OPTIMA: a phase II dose and volume de-escalation trial for human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were assigned to dose and volume de-escalated radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) based on response to induction chemotherapy in an effort to limit treatment-related toxicity while preserving efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were classified as low-risk (≤T3, ≤N2B, ≤10 pack-year history) or high-risk (T4 or ≥N2C or >10 PYH). After three cycles of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel, response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Low-risk patients with ≥50% response received 50 Gray (Gy) RT (RT50) while low-risk patients with 30%-50% response or high-risk patients with ≥50% response received 45 Gy CRT (CRT45). Patients with lesser response received standard-of-care 75 Gy CRT (CRT75). RT/CRT was limited to the first echelon of uninvolved nodes. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival compared with a historic control of 85%. Secondary end points included overall survival and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (28 low risk/34 high risk) were enrolled. Of low-risk patients, 71% received RT50 while 21% received CRT45. Of high-risk patients, 71% received CRT45. With a median follow-up of 29 months, 2-year PFS and OS were 95% and 100% for low-risk patients and 94% and 97% for high-risk patients, respectively. The overall 2-year PFS was 94.5% and within the 11% noninferiority margin for the historic control. Grade 3+ mucositis occurred in 30%, 63%, and 91% of the RT50, CRT45, and CRT75 groups, respectively (P = 0.004). Rates of any PEG-tube use were 0%, 31%, and 82% for RT50, CRT45, and CRT75 groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy with response and risk-stratified dose and volume de-escalated RT/CRT for HPV+ OPSCC is associated with favorable oncologic outcomes and reduced acute and chronic toxicity. Further evaluation of induction-based de-escalation in large multicenter studies is justified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT02258659.

Response-adapted volume de-escalation (RAVD) in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce the late toxicity associated with chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LA-HNSCC) have focused on radiotherapy (RT) dose de-escalation. In this phase I/II protocol investigating the addition of everolimus to induction chemotherapy (IC), we incorporated a novel response-adapted volume de-escalation (RAVD) approach using IC response to guide the extent of RT volume reduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable LA-HNSCC received two cycles of IC (cisplatin, paclitaxel, cetuximab ± everolimus). Patients with ≥50% reduction in the sum of tumor diameters [good response (GR)] received TFHX (paclitaxel, fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and 1.5 Gy twice daily RT every other week) to a dose of 75 Gy with the single planning target volume (PTV1) encompassing exclusively gross disease. Patients with <50% response [non-response (NR)] were treated with TFHX encompassing PTV1 and the next nodal station at risk (PTV2) to a dose of 45 Gy followed by a sequential boost to PTV1 to a dose of 75 Gy. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled. Randomization to everolimus was discontinued on interim analysis after 50 patients due to futility. IC response was evaluable in 89 patients. Thirty-seven patients (41.6%) had GR and 52 (58.4%) had NR. There was a trend for improved progression-free (P = 0.086) but not overall survival (P = 0.94) for GR versus NR. The 2-year PFS and OS were 86.0% and 83.5% for GR and 68.7% and 85.4% for NR, respectively. NR were significantly more likely to undergo G-tube placement during treatment (50.0% GR versus 73.5% NR, P = 0.040) and be G-tube dependent at 6-month follow-up (5.7% GR versus 32.6% NR, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of everolimus to IC was not beneficial. The elimination of elective nodal coverage in patients with GR to IC did not appear to compromise outcomes and resulted in significantly decreased late toxicity. Further investigation of RAVD is warranted. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01133678.

