One-year follow-up after active aortic aneurysm sac treatment with shape memory polymer devices during endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of treating abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sacs with polyurethane shape memory polymer (SMP) devices during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), using a technique to fully treat the target lumen after endograft placement (aortic flow volume minus the endograft volume). SMP devices self-expand in the sac to form a porous scaffold that supports thrombosis throughout its structure. METHODS: Two identical prospective, multicenter, single-arm studies were conducted in New Zealand and the Netherlands. The study population was adult candidates for elective EVAR of an infrarenal AAA (diameter of ≥55 mm in men and ≥50 mm in women). Key exclusion criteria were an inability to adequately seal a common iliac artery aneurysm, patent sac feeding vessels of >4 mm, and a target lumen volume of <20 mL or >135 mL. Target lumen volumes were estimated by subtracting endograft volumes from preprocedural imaging-based flow lumen volumes. SMP devices were delivered immediately after endograft deployment via a 6F sheath jailed in a bowed position in the sac. The primary efficacy end point was technical success, defined as filling the actual target lumen volume with fully expanded SMP at the completion of the procedure. Secondary efficacy outcome measures during follow-up were the change in sac volume and diameter, rate of type II endoleak and type I or III endoleaks, and the rate of open repair and related reinterventions, with data collection at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year (to date). Baseline sac volumes and diameters for change in sac size analyses were determined from 30-day imaging studies. Baseline and follow-up volumes were normalized by subtraction of the endograft volume. RESULTS: Of 34 patients treated with SMP devices and followed per protocol, 33 patients were evaluable at 1 year. Preprocedural aneurysm volume was 181.4 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 150.7-212.1 mL) and preprocedural aneurysm diameter was 60.8 mm (95% CI, 57.8-63.9 mm). The target lumen volume was 56.3 mL (95% CI, 46.9-65.8 mL). Technical success was 100% and the ratio of SMP fully expanded volume to estimated target lumen volume was 1.4 ± 0.3. Baseline normalized sac volume and diameter were 140.7 mL (95% CI, 126.6-154.9 mL) and 61.0 mm (95% CI, 59.7-62.3 mm). The adjusted mean percentage change in normalized volume at 1 year was -28.8% (95% CI, -35.3 to -22.3%; P < .001). The adjusted mean change in sac diameter at 1 year was -5.9 mm (95% CI, -7.5 to -4.4 mm; P < .001). At 1 year, 81.8% of patients (95% CI, 64.5%-93.0%) achieved a ≥10% decrease in normalized volume and 57.6% of patients (95% CI, 39.2%-74.5%) achieved a ≥5 mm decrease in diameter. No device- or study procedure-related major adverse events occurred through 1 year after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of AAA sacs with SMP devices during EVAR resulted in significant sac volume and diameter regression at 1 year with an acceptable safety profile in this prospective study.

Rhodium-Mediated Dehydrogenation of Hydroboranes and Group 14 Compounds: Base-Stabilized Silylene and Germylene Complexes vs. Transmetalation.

Monocarbonyl rhodium complex LRh(CO), 1, which is stabilized by a pyrrole-based bis(phosphinimine) pincer ligand (L=κ3 -NNN'=2,5-[i Pr2 P=N(4-i PrC6 H4 )]2 -N'(C4 H2 )- ), serves as a versatile platform for the dehydrogenation of group 14 substrates. Reaction with primary and secondary silanes and germanes (MesSiH3 , Et2 SiH2 , Ph2 GeH2 , t BuGeH3 ; Mes=mesityl) liberates H2 and yields base-stabilized tetrylene compounds of the form κ2 -L(CO)Rh(ER2 ) (E=Si: R=Mes, H, 2; R=Et, 5; E=Ge: R=Ph, 6; R=t Bu, H, 8). The ":ER2 " fragment in these species bridges between the rhodium center and a phosphinimine donor. Preliminary reactions between pinacol (Pin) and κ2 -L(CO)Rh(ER2 ), E=Si, Ge, indicate that such complexes can serve as silylene and germylene synthons, releasing :ER2 and catalytically generating PinER2 . In contrast, combination of complex 1 and MesGeH3 does not yield the anticipated dehydrogenation product, but rather, transmetalation similar to that observed upon reaction between 1 and 3,5-dimethylphenylborane prevails.

