Antitussive effect of carcainium chloride in patients with chronic cough and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cough is a common presenting symptom in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP); it is often disabling, and lacks effective treatment. Studies in animals suggest that carcainium chloride, a quaternary derivative of the local anesthetic lidocaine, is able to inhibit experimentally induced cough by a mechanism of action distinct from that of lidocaine. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of aerosolised carcainium chloride (VRP700) in controlling cough in patients with IIP. METHODS: Eight female patients (mean age 71 years) with IIP were investigated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled crossover, adaptive contingency study design (EudraCT Number 2010-021350-19). The study consisted of a screening visit to assess the eligibility of patients, and two separated (48-72 h) study days. On the two study days, patients were randomised to receive either nebulized VRP700 (1.0 mg/kg) on the first study visit followed by nebulised placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%) on the second visit, or placebo on the first visit followed by VRP700 on the second visit. The primary endpoint was cough frequency over a 4-h assessment period; secondary endpoints were subjective cough-related level of discomfort as assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the subjective response to treatment as assessed by a quality of life question. Safety (ECG, spirometry, urine and blood tests) and adverse events occurring during the trial were also investigated. RESULTS: In all patients both VRP700 and placebo decreased cough frequency; however, mean decreases in cough frequency after treatment with VRP700 were significantly (P < 0.001) higher than with placebo. Similarly, mean reductions in VAS score were significantly (P < 0.001) higher after treatment with VRP 700 compared with placebo. All but one patient indicated that they felt better after receiving VRP700. No adverse events were reported during the study, nor were any changes in ECG variables, spirometry, urine and blood tests noted. CONCLUSION: The results of this exploratory study indicate that nebulised VRP700 improved cough and quality of life in hospitalised IIP patients with no significant side effects. A larger trial is warranted to assess these promising results.

Efficacy and safety of RPL554, a dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from four clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) routinely receive a combination of an inhaled bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory glucocorticosteroid, but those with severe disease often respond poorly to these classes of drug. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a novel inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) and PDE4 inhibitor, RPL554 for its ability to act as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug. METHODS: Between February, 2009, and January, 2013, we undertook four proof-of-concept clinical trials in the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK. Nebulised RPL554 was examined in study 1 for safety in 18 healthy men who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive an inhaled dose of RPL554 (0·003 mg/kg or 0·009 mg/kg) or placebo by a computer-generated randomisation table. Subsequently, six non-smoking men with mild allergic asthma received single doses of RPL554 (three received 0·009 mg/kg and three received 0·018 mg/kg) in an open-label, adaptive study, and then ten men with mild allergic asthma were randomly assigned to receive placebo or RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) by a computer-generated randomisation table for an assessment of safety, bronchodilation, and bronchoprotection. Study 2 examined the reproducibility of the bronchodilator response to a daily dose of nebulised RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) for 6 consecutive days in a single-blind (patients masked), placebo-controlled study in 12 men with clinically stable asthma. The safety and bronchodilator effect of RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) was assessed in study 3, an open-label, placebo-controlled crossover trial, in 12 men with mild-to-moderate COPD. In study 4, a placebo-controlled crossover trial, the effect of RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cell infiltration in induced sputum was investigated in 21 healthy men. In studies 3 and 4, randomisation was done by computer-generated permutation with a block size of two for study 3 and four for study 4. Unless otherwise stated, participants and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. Analyses were by intention to treat. All trials were registered with EudraCT, numbers 2008-005048-17, 2011-001698-22, 2010-023573-18, and 2012-000742-34. FINDINGS: Safety was a primary endpoint of studies 1 and 3 and a secondary endpoint of studies 2 and 4. Overall, RPL554 was well tolerated, and adverse events were generally mild and of equal frequency between placebo and active treatment groups. Efficacy was a primary endpoint of study 2 and a secondary endpoint of studies 1 and 3. Study 1 measured change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20MCh) in participants with asthma. RPL554 produced rapid bronchodilation in patients with asthma with an FEV1 increase at 1 h of 520 mL (95% CI 320-720; p<0·0001), which was a 14% increase from placebo, and increased the PC20MCh by 1·5 doubling doses (95% CI 0·63-2·28; p=0·004) compared with placebo. The primary endpoint of study 2 was maximum FEV1 reached during 6 h after dosing with RPL554 in patients with asthma. RPL554 produced a similar maximum mean increase in FEV1 from placebo on day 1 (555 mL, 95% CI 442-668), day 3 (505 mL, 392-618), and day 6 (485 mL, 371-598; overall p<0·0001). A secondary endpoint of study 3 (patients with COPD) was the increase from baseline in FEV1. RPL554 produced bronchodilation with a mean maximum FEV1 increase of 17·2% (SE 5·2). In healthy individuals (study 4), the primary endpoint was percentage change in neutrophil counts in induced sputum 6 h after lipopolysaccharide challenge. RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) did not significantly reduce the percentage of neutrophils in sputum (80·3% in the RPL554 group vs 84·2% in the placebo group; difference -3·9%, 95% CI -9·4 to 1·6, p=0·15), since RPL554 significantly reduced neutrophils (p=0·002) and total cells (p=0·002) to a similar degree. INTERPRETATION: In four exploratory studies, inhaled RPL554 is an effective and well tolerated bronchodilator, bronchoprotector, and anti-inflammatory drug and further studies will establish the full potential of this new drug for the treatment of patients with COPD or asthma. FUNDING: Verona Pharma.