Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
1.
Health Commun ; 37(2): 177-184, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33016136

RESUMEN

During the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak, preventing unintended pregnancy was recognized as a primary strategy to reduce adverse Zika-related pregnancy and birth outcomes. To increase awareness and uptake of contraceptive services provided through the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) in Puerto Rico, a multi-strategy campaign called Ante La Duda, Pregunta (ALDP) was developed. The principal aim was to increase awareness of Z-CAN services, which included same-day access to the full range of reversible contraceptives at no cost to women living in Puerto Rico who choose to delay or avoid pregnancy during the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak. Using diverse strategies, ALDP increased exposure to and engagement with the campaign in order to raise awareness of Z-CAN services in Puerto Rico. The ALDP social marketing campaign played an important role in the overall Z-CAN effort. Of all the strategies utilized, Facebook appears to have reached the most people. While the importance of a social marketing campaign communicating to raise awareness and create demand has long been known, through the ALDP campaign efforts, it was shown that an effective campaign, built on formative research, can be developed and implemented rapidly in an emergency response situation without compromising on content, quality, or reach.


Asunto(s)
Infección por el Virus Zika , Virus Zika , Anticoncepción , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Salud Pública , Mercadeo Social , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 24(7): 901-910, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32372243

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Women and healthcare providers lack adequate information on medication safety during pregnancy. While resources describing fetal risk are available, information is provided in multiple locations, often with subjective assessments of available data. We developed a list of medications of greatest concern during pregnancy to help healthcare providers counsel reproductive-aged and pregnant women. METHODS: Prescription drug labels submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with information in the Teratogen Information System (TERIS) and/or Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation by Briggs & Freeman were included (N = 1,186 medications; 766 from three data sources, 420 from two). We used two supervised learning methods ('support vector machine' and 'sentiment analysis') to create prediction models based on narrative descriptions of fetal risk. Two models were created per data source. Our final list included medications categorized as 'high' risk in at least four of six models (if three data sources) or three of four models (if two data sources). RESULTS: We classified 80 prescription medications as being of greatest concern during pregnancy; over half were antineoplastic agents (n = 24), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 10), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (n = 8), and anticonvulsants (n = 7). DISCUSSION: This evidence-based list could be a useful tool for healthcare providers counseling reproductive-aged and pregnant women about medication use during pregnancy. However, providers and patients may find it helpful to weigh the risks and benefits of any pharmacologic treatment for both pregnant women and the fetus when managing medical conditions before and during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Aprendizaje Automático Supervisado/tendencias , Adulto , Bases de Datos Farmacéuticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Etiquetado de Medicamentos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control
3.
Health Promot Pract ; 21(1): 133-141, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31142152

RESUMEN

In response to the Zika virus outbreak in Puerto Rico (2015-2016), the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) was established to provide same-day access to the full range of reversible contraception at no cost to women. Formative research was conducted to inform the development of a communication campaign about Z-CAN. Ten focus groups with women and men, aged 18 to 49 years, in Puerto Rico were conducted to collect data on contraception awareness, use, and decision making during the Zika outbreak, as well as culturally appropriate messaging and outreach strategies. Thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparative method. Data showed that there was community awareness regarding Zika in Puerto Rico. However, it was not a motivating factor in contraception decision making; instead, economic factors were the major drivers. Most participants preferred to receive information on contraception, potential side effects, and where to access contraceptive services via Internet-based channels and health care providers. Based on these findings, the Ante La Duda, Pregunta [When in Doubt, Ask] campaign was launched to promote awareness of Z-CAN services among those who chose to prevent pregnancy during the Zika outbreak. Our results underscore the importance of conducting formative research to develop communication initiatives, while also demonstrating that it is feasible to perform these activities as part of an emergency response.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/métodos , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Comunicación , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Embarazo , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(1): 6-10, 2019 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30629576

RESUMEN

From 2004 to 2014, the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in the United States increased 433%, from 1.5 to 8.0 per 1,000 hospital births. The latest national data from 2014 indicate that one baby was born with signs of NAS every 15 minutes in the United States (1). NAS is a drug withdrawal syndrome that most commonly occurs among infants after in utero exposure to opioids, although other substances have also been associated with NAS. Prenatal opioid exposure has also been associated with poor fetal growth, preterm birth, stillbirth, and possible specific birth defects (2-5). NAS surveillance has often depended on hospital discharge data, which historically underestimate the incidence of NAS and are not available in real time, thus limiting states' ability to quickly direct public health resources (6,7). This evaluation focused on six states with state laws implementing required NAS case reporting for public health surveillance during 2013-2017 and reviews implementation of the laws, state officials' reports of data quality before and after laws were passed, and advantages and challenges of legally mandating NAS reporting for public health surveillance in the absence of a national case definition. Using standardized search terms in an online legal research database, laws in six states mandating reporting of NAS from medical facilities to state health departments (SHDs) or from SHDs to a state legislative body were identified. SHD officials in these six states completed a questionnaire followed by a semistructured telephone interview to clarify open-text responses from the questionnaire. Variability was found in the type and number of surveillance data elements reported and in how states used NAS surveillance data. Following implementation, five states with identified laws reported receiving NAS case reports within 30 days of diagnosis. Mandated NAS case reporting allowed SHDs to quantify the incidence of NAS in their states and to inform programs and services. This information might be useful to states considering implementing mandatory NAS surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Notificación Obligatoria , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(1): 92-100, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28900803

RESUMEN

Objective To explore women's perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with medication use during pregnancy and to better understand how women make decisions related to medication use in pregnancy. Methods We conducted online focus groups with 48 women who used medication during pregnancy or while planning a pregnancy, and 12 in-depth follow-up interviews with a subset of these women. Results We found that women were aware of general risks associated with medication use but were often unable to articulate specific negative outcomes. Women were concerned most about medications' impact on fetal development but were also concerned about how either continuing or discontinuing medication during pregnancy could affect their own health. Women indicated that if the risk of a given medication were unknown, they would not take that medication during pregnancy. Conclusion This formative research found that women face difficult decisions about medication use during pregnancy and need specific information to help them make decisions. Enhanced communication between patients and their providers regarding medication use would help address this need. We suggest that public health practitioners develop messages to (1) encourage, remind, and prompt women to proactively talk with their healthcare providers about the risks of taking, not taking, stopping, or altering the dosage of a medication while trying to become pregnant and/or while pregnant; and (2) encourage all women of childbearing age to ask their healthcare providers about medication use.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Toma de Decisiones , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Percepción , Embarazo , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores Socioeconómicos
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(1): 74-82, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27805547

RESUMEN

We modeled the potential cost-effectiveness of increasing access to contraception in Puerto Rico during a Zika virus outbreak. The intervention is projected to cost an additional $33.5 million in family planning services and is likely to be cost-saving for the healthcare system overall. It could reduce Zika virus-related costs by $65.2 million ($2.8 million from less Zika virus testing and monitoring and $62.3 million from avoided costs of Zika virus-associated microcephaly [ZAM]). The estimates are influenced by the contraception methods used, the frequency of ZAM, and the lifetime incremental cost of ZAM. Accounting for unwanted pregnancies that are prevented, irrespective of Zika virus infection, an additional $40.4 million in medical costs would be avoided through the intervention. Increasing contraceptive access for women who want to delay or avoid pregnancy in Puerto Rico during a Zika virus outbreak can substantially reduce the number of cases of ZAM and healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Brotes de Enfermedades , Microcefalia/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adulto , Anticoncepción/métodos , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Predicción , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Microcefalia/economía , Microcefalia/epidemiología , Microcefalia/virología , Vigilancia de la Población , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Virus Zika/patogenicidad , Virus Zika/fisiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/economía , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/virología
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(44): 1230-1235, 2017 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121000

RESUMEN

Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of microcephaly and other serious brain abnormalities (1). To support state and territory response to the threat of Zika, CDC's Interim Zika Response Plan outlined activities for vector control; clinical management of exposed pregnant women and infants; targeted communication about Zika virus transmission among women and men of reproductive age; and primary prevention of Zika-related adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes by prevention of unintended pregnancies through increased access to contraception.* The most highly effective,† reversible contraception includes intrauterine devices and implants, known as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). On September 28, 2016, the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP) and CDC facilitated a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, of representatives from 15 states to identify state-led efforts to implement seven CDC-published strategies aimed at increasing access to contraception in the context of Zika virus (2). Qualitative data were collected from participating jurisdictions. The number of states reporting implementation of each strategy ranged from four to 11. Participants identified numerous challenges, particularly for strategies implemented less frequently. Examples of barriers were discussed and presented with corresponding approaches to address each barrier. Addressing these barriers could facilitate increased access to contraception, which might decrease the number of unintended pregnancies affected by Zika virus.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Gobierno Local , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Gobierno Estatal , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología
8.
Qual Health Res ; 27(13): 2071-2080, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974142

RESUMEN

Our study sought to explore the actual and potential roles of patients, physicians, and pharmacists, as well as their shared challenges and opportunities, in improving the safety of medication use during pregnancy. We conducted virtual focus groups with 48 women and in-depth interviews with nine physicians and five pharmacists. Qualitative analysis revealed that all three groups of participants reported "playing it safe," the need for an engaged patient making informed decisions, challenges surrounding communication about pregnancy status, and a lack of patient-centric resources. Patients, physicians, and pharmacists are highly motivated to protect developing babies from potential harms of medication use during pregnancy while maintaining the patient's health. Strategic messaging could maximize the effectiveness of these interactions by helping physicians discuss the benefits and risks of medication use during pregnancy, pharmacists screen for pregnancy and counsel on medication safety, and patients using medications to share pregnancy intentions with their providers pre-pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Rol Profesional/psicología , Adulto , Comunicación , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Embarazo , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(3): 63-7, 2016 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820387

RESUMEN

CDC has developed interim guidelines for health care providers in the United States who are caring for infants born to mothers who traveled to or resided in an area with Zika virus transmission during pregnancy. These guidelines include recommendations for the testing and management of these infants. Guidance is subject to change as more information becomes available; the latest information, including answers to commonly asked questions, can be found online (http://www.cdc.gov/zika). Pediatric health care providers should work closely with obstetric providers to identify infants whose mothers were potentially infected with Zika virus during pregnancy (based on travel to or residence in an area with Zika virus transmission [http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices]), and review fetal ultrasounds and maternal testing for Zika virus infection (see Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak*) (1). Zika virus testing is recommended for 1) infants with microcephaly or intracranial calcifications born to women who traveled to or resided in an area with Zika virus transmission while pregnant; or 2) infants born to mothers with positive or inconclusive test results for Zika virus infection. For infants with laboratory evidence of a possible congenital Zika virus infection, additional clinical evaluation and follow-up is recommended. Health care providers should contact their state or territorial health department to facilitate testing. As an arboviral disease, Zika virus disease is a nationally notifiable condition.


Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infección por el Virus Zika/congénito , Infección por el Virus Zika/diagnóstico , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Estados Unidos
10.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(30): 780-7, 2016 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27490117

RESUMEN

Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause congenital microcephaly and brain abnormalities (1,2). Since 2015, Zika virus has been spreading through much of the World Health Organization's Region of the Americas, including U.S. territories. Zika virus is spread through the bite of Aedes aegypti or Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, by sex with an infected partner, or from a pregnant woman to her fetus during pregnancy.* CDC estimates that 41 states are in the potential range of Aedes aegypti or Aedes albopictus mosquitoes (3), and on July 29, 2016, the Florida Department of Health identified an area in one neighborhood of Miami where Zika virus infections in multiple persons are being spread by bites of local mosquitoes. These are the first known cases of local mosquito-borne Zika virus transmission in the continental United States.(†) CDC prevention efforts include mosquito surveillance and control, targeted education about Zika virus and condom use to prevent sexual transmission, and guidance for providers on contraceptive counseling to reduce unintended pregnancy. To estimate the prevalence of contraceptive use among nonpregnant and postpartum women at risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually active female high school students living in the 41 states where mosquito-borne transmission might be possible, CDC used 2011-2013 and 2015 survey data from four state-based surveillance systems: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS, 2011-2013), which surveys adult women; the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS, 2013) and the Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA, 2013), which surveys women with a recent live birth; and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS, 2015), which surveys students in grades 9-12. CDC defines an unintended pregnancy as one that is either unwanted (i.e., the pregnancy occurred when no children, or no more children, were desired) or mistimed (i.e., the pregnancy occurred earlier than desired). The proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who used a highly effective reversible method, known as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), ranged from 5.5% to 18.9% for BRFSS-surveyed women and 6.9% to 30.5% for PRAMS/MIHA-surveyed women. The proportion of women not using any contraception ranged from 12.3% to 34.3% (BRFSS) and from 3.5% to 15.3% (PRAMS/MIHA). YRBS data indicated that among sexually active female high school students, use of LARC at last intercourse ranged from 1.7% to 8.4%, and use of no contraception ranged from 7.3% to 22.8%. In the context of Zika preparedness, the full range of contraceptive methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), including LARC, should be readily available and accessible for women who want to avoid or delay pregnancy. Given low rates of LARC use, states can implement strategies to remove barriers to the access and availability of LARC including high device costs, limited provider reimbursement, lack of training for providers serving women and adolescents on insertion and removal of LARC, provider lack of knowledge and misperceptions about LARC, limited availability of youth-friendly services that address adolescent confidentiality concerns, inadequate client-centered counseling, and low consumer awareness of the range of contraceptive methods available.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Anticonceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Embarazo no Planeado , Medición de Riesgo , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(12): 311-4, 2016 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27031817