A pilot multi-centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) have a significant impact on approximately 3% of the adult population worldwide, with a mean NHS wound care cost of £7600 per VLU over 12 months. The standard care for VLUs is compression therapy, with a significant number of ulcers failing to heal with this treatment, especially with wound size being a risk factor for non-healing. This multicentre, prospective, randomised trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) combined with compression therapy compared with standard compression alone (Control) for the treatment of VLUs. Incidence of complete wound closure at 14 weeks, donor site closure, pain, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), satisfaction, and safety were assessed in 52 patients. At Week 14, VLUs treated with ASCS + compression had a statistically greater decrease in ulcer area compared with the Control (8.94 cm2 versus 1.23 cm2 , P = .0143). This finding was largely driven by ulcers >10 to 80 cm2 in size, as these ulcers had a higher mean percentage of reepithelialization at 14 weeks (ASCS + compression: 69.97% and Control: 11.07%, P = .0480). Additionally, subjects treated with ASCS + compression experienced a decrease in pain and an increase in HRQoL compared with the Control. This study indicates that application of ASCS + compression accelerates healing in large venous ulcers.

Pivotal results for the Valiant Navion stent graft system in the Valiant EVO global clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The Valiant Navion stent graft system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) is a new iteration of a thoracic endograft for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Herein, the 30-day primary safety and efficacy outcomes and secondary end points are presented. METHODS: The Valiant EVO global clinical trial is a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm trial. Patient enrollment occurred from April 2016 to October 2017. The primary end point was defined as access and/or deployment failure and/or a major device effect (MDE), including device-related secondary procedures, device-related mortality, conversion to open surgery, or thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture within 30 days of the index procedure. Other measures of stent graft performance including procedural data, rates of secondary procedures, and frequency of endoleaks are also reported. RESULTS: Of the 87 consecutive patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair who were enrolled, 33 (37.9%) were female with 61 (70.9%) presenting with severe access artery tortuosity and 66 (85.7%) with high thoracic aortic tortuosity per core laboratory evaluation. The mean procedure duration was 88.7 ± 53.4 minutes and geographical differences existed such as percutaneous access (37/52 [71.2%]) in the United States and surgical cut down in the outside of the U.S. sites (28/35 [80.0%]). There were no access or deployment failures and only 2.3% of the patients (2/87; P < .0001; performance goal of 16%) experienced a MDE within 30 days of the index procedure. Two secondary procedures (n = 1 retrograde type A dissection; n = 1 aortic arch rupture) were required, and in the first 30 days, two patients died leading to a freedom from all-cause mortality of 97.7%. Endoleaks at 1 month were reported in 2.5% of patients (n = 1 type Ia; n = 1 type II). CONCLUSIONS: Access/deployment failures, MDEs, and endoleaks were rare in the first 30 days of the Valiant Evo clinical trial. The Valiant Navion thoracic stent graft system has shown encouraging 30-day results in this challenging cohort and trial patients will continue to be followed through 5 years.

An H-Substituted Rhodium Silylene.

Divergent reactivity of organometallic rhodium(I) complexes, which led to the isolation of neutral rhodium silylenes, is described. Addition of PhRSiH2 (R=H, Ph) to the rhodium cyclooctene complex (iPr NNN)Rh(COE) (1-COE; iPr NNN=2,5-[iPr2 P=N(4-iPrC6 H4 )]2 N(C6 H2 )- , COE=cyclooctene) resulted in the oxidative addition of an Si-H bond, providing rhodium(III) silyl hydride complexes (iPr NNN)Rh(H)SiHRPh (R=H, 2-SiH2 Ph; Ph, 2-SiHPh2 ). When the carbonyl complex (iPr NNN)Rh(CO) (1-CO) was treated with hydrosilanes, base-stabilized rhodium(I) silylenes κ2 -N,N-(iPr NNN)(CO)Rh=SiRPh (R=H, 3-SiHPh; Ph, 3-SiPh2 ) were isolated and characterized using multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Both silylene species feature short Rh-Si bonds [2.262(1) Å, 3-SiHPh; 2.2702(7) Å, 3-SiPh2 ] that agree well with the DFT-computed structures. The overall reaction led to a change in the iPr NNN ligand bonding mode (κ3 →κ2 ) and loss of H2 from PhSiRH2 , as corroborated by deuterium labelling experiments.