Comparison of outcomes of locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma over two decades.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) has emerged as a causative agent and positive prognostic factor for oropharyngeal (OP) head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). This prompts inquiry into whether therapy improvements or increasing incidence of HPV drives the apparent improvements in HNSCC outcomes observed in non-randomized clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all locoregionally advanced HNSCC patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation in prospective institutional trials at a single institution. Patients were divided into three groups (1, 2, 3) according to treatment time period (1993-1998, 1999-2003, 2004-2010, respectively). We reasoned that if a favorable trend was observed over time in OP but not non-OP patients, HPV status may be confounding treatment effects, whereas this would be unlikely if both subgroups improved over time. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-two patients were identified with OP (55.7%) and non-OP (44.3%) HNSCC. Five-year OP overall survival (OS) improved from 42.3% (group 1) to 72.5% (group 2), and 78.4% (group 3), adjusted P = 0.0084. Non-OP 5-year OS was 51.0% (group 1), 58.8% (group 2), and 66.3% (group 3), adjusted P = 0.51. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) improved for OP groups from 42.3% to 68.4% to 75.8% (adjusted P = 0.017). Non-OP 5-year RFS was 42.9%, 53.6%, and 61.7% for sequential groups (adjusted P = 0.30). Five-year OP distant failure-free survival (DFFS) improved from 42.3% to 71.1% to 77.8% (adjusted P = 0.011). Five-year non-OP DFFS was 46.9%, 57.1%, and 66.0% for sequential groups (adjusted P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past two decades, OP HNSCC outcomes improved significantly, while non-OP outcomes only trended toward improvement. Although our patients are not stratified by HPV status, improving OP outcomes are likely at least partly due to the increasing HPV incidence. These data further justify trial stratification by HPV status, investigations of novel approaches for carcinogen-related HNSCC, and current de-intensification for HPV-related HNSCC.

A phase I dose escalation study of Ad GV.EGR.TNF.11D (TNFerade™ Biologic) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer undergoing reirradiation.

BACKGROUND: AdGV.EGR.TNF.11D (TNFerade™ Biologic) is a replication-deficient adenoviral vector expressing human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) under the control of the chemoradiation-inducible EGR-1 promoter. TNF-α has been shown to function as a radiation sensitizer. We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of TNFerade™ Biologic, when added to chemoradiotherapy in poor prognosis patients with recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: TNFerade™ Biologic was injected intratumorally on day 1 of each 14-day cycle and dose-escalated in log increments from 4 × 10(9) to 4 × 10(11) PU. Daily radiation, infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and hydroxyurea were given on days 1-5 for seven cycles (FHX). Tumor biopsies were obtained before, during, and after treatment. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated. DLT was reached at a dose level of 3 (4 × 10(11) PU) with three thrombotic events. The response rate was 83.3%. The median survival was 9.6 months. One patient (7.1%) remained alive 3 years after treatment. Biopsies were obtained in 90% of patients. Nearly all tumors expressed adenovirus receptors, TNF-α, and TNF-α receptors. Adenoviral DNA was detected in three biopsies from one patient. CONCLUSIONS: TNFerade™ Biologic can be safely integrated with FHX chemoradiotherapy at an MTD of 4 × 10(10) PU. Monitoring for thrombotic events is indicated.

A randomized phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice-daily radiotherapy compared with bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice-daily radiotherapy for intermediate-stage and T4N0-1 head and neck cancers.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the impact of adding bevacizumab (B) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and radiotherapy (FHX) for intermediate-stage and select T4 head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had newly diagnosed HNSCC. Randomization was 2:1 in favor of BFHX. All patients received 500 mg HU p.o. b.i.d., 600 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion 5-FU, and b.i.d. radiotherapy with or without bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered on day 1 of each 14-day cycle. Patients received five cycles consisting of chemoradiotherapy for 5 days followed by 9 days without therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled (19 BFHX and 7 FHX). The study was halted following unexpected locoregional progression. Two-year survival was 68%; 89% treated with FHX and 58% (95% confidence interval 33% to 78%) treated with BFHX. Two-year locoregional control was 80% after chemoradiotherapy and 85% after surgical salvage. All locoregional progression occurred in T4 tumors randomized to BFHX. Two patients receiving BFHX died during therapy, and one died shortly after therapy. No catastrophic bleeding events were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional progression seen in T4N0-1 tumors treated with BFHX was unexpected and led to study termination. The addition of bevacuzimab to chemoradiotherapy for HNSCC should be limited clinical trials.

Phase II trial of pemetrexed-based induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in previously irradiated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoreirradiation therapy (CRRT) offers a therapeutic option for patients with locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We hypothesized that response to induction chemotherapy (IC) would improve outcome and predict increased survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects with recurrent SCCHN not amenable to standard therapy were eligible. IC consisted of two 28-day cycles of gemcitabine and pemetrexed on days 1 and 14, followed by surgical resection, if appropriate, and/or CRRT consisting of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and single daily fractionated radiotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects were enrolled, 31 were assessable for response, with 11 responders [response rate = 35%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 19.2-54.6]. Among 24 subjects who started CRRT, 11 were assessable for radiographic response, 4 complete response, 2 partial response, and 5 progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 months (95% CI 3.6-8.3) and 9.5 months (95% CI 7.2-15.4), respectively. One-year OS was 43% (95% CI 26% to 58%). Subjects who responded to IC had improved survival (P = 0.02). Toxic effects included mucositis, dermatitis, neutropenia, infection, hemorrhage, dehydration, and pain. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine was active and well tolerated in recurrent SCCHN. Response to IC may help stratify prognosis and offer an objective and dynamic metric in recurrent SCCHN patients being considered for CRRT.

Functional organ preservation with definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials established chemoradiotherapy as standard treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Patients with large-volume T4 disease (LVT4) were excluded from these trials. The purpose of this study was to report T4 laryngeal cancer patient outcome, including those with LVT4 disease, treated with chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective subset analysis of 32 patients with T4 laryngeal carcinoma including LVT4 tumors treated on three consecutive protocols investigating paclitaxel (Taxol), 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and 1.5-Gy twice daily (BID) radiotherapy (TFHX). RESULTS: Median follow-up is 43 months. Four-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was 71%, 67%, 53%, and 86%, respectively. Four patients required laryngectomy for recurrent or persistent disease. Of disease-free patients with >or=1 year follow-up, 90% demonstrated normal or understandable speech. None required laryngectomy for complications. Among LVT4 patients, 4-year LRC, DFS, OS, and LFS was 71%, 65%, 56%, and 81%, respectively. Induction chemotherapy improved 4-year LRC (90% versus 46%, P = 0.03) and DFS (84% versus 42%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Promising control and functional outcomes are achieved with TFHX for T4 laryngeal patients. LVT4 disease had outcomes similar to patients with less advanced disease treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11. Induction chemotherapy improved outcomes, warranting further investigation.

Induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial investigating three radiotherapy dose levels.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized induction chemotherapy (IndCT) would improve distant control (DC) without compromising locoregional control (LRC) for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients. Additionally, we systematically lowered radiotherapy (RT) doses attempting to maintain LRC while decreasing toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stages III-IV (M0) locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients received carboplatin/paclitaxel (Taxol) IndCT followed by four or five cycles consisting of 5 days of paclitaxel, fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and BID RT followed by a nine day break. RT dose to gross disease (high risk), intermediate, and low-risk volumes were reduced from cohort A (n = 68): 75, 60, and 45 Gy; to cohort B (n = 64): 75, 54, and 39 Gy; then cohort C (n = 90): 72, 51, and 36 Gy. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients accrued from November 1998 to September 2002. Median follow-up is 56 months. In all, 93/96/76% achieved a complete response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cohort A/B/C. Three- and 5-year overall survivals (OSs) are 68% and 62%, respectively. Five-year LRC and DC are 91% and 87%, respectively. Response to IndCT predicted for OS, LRC, and time to progression (TTP). Cohort C patients had similar OS (P = 0.95), LRC, and DC, but worse (TTP) (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: IndCT before CRT reduces distant progression while maintaining high LRC. The cohort B schedule provides the best therapeutic ratio. A randomized trial investigating IndCT before CRT has been initiated.

Favorable long-term survival following induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin and concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with head and neck cancer die of locoregional recurrence of disease following surgery and/or radiotherapy. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to administer induction chemotherapy, perform surgery, and administer concomitant chemoradiotherapy in rapid sequence and to evaluate their impact on locoregional and distant tumor control. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with previously untreated, locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer received two cycles of cisplatin, bleomycin, and methotrexate (PBM) (33 patients) or cisplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (PFL) (31 patients). PFL was given to patients who were unable to receive bleomycin. Local therapy consisted of surgery and/or concomitant chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU, hydroxyurea, leucovorin, and radiotherapy (FHX-L), all administered every other week. RESULTS: Complete and overall induction response rates were 21% and 79%, respectively, for PBM and 29% and 81%, respectively, for PFL. At completion of local therapy, 81% of the patients were disease-free. With a median follow-up of 35 months, the median survival and time to progression are 22 and 17 months, respectively, for PBM and have not been reached for PFL. Locoregional recurrence of disease is 30% for PBM and 26% for PFL. Distant disease progression is 24% for PBM and only 3% for PFL. CONCLUSIONS: The sequencing of induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy is feasible and results in a high local control rate and in an encouraging survival rate with PFL. The high distant failure (i.e., outside the head and neck area) rate of PBM suggests insufficient systemic activity for that regimen. IMPLICATIONS: Concomitant FHX-L chemoradiotherapy may improve regional control rates of advanced head and neck cancer. Effective systemic therapy may be needed to control systemic micrometastases. PFL, but not PBM, appears to be suitable to accomplish that goal.

p53 mutation does not correlate with radiosensitivity in 24 head and neck cancer cell lines.

The molecular basis of tumor response to therapeutic radiation is poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests the p53 tumor suppressor gene may be involved in production of the G1 arrest seen following DNA damage by X-irradiation. It has further been proposed that tumor cells lacking the p53 checkpoint function are likely to be more sensitive to cell killing by X-irradiation because these cells enter S phase despite unrepaired DNA damage. We tested the hypothesis that tumor cells with p53 mutations are more radiosensitive by correlating the in vitro surviving fraction at 2 Gy with the mutational status of 24 head and neck squamous cell cancer cell lines. p53 mutations were present in 15 of 24 (63%) of tumors; all were homozygous changes occurring within exons 5-9. The surviving fraction at 2 Gy for the group with mutations was 0.568 compared to 0.507 for tumors without mutations (P = 0.28, Mann-Whitney test). Furthermore, no association between radiosensitivity and mutational type, codon location, or predicted amino acid alteration was noted. Our data do not support the hypothesis that p53 gene alteration predisposes tumor cells to increased cell killing via radiation.

Occurrence of p53 gene deletions and human papilloma virus infection in human head and neck cancer.

Little is known regarding the molecular genetic events in head and neck carcinoma. Epidemiological evidence suggests that both alcohol and tobacco use are related to the development of these neoplasms, and viral infections have also been postulated to play a role in some tumors. Loss of p53 tumor suppressor gene function has been found in many malignancies and can occur through either gene mutation or by interaction with the E6 protein of oncogenic human papilloma viruses (HPV). Because the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck are exposed to mutagens and HPVs, we studied DNA derived from 30 stage I-IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (9 primary tumors and 21 early passage cell lines) for p53 gene mutations as well as for the presence of oncogenic HPV DNA. Exons 2 through 11 of the p53 gene were examined using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis followed by direct genomic sequencing of all variants. HPV detection was done using polymerase chain reaction amplification with HPV E6 region type specific primers as well as L1 region degenerate ("consensus") primers; HPV type was determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the amplified fragment as well as by Southern blotting of genomic DNA. Sixteen of 30 tumors (53%) had p53 mutations and oncogenic HPV DNA was detected in 3 of 30 (10%) tumors, none of which had p53 mutations. The p53 mutational spectrum observed was characterized by equal frequencies of transversions (6 of 16), transitions (5 of 16), and deletions (5 of 16). This distribution of mutations differs from the spectrum of p53 mutation reported in esophageal (P = 0.05) and lung (P = 0.02) cancers, two other tobacco associated neoplasms. A previously undescribed clustering of 3 mutations at codon 205 was also observed. A trend toward a shorter time to tumor recurrence after treatment was noted for those patients with tumors exhibiting p53 gene mutations, and no relationship between p53 mutations and tumor stage or node status was noted. Alteration in p53 gene function appears common in head and neck cancer, and the mutational spectrum observed may reflect the role of different mutagens or mutagenic processes than those responsible for the p53 mutations in lung and esophageal neoplasms.

Measurement of bioreduction rates of cells with distinct responses to ionizing radiation and cisplatin.

A low frequency electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometer has been used to measure the bioreduction rate of an exogenously added nitroxide free radical species. Measurements have been made in a well controlled, in vitro system using an X-ray and cisplatin sensitive Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line, xrs-5, and partial revertants which display wild-type levels of sensitivity to X-rays but retain xrs-5 levels of cisplatin sensitivity. The xrs-5 cells reduce this radical species at a rate which is approx. 50% that of the wild-type CHO cell line, K1. The partial revertants maintain this defect in bioreduction despite their decrease in radiosensitivity. However, the bioreduction rate observed in these cells correlates with their sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin. Low frequency EPR allows measurements and imaging of living tissue and may be of value as a predictive assay of human tumor response to chemotherapy.

Intensified concomitant chemoradiotherapy with and without filgrastim for poor-prognosis head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated high locoregional control rates in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer using fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and concomitant radiotherapy (FHX). In two trials reported here, we added cisplatin with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to 5-FU, HU, and concomitant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had failed to respond to prior local therapy (group 1); previously untreated patients with unresectable and/or metastatic disease and a projected 2-year survival rate less than 10% were also eligible (group 2). Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy on days 1 to 5 with simultaneous infusional 5-FU at 800 mg/m2/d and HU administered every 12 hours for 11 doses at escalating doses. Cisplatin was administered at 100 mg/m2 during every other cycle. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until completion of radiotherapy. In study 2, G-CSF was added on days 6 to 13 at 5 micrograms/kg/d. RESULTS: Acute and cumulative myelosuppression limited the feasibility of adding cisplatin to FHX without G-CSF. G-CSF allowed for escalation of HU to 1 g orally every 12 hours without dose-limiting acute toxicity during cycles 1 and 2. Dose-limiting cumulative toxicity consisted of severe or life-threatening myelosuppression and mucositis. To decrease total treatment duration and, thus, cumulative toxicity, a hyperfractionated radiation therapy schedule was investigated using the established chemotherapy doses with 1.5 Gy twice daily on days 1 to 5 (75 Gy over five treatment cycles). No increase in acute toxicities was seen; cumulative toxicities remained frequently severe or life-threatening. Thirty-eight of 45 assessable patients responded. The median survival duration was 12 months for both groups. Median time to treatment failure was 8 months for group 1 and has not been reached for group 2. At 1 year, local control rates were 74% and 91% for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The addition of cisplatin to 5-FU, HU, and concomitant radiotherapy is feasible using G-CSF. The high locoregional control rate and failure-free interval justify further investigation of this regimen in previously untreated patients.

Quality of life and performance in advanced head and neck cancer patients on concomitant chemoradiotherapy: a prospective examination.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate performance and quality of life (QOL) in advanced-stage head and neck cancer (HNC) patients on a curative-intent, concomitant-chemoradiotherapy (CT/XRT) (twice-daily radiation, fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and cisplatin) regimen aimed at improving locoregional control, survival, and QOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were assessed before, during, and at 3-month intervals after treatment. Standardized measures of QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck), performance (Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients and Karnofsky Performance Status Rating Scale), and patient-reported symptoms (McMaster University Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire) were administered. RESULTS: Acute treatment toxicities were severe, with declines in virtually all QOL and functional domains. Marked improvement was seen by 12 months; general functional and physical measures returned to baseline levels of good to excellent. Although up to a third of the patients continued to report problems with swallowing, hoarseness, and mouth pain, these difficulties were present in similar magnitudes before treatment. The following symptoms were more frequent at 12 months: dry mouth (58% v 17%), difficulties tasting (32% v 8%), and soft food diet (82% v 42%). Twelve-month diet was not related to pretreatment functioning, disease, treatment, or patient characteristics. Twelve-month QOL was best predicted by pretreatment QOL, with very little relationship to residual side effects or functional impairments. Small numbers of patients in four of the five disease sites precluded examination of outcome by site. CONCLUSION: These data support the feasibility of intense CT/XRT as primary treatment for advanced HNC. Results confirm acute toxicity but indicate that many of the treatment-related performance and QOL declines resolve by 12 months. The persistent inability to eat a full range of foods warrants further attention and monitoring.

