MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to prospectively compare image quality and diagnostic accuracy of clinically significant prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil (ERC) at 3 T using a combination of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent MRI with and without ERC at the same visit. Patients subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Specimens were assessed by whole-mount histopathologic examination. Two radiologists reviewed MR images for image quality (5-point scale) and disease using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data Systems version 2 (PI-RADSv2). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated with and without ERC. Additionally, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was correlated with Gleason score and ADC values of each lesion were compared with and without ERC. RESULTS. Image quality was comparable with and without ERC (3.8 vs 3.5). Twenty-nine cancer foci larger than 0.5 cm in diameter were found in 23 patients on histopathologic examination; 18 tumors had a Gleason score of 7 or greater. Two radiologists recorded AUC for tumors with a Gleason score of 7 or greater as 0.96 and 0.96 with ERC and 0.88 and 0.91 without ERC. All 13 tumors with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 were detected with ERC, but only 9 were detected without ERC. One of five tumors with Gleason scores less than 3 + 4 was missed with and without ERC. ADC significantly correlated with Gleason score. There was no significant difference in the ADC of a lesion on MRI with and without an ERC. CONCLUSION. MRI with and without ERC was equally accurate at showing prostate cancers with Gleason scores of 4 + 3 or greater. However, MRI with ERC was superior at showing cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4. There was no significant difference in ADC values between scores acquired with or without an ERC.

A PSA for Radiologists: Pictorial Review of Incidentalomas on Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is a powerful and increasingly utilized imaging study for the diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of prostate cancer. With greater adoption by clinicians, it is becoming more common for incidental findings to be first detected on prostate MRI. Inadequate description of clinically significant findings may not prompt appropriate patient management, while over-reporting of indolent findings comes at increased patient anxiety, cost of workup, and iatrogenic risk. This review article aims to improve awareness, review pathophysiology, and present key imaging features of incidental findings seen on prostate MRI, ranging from common to rare and from benign to clinically significant.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Optimizing Technique and Clinical Applications.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the general principles, technique, and clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. CONCLUSION: Proper technique and optimization of contrast-enhanced ultrasound require a balance between maintaining the integrity of the microbubble contrast agent and preserving the ultrasound signal. Established and emerging applications in the liver include diagnosis of focal lesions, aiding ultrasound-guided intervention, monitoring of therapy, and aiding surgical management.

Classification of Error in Abdominal Imaging: Pearls and Pitfalls for Radiologists.

Peer review for radiologists plays an important role in identifying contributing factors that can lead to diagnostic errors and patient harm. It is essential that all radiologists be aware of the multifactorial causes of diagnostic error in radiology and the methods available to reduce it. This pictorial review provides readers with an overview of common errors that occur in abdominal radiology and strategies to reduce them. This review aims to make readers more aware of pitfalls in abdominal imaging so that these errors can be avoided in the future. This essay also provides a systematic approach to classifying abdominal imaging errors that will be of value to all radiologists participating in peer review.

Management of Acute Contrast Reactions-Understanding Radiologists' Preparedness and the Efficacy of Simulation-Based Training in Canada.

