Quantitative chromogenic immunohistochemical image analysis in cellprofiler software.

Visual grading of chromogenically stained immunohistochemical (IHC) samples is subjective, time consuming, and predisposed to considerable inter- and intra-observer variations. The open-source digital analysis software, CellProfiler has been extensively used for fluorescently stained cells/tissues; however, chromogenic IHC staining is routinely used in both pathological and research diagnostics. The current investigation aimed to compare CellProfiler quantitative chromogenic IHC analyses against the gold standard manual counting. Oral mucosal biopsies from patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease were stained for CD4. Digitized images were manually counted and subjected to image analysis in CellProfiler. Inter-observer and inter-platform agreements were assessed by scatterplots with linear regression and Bland-Altman plots. Validation comparisons between the manual counters demonstrated strong intra-observer concordance (r2 = 0.979), particularly when cell numbers were less than 100. Scatterplots and Bland-Altman plots demonstrated strong agreement between the manual counters and CellProfiler, with the number of positively stained cells robustly correlating (r2 = 0.938). Furthermore, CellProfiler allowed the determination of multiple variables simultaneously, such as area stained and masking to remove any nonstained tissue and white gaps, which also demonstrated reliable agreement (r2 = >0.9). CellProfiler demonstrated versatility with the ability to assess large numbers of images and allowed additional parameters to be quantified. CellProfiler allowed rapid high processing capacity of chromogenically stained chronic inflammatory tissue that was reliable, accurate, and reproducible and highlights potential applications in research diagnostics.

A prospective randomized toxicity study to compare reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning in patients with myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no randomized toxicity studies have been conducted to compare myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Adult patients ≤60 years of age with myeloid leukaemia were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to treatment with RIC (n = 18) or MAC (n = 19) in this Phase II single-centre toxicity study. RESULTS: There was a maximum median mucositis grade of 1 in the RIC group compared with 4 in the MAC group (P < 0.001). Haemorrhagic cystitis occurred in eight of the patients in the MAC group and none in the RIC group (P < 0.01). Results of renal and hepatic tests did not differ significantly between the two groups. RIC-treated patients had faster platelet engraftment (P < 0.01) and required fewer erythrocyte and platelet transfusions (P < 0.001) and less total parenteral nutrition (TPN) than those treated with MAC (P < 0.01). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was more common in the MAC group (14/19) than in the RIC group (6/18) (P = 0.02). Donor chimerism was similar in the two groups with regard to CD19 and CD33, but was delayed for CD3 in the RIC group. Five-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was approximately 11% in both groups, and rates of relapse and survival were not significantly different. Patients in the MAC group with intermediate cytogenetic acute myeloid leukaemia had a 3-year survival of 73%, compared with 90% among those in the RIC group. CONCLUSION: Reduced-intensity conditioning had several advantages compared with MAC, including less mucositis, less haemorrhagic cystitis, faster platelet engraftment, the need for fewer transfusions and less TPN, and fewer CMV infections. Both regimens were tolerated and TRM was low.

Long-term salivary function after conditioning with busulfan, fractionated or single-dose TBI.

OBJECTIVES: Does conditioning with fractionated total body irradiation (fTBI) or busulfan (Bu) causes less salivary dysfunction compared with single dose (sTBI) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 74 adolescents below 13 years of age received allogeneic HSCT and conditioning with either: sTBI, fTBI or Bu. The unstimulated (USSR) and stimulated (SSSR) whole salivary secretion rates were measured at 15 years of age. RESULTS: Irrespective of conditioning type, there were no significant differences in USSR or SSSR between groups. Girls had a significantly lower SSSR, 0.7 ± 0.3 ml per min compared with 1.1 ± 0.4 ml per min in boys (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between age at HSCT and SSSR at 15 years of age (P = 0.02) in children conditioned with sTBI was found as well as an inverse correlation between the plasma area under curve (AUC) of Bu and SSSR. In the multivariate model, only female sex was significantly correlated with low SSSR at 15 years of age (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.21-12.79; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: No differences in long-term whole salivary function after HSCT in adolescents receiving conditioning with sTBI, fTBI or Bu were found. Total systemic exposure to Bu was negatively correlated with stimulated salivary secretion.

Salivary secretion in children after fractionated or single-dose TBI.

The incidence of long-term oral complications after hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) varies between 60 and 100%. The aim of this study was to compare the salivary secretion rate and the contribution of known risk factors for a low salivary secretion rate 1 year after HSCT in children conditioned with fractionated TBI (fTBI) and in children conditioned with single-dose TBI (sTBI). The study involved 44 patients, 27 conditioned with sTBI and 17 conditioned with fTBI. The unstimulated and stimulated salivary secretion rates (USSRs and SSSRs) were estimated before HSCT and at 1-year follow-up. Risk factors that may have influenced the salivary secretion rate were recorded. An SSSR of ≤0.5 mL/min and a USSR of ≤0.1 mL/min were chosen as cut-off points for salivary dysfunction. The median reduction in stimulated salivary flow 1 year after HSCT was 56% in the sTBI group and 12% in the fTBI group (P=0.003). The median reduction in unstimulated salivary flow 1 year after HSCT was 74% in the sTBI group and 33% in the fTBI group (P=0.003). In the multivariate model, a significant correlation between both sTBI (odds ratio (OR)=6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.40-30, P=0.014) and seropositivity of the recipient for 3-4 herpesviruses (OR=6.57, 95% CI=1.26-34, P=0.021) and a low stimulated salivary secretion rate (<0.5 mL/min) was found 1 year after HSCT.