Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(6): 340, 2023 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37191890

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, prostate cancer is both the second-most diagnosed cancer and most common solid tumor in men. Prostate cancer patients present with a symptom burden that is compounded by the impact of medical oncology treatment, affecting different domains of their perceived health status. Education active techniques are a key role in chronic disease to increase participation in their recovery. PURPOSE: The purpose of the current review was to examine the efficacy of education-enhanced in urinary symptom burden, psychological distress, and self-efficacy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. METHODS: A wide search of the literature was conducted for articles from their inception to June 2022. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Data extraction and methodologic quality assessment of the studies were carried out by two reviewers. We previously registered the protocol of this systematic review on PROSPERO (CRD42022331954). RESULTS: A total of six studies were included in the study. After education-enhanced intervention showed significant improvements in any of perceived urinary symptom burden, one in psychological distress, and one in self-efficacy in the experimental group. The meta-analysis showed that education-enhanced interventions have a significant effect on depression. CONCLUSION: Education-enhanced could have positive effects on urinary symptom burden, psychological distress, and self-efficacy in prostate cancer survivors. Our review was unable to demonstrate the best timing to apply education-enhanced strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Distrés Psicológico , Masculino , Humanos , Autoeficacia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Estado de Salud
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(5): 284, 2023 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079161

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to assess self-reported physical activity (PA) levels, barriers to PA, quality of life and self-efficacy to manage chronic disease of prostate cancer survivor 1 year after radiotherapy treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional case-control study was performed. Prostate cancer survivor patients treated with radiotherapy were recruited from the Radiation Oncology Service of the "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario" (Granada) and compared with age-matched healthy men. Outcomes included were perception of benefits for physical activity and potential barriers (Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale), physical activity levels assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-levels) and self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease). RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included in our study. Significant differences were found between groups with worse results for the prostate cancer patient group in the variable perception of the benefit of physical activity, potential barriers, and physical activity. Regarding quality of life and self-efficacy, significant differences were also observed between groups with a greater score in the control group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the results of this study reveal that self-reported PA levels, as measured using the IPAQ, were low in prostate cancer survivors after treatment. Results also showed worse perception of benefits for PA and potential barriers by the cancer survivors. Similarly, the quality of life and self-efficacy to manage chronic disease of prostate cancer survivors was lower.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Oncología por Radiación , Masculino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Próstata , Autoeficacia , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 24(5): 528-534, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37225540

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although pain is common in non-hospitalized post-COVID-19 syndrome, only a few studies have provided information on the pain experience of these patients. AIM: To identify the clinical and psychosocial profile associated with pain in non-hospitalized patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. METHOD: In this study there were three groups: healthy control group, successfully recovered group, and post-COVID syndrome group. Pain-related clinical profile and pain-related psychosocial variables were collected. Pain-related clinical profile included: pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory), central sensitization (Central Sensitization Scale), insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index), and pain treatment. Pain-related psychosocial variables were: fear of movement and (re)injury (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), depression, anxiety and stress (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale), and fear-avoidance beliefs (Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). RESULTS: In all, 170 participants were included in the study (healthy control group n = 58, successfully recovered group n = 57, and post-COVID syndrome group n = 55). Post-COVID syndrome group obtained significantly worse punctuation in pain-related clinical profile and psychosocial variables than the other two groups (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome have experienced high pain intensity and interference, central sensitization, increased insomnia severity, fear of movement, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, and stress.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dolor Crónico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , COVID-19/complicaciones , Catastrofización/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(1): 71, 2022 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542189

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of healthy lifestyle-based interventions in lung cancer survivors. METHODS: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct (last search March 2022). Quality assessment and risk of bias were assessed using the Downs and Black scale and the Cochrane tool. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed. We included controlled trials testing the effect of healthy lifestyle-based interventions in lung cancer survivors versus a control intervention where lung cancer patients had no treatment, were receiving the usual care, or had not an active role in the intervention. The data were pooled and a meta-analysis was completed for quality of life, psychological distress, and cancer-related symptoms. RESULTS: We selected 14 studies, which included 1519 patients with lung cancer. The treatment status of these patients was heterogeneous. Healthy lifestyle programs were applied isolated or in combination with usual care in most of the studies. The components of the healthy lifestyle programs were also heterogeneous. Results showed significant differences in favor of healthy lifestyle-based interventions in comparison to the control group for quality of life (p = 0.01), psychological distress (p = 0.05), and cancer-related symptoms (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated a beneficial effect of healthy lifestyle-based interventions for improving quality of life, psychological distress, and cancer-related symptoms in lung cancer patients. However, this review could not show any conclusion about the better treatment moment to apply healthy lifestyle-based interventions. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42021292152. REVIEW REGISTRATION DATE: 19/12/2021.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Pulmón , Estilo de Vida Saludable
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(2): 1579-1586, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34541609