The Impact of Operating Surgeon Experience, Supervised Trainee vs. Trained Surgeon, in Vascular Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The operative caseload of a surgeon has a positive influence on post-operative outcomes. For surgical trainees to progress effectively, maximising operating room exposure is essential, vascular surgery being no exception. Our aim was to ascertain the impact of supervised trainee led vs. expert surgeon led procedures on post-operative outcomes, across three commonly performed vascular operations. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 1 January 2018. Studies reporting outcomes following major lower limb amputation, fistula formation, or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) that involved a direct comparison between supervised trainee and experts were included, with odds ratios (ORs) calculated. Primary outcomes varied depending on the specific procedure: amputations-rate of amputation revision within 30 days; fistula formation-primary patency; CEA-stroke rate at 30 days. Meta-analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed for each outcome. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final review. Overall, trainees accounted for a third of all procedures analysed (n = 2 421/7 017; 34.5%). Only one study was identified that described rates of amputation revision, precluding any further analysis. Four studies on fistula formation were included, showing no significant difference in outcomes between trainees and experts in primary patency (OR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-6.75). Nine studies were identified reporting post-CEA stroke rates, also demonstrating no difference between trainees and experts (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59-1.32). CONCLUSION: In select cases, with appropriate training and suitable experience, supervised trainees can perform surgical procedures without any detriment to patient care. To ensure high standards for patients of the future, supported training programmes are essential for today's surgical trainees.

Editor's Choice - Mid-term Migration and Device Failure Following Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing with the Nellix Stent Graft System - a Single Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix stent graft system is a novel concept in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that aims to reduce the prevalence of all endoleaks following endovascular repair. There are few data describing the longer-term durability of this approach. The aim was to report the longer-term outcomes following EVAS in a single centre. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients that underwent Nellix at Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust. Factors that are described as device failure include secondary sac rupture, graft explantation, further surgical procedures for Type 1 endoleak, or major migration of the stent grafts with pressurisation of the aortic sac. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients have been treated with Nellix. The indications included primary AAA (n = 115), ruptured AAA (n = 4), salvage of other aortic grafts (n = 18), primary iliac aneurysm (n = 6), and chimney EVAS (ChEVAS) for pararenal AAA (n = 18). In total there have been 42 graft failures in patients treated with EVAS for primary AAA. The 4 year freedom from graft failure was 42% in patients treated for primary AAA. Failures mostly occurred more than 2 years post-Nellix implant. There were eight secondary sac ruptures (incidence 2.4 per 100 person years) and there have been 14 graft explants. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of aneurysm sealing following treatment with Nellix has been more common than anticipated and can cause aortic rupture. Post-operative surveillance of Nellix stent grafts is crucial to identify features of failure.

18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT in Symptomatic versus Asymptomatic Carotid Disease: a Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The role of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the determination of inflammation in arterial disease is not well defined. This can provide information about arterial wall inflammation in atherosclerotic disease, and may give insight into plaque stability. The aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis of PET/CT with 18F-FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) uptake in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease. METHODS: This was a systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, which interrogated the MEDLINE database from January 2001 to May 2017. The search combined the terms, "inflammation", "FDG", and "stroke". The search criteria included all types of studies, with a primary outcome of the degree of arterial vascular inflammation determined by 18F-FDG uptake. Analysis involved an inverse weighted variance estimate of pooled data, using a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 14 articles (539 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Comparing carotid artery 18F-FDG uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic disease yielded a standard mean difference of 0.94 (95% CI 0.58-1.130; p < .0001; I2 = 65%). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT using 18F-FDG can demonstrate carotid plaque inflammation, and is a marker of symptomatic disease. Further studies are required to understand the clinical implication of PET/CT as a risk prediction tool.

Topical oxygen therapy stimulates healing in difficult, chronic wounds: a tertiary centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: Oxygen plays a central role in wound healing. Recent technological advances have miniaturised oxygen delivery systems, with novel topical oxygen therapy allowing patients to receive oxygen therapy 24 hours a day while remaining completely mobile. Here we aim to examine the efficacy and safety of continuous topical oxygen diffusion in a 'real-world' setting. METHODS: Topical oxygen therapy (TOT) was evaluated in patients with chronic, non-healing wounds in a tertiary referral specialist clinic. RESULTS: The mean wound duration before TOT was 15 months. Regardless of treatment duration, in this previously non-healing group complete wound closure was observed in 32% of the total patients treated with the TOT device. However, optimal wound healing occurred when the device was used for >25 days, with an 83% wound area reduction and 47% wound closure rate seen in venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and a 74% reduction and a 57% wound closure rate in arterial foot ulcers. CONCLUSION: Use of TOT in chronic wounds stimulates a healing state. In our study, almost half of the previously non-healing wounds closed.

