Physiotherapists use a great variety of motor learning options in neurological rehabilitation, from which they choose through an iterative process: a retrospective think-aloud study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine which motor learning options are applied by experienced physiotherapists in neurological rehabilitation, and how they choose between the different options. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative approach was used. A purposive sample of five expert physiotherapists from the neurological ward of a rehabilitation center participated. Data were collected using nine videotaped therapy situations. During retrospective think-aloud interviews, the physiotherapists were instructed to constantly "think aloud" while they were watching their own videos. RESULTS: Five "operators" were identified: "act", "know", "observe", "assess" and "argue". The "act" operator consisted of 34 motor learning options, which were clustered into "instruction", "feedback" and "organization". The "know", "observe", "assess" and "argue" operators explained how therapists chose one of these options. The four operators seem to be interrelated and together lead to a decision to apply a particular motor learning option. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that the participating physiotherapists used a great variety of motor learning options in their treatment sessions. Further, the decision-making process with regard to these motor learning options was identified. Results may support future intervention studies that match the content and process of therapy in daily practice. The study should be repeated with other physiotherapists. Implications for Rehabilitation The study provided insight into the way experienced therapist handle the great variety of possible motor learning options, including concrete ideas on how to operationalize these options in specific situations. Despite differences in patients' abilities, it seems that therapists use the same underlying clinical reasoning process when choosing a particular motor learning option. Participating physiotherapists used more than the in guidelines suggested motor learning options and considered more than the suggested factors, hence adding practice based options of motor learning to the recommended ones in the guidelines. A think-aloud approach can be considered for peer-to-peer and student coaching to enhance discussion on the motor learning options applied and the underlying choices and to encourage research by practicing clinicians.

The lived experience of parents enabling participation of their child with a physical disability at home, at school and in the community.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth exploration and understanding of parents' thoughts, feelings and concerns they experience while reflecting on their actions, challenges and needs in enabling their child's participation at home, at school and in the community. METHOD: A naturalistic inquiry with thirteen Dutch parents using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS: Analysis revealed three super-ordinate themes: "Parents' experiences and concerns about systems, laws and regulations", "Parents' experiences and thoughts about physical and/or social environment" and "Parents' experiences and feelings of finding and/or enabling an activity". Parents' often expressed feelings of disappointment derived from being misunderstood, from dealing with the complexity of systems, from hindrance of participation of their children by the social and the physical environment, and from the lack of leisure activities for their child. It is primarily restrictions in the physical and social environments that urge them to take actions, to experience challenges and think of needs. CONCLUSIONS: In-depth exploration and understanding of parents' articulated matters must be shared and taken seriously by policymakers and service providers. Parents' knowledge and experiences should be of major relevance to improve paediatric rehabilitation and other services for children with a physical disability. Implications for Rehabilitation To achieve tailored pediatric rehabilitation, involvement and needs of parents in enhancing their child's participation ought to be acknowledged. Active use of parents' experiences and knowledge regarding the participation of their child on different levels of decision making may improve daily services in pediatric rehabilitation. Aiming for optimal participation of a child with a physical disability at home, at school and in the community, the focus of pediatric rehabilitation needs to shift towards enabling, social and physical, environments.