-glycoprotein mediated multidrug resistance by novel anthranilamide derivatives.

We have synthesised and evaluated a series of anthranilamide based modulators of P-glycoprotein. These studies have identified XR9576(2), a potent inhibitor of P-glycoprotein in vitro and in vivo. The general synthesis and the SAR of these compounds are described.