Mechanochemical Ablation for Treatment of Truncal Venous Insufficiency: A Review of the Current Literature.

Mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) is a nonthermal nontumescent technique used in the treatment of superficial venous disease. This review analyzed the available data on the efficacy and safety of MOCA. A systematic literature search was performed. Of 101 studies identified, 14 were suitable for inclusion. The studies were found to be heterogeneous in design, and the quality of evidence was found to be low or very low. MOCA was demonstrated to be effective in the short-term with minimal complications. Consensus guidelines and definitions of reporting outcome measures must be standardized to allow comparison with other techniques.

Attitudes and factors contributing to attrition in Canadian surgical specialty residency programs.

BACKGROUND: We recently studied attrition in Canadian general surgical programs; however, there are no data on whether residents enrolled in other surgical residencies harbour the same intents as their general surgical peers. We sought to determine how many residents in surgical disciplines in Canada consider leaving their programs and why. METHODS: An anonymous survey was administered to all residents in 9 surgical disciplines in Canada. Significance of association was determined using the Pearson χ2 test. The Canadian Post-MD Education Registry (CAPER) website was used to calculate the response rate. RESULTS: We received 523 responses (27.6% response rate). Of these respondents, 140 (26.8%) were either "somewhat" or "seriously" considering leaving their program. Residents wanting to pursue additional fellowship training and those aspiring to an academic career were significantly less likely to be considering changing specialties (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). Poor work-life balance and fear of unemployment/underemployment were the top reasons why residents would change specialty (55.5% and 40.8%, respectively), although the reasons cited were not significantly different between those considering changing and those who were not (p = 0.64). Residents who were considering changing programs were significantly less likely to enjoy their work and more likely to cite having already invested too much time to change as a reason for continuing (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More than one-quarter of residents in surgical training programs in Canada harbour desires to abandon their surgical careers, primarily because of unsatisfactory work-life balance and limited employment prospects. Efforts to educate prospective residents about the reality of the surgical lifestyle and to optimize employment prospects may improve completion rates.

CONTEXTE: Nous avons récemment étudié les taux d'attrition dans les programmes de chirurgie générale canadiens; toutefois, on ne dispose pas de données pour déterminer si les résidents inscrits dans d'autres programmes de chirurgie ont les mêmes intentions que leurs collègues de chirurgie générale. Nous avons voulu savoir combien de résidents des disciplines chirurgicales au Canada envisagent de quitter leur programme et pourquoi. MÉTHODES: Tous les résidents de 9 disciplines chirurgicales au Canada ont passé un sondage anonyme. La portée de la corrélation a été déterminée à l'aide du test χ2 de Pearson. Le site Web du Répertoire canadien sur l'éducation post-MD (RCEP) a été utilisé pour calculer le taux de réponse. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons reçu 523 réponses (taux de réponse de 27,6 %). Parmi les répondants, 140 (26,8 %) envisageaient « peut-être ¼ ou « sérieusement ¼ de quitter leur programme. Les résidents qui souhaitaient suivre une formation de surspécialité et ceux qui aspiraient à une carrière universitaire étaient notablement moins susceptibles d'envisager un changement de programme (p = 0,003 et p = 0,005, respectivement). Les problèmes de conciliation travail-famille et la crainte du chômage ou du sous-emploi ont été les principales raisons invoquées par les résidents pour changer de spécialité (55,5 % et 40,8 %, respectivement), même si les raisons citées n'étaient pas sensiblement différentes selon que les répondants envisageaient ou non un tel changement (p = 0,64). Les résidents qui envisageaient un changement de programme étaient notablement moins susceptibles d'apprécier leur travail et plus susceptibles d'invoquer le considérable investissement de temps déjà consenti comme raison pour ne pas changer de programme (p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Plus du quart de résidents des programmes de formation en chirurgie au Canada souhaitent abandonner leur carrière en chirurgie, principalement en raison des problèmes de conciliation travail-famille et des perspectives d'emploi limitées. Des efforts pour renseigner les candidats sur ce que représente réellement la vie de chirurgien et pour optimiser les perspectives d'emploi pourraient améliorer les taux d'achèvement des programmes.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Carotid Atheroma: a Comparative Study of Patients with and without Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of atheroma using contrast media enables assessment of the systemic severity of atherosclerosis in different arterial beds. Whether black-blood imaging has similar ability remains widely unexplored. In this study, we evaluate whether black-blood imaging can differentiate carotid plaques of patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) in terms of morphological and biomechanical features of plaque vulnerability, thereby allowing assessment of the systemic severity nature of atherosclerosis in different arterial beds. METHODS: Forty-one patients with CAD and 59 patients without CAD underwent carotid black-blood MR imaging. Plaque components were segmented to identify large lipid core (LC), ruptured fibrous cap (FC), and plaque hemorrhage (PH). These segmented contours of plaque components were used to quantify maximum structural biomechanical stress. RESULTS: Patients with CAD and without CAD had comparable demographics and comorbidities. Both groups had comparable prevalence of morphological features of plaque vulnerability (FC rupture, 44% versus 41%, P = .90; PH, 58% versus 47%, P = .78; large LC, 32% versus 47%, P = .17), respectively. The maximum biomechanical stress was not significantly different for both groups (241versus 278 kPa, P = .14) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Black-blood imaging does not appear to have the ability to differentiate between the morphological and biomechanical features of plaque vulnerability when comparing patients with and without symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in a distant arterial territory such as coronary artery.

Premorbid function, comorbidity, and frailty predict outcomes after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Strategies to improve outcomes for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) are becoming more evident. The aging population, however, continues to make the decision to intervene often difficult, especially given that traditional risk models do not reflect issues of aging and frailty. This study aimed to integrate measures of function alongside comorbidity- and frailty-specific factors to determine outcome. METHODS: Patients treated for a rAAA between January 2006 and April 2014 were assessed. Demographics, mortality, and requirement for care after discharge as well as a variety of measures of function (physical, social, and psychological) and comorbidity were recorded. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Outcome models were generated using multivariate logistic regression and were compared with models of vascular frailty and AAA-related outcome. RESULTS: Of 184 patients treated, 108 (59%) underwent an open surgical repair. The overall 30-day and 1-year mortality were 21.5% and 31.4%, respectively, with an overall median hospital length of stay of 13 days (interquartile range, 6-27 days). An optimal logistic regression model for 12-month mortality used Katz score, Charlson score, number of admission medicines, visual impairment, hearing impairment, hemoglobin level, and statin use as predictors, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: This novel rAAA model incorporating function and comorbidity offers good predictive power for mortality. It is quick to calculate and may ultimately become helpful for both counseling and selection of patients and comparative audit at a time when outcome in patients with rAAA increasingly comes under the spotlight.

Imaging After Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing: A Consensus Document.

Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) using the Nellix system is a new and different method of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Normal postoperative imaging has unique appearances that change with time; complications also have different and specific appearances. This consensus document on the imaging findings after Nellix EVAS is based on the collective experience of the sites involved in the Nellix EVAS Global Forward Registry and the US Investigational Device Exemption Trial. The normal findings on computed tomography (CT), duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiography are described. With time, endobag appearances change on CT due to contrast migration to the margins of the hydrogel polymer within the endobag. Air within the endobag also has unique appearances that change over time. Among the complications after Nellix EVAS, type I endoleak usually presents as a curvilinear area of flow between the endobag and aortic wall, while type II endoleak is typically small and usually occurs where an aortic branch artery lies adjacent to an irregular aortic blood lumen that is not completely filled by the endobag. Procedural aortic injury is an uncommon but important complication that occurs as a result of overfilling of the endobags during Nellix EVAS. The optimum imaging surveillance algorithm after Nellix EVAS has yet to be defined but is largely CT-based, especially in the first year postprocedure. However, duplex ultrasound also appears to be a sensitive modality in identifying normal appearances and complications.

Global Experience With the Nellix Endosystem for Ruptured and Symptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and safety of the endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) technique in the treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 8 centers (7 European and 1 in New Zealand) experienced with EVAS in the elective setting. From February 2013 to April 2015, 58 patients (mean age 74±9 years; 46 men) with an acute AAA were treated (28 ruptured and 30 symptomatic). The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality; secondary endpoints included endoleak, reinterventions, and 30-day morbidity. RESULTS: The overall intensive care unit and hospital stays were 2.2±6.6 days and 9.7±11.4 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rates were 32% (9/28) for the ruptured group and 7% (2/30) for the symptomatic group, with morbidity rates of 57% and 17%, respectively. Early endoleak was present in only 2 (3%) patients, one in each group; both leaks were type Ia. Reinterventions within 30 days were performed in 8 patients in the ruptured group; in the symptomatic patients, the only perioperative reintervention was embolization a type Ia endoleak. The mean follow-up was 9.3±3.1 months in the ruptured group and 12.4±5.4 months in the symptomatic group. The mean aneurysm diameter at 30-day follow-up was 71.8±16.0 mm compared with 74.7±15.7 mm preoperatively in the ruptured group and 66.1±13.5 mm compared with 65.8±13.0 mm in the symptomatic group. CONCLUSION: EVAS in the acute setting appears safe and feasible and concordant with the literature for endovascular aneurysm repair. More robust prospective and comparative data are required to establish the position of the technique in the treatment algorithm of acute AAA.

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing: Early and Midterm Results From the EVAS FORWARD Global Registry.

PURPOSE: To report the early and 12-month results of a global registry of patients treated with endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: The EVAS FORWARD Global Registry was a postmarket, multicenter, open-label, single-arm registry that enrolled 277 patients (mean age 75 years; 228 men) treated with the Nellix EVAS system for nonruptured AAAs at 18 sites over a 1-year period. The cohort had challenging aortic anatomy, with 17% having a proximal aortic neck length <10 mm, 8% a neck angulation >60°, and 20% an iliac diameter >25 mm. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography images were assessed by an independent core laboratory, and major adverse events were reviewed by an independent safety committee. RESULTS: Three patients died within 30 days of the procedure (none device-related). There were 13 endoleaks recorded in this time frame: 8 type Ia, 1 type Ib, and 5 type II. Root cause analysis demonstrated that the majority of type Ia endoleaks were due to technical error (low device placement and underfilling of the endobags). Between 30 days and 1 year, there were 4 new type Ia endoleaks; all were treated. There was also 1 type III endoleak between a Nellix device and a distal extension limb. At 1 year, the persistent endoleak rate was 0.7% (1 type Ia and 1 type II). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from types I and II endoleak at 12-month follow-up were 96% and 98%, respectively. The estimate of freedom from open conversion (n=7) was 98% at 12 months and the rate of freedom from any reintervention was 92%. The need for secondary intervention was associated with aortic morphology; for patients meeting the requirements of the instructions for use (IFU), the freedom from reintervention at 12 months was 98% compared with 86% when the implant was outside the IFU (p=0.009). At 1 year, the estimates of freedom from aortic-related and all-cause mortality were 98% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The EVAS FORWARD Global Registry documents the 12-month outcome of EVAS in an unselected group of patients with challenging aortic morphology. The results at present appear acceptable with regard to perioperative outcomes and complications. The type II endoleak rate is low. The place of EVAS in the armamentarium of techniques to treat AAAs will be defined by durability data in the longer term.

Moving into the 'patient-centred medical home': reforming Australian general practice.

The Australian healthcare system is a complex network of services and providers funded and administered by federal, state and territory governments, supplemented by private health insurance and patient contributions. The broad geographical range, complexity and increasing demand within the Australian healthcare sector mean health expenditure is high. Aspects of current funding for the healthcare system have attracted criticism from medical practitioners, patients, representative organisations and independent statutory agencies. In response to the problems in primary care funding in Australia, The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners developed the Vision for general practice and a sustainable healthcare system (the Vision). The Vision presents a plan to improve healthcare delivery in Australia through greater quality, access and efficiency by reorienting how general practice services are funded based on the 'patient-centred medical home' model.

Randomized trial of a dry-powder, fibrin sealant in vascular procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Topical hemostats are important adjuncts for stopping surgical bleeding. The safety and efficacy of Fibrocaps, a dry-powder, fibrin sealant containing human plasma-derived thrombin and fibrinogen, was evaluated in patients undergoing vascular surgical procedures. METHODS: In this single-blind trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01527357), adult patients were randomized 2:1 to Fibrocaps plus gelatin sponge (Fibrocaps) vs gelatin sponge alone. Results are presented for the patient subset undergoing vascular procedures with suture hole bleeding. The primary efficacy endpoint compared time to hemostasis (TTH) over 5 minutes. Safety follow-up continued to day 29. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were randomized and treated (Fibrocaps, 117; gelatin sponge, 58). Patients were predominately male (69%) and underwent arterial bypass (81%), arteriovenous graft formation (9%), or carotid endarterectomy (9%). Fibrocaps significantly reduced TTH compared with gelatin sponge (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.1; median TTH, 2 minutes; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5 vs 4 minutes; 95% CI, 3.0-5.0; P < .002). Significant reductions were also observed in patients receiving concomitant antiplatelet agents alone (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.0-7.4; P = .03; n = 33), anticoagulants alone (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.0; P = .04; n = 43), or both antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants (Fibrocaps vs gelatin sponge, HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3; P = .008; n = 65). Incidences of common adverse events (procedural pain, nausea, constipation) were generally comparable between treatment arms. Anti-thrombin antibodies developed in 2% of Fibrocaps-treated patients and no-gelatin-sponge patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrocaps, a ready-to-use, dry-powder fibrin sealant, was well-tolerated and reduced TTH in patients undergoing vascular procedures, including those receiving antiplatelet agents and/or anticoagulants, demonstrating its safety and usefulness as an adjunct to hemostasis.

