GECOP-MMC: phase IV randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mytomicin-C after complete surgical cytoreduction in patients with colon cancer peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: The French PRODIGE 7 trial, published on January 2021, has raised doubts about the specific survival benefit provided by HIPEC with oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2 (30 minutes) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. However, several methodological flaws have been identified in PRODIGE 7, specially the HIPEC protocol or the choice of overall survival as the main endpoint, so its results have not been assumed as definitive, emphasizing the need for further research on HIPEC. It seems that the HIPEC protocol with high-dose mytomicin-C (35 mg/m2) is the preferred regime to evaluate in future clinical studies. METHODS: GECOP-MMC is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase IV clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HIPEC with high-dose mytomicin-C in preventing the development of peritoneal recurrence in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis from colon cancer (not rectal), after complete surgical cytoreduction. This study will be performed in 31 Spanish HIPEC centres, starting in March 2022. Additional international recruiting centres are under consideration. Two hundred sixteen patients with PCI ≤ 20, in which complete cytoreduction (CCS 0) has been obtained, will be randomized intraoperatively to arm 1 (with HIPEC) or arm 2 (without HIPEC). We will stratified randomization by surgical PCI (1-10; 11-15; 16-20). Patients in both arms will be treated with personalized systemic chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is peritoneal recurrence-free survival at 3 years. An ancillary study will evaluate the correlation between surgical and pathological PCI, comparing their respective prognostic values. DISCUSSION: HIPEC with high-dose mytomicin-C, in patients with limited (PCI ≤ 20) and completely resected (CCS 0) peritoneal metastases, is assumed to reduce the expected risk of peritoneal recurrence from 50 to 30% at 3 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2019-004679-37; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05250648 (registration date 02/22/2022, ).

Effect of Cilastatin on Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Patients Undergoing Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Cisplatin is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic agents in oncology, although its nephrotoxicity limits application and dosage. We present the results of a clinical study on prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC-cisplatin). Prophylaxis was with imipenem/cilastatin. Cilastatin is a selective inhibitor of renal dehydropeptidase I in the proximal renal tubule cells that can reduce the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin. Unfortunately, cilastatin is not currently marketed alone, and can only be administered in combination with imipenem. The study has a retrospective part that serves as a control (n = 99 patients receiving standard surgical prophylaxis) and a prospective part with imipenem/cilastatin prophylaxis corresponding to the study group (n = 85 patients). In both groups, we collected specific data on preoperative risk factors of renal damage, fluid management, hemodynamic control, and urine volume during surgery (including the hyperthermic chemotherapy perfusion), as well as data on hemodynamic and renal function during the first seven days after surgery. The main finding of the study is that cilastatin may exert a nephroprotective effect in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin perfusion. Creatinine values remained lower than in the control group (ANOVA test, p = 0.037). This translates into easier management of these patients in the postoperative period, with significantly shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.

Single-Institution Multidisciplinary Management of Locoregional Oligo-Recurrent Pelvic Malignancies: Long-Term Outcome Analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze long-term outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with locoregional oligo-recurrent (LROR) pelvic malignancies treated in a multimodal protocol. METHODS: Patients with an histologic diagnosis of LROR pelvic cancer (rectal 50 %, gynecological 50 %) with absence of distant metastases, undergoing surgery with radical intent and intraoperative radiotherapy (median dose 12.5 Gy) were considered eligible for participation in this study. Additionally, 48 % received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (median dose 50 Gy). RESULTS: From 1995 to 2012, a total of 143 patients from a single institution were analyzed. With a median follow-up time of 48 months (range 2-189), 5-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 53, 44, and 46 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, no EBRT treatment to the locoregional (p ≤ 0.001), R1 margin status (p = 0.03), time interval from primary tumor diagnosis to LROR <24 months (p = 0.05), and fragmentation in the resected specimen (p = 0.004) retained significance in relation to LRC. On multivariate analysis we found that only R1 margin status (p = 0.003), primary tumor diagnosis to LROR <24 months (p = 0.02), and high histological grade (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: From this analysis emerges the fact that EBRT influences local control but, given the high risk of distant metastases, DFS remains modest. Margin status, tumor fragmentation, no EBRT to the LR, and time interval from primary tumor diagnosis to LROR are the dominant factors for subsequent locoregional recurrence (LRR). Accordingly, future prospective studies might be designed which adapt treatment according to the predicted risk of subsequent LRR.

Role of radiotherapy in the chemotherapy-containing multidisciplinary management of patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To analyze prognostic factors associated with long-term outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy (CT) and surgery with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2012, 95 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and locoregional disease [clinical stage IB-IIA (n = 45; 47%), IIB-IIIC (n = 50; 53%)] were treated with curative resection [R0 (n = 52; 55%), R1 (n = 43, 45%)] and CT with (n = 60; 63%) or without (n = 35; 37%) EBRT (45-50.4 Gy). Additionally, 29 patients (48%) also received a pre-anastomosis IOERT boost (applicator diameter size, 7-10 cm; dose, 10-15 Gy; beam energy, 9-18 MeV). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 17.2 months (range, 1-182), 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control were 28, 20, and 53%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that IIB-IIIC stage (HR, 2.23; p = 0.04), R1 margin resection status (HR, 2.09; p = 0.04), no vascular resection (HR, 0.42; p = 0.02), and not receiving external beam radiotherapy (HR, 2.70; p = 0.004) were associated with locoregional recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, only R1 margin resection status (HR, 2.63; p = 0.009) and not receiving EBRT (HR, 2.91; p = 0.002) retained significance with regard to locoregional recurrence. We observed no difference in toxicity between patients treated with or without EBRT (p = 0.44). Overall treatment mortality was 3%. No long-term treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although adjuvant CT is still the standard of care for resected pancreatic tumors, OS remains modest owing to the high risk of distant metastases. Locoregional treatment needs to be tested in the context of more efficient systemic therapy.

Postchemoradiation resected locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma: long-term outcome with or without intraoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To report feasibility, tolerance, anatomical topography of locoregional recurrence (LRR), and long-term outcome for esophageal and esophagogastric (EG) cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) and surgery with or without a radiation boost of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT). METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2010, 53 patients with primary esophageal (n = 26; 44 %) or EG carcinoma (n = 30; 56 %), and disease confined to locoregional area [clinical stage: IIb (n = 30; 57 %), IIIa (n = 14; 26 %), IIIb (n = 6; 11 %), IIIc (n = 3; 6 %)], were treated with preoperative CRT, curative (R0) resection with an extended (two-field) lymph node dissection in all cases. Thirty-seven patients also received a preanastomotic reconstruction IOERT boost (applicator diameter size 6-9 cm, dose 10-15 Gy, beam energy 6-15 MeV) over the tumor bed in the mediastinum and upper abdominal lymph node area. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 27.9 months (range, 0.2-148), LRR rate was 15 % (n = 8). Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival was 48 and 36 %, respectively. Univariate log-rank analyses showed that receiving IOERT was associated with lower risk of LRR (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, only the IOERT group retained significance in relation to LRR (odds ratio, 0.08; 95 % confidence interval, 0.01-0.48; p = 0.01). Postoperative mortality and perioperative complications were 11 % (n = 6) and 30 % (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: Local control is high in the radiation-boosted area, but OS remains modest, given the high risk of distant metastases. Intensified locoregional treatment needs to be tested in the context of more efficient concurrent, neo-, and adjuvant systemic therapy.

Chemoradiation for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with or without intraoperative radiation therapy boost: Long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To analyze prognostic factors associated with long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and surgery with or without intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2012, 60 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and locoregional disease (clinical stage IB [n = 13; 22%], IIA [n = 16; 27%], IIB [n = 22; 36%], IIIC [n = 9; 15%]) were treated with CRT (45-50.4 Gy before surgery [n = 19; 32%] and after surgery [n = 41; 68%]) and curative resection (R0 [n = 34; 57%], R1 [n = 26, 43%]). Twenty-nine patients (48%) also received a pre-anastomosis IOERT boost (applicator diameter size, 7-10 cm; dose, 10-15 Gy; beam energy, 9-18 MeV). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range, 1-182), 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control were 20%, 13%, and 58%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that R1 margin resection status (HR, 3.17; p = 0.04), not receiving IOERT (HR, 7.33; p = 0.01), and postoperative CRT (HR, 5.12; p = 0.04) were associated with a higher risk of locoregional recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, only margin resection status (HR, 3.0; p = 0.05) and not receiving IOERT (HR, 6.75; p = 0.01) retained significance with regard to locoregional recurrence. Postoperative mortality and perioperative complications were 3% (n = 2) and 43% (n = 26). CONCLUSIONS: Although local control is good in the radiation-boosted area, OS remains modest owing to high risk of distant metastases. Intensified locoregional treatment needs to be tested in the context of more efficient systemic therapy.

Which classification system defines best prognosis of mucinous neoplasms of the appendix with peritoneal dissemination: TNM vs PSOGI?

AIMS: Several classification systems are used for pseudomyxoma peritonei. The four-tiered classification system proposed by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and the two-tiered proposed by the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) result from evolution in terminology and pathological insight. The aim is to evaluate the impact of PSOGI and eighth edition of the AJCC classifications on survival. METHODS: Pathological slides were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database including patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with peritoneal dissemination between January 2009 and December 2019. Patients were reclassified according to PSOGI and AJCC eighth edition criteria. Survival analysis evaluated the impact of each classification system on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) while the concordance-index evaluated their predictive power. RESULTS: 95 patients were identified; 21.1% were reclassified as acellular mucin, 55.8% as low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei, 8.4% as high-grade MCP (HGMCP) and 14 as HGMCP with signet ring cells. Median OS was not reached, 5-year OS and DFS were 86.1% and 51.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations with OS (PSOGI: HR 10.2, p=0.039; AJCC: HR 7.7, p=0.002) and DFS (PSOGI: HR 12.7, p=0.001; AJCC: HR 3.7, p<0.001). The predictive capacity of both classification systems was unacceptable for OS and DFS (concordance-index values <0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Both classification systems behaved similarly when stratifying our series into prognostic groups. The PSOGI classification provides better histopathological description, but histology alone is insufficient for adequate patient prognostication.

Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms: From Clinic to Pathology and Prognosis.

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms have been classified differently over time causing confusion when comparing results between working groups in this field and establishing a prognosis of the disease. A historical perspective of the different classification systems of these tumors is essential for the understanding of the evolution of concepts and histopathological definitions that have led up to the present moment. We carried out a systematic review of the pathological classifications of appendiceal mucinous tumors and how they have included the new criteria resulting from clinical and pathological research. The latest classifications by PSOGI and AJCC 8th edition Cancer Staging have made a great effort to incorporate the new pathological descriptions and develop prognostic groups. The introduction of these new classification systems has posed the challenge of verifying how they adapt to our casuistry and which one defines best the prognosis of our patients. We reclassified our series of patients treated for mucinous appendiceal tumors with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following the PSOGI and the AJCC 8th edition criteria and concluded that both classifications correspond well with the OS and DFS of these patients, with some advantage relative to the PSOGI classification due to a better histopathological description of the different groups.

Recommendations for the optimal management of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a TTD and GECOP-SEOQ expert consensus statement.

Peritoneal metastases (PM) occur when cancer cells spread inside the abdominal cavity and entail an advanced stage of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prognosis, which is poor, correlates highly with tumour burden, as measured by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in specialized centres should be offered especially to patients with a low to moderate PCI when complete resection is expected. The presence of resectable metastatic disease in other organs is not a contraindication in well-selected patients. Although several retrospective and small prospective studies have suggested a survival benefit of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to CRS, the recently published phase III studies PRODIGE-7 in CRC patients with PM, and COLOPEC and PROPHYLOCHIP in resected CRC with high-risk of PM, failed to show any survival advantage of this strategy using oxaliplatin in a 30-min perfusion. Final results from ongoing randomized phase III trials testing CRS plus HIPEC based on mitomycin C (MMC) are awaited with interest. In this article, a group of experts selected by the Spanish Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD) and the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Oncologic Surgery (GECOP), which is part of the Spanish Society of Surgical Oncology (SEOQ), reviewed the role of HIPEC plus CRS in CRC patients with PM. As a result, a series of recommendations to optimize the management of these patients is proposed.

ESTRO/ACROP IORT recommendations for intraoperative radiation therapy in locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Multimodal strategies have been implemented for locally recurrent rectal cancer scheduled for complete surgical resection. Irradiation and systemic therapy have been added to improve the oncological outcome, as surgery alone was associated with a poor prognosis. Intraoperative irradiation (IORT) is a component of irradiation intensification. Long-term cancer control and a higher survival rate were consistently reported in patients who had IORT as a component of their multidisciplinary treatment. The experience reported by expert IORT groups is reviewed and recommendations to guide clinical practice are explained in detail.

Indications and patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has provided unprecedented results in the management of peritoneal-based neoplasms. Prognostic factors leading to a survival advantage when this treatment modality is employed have been identified. A steep learning curve has been described as well. Therefore, knowledgeable indication setting and proper selection of patients to whom this combined treatment can be offered is warranted in order to obtain the best results at the lowest possible toxicity.

Initiation of a program in peritoneal surface malignancy.

The initiation of a Program in Peritoneal Malignancy is a long and complex process. The novelty, technically demanding nature and steep learning curve that characterize this treatment strategy calls for a carefully planned, systematic, controlled, and informed introduction is an institution, for which an Institutional Review Board approved protocol is suggested. Commitment of a surgical team and institution, education of other physician, nurses, and ancillary personnel involved in the procedure, safety precaution for patients and health care workers, and proper patient selection are important requirements for initiating the program. This manuscript provides a guide for implementation of this treatment strategy with a minimum of untoward events, reduced apprehension of medical and nursing colleagues, and a maximum benefit for patients.

Multidisciplinary therapy for patients with locally oligo-recurrent pelvic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To analyze prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in patients with locally recurrent pelvic cancer (LRPC) treated with a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 1995 to December 2011, 81 patients [rectal (47 %); gynecologic (39 %); retroperitoneal sarcoma (14 %)] underwent extended surgery [multiorgan (58 %), bone (35 %), vascular (9 %), soft tissue (63 %)] and intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) to treat recurrent tumors in the pelvic region. Thirty-five patients (43 %) received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 39 months (6-189 months); the 1- 3- and 5-year rates of locoregional control (LRC) were 83, 53, and 41 %, respectively. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed worse LRC in patients who did not receive integrated EBRT as rescue treatment of pelvic recurrence (p = 0.003) or underwent non-radical resection (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis EBRT, non-radical resection, and tumor fragmentation retained significance (p = 0.002, p = 0.004, and p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection, absence of tumor fragmentation and addition of EBRT for rescue are associated with improved LRC in patients with LRPC. Our results suggest that this group can benefit from EBRT combined with extended surgical resection and IOERT.

Prognostic impact of external beam radiation therapy in patients treated with and without extended surgery and intraoperative electrons for locally recurrent rectal cancer: 16-year experience in a single institution.

PURPOSE: To analyze prognostic factors associated with survival in patients after intraoperative electrons containing resective surgical rescue of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 1995 to December 2011, 60 patients with LRRC underwent extended surgery (n=38: multiorgan [43%], bone [28%], soft tissue [38%]) or nonextended (n=22) surgical resection, including a component of intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy (IOERT) to the pelvic recurrence tumor bed. Twenty-eight (47%) of these patients also received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (range, 30.6-50.4 Gy). Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 36 months (range, 2-189 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates for locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) were 86%, 52%, and 44%; and 78%, 53%, 43%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R1 resection, EBRT at the time of pelvic rerecurrence, no tumor fragmentation, and non-lymph node metastasis retained significance with regard to LRR. R1 resection and no tumor fragmentation showed a significant association with OS after adjustment for other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT treatment integrated for rescue, resection radicality, and not involved fragmented resection specimens are associated with improved LRC in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Additionally, tumor fragmentation could be compensated by EBRT. Present results suggest that a significant group of patients with LRRC may benefit from EBRT treatment integrated with extended surgery and IOERT.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: methodology and safety considerations.

Several methods of delivering hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) during the course of cytoreductive surgery have been described, but no significant differences in treatment results have been found among them. HIPEC is a safe treatment for the patient and for healthcare workers involved in the procedure provided standard protective and environmental measures are used. This article describes the different techniques in use and the technology available for the administration of HIPEC. Also reviewed are the safety features that must be taken into consideration when performing this procedure. Recommended guidelines to prevent associated occupational hazards are provided.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Rationale and technique.

