Dose comparison of robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) vs IMRT and VMAT photon plans for testicular seminoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage II seminoma have traditionally been treated with photons to the retroperitoneal and iliac space, which leads to a substantial dose bath to abdominal and pelvic organs at risk (OAR). As these patients are young and with excellent prognosis, reducing dose to OAR and thereby the risk of secondary cancer is of utmost importance. We compared IMPT to opposing IMRT fields and VMAT, assessing dose to OAR and both overall and organ-specific secondary cancer risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative treatment planning study was conducted on planning CT-scans from ten patients with stage II seminoma, treated with photons to a 'dog-leg' field with doses ranging from 20 to 25 Gy and a 10 Gy sequential boost to the metastatic lymph node(s). Photon plans were either 3-4 field IMRT (Eclipse) or 1-2 arc VMAT (Pinnacle). Proton plans used robust (5 mm; 3.5%) IMPT (Eclipse), multi field optimization with 3 posterior fields supplemented by 2 anterior fields at the level of the iliac vessels. Thirty plans were generated. Mean doses to OARs were compared for IMRT vs IMPT and VMAT vs IMPT. The risk of secondary cancer was calculated according to the model described by Schneider, using excess absolute risk (EAR, per 10,000 persons per year) for body outline, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, bowel, bladder and spinal cord. RESULTS: Mean doses to all OARs were significantly lower with IMPT except similar kidney (IMRT) and spinal cord (VMAT) doses. The relative EAR for body outline was 0.59 for IMPT/IMRT (p < .05) and 0.33 for IMPT/VMAT (p < .05). Organ specific secondary cancer risk was also lower for IMPT except for pancreas and duodenum. CONCLUSION: Proton therapy reduced radiation dose to OAR compared to both IMRT and VMAT plans, and potentially reduce the risk of secondary cancer both overall and for most OAR.

Corrigendum to "Two compound techniques for total body irradiation" [Tech. Innov. Patient Support Radiat. Oncol. 21 (2022) 1-7].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.11.006.].

Two compound techniques for total body irradiation.

INTRODUCTION: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an important treatment modality that is used in combination with chemotherapy in many stem cell transplantation protocols. Therefore, the quality of the irradiation is important. Two techniques for planning and delivering TBI are presented and compared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The technique named ExIMRT is a combination of manually shaped conventional fields from an extended SSD and isocentric IMRT fields. The technique named ExVMAT is a combination of conventional and IMRT fields from an extended SSD and isocentric VMAT fields. Dosimetric data from 32 patients who were planned and treated according to one of the two techniques were compared. RESULTS: When comparing the two techniques, it is determined that the ExVMAT technique is able to significantly reduce the mean total volume overdosed by 120% from 408 to 12 cm3. The dose covering 98% of the total lung volume is significantly increased by this technique from a mean of 9.7 Gy to 10.3 Gy. Additionally, the dose covering 2% of the total kidney volume is significantly decreased from a mean of 12.8 to 12.5 Gy. Furthermore, the population-based variance of the median dose to the total lung volume, the heart and the volume of the body prescribed to 12.5 Gy is significantly reduced. The results are obtained without compromising overall treatment quality as treatment time or dose rate to the lungs. CONCLUSION: Using the ExVMAT technique, a superior dose distribution can be delivered both from a patient and a population perspective compared to the ExIMRT technique.

Analysis of Current Practice of CT examinations.

BACKGROUND: The number of CT examinations performed in Denmark increased from 14,500 examinations in 1979 to 301,617 in 2005. This implies increased radiation dose to the population. On this background, an analysis of the practice for CT examinations including potential limitations of radiation exposure and the associated risk is needed. PURPOSES: To analyse 1) the current use of CT in a university department compared to 1996, 2) the radiation dose and risk associated with the examinations and 3) the use of CT in Denmark since 1979. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The administrative data of CT examinations performed in the Department of Radiology, Aarhus Sygehus, during 2005 and 1996, respectively, were obtained. Additionally national CT data were obtained from the database at the National Board of Health. RESULTS: In 1996 1,840 patients obtained 5,538 CT examinations at Aarhus Sygehus. Their mean age was 46.7 years (0-88). The most frequent referring speciality was oncology followed by abdominal surgery and orthopaedic surgery. In 2005 3,769 patients obtained 11,216 CT examinations. They were generally older with a mean age of 56.9 years (0-97). The most frequent referring speciality was oncology followed by chest medicine and abdominal surgery. In 2005 the total effective dose was 71,043 mSv (mean 18.9 mSv/per patient). According to the BEIR VII model this radiation level corresponded to a risk for inducing a cancer in 7 patients, being fatal in half of them. The national data showed a gradual increase of the number of CT examinations from 1979 to 2005, most pronounced after year 2000 coinciding with the introduction of multi-slice CT (MSCT). CONCLUSION: The number of CT examinations at Aarhus Sygehus doubled during a 9 year period. The increase occured especially in middle and high age groups.

Survival and radiation risk in patients obtaining more than six CT examinations during one year.

BACKGROUND: During a review of the current practice for computer tomography (CT) in 2005 at the Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, we observed 300 patients with more than six CT examinations during one year. They comprised 8% of the patients and accounted for 27% of all examinations. These patients needed further analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 300 patients were analyzed concerning age, type of diseases indicating multiple CTs and the CT protocols used. The effective dose and risk of low dose radiation was estimated and survival of the patients after >1.5 year was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients had malignancies, the most frequent being lung cancer, bladder cancer and colon cancer. A total of 4.3% of the patients with malignancies were < or =40 year old, 13.3% were 41-50 years old and 62.7% 51-70 years old. The highest average number of CT examinations was observed in patients with sarcomas (11.2 examinations per patient). Eleven patients (aged 15-77 years) had traumatic lesions. Their number of examinations varied from 7 to 20. The total radiation dose for all 300 patients was 21.42 Sv, which may imply induction of a fatal cancer in one of the patients. However, only 102 patients survived their disease. CONCLUSION: A total of 198 patients had serious disease and were not alive 1.5 years after the examinations. The multiple CT examinations were necessary to monitor their treatment. For the surviving 102 patients the use of CT contributed to an optimal therapy, but the examinations implied a risk for radiation induced malignancies.

Evaluating out-of-field doses during radiotherapy of paediatric brain tumours using lead shielding and flattening-filter free beams.

Paediatric radiotherapy comes at the expense of increased risk of late effects due to out-of-field dose caused not only by the treatment itself but also by image guidance. This study examined how the out-of-field dose to selected radiosensitive organs was affected by applying a 1 mm lead shielding during delivery of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for paediatric brain cancer. The study also investigated how the out-of-field dose to the same organs was affected by the use of flattening-filter free (FFF) beams. Out-of-field doses to the thyroid, breast and testes were measured using thermoluminescence dosimeters inserted in two anthropomorphic phantoms equivalent to a 1-year and 5-year old child. Coplanar VMAT plans were prepared for 6 MV and 6 MV FFF photon beams and delivered using a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator, with and without lead shielding applied to the phantoms. The measured out-of-field doses were as large as 200,9 cGy for the whole treatment, with associated secondary cancer risk being as large as 1,1%. Shielding of the phantoms was found to decrease the out-of-field dose by up to 24%. The use of 6 MV FFF beams yielded a decrease in the dose to the testes by 21-42% compared to 6 MV, while in one case increasing the dose to the thyroid by 18%. The observation that only doses to organs distant to the primary irradiated volume were significantly decreased for FFF can be explained by an increase in internal scatter caused by the softer energy spectrum of the Varian FFF beam.

Prospective evaluation of acute toxicity and patient reported outcomes in anal cancer and plan optimization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard therapy for localized anal cancer (AC), but this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity. However, there is a lack of prospectively collected toxicity and patient reported outcome (PRO) data from larger cohorts. The purpose was to prospectively collect and determine agreement between physician assessed toxicity (CTCAE) and PRO during and after CRT and to compare IMRT, VMAT and proton-based planning in a subgroup of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients, treated with CRT for AC, were included between 2015 and 2017. NCI-CTCAE v.4.0, EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 data were collected baseline, mid-therapy, end-of therapy and 2-4 weeks posttherapy. Treatment planning with 5- or 6-fixed field IMRT, 2 and 3 arc VMAT, and 3- and 4-field proton plans were compared. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included. Both CTCAE and PROs related to acute toxicity reached a maximum at end of therapy. Incidences of PROs were markedly higher with only slight to fair agreement to CTCAE, (κ 13-37). Comparative planning revealed dosimetric equality of IMRT and VMAT plans, but superiority of proton plans. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of PRO scores and weak agreement to CTCAE suggest that PROs are important tools complementary to CTCAE in evaluating patient symptoms during and after CRT. Proton therapy has the potential to lower radiation doses to most organs at risk.

Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children.

OBJECTIVE: To present results of optimising scoliosis examination by changing from a conventional film/grid (F/G) to air-gap technique using computed radiography (CR), and to evaluate different methods for estimating effective radiation doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine children and adolescents were examined with an F/G technique, and 21 with air-gap and CR techniques. Entrance surface doses (ESD) were determined with lithium fluoride thermoluminescence dosimeters. For all patients, the effective radiation doses were determined using a hermaphrodite PCXMC computer program. For all F/G radiographs, the effective doses were also determined according to the NRPB-R279 report, and for 22 children (>9 years and/or >40 kg) also with the ODS-60 program, which allows separate gender calculations. Accumulated doses for 37 children examined more than once with F/G examinations were assessed. RESULTS: For F/G techniques, the ESDs for both frontal and lateral views varied with age and were significantly correlated to the patients' thickness. The calculated effective doses using the PCXMC program and the NRPB-R279 did not differ significantly for all frontal and lateral radiographs, respectively, but ODS-60 gave significantly higher values in female subjects. With air-gap and CR techniques, the mean effective doses were reduced by a factor over 10. The mean accumulated effective dose for 37 children with a mean of seven F/G examinations was 6.1 mSv, implying a risk of death of about 1:2,000 for boys and at least 1:1,000 for girls. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric scoliosis radiography should be considered a specialised procedure, which has to be optimised using a non-grid technique.

Effective radiation dose from semicoronal CT of the sacroiliac joints in comparison with axial CT and conventional radiography.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose given by semicoronal CT of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) in comparison with axial CT and conventional radiography. The total effective radiation doses given by serial contiguous semicoronal and axial CT, using 5-mm slices, 120 kV and 330 mAs, were determined by measurement of organ doses using an anthropomorphic Rando Alderson phantom paced with thermoluminescence dosimeters. The doses given by conventional antero-posterior (AP) and oblique projections of the SIJs were determined similarly. In a female the total effective dose by semicoronal CT was found to be more than six times lower than by axial CT and 2.5 times lower than the dose use to obtain a conventional AP radiograph, the values being 102, 678, and 255 micro Sv, respectively. The effective dose by semicoronal CT was only a little higher than the dose given to obtain two oblique radiographs. In a male with lead protection of the gonads the dose by semicoronal CT was four times lower than by axial CT, but higher than by conventional radiography. In conclusion, the effective dose by semicoronal CT of the SIJs is lower than by axial CT, and in females a semicoronal CT implies a lower effective radiation dose that used to obtain an AP radiograph.