Asunto(s)
Colon/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Ligadura/métodos , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
To investigate the discrepancy between the distal resection margin (DRM) assessed by surgeons and pathologists, and the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on DRM. This study included 67 rectal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. DRMs were assessed through four different techniques: in vivo subjective estimative, made by the surgeon before the rectal resection (by palpation and visual estimative); in vivo objective, measured with a ruler before the rectal transection; ex vivo objective, measured right after resection of the specimen; post-fixation objective measurement, conducted by the pathologist. The DRMs subjectively and objectively assessed by the surgeons were not significantly different (3.40 cm vs. 3.45 cm). There was a mean reduction in the length of DRMs of 35.6%, from 3.45 cm objectively measured by the surgeon to 2.20 cm measured by the pathologist. This difference was significant among patients that did not receive nCRT (3.90 cm vs. 2.30 cm, P < 0.001), but not among those who received nCRT (2.30 vs. 2.05 cm). Surgeons are accurate in assessing rectal cancer DRMs. There are significant differences between intraoperative measurements of DRMs and the final pathologic results. However, these differences are not seen when nCRT is used, a finding that may be useful when sphincter preservation is being considered.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Recto , Cirujanos , Quimioradioterapia , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Patólogos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/virología , Neoplasias del Colon/virología , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias del Colon/secundario , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the several series in which the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery were investigated, data concerning the long-term outcomes are still scarce. METHODS: The prospectively collected records of 65 consecutive patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer who underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) were compared with those of 109 consecutive patients treated with open surgery (OTME). Patient characteristics, pathological findings, local and systemic recurrence rates and 5-year survival rates were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, reoperation and 30-day mortality. There were significant differences comparing groups: number of lymph nodes harvested (RTME: 20.1 vs. OTME: 14.1, P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (RTME: 0 vs. OTME: 150 ml, P = 0.003), operation time (RTME: 299.0 vs. OTME: 207.5 min, P < 0.001) and length of postoperative stay (RTME: 6 vs. OTME: 9 days, P < 0.001). The rate of circumferential resection margin involvement and distal resection margin were not statistically different between groups. There were no statistically significant differences at the 5-year follow-up: overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival. The cumulative local recurrence rate was statistically lower in the robotic group (RTME: 3.4% vs. OTME: 16.1%, P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: RTME showed a significant reduction in local recurrence rate and a higher, although not statistically significant, long-term cancer-specific survival with respect to OTME. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm or deny significantly better local control rates with robotic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Robótica/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Cohortes , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: To determine the quantitative gene expression of KRAS codon 12 mutant, TACSTD2, Ku70 and SERIN1 in samples of tumor tissue and to relate them with clinical-pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Samples of tumor and normal tissue of patients surgically treated for colorectal cancer between July 2005 and July 2009 were stored in a tissue bank. These samples were studied with the technique of real-time polymerase chain reaction in respect to expression of the following genes: KRAS codon 12 mutation, TACSTD2, Ku70, and SERIN1. RESULTS: Tumor samples of 37 patients were studied. The mean age was 65.5 years. Twenty one patients (56.8%) were male. Nine patients (24.3%) were classified as TNM stage I, 11 patients (29.8%) as TNM stage II, eight patients (21.6%) as TNM stage III and nine patients (24.3%) as TNM stage IV. The Ku70 expression in poorly-differentiated tumors is significantly higher than in well and moderately-differentiated tumors (2.76 vs. 1.13; p < 0.05). SERIN1, TACSTD2 and KRAS codon 12 mutation are not associated with clinical-pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Ku70 expression in poorly-differentiated tumors is significantly higher than in well and moderately-differentiated colorectal tumors.