RESUMEN

Zika virus is a flavivirus transmitted primarily by Aedes species mosquitoes. Increasing evidence links Zika virus infection during pregnancy to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, including pregnancy loss, intrauterine growth restriction, eye defects, congenital brain abnormalities, and other fetal abnormalities. The virus has also been determined to be sexually transmitted. Because of the potential risks associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy, CDC has recommended that health care providers discuss prevention of unintended pregnancy with women and couples who reside in areas of active Zika virus transmission and do not want to become pregnant. However, limitations in access to contraception in some of these areas might affect the ability to prevent an unintended pregnancy. As of March 16, 2016, the highest number of Zika virus disease cases in the United States and U.S. territories were reported from Puerto Rico. The number of cases will likely rise with increasing mosquito activity in affected areas, resulting in increased risk for transmission to pregnant women. High rates of unintended and adolescent pregnancies in Puerto Rico suggest that, in the context of this outbreak, access to contraception might need to be improved. CDC estimates that 138,000 women of reproductive age (aged 15-44 years) in Puerto Rico do not desire pregnancy and are not using one of the most effective or moderately effective contraceptive methods, and therefore might experience an unintended pregnancy. CDC and other federal and local partners are seeking to expand access to contraception for these persons. Such efforts have the potential to increase contraceptive access and use, reduce unintended pregnancies, and lead to fewer adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy. The assessment of challenges and resources related to contraceptive access in Puerto Rico might be a useful model for other areas with active transmission of Zika virus.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Necesidades , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología
12.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 25(1): 35-44, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26541372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When making decisions about medication use in pregnancy, women consult many information sources, including the Internet. The aim of this study was to assess the content of publicly accessible YouTube videos that discuss medication use in pregnancy. METHODS: Using 2023 distinct combinations of search terms related to medications and pregnancy, we extracted metadata from YouTube videos using a YouTube video Application Programming Interface. Relevant videos were defined as those with a medication search term and a pregnancy-related search term in either the video title or description. We viewed relevant videos and abstracted content from each video into a database. We documented whether videos implied each medication to be "safe" or "unsafe" in pregnancy and compared that assessment with the medication's Teratogen Information System (TERIS) rating. RESULTS: After viewing 651 videos, 314 videos with information about medication use in pregnancy were available for the final analyses. The majority of videos were from law firms (67%), television segments (10%), or physicians (8%). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most common medication class named (225 videos, 72%), and 88% of videos about SSRIs indicated that they were unsafe for use in pregnancy. However, the TERIS ratings for medication products in this class range from "unlikely" to "minimal" teratogenic risk. CONCLUSION: For the majority of medications, current YouTube video content does not adequately reflect what is known about the safety of their use in pregnancy and should be interpreted cautiously. However, YouTube could serve as a platform for communicating evidence-based medication safety information.


Asunto(s)
Información de Salud al Consumidor , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Grabación en Video , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/clasificación , Embarazo , Teratógenos/clasificación , Teratógenos/toxicidad
13.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(2): 37-41, 2015 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25611168

RESUMEN

Prescription opioid use in the United States has become widespread, and studies of opioid exposure in pregnancy suggest increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including neonatal abstinence syndrome and birth defects (e.g., neural tube defects, gastroschisis, and congenital heart defects). The development of birth defects often results from exposures during the first few weeks of pregnancy, which is a critical period for organ formation. Given that many pregnancies are not recognized until well after the first few weeks and half of all U.S. pregnancies are unplanned, all women who might become pregnant are at risk. Therefore, it is important to assess opioid medication use among all women of reproductive age. CDC used Truven Health's MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicaid data to estimate the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed by outpatient pharmacies to women aged 15-44 years. During 2008-2012, opioid prescription claims were consistently higher among Medicaid-enrolled women when compared with privately insured women (39.4% compared with 27.7%, p<0.001). The most frequently prescribed opioids among women in both groups were hydrocodone, codeine, and oxycodone. Efforts are needed to promote interventions to reduce opioid prescriptions among this population when safer alternative treatments are available.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Privado/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Embarazo , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
14.
Matern Child Health J ; 19(5): 1097-106, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25287251

RESUMEN

Many prescription medications have limited information regarding safety for use during pregnancy. In order to inform research on safer medication use during pregnancy, we examined prescription medication use among women in the United States. We analyzed data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the prevalence of prescription medication use in the past 30 days among pregnant women and non-pregnant women of childbearing age (15-44 years) and to ascertain the most commonly reported prescription medications by women in these groups. We assessed how the most commonly reported medications differed among groups defined by selected demographic characteristics, including age, race/ethnicity, and markers of socioeconomic status. Prescription medication use in the past 30 days was reported by 22 % of pregnant women and 47 % of non-pregnant women of childbearing age. The most commonly reported prescription medications by NHANES participants differed somewhat by pregnancy status; allergy and anti-infective medications were more common among pregnant women, while oral contraceptives were more common among non-pregnant women. Use of prescription medication for asthma and thyroid disorders was reported by both groups. Although prescription medication use in the previous 30 days was less common among pregnant women than non-pregnant women, its use was reported among almost 1 in 4 pregnant women. Many of the most common medications reported were for the treatment of chronic medical conditions. Given the potential impact of medications on the developing fetus, our data underscore the importance of understanding the safety of these medications during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Mujeres Embarazadas , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Anticonceptivos Orales/uso terapéutico , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Embarazo , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/clasificación , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 211(3): 208-214.e1, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24881821

RESUMEN

To address information gaps that limit informed clinical decisions on medication use in pregnancy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) solicited expert input on a draft prototype outlining a systematic approach to evaluating the quality and strength of existing evidence for associated risks. The draft prototype outlined a process for the systematic review of available evidence and deliberations by a panel of experts to inform clinical decision making for managing health conditions in pregnancy. At an expert meeting convened by the CDC in January 2013, participants divided into working groups discussed decision points within the prototype. This report summarizes their discussions of best practices for formulating an expert review process, developing evidence summaries and treatment guidance, and disseminating information. There is clear recognition of current knowledge gaps and a strong collaboration of federal partners, academic experts, and professional organizations willing to work together toward safer medication use during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Feto/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Seguridad , Estados Unidos
16.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord ; 31(6): 443-50, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21778725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) impairment in Alzheimer's disease has been associated with global amyloid deposition in postmortem studies. We sought to determine whether IADL impairment is associated with increased cortical Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) retention. METHODS: Fifty-five subjects (19 normal older controls, NC, and 36 with mild cognitive impairment, MCI) underwent clinical assessments and dynamic PiB positron emission tomography imaging. RESULTS: A linear multiple regression model showed that greater IADL impairment was associated with greater global PiB retention in all subjects (R(2) = 0.40; unstandardized partial regression coefficient, ß = 5.8; p = 0.0002) and in MCI subjects only (R(2) = 0.28; ß = 6.1; p = 0.003), but not in NC subjects only. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that daily functional impairment is related to greater amyloid burden in MCI.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Amiloide/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Amiloidosis/metabolismo , Compuestos de Anilina/metabolismo , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Análisis de Regresión , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lóbulo Temporal/fisiología , Tiazoles/metabolismo
17.
Alzheimers Dement ; 7(3): 300-8, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21575871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) leads to early loss in productivity and adds significant burden to caregivers. Executive dysfunction is thought to be an important contributor to functional impairment. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between executive function and IADL in a large cohort of well-characterized normal older controls, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with mild Alzheimer's disease, separately as well as across the entire sample, while accounting for demographic, cognitive, and behavioral factors. METHODS: Subjects with baseline clinical datasets (n=793) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study (228 normal older controls, 387 MCI, 178 Alzheimer's disease) were included in the analysis. A multiple regression model was used to assess the relationship between executive function and IADL. RESULTS: A multiple regression model, including diagnosis, global cognitive impairment, memory performance, and other covariates demonstrated a significant relationship between executive dysfunction and IADL impairment across all subjects (R2=.60, P<.0001 for model; Digit Symbol, partial ß=-.044, P=.005; Trailmaking Test B-A, quadratic relation, P=.01). Similarly, an analysis using MCI subjects only yielded a significant relationship (R2=.16, P<.0001 for model; Digit Symbol, partial ß=-.08, P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that executive dysfunction is a key contributor to impairment in IADL. This relationship was evident even after accounting for degree of memory deficit across the continuum of cognitive impairment and dementia.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Función Ejecutiva/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
J Opioid Manag ; 17(2): 125-133, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33890276

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual percentage of women of reproductive age with private insurance or Medicaid who had opioid prescription claims during 2013-2017 and describe trends over time. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of insurance claims data from IBM MarketScan® Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid Databases to assess outpatient pharmacy claims for prescription opioids among women aged 15-44 years during 2013-2017. PARTICIPANTS: Annual cohorts of 3.5-3.8 million women aged 15-44 years with private insurance and 0.9-2.1 million women enrolled in Medicaid. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The percentage of women aged 15-44 years with outpatient pharmacy claims for opioid prescriptions. RESULTS: During 2013-2017, the proportion of women aged 15-44 years with private insurance who had claims for opioid prescriptions decreased by 22.1 percent, and among women enrolled in Medicaid, the proportion decreased by 31.5 -percent. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescription claims decreased from 2013 to 2017 among insured women of reproductive age. However, opioid prescription claims remained common and were more common among women enrolled in Medicaid than those with private insurance; additional strategies to improve awareness of the risks associated with opioid prescribing may be needed.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Medicaid , Prescripciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 29(2): 139-147, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045325

RESUMEN

Scientific evidence demonstrated a causal relationship between Zika virus infection during pregnancy and neurologic abnormalities and other congenital defects. The U.S. government's Zika Virus Disease Contingency Response Plan recognized the importance of preventing unintended pregnancy through access to high-quality family planning services as a primary strategy to reduce adverse Zika-related birth outcomes during the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak. The U.S.-affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) includes three U.S. territories: American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam, and three independent countries in free association with the United States: the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau. Aedes spp. mosquitoes, the primary vector that transmits Zika virus, are common across the Pacific Islands, and in 2016, laboratory-confirmed cases of Zika virus infection in USAPI were reported. CDC conducted a rapid assessment by reviewing available reproductive health data and discussing access to contraception with family planning providers and program staff in all six USAPI jurisdictions between January and May 2017. In this report, we summarize findings from the assessment; discuss strategies developed by jurisdictions to respond to identified needs; and describe a training that was convened to provide technical assistance to USAPI. Similar rapid assessments may be used to identify training and technical assistance needs in other emergency preparedness and response efforts that pose a risk to pregnant women and their infants.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonceptivos/uso terapéutico , Servicios de Planificación Familiar/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Islas del Pacífico , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven , Virus Zika
20.
Pest Manag Sci ; 76(4): 1500-1512, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: RNA interference (RNAi) triggered by maize plants expressing RNA hairpins against specific western corn rootworm (WCR) transcripts have proven to be effective at controlling this pest. To provide robust crop protection, mRNA transcripts targeted by double-stranded RNA must be sensitive to knockdown and encode essential proteins. RESULTS: Using WCR adult feeding assays, we identified Sec23 as a highly lethal RNAi target. Sec23 encodes a coatomer protein, a component of the coat protein (COPII) complex that mediates ER-Golgi transport. The lethality detected in WCR adults was also observed in early instar larvae, the life stage causing most of the crop damage, suggesting that WCR adults can serve as an alternative to larvae for dsRNA screening. Surprisingly, over 85% transcript inhibition resulted in less than 40% protein knockdown, suggesting that complete protein knockdown is not necessary for Sec23 RNAi-mediated mortality. The efficacy of Sec23 dsRNA for rootworm control was confirmed in planta; T0 maize events carrying rootworm Sec23 hairpin transgenes showed high levels of root protection in greenhouse assays. A reduction in larval survival and weight were observed in the offspring of WCR females exposed to Sec23 dsRNA LC25 in diet bioassays. CONCLUSION: We describe Sec23 as RNAi target for in planta rootworm control. High mortality in exposed adult and larvae and moderate sublethal effects in the offspring of females exposed to Sec23 dsRNA LC25 , suggest the potential for field application of this RNAi trait and the need to factor in responses to sublethal exposure into insect resistance management programs. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.


Asunto(s)
Zea mays , Animales , Escarabajos , Femenino , Larva , Control Biológico de Vectores , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente , Interferencia de ARN , ARN Bicatenario
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA