RESUMEN
Background Depression is a severe comorbidity that is often detected in patients with chronic diseases. Poor prognosis may eventuate high mortality risk. Up to 30% of heart failure patients have been documented with depression and the majority upholds depression-related symptoms that may have serious clinical implications, such as hospital readmissions and fatalities. To mitigate depression-induced harms among heart failure patients, studies are being conducted to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and interventions. Objectives The current investigation is envisioned to examine the prevalence of depression and anxiety among the Saudi heart failure population. Also, it will help to explore the risk factors that will subsequently facilitate the analysis of preventive measures. Methodology The cross-sectional epidemiologic research was conducted at King Khalid University, Hospital with the recruitment of 205 participants. Each participant underwent a 30-question screening for depression, anxiety, and related risk factors. The "Hospital, Anxiety, and Depression Scale" (HADS score) was used to score subjects for the assessment of both comorbidities. The data points were subsequently analyzed by descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Results Among 205 participants, 137 (66.82%) were male and 68 (33.17%) were female with a mean age of 59.71 years. Our sample reflects a prevalence of 52.7% depression and 56.9% anxiety in Saudi heart failure patients. High depression scores were positively related to age, female gender, hospital readmissions, and pre-existing comorbidities in heart failure patients. Conclusion The study manifested high depression scores among the Saudi heart failure cohort compared to the previous survey. In addition, a substantial interrelationship of depression and categorical variables has been identified that accentuates predominating risks that can potentially promote depression and anxiety in heart failure patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus causes ischemic heart disease (IHD) through macrovascular or microvascular involvement. Diabetes-associated hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity further increase coronary artery disease risk and can cause left ventricular hypertrophy leading to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction independent of IHD. This study was undertaken to evaluate the differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, Echocardiographic parameters, management, and outcomes between non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients in cohort of diabetes patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included diabetes patients with reduced ejection fraction (≤40) who were hospitalized with heart failure between January 2014 and February 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1; ICM and group 2; NICM. Data obtained on above mentioned features including mortality and heart failure readmissions were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 612 diabetes patients admitted with acute heart failure were screened of which 442 were included. Group 1 (ICM) had 361 patients (81.7%) and group 2 (NICM) had 81 patients (18.3%). Patients in group 1 were older, predominantly males and with higher prevalence of hypertension, smoking and insulin dependent Diabetes while group 2 patients had higher BMI and higher prevalence of cardiac rhythm problems. No significant difference was detected in 5-year-mortality between the two groups (P=0.165). However, heart failure associated hospitalizations were higher in group 2 though it was not statistically significant (P=0.062). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in 5-years mortality between ICM and NICM in diabetes patients. However, NICM patients had higher prevalence of obesity and rhythm problems.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to show whether blocking the deleterious effects of neurohormonal activation from furosemide by the use of ACEI/ARBs, or the improvement of renal perfusion by using these drugs allows better diuresis and renal function preservation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized study in which patients with chronic heart failure were included. Patients admitted for ACEI/ARBs maintenance with acute decompensated HF were added in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 had ACEI/ARBs continued during admission and group 2 had stopped taking them. Patients with acute heart failure were provided with angiotensin II receptor blockers. Therefore, the present study aims to differentiate between the uses of ACEI/ARBs blocking the deleterious effects of neurohormonal activation or the improvement of renal perfusion by holding these drugs to allow better diuresis and renal function preservation in a young population. RESULTS: The results showed that the mean age of 32 patients of group 1 was 58±15.3 and for group 2 56±15.6. On day of analysis, BP was 113/65±11.9/6.5 and 108/66.9±14.1/9.8, weight was 68.4±19.8 kg and 73.7±20.2 kg, net volume balance of urine output was 2810.3±1011.8 mL and 3941.7±2849.7 mL, and length of stay was 11.75±6 and 7.9±3.7 days for groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no significant difference in SBP (p=0.2926), DBP (p=0.7369), weight (p=0.4798), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p=0.7), and volume balance (p=0.166). However, there was statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay (p=0.0392). CONCLUSION: The study concluded that continuing ACEI/ARBs or holding them during IV diuresis had no difference in the effect on kidney function or diuresis. Length of stay appears to be shorter for those who held their ACEI/ARBs.