International variation in managing locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer: prospective benchmark analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tumour extension beyond the mesorectal plane (ymrT4) occurs in 5-10 per cent of patients with rectal cancer and 10 per cent of patients develop locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) after primary surgery. There is global variation in healthcare delivery for these conditions. METHODS: An international benchmark trial of the management of ymrT4 tumours and LRRC was undertaken in France and Australia between 2015 and 2017. Heterogeneity in management and operative decision-making were analysed by comparison of surgical resection rates, blinded intercountry reading of pelvic MRI, quality-of-life assessment and qualitative evaluations. RESULTS: Among 154 patients (97 in France and 57 in Australia), 31·8 per cent had ymrT4 disease and 68·2 per cent LRRC. The surgical resection rates were 88 and 79 per cent in France and Australia respectively (P = 0·112). The concordance in operative planning was low (κ = 0·314); the rate of pelvic exenteration was lower in France than Australia both in clinical practice (36 of 78 versus 34 of 40; P < 0·001) and in theoretical conditions (10 of 25 versus 50 of 57; P = 0·002). The R0 resection rate was lower in France than Australia for LRRC (25 of 49 versus 18 of 21; P = 0·007) but not for ymrT4 tumours (21 of 26 versus 15 of 15; P = 0·139). Morbidity rates were similar. Patients who underwent non-exenterative procedures had higher scores on the mental functioning subscale at 12 months (P = 0·047), and a lower level of distress at 6 months (P = 0·049). Qualitative analysis highlighted five categories of psychosocial factors influencing treatment decisions: patient, strategy, specialist, organization and culture. CONCLUSION: This international benchmark trial has highlighted the differences in worldwide treatment of locally advanced and LRRC. Standardized care should improve outcomes for these patients.

ANTECEDENTES: La extensión del tumor más allá del plano del meso-rrecto (ymrT4) ocurre en el 5-10% de los pacientes con cáncer de recto y el 10% de los pacientes desarrollan recidiva local del cáncer de recto (locally recurrent rectal cáncer, LRRC) después de una cirugía primaria. Existe una variación global en la prestación de la asistencia sanitaria para esta pato-logía. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un ensayo de referencia internacional sobre el manejo de ymrT4 y LRRC en Francia y Australia entre 2015 y 2017. La heterogeneidad en el manejo y la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas se analizaron mediante la comparación de las tasas de resección quirúrgica, la lectura a ciegas de la resonancia magnética (RM) pélvica entre países, la evaluación de la calidad de vida y las evaluaciones cualitativas. RESULTADOS: De 154 pacientes (97 en Francia versus 57 en Australia), el 32% tenía ymrT4 y el 68% tenía cáncer de recto con recidiva local. Las tasas de resección quirúrgica fueron del 87,6% versus 77,8% (P = 0,112). La tasa de concordancia en la decisión quirúrgica fue baja (coeficiente kappa = 0,314) con una tasa más baja de exenteración pélvica en Francia, tanto en la práctica clínica (46% versus 85%; P < 0,0001) como en condiciones teóricas (40% versus 88%; P = 0,002). La tasa de resección R0 fue menor en Francia para la LRRC (51% versus 86%, P = 0,007) pero no para el ymrT4 (81% versus 100%, P = 0,139). Las tasas de morbilidad fueron similares. Los pacientes que se sometieron a procedimientos no exenterativos tuvieron una subescala de funcionamiento mental más alta a los 12 meses (P = 0,04) y un nivel de angustia más bajo a los 6 meses (P = 0,04). El análisis cualitativo destacó 5 categorías de factores psicosociales que afectaron a la decisión del tratamiento: paciente, estrategia, especialista, organización y cultura. CONCLUSIÓN: Este ensayo de referencia internacional destaca las diferencias en el tratamiento mundial del cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y de la LRR. La aten-ción estandarizada debería mejorar los resultados para estos pacientes.

Gastric bleeding risk following spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of the splenic vessels: a long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with resection of the splenic vessels (VR-SPDP) is an effective procedure. However, hemodynamic changes in splenogastric circulation may lead to the development of gastric varices (GV) with a risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. This retrospective study aimed to assess the long-term postoperative clinical follow-up of patients and review the late postoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic examination. METHODS: From 1988 to 2015, 48 consecutive VR-SPDP for benign or low-grade malignant disease were included. Late postoperative follow-up was undertaken with the use of a prospective database and assessment undertaken by CT and/or endoscopy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 76 months (range: 12-334 months). Two patients were lost to follow-up. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in one patient. Endoscopy and abdominal CT showed submucosal GV in five patients. Ten patients had perigastric varices (27%), but none developed clinical complications from their varices. All varices occurred within one year after distal pancreatectomy and remained stable during follow-up. DISCUSSION: Asymptomatic varices frequently occurred in patients who underwent VR-SPDP, but bleeding risk seemed low. Abdominal CT could identify GV and distinguish submucosal varices with a higher risk of gastric bleeding.

