A novel toxicogenomics-based approach to categorize (non-)genotoxic carcinogens.

Alternative methods to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens are urgently needed, as this class of carcinogens goes undetected in the current testing strategy for carcinogenicity under REACH. A complicating factor is that non-genotoxic carcinogens act through several distinctive modes of action, which makes prediction of their carcinogenic property difficult. We have recently demonstrated that gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes is a useful approach to categorize non-genotoxic carcinogens according to their modes of action. In the current study, we improved the methods used for analysis and added mouse embryonic stem cells as a second in vitro test system, because of their features complementary to hepatocytes. Our approach involved an unsupervised analysis based on the 30 most significantly up- and down-regulated genes per chemical. Mouse embryonic stem cells and primary mouse hepatocytes were exposed to a selected set of chemicals and subsequently subjected to gene expression profiling. We focused on non-genotoxic carcinogens, but also included genotoxic carcinogens and non-carcinogens to test the robustness of this approach. Application of the optimized comparison approach resulted in improved categorization of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Mouse embryonic stem cells were a useful addition, especially for genotoxic substances, but also for detection of non-genotoxic carcinogens that went undetected by primary hepatocytes. The approach presented here is an important step forward to categorize chemicals, especially those that are carcinogenic.

Dissecting modes of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens in primary mouse hepatocytes.

Under REACH, the European Community Regulation on chemicals, the testing strategy for carcinogenicity is based on in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays. Given that non-genotoxic carcinogens are negative for genotoxicity and chronic bioassays are no longer regularly performed, this class of carcinogens will go undetected. Therefore, test systems detecting non-genotoxic carcinogens, or even better their modes of action, are required. Here, we investigated whether gene expression profiling in primary hepatocytes can be used to distinguish different modes of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens. For this, primary mouse hepatocytes were exposed to 16 non-genotoxic carcinogens with diverse modes of action. Upon profiling, pathway analysis was performed to obtain insight into the biological relevance of the observed changes in gene expression. Subsequently, both a supervised and an unsupervised comparison approach were applied to recognize the modes of action at the transcriptomic level. These analyses resulted in the detection of three of eight compound classes, that is, peroxisome proliferators, metalloids and skin tumor promotors. In conclusion, gene expression profiles in primary hepatocytes, at least in rodent hepatocytes, appear to be useful to detect some, certainly not all, modes of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens.

The ToxTracker assay: novel GFP reporter systems that provide mechanistic insight into the genotoxic properties of chemicals.

People are exposed to an ever-increasing number of chemical compounds that are developed by industry for a wide range of applications. These compounds may harmfully react with different cellular components and activate specific defense mechanisms that provide protection against the toxic, mutagenic, and possibly oncogenic consequences of exposure. Monitoring the activation of specific cellular signaling pathways upon exposure may therefore allow reliable and mechanism-based assessment of potential (geno)toxic properties of chemicals, while providing insight into their primary mode of toxicity. By whole-genome transcription profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells, we identified genes that were transcriptionally activated upon exposure to either genotoxic compounds or pro-oxidants. For selected biomarker genes, we constructed reporters encoding C-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged fusion proteins. GFP reporter genes were located on bacterial artificial chromosomes, thereby enabling transcriptional regulation of the reporters by their own physiological promoter. The Bscl2-GFP reporter is selectively activated after exposure to genotoxic agents and its induction is associated with inhibition of DNA replication and activation of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein signaling pathway. The Srxn1-GFP reporter is preferentially induced upon oxidative stress and is part of the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2-antioxidant response pathway. The novel (geno)toxicity assay (ToxTracker) that utilize the differential responsiveness of various reporter cell lines will enable prediction of the primary reactive properties of known and unknown chemicals.

The Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus ie0-ie1 gene complex is essential for wild-type virus replication, but either IE0 or IE1 can support virus growth.