PURPOSE: Acute radiologic emergencies, primarily severe contrast reactions, are rare but life-threatening events. Given a generalized paucity of formalized or mandated training, studies have shown that radiologists and trainees perform poorly when acutely managing such events. Moreover, skill base, knowledge, and comfort levels precipitously decline over time given the infrequent occurrence of these events during one's daily practice. The primary aim of this study was to assess radiologists' preparedness for managing acute radiologic emergencies and to determine the efficacy of a high-fidelity simulation based training model in an effort to provide a rationale for similar programs to be implemented on a provincial or national level. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of radiology residents and attending radiologists throughout the province who were recruited to attend a full-day simulation-based course presenting various cases of acute radiologic emergencies. Participant demographics were collected at the time of commencement of the workshop. Course materials were disseminated 4 weeks prior to the workshop, and a 17-question knowledge quiz was administered before and after the workshop. Likert-type questionnaires were also distributed to survey comfort levels and equipment familiarity. The knowledge quiz and questionnaire were redistributed at 3- and 6-month intervals for acquisition of follow-up data. RESULTS: A total of 14 attending radiologists and 7 residents attended the workshop, with all participants completing the preworkshop questionnaire and 90.5% (19 of 21) completing the post-workshop questionnaire. Participants' principle locations of practice were as follows: academic institutions (50%), community hospitals (36.9%), and private clinics (13.1%). A significant increase in knowledge was demonstrated, with average scores of 10 out of 17 (59%) and 14.5 out of 17 (85%) (P < .001) before and after the workshop, respectively. A significant increase in participants' comfort levels in recognizing acute anaphylactic reactions (3.5; 4.7, P < .001), commencing initial management for acute radiologic emergencies (3.3; 5.0, P < .001), and administering the correct dose for anaphylactic reactions (2.5; 4.8, P < .001) was also demonstrated. Moreover, participants became increasingly familiar with the contents and equipment found within contrast reaction kits (2.8; 3.8, P < .01). Repeat evaluations at 3 and 6 months found an average knowledge test score of 13.8 out of 17 (81%) and 10.8 out of 17 (64%), respectively. Comfort levels were also reassessed in recognizing acute anaphylactic reactions (4.5; 4.1), commencing initial management (4.0; 3.9) and administering the correct dose of medication (4.0; 3.7) at 3- and 6-month intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Acute radiologic emergencies are rare but life-threatening events that require rapid diagnosis and treatment to mitigate associated morbidity and mortality. Simulation-based workshops are a highly efficacious training model to increase knowledge, comfort levels, and equipment familiarity for radiologists and trainees alike; however, retraining at regular intervals is required.

A Pictorial Review of Hepatobiliary Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Hepatocyte-Specific Contrast Agents: Uses, Findings, and Pitfalls of Gadoxetate Disodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a well-established role as a highly specific and accurate modality for characterizing benign and malignant focal liver lesions. In particular, contrast-enhanced MRI using hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (HSCAs) improves lesion detection and characterization compared to other imaging modalities and MRI techniques. In this pictorial review, the mechanism of action of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents, with a focus on HSCAs, is described. The clinical indications, protocols, and emerging uses of the 2 commercially available combined contrast agents available in the United States, gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine, are discussed. The MRI features of these agents are compared with examples of focal hepatic masses, many of which have been obtained within the same patient therefore allowing direct lesion comparison. Finally, the pitfalls in the use of combined contrast agents in liver MRI are highlighted.

Imaging Intra-abdominal Burkitt's Lymphoma: From Discrete Bowel Wall Thickening to Diffuse Soft Tissue Infiltration.

Burkitt's lymphoma is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma, which often presents with intra-abdominal involvement. The purpose of this pictorial review is to illustrate the various intra-abdominal imaging findings of Burkitt's lymphoma. Extranodal disease at presentation is common, including involvement of the bowel, stomach, pancreas, spleen, and mesentery.

Approach to the Solitary Liver Lesion: Imaging and When to Biopsy.

The characterization and management of focal liver lesions is a commonly encountered problem in radiology. While the imaging findings will often be diagnostic, in equivocal cases the decision of how to proceed may be challenging. The primary modalities for liver lesion characterization are multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Most lesions have typical imaging features, and when taken in conjunction with patient demographics and biochemistry the diagnosis can usually be made. Ancillary imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and hepatobiliary specific contrast agents are also useful. Cirrhotic livers present a challenge due to the spectrum of benign, dysplastic, and malignant nodules that can occur. The report should include information necessary for accurate staging, and published standardized reporting guidelines should be taken into consideration. A decision to proceed to biopsy should be made only after multidisciplinary review of the case. If biopsy is required, fine needle aspiration is usually sufficient, though core needle biopsy may be required in certain circumstances.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post Embolotherapy: Imaging Appearances and Pitfalls on Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Embolotherapies used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include bland embolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) using ethiodol as a carrier, TACE with drug-eluting beads and super absorbent polymer microspheres (DEB-TACE), and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Successfully treated HCC lesions undergo coagulation necrosis, and appear as nonenhancing hypoattenuating or hypointense lesions in the embolized region on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance. Residual or recurrent tumours demonstrate arterial enhancement with portal venous phase wash-out of contrast, features characteristic of HCC, in and/or around the embolized area. Certain imaging features that result from the procedure itself may limit assessment of response. In conventional TACE, the high-attenuating retained ethiodized oil may obscure arterially-enhancing tumours and limit detection of residual tumours; thus a noncontrast CT on follow-up imaging is important post-cTACE. Hyperenhancement within or around the treated zone can be seen after cTACE, DEB-TACE, or SIRT due to physiologic inflammatory response and may mimic residual tumour. Recognition of these pitfalls is important in the evaluation embolotherapy response.

Primary retroperitoneal masses: what is the differential diagnosis?

Primary retroperitoneal masses include a diverse, and often rare, group of neoplastic and non-neoplastic entities that arise within the retroperitoneum but do not originate from any retroperitoneal organ. Their overlapping appearances on cross-sectional imaging may pose a diagnostic challenge to the radiologist; familiarity with characteristic imaging features, together with relevant clinical information, helps to narrow the differential diagnosis. In this article, a systematic approach to identifying and classifying primary retroperitoneal masses is described. The normal anatomy of the retroperitoneum is reviewed with an emphasis on fascial planes, retroperitoneal compartments, and their contents using cross-sectional imaging. Specific radiologic signs to accurately identify an intra-abdominal mass as primary retroperitoneal are presented, first by confirming the location as retroperitoneal and secondly by excluding an organ of origin. A differential diagnosis based on a predominantly solid or cystic appearance, including neoplastic and non-neoplastic entities, is elaborated. Finally, key diagnostic clues based on characteristic imaging findings are described, which help to narrow the differential diagnosis. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the cross-sectional imaging features of primary retroperitoneal masses, including normal retroperitoneal anatomy, radiologic signs of retroperitoneal masses and the differential diagnosis of solid and cystic, neoplastic and non-neoplastic retroperitoneal masses, with a view to assist the radiologist in narrowing the differential diagnosis.

Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Features in Autoimmune Pancreatitis.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) accounts for approximately 5% of chronic pancreatitis cases and is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic pathologies. The underlying pathophysiology of AIP is thought to involve lymphocyte infiltration and associated sclerosis. Although AIP is a benign condition that is treatable with corticosteroids, it can have imaging and clinical findings indistinguishable from pancreatic cancer. As such, the radiologist plays an important management role in distinguishing AIP from more sinister conditions. In addition, there are several extrapancreatic imaging findings in the context of AIP that have been recently described. This pictorial review outlines both the pancreatic and extrapancreatic imaging features in AIP and the response to steroid therapy. Important imaging features that allow AIP to be differentiated from other pancreatic pathology, including adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, and acute pancreatitis will be discussed.

The Role of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Guiding Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using ultrasound (US)-specific microbubbles in guiding radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 patients with HCC treated with CEUS guided RFA using perflutren at our institution was performed. CEUS images were first compared to B-mode US images performed at the same RFA session to determine the ability of CEUS to increase the conspicuity of lesions. A qualitative score (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = excellent) was used to grade the ability to visualize the lesions. The preprocedure CEUS images were then evaluated using the most recent prior contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated with short-term follow-up imaging (median 1 month) for presence of residual or recurrent disease. RESULTS: CEUS allows at least fair visualization (score ≥2) in 78% (reader 1) and 80% (reader 2) of the lesions not visualized by B-mode US, and 50% (reader 1) and 42% (reader 2) of the lesions poorly visualized by B-mode US. Lesion appearances on CEUS are largely concordant with those on CT or MRI: 88% for reader 1, 96% for reader 2. With CEUS-guided RFA, complete response was achieved in the vast majority of the lesions at short-term follow-up: 82% for reader 1, 94% for reader 2. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS increases the conspicuity and provides better characterization of hypervascular HCC that are either not seen or poorly seen on B-mode US, and CEUS provides real-time guidance of RFA with good short-term treatment responses.

Half-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard-dose gadodiamide in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of non-cirrhotic livers: a retrospective intra-individual crossover comparison.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare enhancement characteristics of half-dose gadobenate dimeglumine (0.05 mmol kg(-1)) with standard-dose gadodiamide (0.10 mmol kg(-1)), in the assessment of hepatic vessels and lesions, using retrospective intra-individual crossover comparison methodology. METHODS: Ethics committee approval was obtained. From 2004 to 2012, 21 patients underwent MRI examination with both standard-dose gadodiamide and half-dose gadobenate dimeglumine, using the same liver MRI protocol at 1.5 T. Eighteen patients whose scans showed no artifacts were selected. Quality of liver lesion [12 hemangiomas, 7 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs)] and liver vessel enhancement, and the global diagnostic quality of studies were ranked on a scale of 1-4 by two independent radiologists. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and % enhancement of liver vessels and lesions were calculated based on region of interest, signal intensity, and noise standard deviation measurements performed at 0, 20 s, 1, 3, and 5 min post-contrast injection. Qualitative and quantitative results were compared using the paired Wilcoxon signed rank and Student's t-tests, respectively. RESULTS: No qualitative differences were noted in enhancement of liver vessels, hemangiomas, and FNHs. There was no statistically significant difference between the global diagnostic qualities of scans performed with the two contrast agents. Quantitatively, liver vessels and hemangiomas did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in contrast enhancement. At 20 s, FNHs achieved higher CNR (P = 0.02) with gadodiamide. CONCLUSION: Half-dose gadobenate dimeglumine results in similar contrast enhancement compared to standard-dose gadodiamide in assessment of liver vessels, hemangiomas, and FNHs, and is a reasonable alternative to standard doses of extracellular agents in dynamic liver MRI.

Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma: A spectrum of imaging findings.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary tumour of the liver, responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the Western world, it primarily affects patients with cirrhosis, secondary to hepatitis C virus and alcoholism. In the rest of the world, HCC is closely associated with hepatitis B virus infections. Radiologists play a key role in accurately staging HCC, which has important implications for treatment planning. This pictorial review aims to describe the routes of HCC spread and the most frequent sites of metastases, to recognize extrahepatic HCC findings on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and to understand the implications of HCC staging on treatment planning.

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis using ARFI with pathological correlation, a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: ARFI is a new technique that uses acoustic push pulse to generate tissue displacement resulting in shear wave propagation, can be used to measure elasticity of tissue. We aim to assess feasibility of ARFI as a non-invasive method to measure liver fibrosis compared to histological fibrosis scores and to compare our results with the published pooled-meta-analysis cut off values. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study to compare median velocities of ARFI shear wave measurements (Virtual Touch Imaging™ ACUSON S2000, Siemens, Mountain View CA) with Batts and Ludwig liver fibrosis scoring system F0-F4. RESULTS: 70 patients (mean = 49 years) were included. Etiologies were chronic hepatitis C (n = 43), chronic hepatitis B (n = 7) and others (n = 20). Median ARFI values (m/sec) for fibrosis stages and inflammatory stages measured were F0: 1.52, 1.42; F1: 1.50, 1.37; F3: 2.36, 2.41 and F4: 2.61. Areas under the curve for grade 3 = 0.875, stage 3 = 0.867; grade 2 = 0.4, stage 2 = 0.3.Using the cut-off ARFI value of 1.34 m/s for F ≥ 2 suggested in the meta-analysis, we found sensitivity of detecting true F ≥ 2 is 68%, specificity 66%, PPV 74% and NPV 59%. For F ≥ 3 using the cut-off ARFI value of 1.55 m/s, we found sensitivity of 95%, specificity 86%, PPV 74% and NPV 98%. No stage 4 was compared due to insufficient cases. CONCLUSION: ARFI has strong correlation with higher fibrosis scores compared to lower. When compared to the pooled meta-analysis cut off values, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting true F ≥ 3 are higher than that of F ≥ 2.