Equivalent racial outcome after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a single departmental experience.

PURPOSE: African-American (AA) men with prostate cancer present with advanced disease, relative to white (W) men. This report summarizes our clinical and biochemical control (bNED) rates after conformal radiotherapy (RT). In particular, we aim to characterize any race-based outcome differences seen after comparable treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 893 patients (418 AA and 475 W) with clinically localized prostate cancer treated between 1988 and 1997. Neoadjuvant hormonal blockade was used in 22.5% of cases, and all patients received conformal RT to a median dose of 68 Gy (range, 60 to 74.8 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 1 to 114 months). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial survival, disease-free survival, and bNED rates for the entire population were 80.5%, 70.0%, and 57.6%, respectively. When classified by prognostic risk category, the 5-year actuarial bNED rates were 78.7% for favorable, 57.7% for intermediate, and 39.8% for unfavorable category patients. AA men presented at younger ages and with more advanced disease. Controlled for prognostic risk category, AA and W men had similar 5-year actuarial bNED rates in favorable (78% v 79%, P: = .91), intermediate (52% v 62%, P: =.44), and unfavorable categories (36% v 45%, P: = .09). Race was not an independent prognostic factor (P: = .36). CONCLUSION: Conformal RT is equally effective for AA and W patients. More research is needed in order to understand and correct the advanced presentations in AA men. These data suggest a need for early screening in AA populations.

How Do head and neck cancer patients prioritize treatment outcomes before initiating treatment?

PURPOSE: To determine, pretreatment, how head and neck cancer (HNC) patients prioritize potential treatment effects in relationship to each other and to survival and to ascertain whether patients' preferences are related to demographic or disease characteristics, performance status, or quality of life (QOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients were assessed pretreatment using standardized measures of QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck) and performance (Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer). Patients were also asked to rank a series of 12 potential HNC treatment effects. RESULTS: Being cured was ranked top priority by 75% of patients; another 18% ranked it second or third. Living as long as possible and having no pain were placed in the top three by 56% and 35% of patients, respectively. Items that were ranked in the top three by 10% to 24% of patients included those related to energy, swallowing, voice, and appearance. Items related to chewing, being understood, tasting, and dry mouth were placed in the top three by less than 10% of patients. Excluding the top three rankings, there was considerable variability in ratings. Rankings were generally unrelated to patient or disease characteristics, with the exception that cure and living were of slightly lower priority and pain of higher priority to older patients compared with younger patients. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that, at least pretreatment, survival is of primary importance to patients, supporting the development of aggressive treatment strategies. In addition, results highlight individual variability and warn against making assumptions about patients' attitudes vis-à-vis potential outcomes. Whether patients' priorities will change as they experience late effects is currently under investigation.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: impact on the natural history of the disease.

PURPOSE: To determine survival rates and the pattern of failure in head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy, limited surgery and concomitant chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and interferon alfa-2b (PFL-IFN) were followed by optional surgery, and seven or eight cycles of 5-FU, hydroxyurea, and concurrent radiation for 5 days (FHX) for a total radiation dose of 65 to 75 Gy. Surgical resection was performed with the intent to spare organ function. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were treated at three institutions. Sixty-five patients (91%) had stage IV disease with N2/3 in 46. Thirty-three patients (51%; 95% confidence interval, 39% to 63%) achieved a clinical complete response (CR) to PFL-IFN. Local therapy consisted of surgery in 37 and/or FHX in 55 patients. With a median follow-up duration of 37 months, there have been 20 recurrences (15 local, four distant, and one both local and distant), and 29 deaths, 15 in patients with disease progression and 14 not directly related to the primary tumor. Four patients have developed second malignancies. At 3 years, 69% (+/- 6%) are progression-free and the overall survival rate is 60% (+/- 6%). Toxicity of PFL-IFN included severe or life-threatening mucositis (54%) and myelosuppression (60%). Five patients died of toxicity. During FHX, 70% of patients had grade 3 or 4 mucositis. CONCLUSION: PFL-IFN is highly active, producing clinical CRs in 51% of patients, and, when followed by FHX, resulting in high local and distant control and overall survival rates. Second malignancies and intercurrent medical disease emerge as major risks to long-term survival. In view of the high toxicity and long treatment duration, further modifications of this approach are required.