The immediate-early ie0-ie1 gene complex expresses the only baculovirus spliced gene that produces an alternate protein product. Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) IE1 is a potent transcriptional transactivator that is essential for viral replication in transient assays. IE1 contains 582 amino acids that are arranged into different domains, including an acidic activation domain at the N terminus, a DNA binding domain, and an oligomerization domain at the C terminus. IE0 is a 52-amino-acid N-terminally elongated form of IE1. We investigated the functions of IE0 and IE1 in virus-infected cells by constructing the first ie1 open reading frame knockout virus. An infectious AcMNPV bacmid was used to generate the ie1 knockout, and the resulting virus, AcBacIE1KO, effectively deletes both ie0 and ie1. AcBacIE1KO does not infect Spodoptera frugiperda cells, showing that the ie0-ie1 gene complex is essential for viral infection. Rescue viruses of AcBacIE1KO were constructed that express only IE1, IE1 and IE0, or only IE0. Our results show that both IE0 and IE1 can function independently, but not equivalently, to support replication, producing infectious virus. Viruses expressing predominately, or only, IE0 produced significantly fewer cells with polyhedra than either the IE1 counterpart or wild-type virus. In addition, DNA replication was prolonged and budded virus and late gene expression were delayed. Viruses expressing only IE1 also produced fewer polyhedra, but replication was slightly faster and achieved higher levels than that of the wild-type virus. Both IE0 and IE1 are therefore required and must be expressed in the correct quantitative ratios to achieve a wild-type infection.

Role of AcMNPV IE0 in baculovirus very late gene activation.

IE0 is the only known baculovirus protein that is produced by splicing. In this study, we have explored the role of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) IE0 and its interaction with IE1 in the activation of very late gene expression from the polyhedrin promoter using transient assays. IE0 is co-expressed with IE1 throughout infection up to late times post-infection (p.i.) but shows peak levels of expression at early times. Significant changes in the ratios of the relative levels of IE0 to IE1 were observed throughout the course of infection. To study IE0 in the absence of IE1, we constructed a plasmid pAc-IE0(M-->A) that expressed only IE0. This was due to a mutation of the internal AUG that prevented translation of IE1 from the ie0 mRNA. Both IE0 and IE0(M-->A) were able to replace IE1 in transient assays, showing that IE0 is functional for very late gene activation and should be considered the 20th late gene expression factor (lef). In transient assays, IE0 showed that maximum very late gene expression is achieved at very low relative levels of protein. In contrast, IE1 requires higher levels of protein to obtain maximum very late gene expression. Furthermore, when the levels of IE0 become too high, very late gene expression rapidly declines. Interestingly, co-expression of IE0 and IE1 results in a mutually antagonistic affect on very late gene expression.

The acidic activation domains of the baculovirus transactivators IE1 and IE0 are functional for transcriptional activation in both insect and mammalian cells.

The acidic activation domains (AADs) of the baculovirus transactivators IE1 and IE0 are essential for transcriptional transactivation. To compare the relative transcriptional activation potentials of IE1 and IE0 AADs of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) and Orgyia pseudotsugata MNPV (OpMNPV), we constructed two ecdysone receptor (EcR)-based inducible expression systems to analyse six baculovirus AADs in two insect cell lines (Ld652Y and Sf9) and two mammalian cell lines (NIH-3T3 and CHO). For insect cell expression, the AADs were fused to the C, D, E and F domains of the spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana EcR. For mammalian cell expression the AADs were fused to the E and F domains of mammalian Mus musculus retinoid X receptor. In Ld652Y and Sf9 cells, chimeric proteins containing the AcMNPV AADs activated gene expression to higher levels than those containing the OpMNPV AADs. In NIH-3T3 cells, chimeras containing AcMNPV IE1 and IE0 AADs consistently activated gene expression to higher levels than the archetypal mammalian herpesvirus VP16 AAD. In contrast, OpMNPV AADs only activated expression by 5-15 % relative to the VP16 AAD. In CHO cells, both AcMNPV and OpMNPV AADs exhibited intermediate transactivation levels relative to VP16 AAD. These results show that the baculovirus AADs are functional for transcriptional activation in mammalian cells and that AcMNPV AADs generally appear to be more potent than OpMNPV AADs in both insect and mammalian cells.