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with lung cancer experience a variety of distressing symptoms which could adversely affect quality of life. The aim of this study was to determine whether psychological distress prior to surgery is associated to health status and symptom burden in lung cancer survivors. METHODS: A longitudinal observational study with 1-year follow-up was carried out. Health status was measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS 2.0), the Euroqol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Symptoms severity included dyspnoea (Multidimensional Profile of Dyspnoea); pain (Brief Pain Inventory); fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale); and cough (Leicester Cough Questionnaire). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four lung cancer patients were included. Patients in the group with psychological distress presented a worse self-perceived health status, functionality and sleep quality. The group with psychological distress also presented higher dyspnoea, fatigue and pain. CONCLUSION: Patients with psychological distress prior surgery present with a greater symptom burden and a poorer self-perceived health status, lower functionality and sleep quality, than patients without distress 1 year after the lung resection.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Distrés Psicológico , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/etiología , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Pulmón , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Calidad del Sueño , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(4): 3017-3027, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34714414

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the exercise intervention focused on high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in lung cancer survivors. DESIGN: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct (last search March 2021). Quality assessment and risk of bias were assessed using the Downs and Black scale and the Cochrane tool. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 305 patients of 8 studies were assessed, with their mean age ranging from 61 ± 6.3 to 66 ± 10 years in the exercise group and from 58.5 ± 8.2 to 68 ± 9 years in the control group. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and pilot randomized controlled trials was performed. We included controlled trials testing the effect of HIIT in lung cancer survivors versus the usual care provided to these patients. The data were pooled and a meta-analysis was completed for cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). RESULTS: We selected 8 studies, which included 305 patients with lung cancer: 6 studies were performed around surgical moment, one study during radiotherapy's treatment, and other during target therapy. After pooling the data, exercise capacity was included in the analysis. Results showed significant differences in favour to HIIT when compared to usual care in cardiorespiratory fitness (standard mean difference = 2.62; 95% confidence interval = 1.55, 3.68; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings indicated a beneficial effect of HIIT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in lung cancer patients in early stages around oncological treatment moment. Nevertheless, this review has several limitations, the total number of studies was low, and the stage and subtype of lung cancer patients were heterogeneous that means that the conclusions of this review should be taken with caution. Review registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42021231229.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Capacidad Cardiovascular , Entrenamiento de Intervalos de Alta Intensidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Anciano , Entrenamiento de Intervalos de Alta Intensidad/métodos , Humanos , Pulmón , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 23(6): 737-741, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35725544

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic influences of COPD patients. The worsening of their health status may contribute to a higher pain prevalence. AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the pain-related variables before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: In this cross-sectional case-control study, stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without a COVID-19 diagnosis were evaluated before and during the pandemic. The main outcomes were the pronociceptive pain profile (general pain sensitivity, pain intensity, pain interference, and pressure pain sensitivity) and the psychological vulnerability (perceived health status, anxiety, and depression). RESULTS: Our results showed that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during COVID-19 pandemic experienced higher general pain sensitivity and intensity with statistical differences in pain interference (p < .001), being the overall perceived health status lower than before the pandemic (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during the COVID-19 pandemic showed a rise the pronociceptive pain profile accompanied by increased psychological vulnerability.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Prueba de COVID-19 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Dolor/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología
8.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(13)2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38998858

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between clinical severity and functionality, occupational performance, and health-related quality of life in patients hospitalized with pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism patients were grouped by clinical severity using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. Those scoring ≥160 were in the high-severity group (HSG); those scoring < 160 in the low-moderate group (LMSG). The main variables were functionality assessed by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), self-perception of occupational performance assessed by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), pain and fatigue assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and health-related quality of life assessed by the EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D). Patients were evaluated at hospital admission and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. At admission, there were significant differences between groups in the WHODAS and health-related quality of life in favor of the LMSG. At 1-month and at 3-month follow-up, there were significant differences between the LMSG and HSG in WHODAS, COMP, NRS pain, fatigue and EQ-5D scores in favor of the LMSG. An association exists between clinical severity and mid-term functionality, self-perception of occupational performance, pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life in PE patients.

9.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(13)2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39001530

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cancer-related pain is a global health-related problem associated with functional impairment, anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. The use of educational interventions for patients and their caregivers has been proposed as a promising tool for overcoming pain in cancer. The aim of this study was to summarize by means of a standardized methodological systematic revision the actual pain education intervention used in cancer patients and their caregivers and to analyze its effects on pain. METHODS: A search was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cinhal from their inception to September 2022. Randomized controlled trials which included pain education interventions were identified. Two reviewers performed independent data extraction and methodologic quality assessments of these studies. RESULTS: A total of seven studies was included in the study. The meta-analysis showed that pain education interventions have a significant effect on the worst pain; however, there was no effect on average pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pain education interventions addressed to patients and their caregivers could have positive effects on cancer-related pain. It is recommended that a minimum of three sessions of about one hour's duration be held once a week. Further research needs to be carried out and analyzed on the effects over the long term. Pain education interventions show positive results in improving pain in cancer patients regardless of etiology or extent of the cancer. Studies with better methodological quality should be carried out to address specific components related to education interventions.

10.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 18(3-4): 207-217, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38800959

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To date, it is unknown whether respiratory training interventions can benefit Long COVID-19 patients. The main objective was to analyze the effects of respiratory training on patients with Long COVID-19, concretely on respiratory muscle strength, lung function, dyspnea, and functional capacity. METHODS: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA statement using PubMed, Scopus, and PEDro (last search November 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. We included randomized controlled trials testing the effect of respiratory training interventions in Long COVID-19 patients versus no intervention, control, or placebo intervention. The data was pooled, and a meta-analysis was complete. RESULTS: We selected 7 studies, which included 572 patients. Meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory training in respiratory muscle strength (MD = 13.71; 95% CI = 5.41; 22; p = 0.001), dyspnea (SDM = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.33; 2.46; p = 0.01) and functional capacity (SDM = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.37; 1.43; p = 0.0009), but not in lung function (MD = 0.28; 95%CI = -0.27; 0.83; p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review with meta-analysis suggest that respiratory training improves respiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in Long COVID-19 patients, as well as dyspnea if combined with therapeutic exercise. However, respiratory training does not improve lung function in these patients. REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO IDENTIFIER: CRD42022371820.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicios Respiratorios , COVID-19 , Fuerza Muscular , Músculos Respiratorios , Humanos , Músculos Respiratorios/fisiopatología , Disnea/fisiopatología , SARS-CoV-2 , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19
11.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(16)2024 Aug 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39199563

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung resection represents the main curative treatment modality for lung cancer. These patients present with physical deterioration that has been studied previously using objective variables; however, no previous studies have evaluated the self-perceived physical fitness of these patients. For these reasons, to increase the current knowledge on lung cancer patients' impairment, the aim of this study was to characterize the self-perceived physical deconditioning of lung cancer patients undergoing lung resection in the short and medium term after surgery. METHODS: A longitudinal, observational, prospective cohort study was performed in the Thoracic Surgery Service of the Hospital Virgen de las Nieves (Granada). Symptoms (pain, fatigue, cough and dyspnea) and physical fitness (upper and lower limbs) were assessed before surgery, at discharge and at one month after discharge. RESULTS: Among the total of 88 patients that we included in our study, significant differences were found at discharge in symptoms (p < 0.05) and physical fitness (p < 0.05). One month after surgery, higher levels of pain (p = 0,002) and dyspnea (p = 0.007) were observed, as well as poorer results in the upper (p = 0.023) and lower limbs' physical fitness, with regard to the initial values. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing lung resection present an increase in symptoms and physical fitness deterioration at discharge, which is maintained one month after surgery.