Pharmacodynamics of fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: To optimize the biochemical modulation of fluorouracil (5-FU), we administered the pure I-stereoisomer of leucovorin (LV) as a 132-hour continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) with cisplatin 100 mg/m2, 5-FU 640 mg/m2/d as a 120-hour CIV, and interferon alfa-2b (IFN) at 2 MU/m2/d for 6 days for three cycles (I-PFL-IFN). Pharmacologic parameters included morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) plasma concentrations of 5-FU, LV and its active metabolite 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate (MTHF), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in peripheral mononuclear cells. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were treated (86 stage IV). Neutropenia and mucositis were the most common toxicities. Sixty-six percent achieved a complete remission (CR). There was a trend for higher PM versus AM 5-FU concentrations (median, 1.64 v 1.51 mumoles/L; P = .08), but not for LV plus MTHF (P = .66). The mean +/- SD DPD activity was 0.21 +/- 0.14 nmol/min/mg and did not correlate with plasma concentrations of 5-FU or LV plus MTHF or clinical toxicities. Higher PM 5-FU concentrations correlated with worse leukopenia (P = .04) and severity of mucositis (P = .04). PM 5-FU concentration was higher in women than in men (P = .07), with no apparent difference in severity of toxicities. The maximum 5-FU concentration was higher in CR than non-CR patients (median, 2.01 v 1.54 mumoles/L; P = .02) and higher in women than men who achieved a CR (median, 2.77 v 1.91 mumoles/L; P = .03). No correlation of CR with dose-intensity was found. CONCLUSION: L-PFL-IFN is active in stage IV head and neck cancer. 5-FU concentration is a significant predictor of toxicity. In women, optimization of response outcome requires a higher 5-FU concentration. Individualized 5-FU dosing to obtain higher 5-FU plasma concentrations may be indicated.

Radiation therapy with concomitant hydroxyurea and fluorouracil in stage II and III head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: In 1986, a multi-institutional phase II trial was begun to study the use of chemotherapy with concomitant radiation in patients with stage II and III head and neck cancer. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, local/regional control, and toxicity in the setting of organ preservation with concomitant treatment. METHODS: Eligible patients with stage II or III disease received chemotherapy and radiation on a 2-week cycle. Chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) at 800 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days (days 1 to 5) and hydroxyurea (HU) at 1 g orally every 12 hours for 13 doses starting the evening before the start of irradiation. Radiation therapy was given as single 1.8- to 2.0-Gy fractions for 5 consecutive days (days 1 to 5) with chemotherapy. Each 5 days of treatment was followed by a 9-day break (days 6 to 14), during which no additional treatment was given. Treatment cycles were repeated until the completion of the planned radiation dose (six to eight cycles). RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1996, 60 patients were enrolled. All patients were eligible for analysis, with a median follow-up of 52 months for surviving patients and 42 months for all patients. Grade 3 to 4 mucositis occurred in 57% of patients. The 5 year-actuarial overall survival, progression-free survival, and local/regional control were 65%, 82%, and 86%, respectively. Eight patients developed local and/or regional recurrence after treatment. Surgical salvage was possible in three of these patients. Thus, the ultimate 5-year local/ regional control was 91%. CONCLUSION: Concomitant radiation and chemotherapy with 5-FU and HU is an effective regimen in patients with stage II and III head and neck cancer. Progression-free survival and local/regional control appear to be superior to expected rates in patients treated with surgery and radiation. Further testing of this regimen in a phase III setting is indicated.