Multicenter Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing system experience in aneurysm sac sealing.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in endograft devices, operator technique, and patient selection, endovascular repair has not achieved the long-term durability of open surgical aneurysm repair. Persistent or recurrent aneurysm sac flow from failed proximal sealing, component failure, or branch vessel flow underpins a significant rate of reintervention after endovascular repair. The Nellix device (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) employs a unique design with deployment of polymer-filled EndoBags surrounding the endograft flow lumens, sealing the aneurysm sac space and potentially reducing complications from persistent sac flow. This retrospective analysis represents the initial experience in consecutive patients treated with the device in real-world practice. METHODS: This study was performed at six clinical centers in Europe and one in New Zealand during the initial period after commercialization of the Nellix device. Patients underwent evaluation with computed tomography and other imaging modalities following local standards of care. Patients were selected for treatment with Nellix and treated by each institution according to its endovascular repair protocol. Clinical and imaging end points included technical success (successful device deployment and absence of any endoleak at completion angiography), freedom from all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, endoleak by type, limb occlusion, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention. RESULTS: During a 17-month period, 171 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with the Nellix device and observed for a median of 5 months (range, 0-14 months). The 153 male and 18 female patients with mean age of 74 ± 7 years had aneurysms 61 ± 9 mm in diameter with an average infrarenal neck length of 28 ± 15 mm and infrarenal angulation of 37 ± 22 degrees. Technical success was achieved in all but two patients (99%); one patient had a type Ib endoleak and another had a type II endoleak. Through the last available follow-up, type Ia endoleak was observed in five patients (3%), type Ib endoleak in four patients (2%), and type II endoleak in four patients (2%). There were eight limb occlusions (5%), among which seven were evident at the 1-month follow-up visit. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 15 patients (9%). There were no aneurysm ruptures or open surgical conversions. CONCLUSIONS: This first multicenter postmarket report of the Nellix device for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair demonstrates satisfactory results during the initial learning phase of this new technology. The rate of aneurysm exclusion was high, and frequency of complications was low. More definitive conclusions on the value of this novel device await the results of the ongoing Nellix EVAS FORWARD Global Registry and the EVAS FORWARD investigational device exemption trial.

Independence and mobility after infrainguinal lower limb bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a common condition associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Most work to date has focused on surgeon-oriented outcomes such as patency, but there is increasing interest in patient-oriented outcomes such as mobility and independence. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the effect of infrainguinal lower limb bypass surgery (LLBS) on postoperative mobility in a United Kingdom tertiary vascular surgery unit and to investigate causes and consequences of poor postoperative mobility. METHODS: We collected data on all patients undergoing LLBS for CLI at our institution during a 3-year period and analyzed potential factors that correlated with poor postoperative mobility. RESULTS: During the study period, 93 index LLBS procedures were performed for patients with CLI. Median length of stay was 11 days (interquartile range, 11 days). The 12-month rates of graft patency, major amputation, and mortality were 75%, 9%, and 6%, respectively. Rates of dependence increased fourfold during the first postoperative year, from 5% preoperatively to 21% at 12 months. Predictors of poor postoperative mobility were female sex (P = .04) and poor postoperative mobility (P < .001), initially and at the 12-month follow-up. Patients with poor postoperative mobility had significantly prolonged hospital length of stay (15 vs 8 days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LLBS for CLI suffer significantly impaired postoperative mobility, and this is associated with prolonged hospital stay, irrespective of successful revascularization. Further work is needed to better predict patients who will benefit from revascularization and in whom a nonoperative strategy is optimal.