Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 52(2): 173-177, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27796144

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very common condition in general practise, affecting 10-20% of the population in the Western world. The clinical picture of diarrhoea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) resembles other chronic diarrhoeic conditions, such as microscopic colitis (MC). It is impossible to separate these by clinical examinations or lab-tests that can be done in general practise. The aim of this study was to detect any missed diagnoses when only using a symptom-based approach for the diagnosis of IBS. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY: We examined 87 participants diagnosed with IBS by the Rome III criteria. All the participants underwent full clinical examination, lab-tests and colonoscopy including mucosa biopsies for histological examination. RESULTS: The histological analysis revealed four cases of MC in participants who for years had been diagnosed with IBS. We found no biochemical or clinical markers that made it possible to differentiate between IBS and MC. MC was only found in the participants diagnosed with IBS-D. CONCLUSION: When long-lasting, unresolved diarrhoeic conditions are present in patients over 45-50 years of age, colonoscopy with biopsy should be performed to rule out MC and other pathologies before diagnosing IBS. In younger patients with pronounced watery diarrhoea, one should consider colonoscopy individually if there is no response to IBS-treatment.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Microscópica/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia , Colitis Microscópica/patología , Colonoscopía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diarrea/etiología , Femenino , Medicina General , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Adulto Joven
3.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 131(1): 28-31, 2011 Jan 07.
Artículo en Nor | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21233884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian counties Troms and Finnmark are dominated by large areas with widespread habitation and rather long response times for ambulances and doctors. We wished to investigate the extent to which the municipal preparedness in these counties use employees from the municipal nursing and social care services and if these are part of local emergency teams. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the autumn of 2008, we sent a questionnaire to the district medical officers and the leaders for municipal nursing and social care services in all 44 municipalities in Troms and Finnmark. The answers were analyzed manually. RESULTS: 41 municipalities responded. In 34 of these the municipal nurses and social care workers practice emergency medicine procedures. The content in these training sessions is much more comprehensive than that in a typical first aid course. In three of four municipalities ambulance personnel do not participate in this training. In 31 municipalities the inhabitants contact nurses and social care workers directly if they are acutely ill. In only 10 of the municipalities the nurses and social care workers are organized in local teams including a doctor and an ambulance. INTERPRETATION: In the districts, nursing and social care services are a resource in an emergency medicine context. The potential within these professions can be exploited better and be an important supplement in emergencies. In emergencies, cooperation across disciplines requires a clear organizational and economical structure, local basis and leadership.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Ambulancias , Regiones Árticas , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Área sin Atención Médica , Noruega , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Servicio Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos
4.
EBioMedicine ; 51: 102562, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31877418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is associated to impaired quality of life and fatigue. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) induces significant relief in gastro-intestinal related complaints. The objective was to evaluate the effect of FMT on the secondary endpoints: IBS-related quality of life and fatigue in patients with non-constipated IBS. METHOD: In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study, we enrolled patients with non-constipated IBS, defined by the ROME 3 criteria. We randomly assigned participants (2:1) in blocks of six to active or placebo FMT. Responder in fatigue and quality of life were defined as a decrease of 20 points in total Fatigue Impact Scale score, and improvement of 14 points in the IBS-quality of life questionnaire, respectively. In a modified-intention-to-treat population, we excluded participants who did not undergo treatment or who were diagnosed with any other disease by pinch biopsies during the treatment procedure. FINDINGS: Between Jan1, and Oct 30, 2015, we recruited 90 participants and randomly assigned them to active treatment (n = 60) or placebo (n = 30). Three participants did not undergo FMT and four were excluded after diagnosis of microscopic colitis, leaving 83 for final modified intention-to-treat analysis (55 in the active treatment group and 28 in the placebo group). Significant improvement in QoL (Odds ratio (OR) 3,801; confidence interval (CI) = 1,309-11,042 p = 0.011) and fatigue (OR = 4,398; CI = 1,175-16,468 and p = 0,020) was found at six months. Absence of other self reported functional disorders and presence of depression at baseline is suggested to predict a lasting effect of FMT in QoL and fatigue, respectively. INTERPRETATION: FMT induced significant relief in quality of life and fatigue. Results suggest a lasting effect of FMT in subgroups that should be further investigated in future studies. Funding Helse Nord, Norway and the Norwegian Centre of Rural Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway.