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: imaging features beyond the chest.

The purpose of this pictorial review is to illustrate the various imaging findings of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Manifestations of cardiac, central nervous system, head and neck, musculoskeletal, abdominal, genitourinary, and breast tuberculosis will be discussed. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis presents a difficult diagnostic challenge for the radiologist and requires a high index of suspicion, particularly in high-risk populations.

Biliary and vascular anomalies in living liver donors: the role and accuracy of pre-operative radiological mapping.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomic mapping in the detection of biliary and vascular anomalies prior to a living liver donor (LLD) operation. METHODS: A retrospective study of all LLD patient charts, operative and radiology reports from 1 January 2002 to 1 January 2012 was conducted. Primary post-operative outcomes assessed included mortality, re-operation, readmission and need for endoscopic or percutaneous intervention. Sensitivity and specificity of MR and CT pre-operative screening was calculated against the gold standard of intra-operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 34 donors had an average age of 38 years (range: 22-58) with a body mass index (BMI) of 25.6 kg/m(2) (range: 19.8-32.5) and a length of stay (LOS) of 10.1 days (range: 5-41). There were no donor mortalities. Sensitivity and specificity of CT was 70.0% and 91.3%, and of MRI screening 23.1% and 100.0%, respectively. Patients with inaccurate pre-operative CT or MRI did not have an increased risk of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Even although it was specific, pre-operative MR screening missed up to 77.0% of biliary anomalies. An impeccable surgical technique remains the key in preventing biliary complications of a living donor hepatectomy where pre-operative MRI screening is false.

Bi-parametric prostate MRI with a recall system for contrast enhanced imaging: Improving accessibility while maintaining quality.

PURPOSE: To review the efficacy of a recall system for bi-parametric non-contrast prostate MRI (bp-MRI). METHODS: A bi-parametric protocol was instituted in July 2020 for all patients who had a prostate MRI requested, excluding those after treatment of prostate cancer, patients with hip prosthesis or pacemaker, and those who lived out-of-town. The protocol consisted of tri-planar T2-weighted and diffusion weighted images (DWI) (b = 50, 800 s/mm2 for ADC map; b = 1,500 s/mm2 acquired separately) in accordance with the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data system (PI-RADS) v2.1 guidelines. After interpretation of bp-MRI exams, patients with equivocal (PI-RADS 3) lesions in peripheral zone (PZ) or any technical limitations were recalled for contrast administration. RESULTS: Out of 909 bp-MRI scans performed from July 2020 to April 2021, only 52 (5.7 %) were recalled, of which 46 (88.5 %) attended. Amongst these, 41/52 (78.8 %) were recalled for PZ PI-RADS 3 lesions, while the rest of 11 (21.2 %) cases were recalled for technical reasons. Mean time to subsequent recall scan was 11.6 days. On assessment of post-contrast imaging, 29/46 (63 %) cases were upgraded to PI-RADS 4 while 17/46 (37 %) remained PI-RADS 3. This system avoided contrast-agent use in 857 patients, with contrast cost savings of €64,620 (US$68,560) and 214 hours 15 minutes of scanner time was saved. This allowed 255 additional bp-MRI scans to be performed, reducing the waitlist from 1 year to 2-3 weeks. CONCLUSION: A bi-parametric prostate MRI protocol with a robust recall system for contrast administration not only saved time eliminating the marked backlog but was also more cost efficient without compromising the quality of patient care.