[Urinary complications of pelvic exenterations for rectal cancer with urinary invasion]. / Complications urinaires des exentérations pelviennes pour cancer du rectum avec envahissement urinaire.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer is indicated in locally advanced rectal tumors or pelvic recurrence invading adjacent organs. The oncologic goal being a complete R0 resection. Our aim was to study the urinary complications resulting from pelvic exenterations with urinary reconstruction in order to obtain a complete local control of the disease. METHODS: Between April 2004 and June 2013, 42 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma with urinary tract reconstruction were included. The urinary reconstruction was performed based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings. We studied early (within 30 postoperative days) and late urinary morbidity, as well as postoperative carcinologic control. RESULTS: Forty-two exenterations were performed for primary rectal cancer (n=15) or pelvic recurrence (n=27). R0 complete resection was achieved in 64% of patients. The resection was incomplete (R1) on the urinary tract in 9.5% of patients. The urinary reconstruction methods used were: 31 transileal ureterostomies after total exenteration (bricker procedure), 6 ureteral reimplantations on psoic bladder, 2 ureteroileoplasties, 2 partial cystectomies and one ureteral resection with simple ligation. The median follow-up was 20 months. The perioperative mortality was 2.3% (n=1) and postoperative overall morbidity was 64%. Early and late urinary morbidity was 23.8% and 21.4% respectively. Six patients developed major urinary complications (≥ Clavien IIIb). CONCLUSION: Pelvic exenteration with urinary resection resulted in our experience, in a local disease control of 64% (including a 90.5% for the urinary tract) at the price of an acceptable early specific morbidity and a low mortality that seems to justify an aggressive surgical approach.

Mid-term outcomes after biologic mesh use: Does their performance meet our expectations?

INTRODUCTION: The indications for use of biological mesh prostheses are very limited because of their high cost, but include parietal repair in a contaminated setting. Their efficacy has been questioned by several recent studies. We therefore studied the results of all of our patients who received a biological prosthesis, including hernia recurrence and infectious complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 68 patients who underwent biological prosthesis placement from 2009 to 2015 in a single center. RESULTS: The site of implantation was on the anterior abdominal wall in 49 (72%) of cases, in the pelvis in 19 (28%). The median follow-up was 19 months. In the early post-operative period, 22 (32.3%) of patients presented with wall abscess; eight (11.7%) underwent surgical revision and seven (10.2%) underwent interventional radiological drainage. In the medium term, 41/56 (73%) had a late complication; 32 (57%) of the patients developed recurrent herniation and 15 (26.7%) of them were re-operated. In addition, nine (16%) of patients developed a late surgical site infection and eight (14.2%) a chronic residual infection. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for recurrence were parastomal hernia (P=0.007) and a history of recurrent hernia (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: A majority of patients developed recurrent incisional herniation in the medium term. This puts the use of biological prostheses into question. These results need to be compared to those of semi-absorbable prostheses.

Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in radical oncopelvic surgery: a safe and useful procedure.

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flaps to treat locally advanced pelvic gynaecological or digestive tumours. METHODS: We reviewed 46 patients, who received RAM flaps after radical oncopelvic surgery, including: (a) total vaginal reconstruction (TVR); (b) partial vaginal reconstruction (PVR); (c) perineal reconstruction (PR). RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1998, 46 patients underwent pelvi-perineal reconstruction with RAM flaps after radical pelvic surgery for carcinoma of the cervix (n=22), anal carcinoma (n=11), rectal carcinoma (n=7), or other pelvic tumours types (n=6). There were two post-operative deaths. Overall surgical morbidity was 45, 6% (n=21). Specific morbidity of the RAM flap was 21, 7% (n=10). Global re-intervention rate was 13% (n=6). CONCLUSION: Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in radical oncopelvic surgery is useful for vaginal or perineal reconstruction and prevention of pelvic collections after extended resections with a low rate of associated morbidity.

[Surgery of rectal cancer: total exeresis of the mesorectum]. / Chirurgie du cancer du rectum: l'exérèse totale du mésorectum.

The authors review the recent literature about total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. They report the actual management of such patients.

Surgical treatment of extraluminal pelvic recurrence from rectal cancer: oncological management and resection techniques.

Local recurrence (LR) after curative surgery for rectal cancer occurs in 4 to 33% of cases especially with suboptimal surgery (non-TME). For numerous patients, diagnosis of LR is done at late stage of the disease because of the high rate of asymptomatic patients. MRI and PET-scan are the most performing exams to assess the local and general extension, with high diagnostic accuracy (sensibility 85% and specificity 92%). For extraluminal pelvic recurrences from rectal cancer, pelvic exenterations alone or with irradiation (preoperative and/or intraoperative) can afford a R0 resection rate ranging from 30% to 45% with acceptable morbidity. Morbidity and mortality rates are high for total exenteration and abdominosacral resection. After curative surgery, 5-year global survival from 30% to 40% is observed. Careful selection of patients with better preoperative status before resection is needed to achieve more curative resections and increase long-term survivor rates.

Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The value of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis (CAA) for rectal cancer is dependent on the oncological and functional results. The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the long-term oncological outcome of CAA with or without intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low-lying rectal tumours. METHODS: The study population comprised consecutive patients with low rectal cancer who underwent CAA in a single institution between 1977 and 2004. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not a partial ISR had been performed. Cox multivariate models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Some 278 patients underwent CAA with curative intent; 173 had ISR and 105 had CAA without ISR. Mean follow-up was 66.8 months. The 5-year actuarial rate for local recurrence, regardless of tumour stage, was 10.6 per cent in the ISR group versus 6.7 per cent for CAA alone (P = 0.405), and the 5-year actuarial overall survival rate was 86.1 and 80.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.318). Cox multivariable analysis revealed that resection of the anal canal was not a prognostic factor for local or metastatic recurrence. CONCLUSION: Sphincter-preserving surgery appears to be oncologically adequate for very low-lying rectal tumours.