The combination of complete cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy provides the only chance for long-term survival for selected patients diagnosed with a variety of peritoneal neoplasms, either primary or secondary to digestive or gynecologic malignancy. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) delivered in the operating room once the cytoreductive surgical procedure is finalized, constitutes the most common form of administration of perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This may be complemented in some instances with early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). HIPEC combines the pharmacokinetic advantage inherent to the intracavitary delivery of certain cytotoxic drugs, which results in regional dose intensification, with the direct cytotoxic effect of hyperthermia. Hyperthermia exhibits a selective cell-killing effect in malignant cells by itself, potentiates the cytotoxic effect of certain chemotherapy agents and enhances the tissue penetration of the administered drug. The chemotherapeutic agents employed in HIPEC need to have a cell cycle nonspecific mechanism of action and should ideally show a heat-synergistic cytotoxic effect. Delivery of HIPEC requires an apparatus that heats and circulates the chemotherapeutic solution so that a stable temperature is maintained in the peritoneal cavity during the procedure. An open abdomen (Coliseum) or closed abdomen technique may be used, with no significant differences in efficacy proven to date. Specific technical training and a solid knowledge of regional chemotherapy management are required. Concerns about safety of the procedure for operating room personnel are expected but are manageable if universal precautions and standard chemotherapy handling procedures are used. Different HIPEC drug regimens and dosages are currently in use. A tendency for concurrent intravenous chemotherapy administration (bidirectional chemotherapy, so-called "HIPEC plus") has been observed in recent years, with the aim to further enhance the cytotoxic potential of HIPEC. Future trials to ascertain the ideal HIPEC regimen in different diseases and to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs or drug combinations in this context are warranted.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignant disease.

Peritoneal Malignant Disease (PMD) is the presence of tumoral tissue on the peritoneal surface from primary tumors or tumors from other locations (e.g. digestive or gynecologic). It is a regional disease with poor prognosis when treated with repeated "debulking" and traditional systemic chemotherapy. Cytoreduction plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a combined multimodal regional procedure aimed at reducing the macroscopic tumoral mass as much as possible and treating with chemotherapy the microscopic disease that is out of the scope of the surgeon. This combined treatment may change the natural history of PMD, it is translated into a higher overall survival and cancer-free survival and it offers the option of cure in selected cases. The high-complexity procedure is also associated with complications and mortality, but in similar rates as other major oncologic procedures.

Imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Imaging studies are crucial in the evaluation of patients with suspected or known peritoneal cancerous dissemination. Despite the major progress that has occurred in radiological technology in the last few years, adequate and early detection of peritoneal surface disease remains a challenge. Improvements in spatial resolution are still insufficient to detect small volume peritoneal implants, often resulting in an underestimation of peritoneal disease burden, as assessed at subsequent surgical exploration. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has provided unprecedented results in the management of peritoneal-based neoplasms, provided that a complete (adequate) cytoreduction is achieved. Diagnostic imaging tests are used to select patients who may benefit from this combined treatment by ruling out extraperitoneal involvement and signs of unresectable peritoneal disease. Furthermore, a careful assessment of the disease distribution within the peritoneal cavity, guided by a deep knowledge of the disease's clinical and biological behavior helps in planning the surgical procedure. Close interaction and cooperation between surgeons and radiologists is of utmost importance in this regard, and dedicated, motivated radiologists are required. Contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomography scan remains the standard imaging modality in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Magnetic resonance imaging may offer complementary valuable data. Positron emission tomography (PET) has a more limited role, its main indication being the detection of unsuspected extraperitoneal involvement in nonmucinous neoplasms.

[Intraoperative therapeutic intensification techniques in locally advanced abdominal sarcomas]. / Intensificación terapéutica intraoperatoria en el tratamiento de los sarcomas abdominales localmente avanzados.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcomas are rare tumors that develop from mesenchymal cells. Their management is difficult due to their changing histology, location, and behavior. In this article, we discuss the use of two intraoperative therapeutic intensification techniques, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIIC), in the treatment of locally advanced abdominal sarcomas and peritoneal sarcomatosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed a series of 20 consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced abdominal sarcoma and 5 patients with a diagnosis of peritoneal sarcomatosis who were evaluated and treated in our department from December 1996 to October 2005. In advanced abdominal sarcoma, we performed complete or maximal resection followed by IORT. In peritoneal sarcomatosis we performed massive cytoreduction followed by HIIC. RESULTS: The survival rate in advanced abdominal sarcomas without sarcomatosis was 65% at 26 months. Among the 5 patients diagnosed with peritoneal sarcomatosis, 3 were alive, and 2 were without recurrence at 20 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IORT associated with radical surgery seems to improve local control and survival in advanced abdominal sarcomas. Maximal cytoreduction plus HIIC used as treatment of peritoneal sarcomatosis is a feasible technique that offers a therapeutic option with curative intent.