Asunto(s)
Fatiga , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/epidemiología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Gut Microbes ; 12(1): 1794263, 2020 11 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991818

RESUMEN

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of the lower gastrointestinal tract. The pathophysiology is far from settled, but a gut microbial dysbiosis is hypothesized to be a contributing factor. We earlier published a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial on fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for IBS - the REFIT trial. The present data set describes the engraftment and includes participants from the study who received active FMT; 14 participants with effect of FMT (Effect) and 8 without (No effect). Samples were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. Samples from the transplants (Donor) served as a comparator. In total 66 recipient samples and 17 donor samples were subjected to deep metagenomic sequencing, and taxonomic and functional analyses were performed. Alpha diversity measures showed a significantly increased diversity and evenness in the IBS groups compared to the donors. Taxonomic profiles showed higher relative abundance of phylum Firmicutes, and lower relative abundance of phylum Bacteroidetes, compared to donors at baseline. This profile was shifted toward the donor profile following FMT. Imputed growth rates showed that the resulting growth pattern was a conglomerate of donor and recipient activity. Thirty-four functional subclasses showed distinct differences between baseline samples and donors, most of which were shifted toward a donor-like profile after FMT. All of these changes were less pronounced in the No effect group. We conclude that FMT induces long-term changes in gut microbiota, and these changes mirror the clinical effect of the treatment. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02154867).


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/microbiología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacterias/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Donantes de Tejidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 3(1): 17-24, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common condition characterised by abdominal pain, bloating, and poor quality of life. IBS might be caused by a gut dysbiosis. We aimed to compare faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with placebo in patients with IBS. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre study, we enrolled patients with IBS with diarrhoea or with diarrhoea and constipation (excluding dominating constipation) defined by the ROME III criteria, scored as moderate to severe according to the IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS; a score of ≥175). Eligible participants were aged 18-75 years and were recruited locally by general practitioners in northern Norway. We randomly assigned participants (2:1) in blocks of six to active or placebo FMT. Personnel not involved in the clinical performance of the trial generated the randomisation sequence using a randomisation website. Non-study personnel performed the final allocation and standardised the active and placebo transplants to make them identical in appearance and temperature. The faeces were freshly processed, and were used the same day (fresh transplant) or were stored in a freezer for later use (frozen transplant); participants' own faeces served as placebo. A dose of 8 mg loperamide was administered orally 2 h before endoscopy to retain the transplant. The transplant (50-80 g of faeces mixed with 200 mL of isotonic saline and 50 mL of 85% glycerol) was administered by a colonoscope to the caecum. The primary endpoint was symptom relief of more than 75 points assessed by IBS-SSS, 3 months after FMT. The primary analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population, excluding participants who did not undergo treatment or who were diagnosed with any other disease by pinch biopsies obtained during the treatment procedure. For the safety analysis, only participants who did not undergo treatment were excluded. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02154867. The trial has been extended with an open-labelled study treating the placebo group with frozen FMT for further exploratory studies. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, and Oct 30, 2015, we recruited 90 participants and randomly assigned them to active treatment (n=60) or placebo (n=30). Three participants did not undergo FMT and four were excluded after diagnosis of microscopic colitis, leaving 83 for final modified intention-to-treat analysis (55 in the active treatment group and 28 in the placebo group). 36 (65%) of 55 participants receiving active treatment versus 12 (43%) of 28 receiving the placebo showed response at 3 months (p=0·049). One participant had transient nausea and vertigo (active group) and was observed at the hospital for a few hours after the procedure. Two participants had soiling of transplant on their way home from treatment (one in each group) and three experienced self-limiting intermittent abdominal pain (one in the active group and two in the placebo group). No serious adverse events could be attributed to FMT. INTERPRETATION: FMT induced significant symptom relief in patients with IBS. However, larger multicentre studies are needed to confirm the results. FUNDING: HelseNord and the Norwegian Centre of Rural Medicine, University of Tromsø.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/etiología , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Vértigo/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA