The "puffed cheek method" to evaluate mucosal thickness: case series.

OBJECTIVES: Mucosal thickness should be considered in implant treatment planning. Needle probing to measure mucosal thickness is invasive and therefore not used in routine diagnosis. The "puffed cheek" method is an established technique to visualize the vestibule in computed tomography (CT). As CT assesses bone availability, a simultaneous mucosal thickness measurement would be useful. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of mucosal thickness measurement in CT with distended cheeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Buccal maxillary mucosa thickness was evaluated at four measurement sites in the incisor and molar area of 11 patients. Each site was evaluated via CT with cheek distension and needle probing. Measurement area was identified with the aid of a thermoplastic splint to localize the exact position by a gutta-percha marker point. The comparison between the two methods was performed by Bland-Altman diagram. RESULTS: The mean clinical thickness was 1.17 mm (±0.31) compared to 1.11 mm (±0.31) in CT evaluation. The mean difference between the two methods was 0.07 mm (±0.40; CI-0.14;0.12, P = 0.88, Krippendorff α = 0.38). According to Bland-Altman diagram the mucosal thickness may diverge by up to 0.9 mm from the radiologic thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The two measurement methods may not be interchangeably used. As additional information to three-dimensional bone analyses, CT may be performed as a pre-operative soft tissue analysis at most implant sites with distended cheeks. Nevertheless, this method yields less valid and reliable results than the gold standard.

Oral rehabilitation of tooth agenesis frequently starts in paediatric dentistry. A retrospective analysis of 625 patients.

AIM: As oral rehabilitation of tooth agenesis usually begins at a very young age, it is important to plan the therapy in advance in order to prepare the patient for the final treatment after the end of skeletal and dental growth. The diverse patterns of tooth agenesis require interdisciplinary oral rehabilitation adapted to individual factors like patient's age, number of missing teeth, and alveolar-bone development. The aim of the present high volume single-center study was to provide an overview of the management of patients with tooth agenesis, in terms of treatment approaches, associations, and long-term implant survival, over a period of 30 years. METHODS: Descriptive analyses were performed to analyse treatment approaches and and how they reated to severity of agenesis as well as patients' gender and age. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank-tests were used to investigate implant survival over time. CONCLUSION: Treatment starts usually in childhood or adolescence; orthodontic therapy was the most common treatment. All treatment options showed similar high survival rates. External bone augmentation might be a risk-factor for implant loss.