12.
Patient Educ Couns ; 130: 108454, 2024 Oct 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39368436

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of proactive physical activity (PA) programs on lung cancer patients undergoing lung resection at short and mid-term. METHODS: We conducted a literature search through MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (last search October 2023). The GRADE System and the Cochrane tool were applied to quality assessment. The included studies focused on the application of proactive PA interventions among lung cancer surgical patients compared to usual or standard care. We performed a meta-analysis addressing hospital stay, cancer-related symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity at short and mid-term. RESULTS: We selected 9 studies, which included 798 lung cancer patients. Proactive interventions were applied in combination with respiratory training and exercise in most of the studies. The treatment status was heterogeneous. Significant results in favour of proactive interventions were observed for hospital stay, cancer-related symptoms, quality of life, and short and mid-term exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive PA interventions showed positive effects for reducing length stay, enhancing exercise capacity at short and mid-term, alleviating cancer-related symptoms, and improving the quality of life for lung cancer surgical patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Proactive interventions can optimize the timing and setting of PA results around lung surgical treatment.

13.
J Clin Med ; 13(18)2024 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39337034

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Swallowing disorders are common following a stroke. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a home-based daily intervention focused on inspiratory and expiratory muscle training on swallowing outcomes in patients with chronic stroke. (2) Methods: This manuscript presents the protocol of a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients with chronic stroke will be randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The experimental group will undergo daily home-based respiratory muscle training in addition to standard speech and language therapy, while the control group will receive only the standard intervention. The main outcome measures will include the aspiration risk, the strength of respiratory muscles, and peak cough flow. (3) Results: It is hypothesized that patients receiving home-based respiratory training in addition to standard therapy will achieve significant improvements in aspiration risk, respiratory muscle strength, and cough efficacy in comparison with those included in the control group. The results will be published as a manuscript. (4) Conclusions: This study aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness of home-based respiratory muscle training in enhancing swallowing function and respiratory parameters in patients with chronic stroke.

14.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(16)2024 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201161

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease that involves damage to one or more organs and systems. E-Health technologies have been used to improve the quality of care and to minimize the cost of rehabilitation services. This study aimed to provide the most recent and convincing evidence on the rehabilitation effects of e-Health interventions compared to conventional treatments. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Inclusion criteria were defined following PICO recommendations (i.e., populations, intervention, comparison and outcome measures). Methodological quality and risk-of-bias were assessed for each study. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, providing data on 743 individuals with SLE. Results indicated that e-Health interventions improved health outcomes, such as disease management or emotional status. Methodological quality was moderate and low risk-of-bias was found in the majority of the studies included. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with SLE, e-Health interventions are a safe rehabilitation intervention to improve health outcomes. However, more high-quality studies with large samples are needed, with a focus on the long-term outcomes of e-Health interventions for patients with SLE.

15.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(12)2024 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38921339

RESUMEN

No previous study has evaluated the effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization for patients with chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization on pain and mobility in patients with chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials involving the use of neural mobilization techniques for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy was conducted. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and PEDro scale. Data were pooled and a meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with Review Manager 5 software. Seven articles were included in our review. Significant differences were found in mobility but not in pain in favor of using routine physical therapy with neural mobilization for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy. Our results show that routine physical therapy accompanied by neural mobilization is superior for improving mobility in comparison with routine physical therapy alone in patients with musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy.

16.
Patient Educ Couns ; 120: 108128, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147773

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of neurophysiological pain education in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis considering pain-related variables. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted in PubMed, PEDro Database, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled trials enrolling patients ≥ 18 years of age with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were included. The Downs and Black quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the articles, and the risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies were included in the study. Most of the studies were rated as "fair" on the Downs and Black quality assessment tool, and in the category of "some concerns" according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Neurophysiological pain education was conducted alone or combined with exercise, joint mobilizations, or self-management programs. The number of sessions ranged from 1 to 10. The meta-analysis results showed significant differences in favor of the intervention group in pain (MD = -0.49; 95% CI = -0.66; -0.32; p < 0.001) and catastrophization (MD = -1.81; 95% CI = -3.31, -0.3; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION, PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Neurophysiological pain education interventions in isolation or combined with exercise, joint mobilizations, or self-management programs have proven to significantly improve pain and catastrophization in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. These findings could provide clinicians with more information regarding the management of patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.


Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Ejercicio Físico , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Dolor
17.
J Clin Med ; 13(2)2024 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38276103

RESUMEN

(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated 771 million confirmed cases. Of these patients, 60% have developed persistent symptoms including pain. This pain is a complex symptom that needs comprehensive therapeutic strategies to address it holistically. The main objective of this study will be to evaluate the early impact of the Pain Informed Movement (PIM) program in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions experiencing new-onset persistent pain. (2) Methods: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial will be performed. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental or control group. The experimental group will undergo a PIM program consisting of low-intensity functional exercises, pain neuroscience education, and relaxation techniques. The control group will receive no intervention. (3) Results: The results will be published as a peer-reviewed article. (4) Conclusions: This study will provide a basis for future research to support the implementation of comprehensive therapeutic approaches in the care of patients with post-COVID-19 persistent pain.

18.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(12)2024 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927983

RESUMEN

Lung resection represents the main curative treatment in lung cancer; however, this surgical process leads to several disorders in tissues and organs. Previous studies have reported cardiovascular, pulmonary, and muscular disturbances that affect the functional capacity of these patients in the short, mid, and long term. However, upper limb impairment has been scarcely explored in the long term, despite the relevance in the independence of the patients. The aim of this study was to characterize the upper limb impairment in survivors of lung cancer one year after pulmonary resection. In this observational trial, patients who underwent lung cancer surgery were compared to control, healthy subjects matched by age and gender. Upper limb musculoskeletal disorders (shoulder range of motion, pain pressure threshold, nerve-related symptoms) and functional capacity (upper limb exercise capacity) were evaluated one-year post-surgery. A total of 76 survivors of lung cancer and 74 healthy subjects were included in the study. Significant differences between groups were found for active shoulder mobility (p < 0.05), widespread hypersensitivity to mechanical pain (p < 0.001), mechanosensitivity of the neural tissue (p < 0.001), and upper limb exercise capacity (p < 0.001). Patients who undergo lung cancer surgery show upper limb musculoskeletal disorders and upper limb functional impairment after a one-year lung resection. This clinical condition could limit the functionality and quality of life of patients with lung cancer.

19.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(22)2023 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37998418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most deleterious diseases of the pulmonary fibrosis spectrum. Its clinical presentation includes irreversible loss of lung function, and increasing cough, dyspnea and impaired quality of life. Chest physiotherapy can improve ventilation capacity, gas exchange, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life. The aim of this study was to review the evidence about chest physiotherapy in IPF, specifically meta-analyzing quality of life, exercise capacity and pulmonary function. METHODS: A wide search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science for articles included until October 2023. PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022333496. The Downs and Black scale and the Cochrane tool were employed to evaluate quality assessments and to assess the risk of bias. Data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: We selected 10 studies in which a chest physiotherapy program was performed with a total of 340 patients; of these, three articles were meta-analyzed. Significant effects in favor of chest physiotherapy were found for quality of life (MD = -8.60, 95% CI = -11.30, -5.90; p < 0.00001; I2 = 24%), exercise capacity (MD = 37.62, 95% CI = 15.10, 60.13; p = 0.001; I2 = 65%) and pulmonary function (MD = 7.86, 95% CI = 2.54, 13.17; p = 0.004; I2 = 80%). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review showed significant results for the application of chest physiotherapy regarding pulmonary capacity, diffusion of gases and quality of life in IPF patients. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement associated with applying chest physiotherapy in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life.

20.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(18)2023 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37761716

RESUMEN

The aim of this review was to identify, map, and synthesize the extent and nature of research activity on the use of telerehabilitation to support Long COVID-19 rehabilitation and examine the efficacy and safety of respiratory telerehabilitation in patients with Long COVID-19. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed. We included controlled trials that tested the effect of respiratory telerehabilitation interventions in patients with Long COVID-19 versus no intervention, usual care, placebo, or face-to-face intervention. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for quality of life, dyspnea, lung function, anxiety and depression, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and lower limb strength. Finally, 10 studies were included. The meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory telerehabilitation in quality of life (p = 0.02), dyspnea (p < 0.00001), respiratory muscle strength (p < 0.001), functional capacity (p < 0.0001), and lower limb strength (p = 0.01) but not in lung function (p = 0.28) and anxiety and depression (p = 0.55). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse effects (p = 0.06) between the telerehabilitation and comparator groups. The results suggest that these interventions can improve quality of life, reduce dyspnea, and increase respiratory and lower extremity muscle strength as well as functional capacity in patients with Long COVID-19.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA