Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889288

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA) occurs in 4-6% of ICI-treated patients based on one observational study. We identified cases of ICI-IA using administrative claims to study its incidence and characteristics at the population level. METHODS: We used the Medicare 5% sample to identify patients initiating ICIs. Cancer patients were identified by having ≥ 2 ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes from an oncologist for lung cancer, melanoma, or renal/urothelial cancer. ICI-IA was defined as having two Medicare claims ≥ 30 days apart with combinations of ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes that favored specificity. ICI-IA was identified in patients with a musculoskeletal diagnosis after ICI initiation, who had i.) no inflammatory arthritis or inflammatory rheumatic disease before ICI initiation ever, and ii) no musculoskeletal complaint in the one year prior to ICI. We examined DMARD utilization and visits to rheumatology in patients with ICI-IA. Landmark analysis and a time varying Cox proportional hazards model for overall survival was constructed. RESULTS: The incidence of ICI-IA was 7.2 (6.1-8.4) per 100 patient years. Patients with ICI-IA were mean (SD) age 73.5(7.0) years, 48% women, 91% white. Median(IQR) time from ICI initiation to first ICI-IA diagnosis was 124(56, 252) days. Only 24(16%) received care from a rheumatologist, and 24(16%) were prescribed a DMARD (46% by a rheumatologist). The HR for mortality in patients with ICI-IA was 0.86 (95% CI 0.59-1.26, p= 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ICI-IA identified in claims data is similar to that reported in observational studies, however, few patients are treated with a DMARD or see a rheumatologist. There was no difference in overall survival between ICI-treated patients with and without ICI-IA.

2.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 30(1): e1-e8, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946323

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among rheumatology outpatients from an early COVID-19 "hotspot" during the initial period of vaccine availability. METHODS: In March 2021, a Web-based survey was sent to 7505 adults seen at a Rheumatology Division in New York City. We evaluated characteristics associated with 3 categories of COVID-19 vaccination status: declined, undecided, and willing/already received. We used multinomial logistic regression models to calculate relative risk ratios assessing predictors of vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 2384 (32%) respondents (80% female, 87% White, 59% with systemic rheumatic disease), 2240 (94.0%) were willing/already received COVID-19 vaccination, 88 (3.7%) were undecided, and 56 (2.3%) declined. Compared with those willing/already vaccinated, those declining or undecided were younger, more likely identified as Black or Hispanic/Latinx, and had lower household income and educational attainment. Immunosuppressive medication use did not differ among groups. After multivariable adjustment, every 1-year increase in age was associated with a 0.96 lower relative risk of declining or being undecided versus willing/already vaccinated. Respondents identifying as Black versus White had a higher relative risk ratio of being undecided (4.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.96-9.36]), as did those identifying as Hispanic/Latinx versus non-Hispanic/non-Latinx (2.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-6.09]). Those declining vaccination were least likely to believe in general vaccine importance or the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Among rheumatology patients in New York City with and without systemic rheumatic disease, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was high after its initial availability. Sociodemographic but not medication-related factors were associated with vaccine hesitancy; these findings can inform future rheumatology vaccination programs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
3.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(4): 1005-1012.e4, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients require a clear understanding of their prognosis to make informed decisions about their care. The aim of this study was to compare the perceptions of prognosis and transplant candidacy between patients with cirrhosis and their hepatologists. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis and their hepatologists were prospectively recruited at an urban liver transplant center. Patients and hepatologists were asked about transplant candidacy and about how many years patients would live with and without a liver transplant. Agreement between patients and hepatologists was assessed with the weighted kappa statistic. Associations between patient/hepatologists' prognostic estimates and those predicted by patients' Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score were estimated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Seventy patients and 6 hepatologists were enrolled in the study. Patients were predominantly male (61.4%) and white (68.6%), with a mean MELD-Na score of 19 ± 9. There was no-slight agreement between patients and hepatologists regarding survival without and with a liver transplant (κ = 0.1 and 0.2, respectively), with patients more optimistic than their hepatologists. There was greater agreement between patients and hepatologists about transplant candidacy (κ = 0.6). There was a negligible association between MELD-Na and patient estimates (r = -0.24, P = .05) but a moderate association between MELD-Na and hepatologist estimates (r = -0.51, P < .001), with higher MELD-Na scores associated with lower predicted survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis are more optimistic and less accurate in their predictions of survival compared with hepatologists, although they are more realistic about their transplant candidacy. Aligning patient and provider expectations may increase the likelihood that patients receive value-concordant care.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Gastroenterólogos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 82(7): 920-926, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37019614

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and effectiveness of biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). METHODS: The retrospective multicentre observational study included patients with a diagnosis of ICI-IA treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6Ri) and/or methotrexate (MTX); patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from ICI initiation; the secondary outcome was time to arthritis control from DMARD initiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare medication groups, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: 147 patients were included (mean age 60.3 (SD 11.9) years, 66 (45%) women). ICI-IA treatment was TNFi in 33 (22%), IL6Ri 42 (29%) and MTX 72 (49%). After adjustment for time from ICI initiation to DMARD initiation, time to cancer progression was significantly shorter for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 3.27 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.84, p=0.019)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 2.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.98, p=0.055). Time to arthritis control was faster for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.45, p=0.032)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.97, p=0.089). A subset analysis in patients with melanoma gave similar results for both cancer progression and arthritis control. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ICI-IA with a biologic DMARD is associated with more rapid arthritis control than with MTX, but may be associated with a shorter time to cancer progression.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Inhibidores de la Interleucina-6 , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa
5.
J Rheumatol ; 50(3): 420-425, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36521910

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with serologic response to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccine in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases treated with rituximab (RTX) who were previously serologically unresponsive to the initial vaccine series. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients treated with RTX who failed to demonstrate a serologic response to the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination series and subsequently received an mRNA vaccine booster was performed. Serologic response ≥ 4 weeks after the booster was the primary outcome. Fisher exact tests, t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS: In 31 patients who were previously seronegative, 68% seroconverted following a booster of the COVID-19 vaccine. B cell reconstitution was significantly different between those with positive (median 1.79, IQR 0.65-3.00) and negative (median 0, IQR 0-0) serologic responses to the booster. The days from last RTX dose were also statistically different among seroconverters (median 301, IQR 251-368) vs nonseroconverters (median 188, IQR 169-245). Demographic characteristics were not associated with serologic positivity. Positive predictive value of B cell presence was 90.9% (95% CI 70.8-98.9) and negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI 59-100) for serologic response to the mRNA booster vaccine. Positive predictive value of time ≥ 6 months from last RTX dose to booster was 78.3% (95% CI 56.3-92.5) and the negative predictive value was 62.5% (95% CI 24.5-91.5). CONCLUSION: Detectable B cells and longer time from last RTX exposure were associated with the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies following the booster vaccine. These findings should be considered in timing boosters in patients treated with RTX.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Rituximab , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Anticuerpos Antivirales
6.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(5): 836-842, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rarely performed in patients under 21 years old, but the frequency of utilization of TKA in this population in the United States is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in the use of TKA in patients <21 in the United States. Additionally, we aimed to determine the characteristics of these patients and the hospitals in which this procedure is performed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Kids' Inpatient Database, a national weighted sample of all inpatient hospital admissions in the United States in patients <21 years of age. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes to identify patients undergoing TKA from 2000 to 2019 and determine a primary diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were calculated using the appropriate sample weights. RESULTS: The total weighted number of TKAs performed in patients <21 years from 2000 to 2019 was 1,535. There were 70.9% of TKAs performed for a primary diagnosis of tumor, and the use of TKA for malignant tumors has increased. In contrast, the use of TKA for inflammatory arthritis/juvenile idiopathic arthritis decreased significantly over the study period. The majority of TKAs were performed in urban teaching hospitals with a large bed size. CONCLUSION: Approximately 1,535 TKAs have been performed in patients <21 years from 2000 to 2019 in the United States. The majority of these procedures were performed for reconstruction after resection of a malignant tumor. The rate of TKA for inflammatory arthritis/juvenile idiopathic arthritis has decreased over the past two decades.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artritis Juvenil/etiología , Hospitales Urbanos
7.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(11): 4455-4464, 2022 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35136992

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of frailty in a single-centre cohort of patients with PMR and describe its association with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cognition and sarcopenia. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with PMR, according to 2012 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria, presenting within 12 months of diagnosis and on treatment with glucocorticoids. Frailty was defined according to the Fried frailty criteria. HRQoL was assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) and cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Sarcopenia was measured by DXA. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. Prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty was 17% and 59%, respectively. Frail patients had higher inflammatory markers at diagnosis compared with pre-frail and robust patients. Of 27 patients with DXA results, 26% were sarcopenic. Frail patients had worse physical function, and more pain behaviour and interference compared with pre-frail and robust patients. In univariable analyses, frail patients were more likely to have worse physical function, and more pain behaviour and pain interference, which remained significant after adjusting for age. There were no significant associations between cognition or sarcopenia and frailty. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of PMR patients, there was a higher prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty compared with that reported in community-dwelling elderly. Frailty was associated with worse physical function, and increased pain behaviour and pain interference, differences that were also clinically meaningful. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and analyse the association of frailty with other PMR disease outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Polimialgia Reumática , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Anciano , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Sarcopenia/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Anciano Frágil , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Cognición , Dolor , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos
8.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(4): 1510-1517, 2022 04 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34273167

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify individual-level factors associated with hospital readmission among individuals with SSc-associated pulmonary hypertension (SSc-PH). METHODS: Individuals enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma (PHAROS) registry contributed clinical data related to SSc-PH disease severity and hospital admissions. Readmission was defined as a subsequent hospitalization within 12 months of any hospital discharge. Characteristics were compared between individuals with and without readmissions using Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or Kruskal-Wallis test. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between clinical predictors and likelihood of readmission. RESULTS: Of 572 individuals with SSc-PH enrolled in PHAROS, 54% had ≥1 hospitalizations between 2005 and 2016. Among individuals ever-hospitalized, 34% had ≥1 readmission. Individuals with vs without readmissions had shorter median (IQR) time between index hospitalization date and next PHAROS visit [37 (3, 80) vs 81 (42, 136) days, P <0.001]. Index admissions related to PH or SSc (vs non-PH/SSc related) were associated with an increased odds of 12-month readmission [aOR 6.6 (95% CI 3.2, 13.6) and aOR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1, 4.5), respectively]. Readmission was less likely among home oxygen users (vs non-users) (aOR 0.44; 95% CI 0.22, 0.89). Race, age, sex, disease duration and disease subtype were not associated with readmission. CONCLUSION: The strongest predictor for 12-month readmission was an index hospitalization reason related to PH. Home oxygen use was associated with lower odds of readmission. Future studies should determine whether testing for the need for home oxygen mediates the risk of readmission in SSc-PH.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Esclerodermia Localizada , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/epidemiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Oxígeno , Readmisión del Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Localizada/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 19, 2022 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Upcoming alternative payment models Primary Care First (PCF) and Kidney Care Choices (KCC) incorporate capitated payments for chronic disease management. Prior research on the effect of capitated payments on chronic disease management has shown mixed results. We assessed the patient, physician, and practice characteristics of practices with capitation as the majority of revenue, and evaluated the association of capitated reimbursement with quality of chronic disease care. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of visits in the United States' National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) for patients with hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Our predictor was practice reimbursement type, classified as 1) majority capitation, 2) majority FFS, or 3) other reimbursement mix. Outcomes were quality indicators of hypertension control, diabetes control, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) use, and statin use. RESULTS: About 9% of visits were to practices with majority capitation revenue. Capitated practices, compared with FFS and other practices, had lower visit frequency (3.7 vs. 5.2 vs. 5.2, p = 0.006), were more likely to be located in the West Census Region (55% vs. 18% vs. 17%, p < 0.001), less likely to be solo practice (21% vs. 37% vs. 35%, p = 0.005), more likely to be owned by an insurance company, health plan or HMO (24% vs. 13% vs. 13%, p = 0.033), and more likely to have private insurance (43% vs. 25% vs. 19%, p = 0.004) and managed care payments (69% vs. 23% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) as the majority of revenue. The prevalence of controlled hypertension, controlled diabetes, ACEi/ARB use, and statin use was suboptimal across practice reimbursement types. Capitated reimbursement was not associated with differences in hypertension, diabetes, or CKD quality indicators, in multivariable models adjusting for patient, physician, and practice characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Practices with majority capitation revenue differed substantially from FFS and other practices in patient, physician, and practice characteristics, but were not associated with consistent quality differences. Our findings establish baseline estimates of chronic disease quality of care performance by practice reimbursement composition, informing chronic disease care delivery within upcoming payment models.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Capitación , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estados Unidos
10.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(5): 250-256, 2022 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35471418

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In a cohort assembled during the height of mortality-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in New York City, the objectives of this qualitative-quantitative mixed-methods study were to assess COVID-related stress at enrollment with subsequent stress and clinical and behavioral characteristics associated with successful coping during longitudinal follow-up. METHODS: Patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed rheumatic disease taking immunosuppressive medications were interviewed in April 2020 and were asked open-ended questions about the impact of COVID-19 on psychological well-being. Stress-related responses were grouped into categories. Patients were interviewed again in January-March 2021 and asked about interval and current disease status and how well they believed they coped. Patients also completed the 29-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) measuring physical and emotional health during both interviews. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients had follow-ups; 83% were women, and mean age was 50 years. Patients who reported stress at enrollment had improved PROMIS-29 scores, particularly for the anxiety subscale. At the follow-up, patients reported persistent and new stresses as well as numerous self-identified coping strategies. Overall coping was rated as very well (30%), well (48%), and neutral-fair-poor (22%). Based on ordinal logistic regression, variables associated with worse overall coping were worse enrollment-to-follow-up PROMIS-29 anxiety (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; confidence interval [CI], 1.1-17.3; p = 0.03), not reporting excellent/very good disease status at follow-up (OR, 2.7; CI, 1.1-6.5; p = 0.03), pandemic-related persistent stress (OR, 5.7; CI, 1.6-20.1; p = 0.007), and pandemic-related adverse long-lasting effects on employment (OR, 6.1; CI, 1.9-20.0; p = 0.003) and health (OR, 3.0; CI, 1.0-9.0; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reflects the evolving nature of COVID-related psychological stress and coping, with most patients reporting they coped well. For those not coping well, multidisciplinary health care providers are needed to address long-lasting pandemic-associated adverse consequences.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Adaptación Psicológica , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): e1713-e1718, 2021 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33245364

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diphtheria has re-emerged over the past several years. There is a paucity of data on the administration and safety of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT), the standard treatment for diphtheria. The 2017-2018 outbreak among Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh was the largest in decades. We determined the outcomes of DAT-treated patients and describe the occurrence and risk factors associated with adverse reactions to DAT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at the Médecins Sans Frontières Rubber Garden Diphtheria Treatment Center from December 2017-September 2018. Diphtheria was diagnosed based on the World Health Organization clinical case criteria. High-acuity patients were eligible for DAT. Safety precautions were meticulously maintained. We calculated the presence of adverse events by age, duration of illness, and DAT dosage using bivariate comparisons. RESULTS: We treated 709 patients with DAT; 98% (n = 696) recovered and were discharged. One-fourth (n = 170) had at least 1 adverse reaction. Common reactions included cough (n = 115, 16%), rash (n = 66, 9%), and itching (n = 37, 5%). Three percent (n = 18) had severe hypersensitivity reactions. Five patients died during their DAT infusion or soon afterwards, but no deaths were attributed to DAT. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for DAT-treated patients were excellent; mortality was <1%. Adverse reactions occurred in one-quarter of all patients, but most reactions were mild and resolved quickly. DAT can be safely administered in a setting with basic critical care, provided there is continuous patient monitoring during the infusion, staff training on management of adverse effects, and attention to safety precautions.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica , Difteria , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Difteria/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
J Arthroplasty ; 36(12): 3928-3933.e1, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34456091

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate trends in the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the United States in patients under 21 years of age. Specifically, we examined the frequency of THA in this patient population over the past 2 decades, the epidemiologic characteristics of patients under 21 who underwent THA, and the characteristics of the hospitals where these procedures were performed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Kids' Inpatient Database, an inpatient US national weighted sample of hospital admissions in patients under 21 from approximately 4200 hospitals in 46 states. We queried the database using Current Procedural Terminology codes for elective and non-elective primary THA for the years 2000-2016. We utilized the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes to determine primary diagnoses. RESULTS: The weighted total number of THAs performed in patients under 21 in the Kids' Inpatient Database increased from 347 in 2000 to 551 in 2016. The most common diagnoses were osteonecrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory arthritis. The frequency of THA for osteonecrosis increased from 24% in 2000 to 38% in 2016, while the frequency of THA for inflammatory arthritis decreased from 27% in 2000 to 4% in 2016. CONCLUSION: The number of THAs in patients under 21 in the United States has increased over the past 2 decades and these procedures are increasingly performed in urban teaching hospitals. The decrease in THA for inflammatory arthritis in this population likely reflects improvements in medical management during the study period.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
13.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 27(3): 120-126, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264246

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess patients' perceived risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 at the peak of the pandemic in NYC in terms of their systemic rheumatic disease and medications. METHODS: With the approval of their rheumatologists, patients were interviewed by telephone and were asked about their perceived risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 considering their rheumatic condition and whether medications increased this risk. Patients also completed surveys assessing beliefs about medication and multidimensions of physical/mental well-being. Information about current medications and rheumatologist-initiated changes in medications during the pandemic were reported by patients and verified from medical records. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients (86% women; mean age, 50 years; 81% White, 15% Latino) with diverse diagnoses were enrolled. Fifty-four percent thought they were at "very much greater risk" of COVID-19 because of their rheumatic condition, and 57% thought medications "definitely" put them at greater risk. In multivariable analysis, the perception of "very much greater risk" was associated with greater belief that rheumatic disease medications were necessary, worse physical function, chronic pulmonary comorbidity, and more anxiety. In a separate model, the perception that medications "definitely" caused greater risk was associated with White race, not taking hydroxychloroquine, rheumatologists initiating change in medications, more anxiety, and taking biologics and corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceived increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 was associated with beliefs about their rheumatic disease, medications, comorbidity, and anxiety. Clinicians should be aware of patients' perceptions and foster self-management practices that will alleviate anxiety, minimize exposure to the virus, and optimize systemic rheumatic disease outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/etiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/psicología , Autoimagen , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad , COVID-19/psicología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
14.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 26(6): 224-228, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694358

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: With hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) emerging as potential therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), shortages have been reported. We aimed to understand how rheumatologists, one of the most common prescribers of HCQ/CQ, prescribed these medications to manage COVID-19 and to understand if their patients are affected by shortages. METHODS: Between April 8 and April 27, 2020, an online survey was distributed to a convenience sample of rheumatologists who practice medicine in a diverse range of settings globally, resulting in 506 responses. Adjusted Poisson regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Only 6% of respondents prescribed HCQ/CQ for COVID-19 prophylaxis, and only 12% for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Compared to the United States, the likelihood of prescribing HCQ/CQ for prophylaxis was higher in India (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-16.8; p < 0.001). Further, compared to the United States and those with 1 to 5 years of experience, rheumatologists in Europe (aRR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6-5.3; p < 0.001) and those with 10+ years of experience (11-20 years: aRR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.3; p = 0.015; 21+ years: aRR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.4; p = 0.004) had a higher likelihood of prescribing HCQ/CQ for outpatient treatment. Of note, 71% of all rheumatologists reported that their patients were directly affected by HCQ/CQ shortages. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that only a small percentage of rheumatologists are prescribing HCQ/CQ for prophylaxis or outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Medication shortages experienced by large numbers of autoimmune disease patients are concerning and should play a role in decisions, especially given poor efficacy data for HCQ/CQ in COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Reumatología , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
15.
J Card Fail ; 25(2): 130-136, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30582968

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment (CI) is estimated to be present in 25%-80% of heart failure (HF) patients, but its prevalence at diagnosis is unclear. To improve our understanding of cognition in HF, we determined the prevalence of CI among adults with incident HF in the REGARDS study. METHODS AND RESULTS: REGARDS is a longitudinal cohort study of adults ≥45 years of age recruited in the years 2003-2007. Incident HF was expert adjudicated. Cognitive function was assessed with the Six-Item Screener. The prevalence of CI among those with incident HF was compared with the prevalence of CI among an age-, sex-, and race-matched cohort without HF. The 436 participants with incident HF had a mean age of 70.3 years (SD 8.9), 47% were female, and 39% were black. Old age, black race, female sex, less education, and anticoagulation use were associated with CI. The prevalence of CI among participants with incident HF (14.9% [95% CI 11.7%-18.6%]) was similar to the non-HF matched cohort (13.4% [11.6%-15.4%]; P < .43). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 14.9% of the adults with incident HF had CI, suggesting that the majority of cognitive decline occurs after HF diagnosis. Increased awareness of CI among newly diagnosed patients and ways to mitigate it in the context of HF management are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cognición/fisiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etnología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Grupos Raciales , Anciano , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etnología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 87, 2019 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30709377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few published articles have focused on identifying the gaps in care that follow a malnutrition diagnosis and their effects on length of stay (LOS) and 90-day readmission. We hypothesized that length of stay and readmission were associated with these gaps in care. METHODS: Two registered dietitians retrospectively reviewed charts of 229 adult malnourished patients admitted to a medicine unit to determine their system level gap in care: communication, test delay, or discharge planning. In this secondary analysis, both readmission and length of stay were regressed on each gap in care. RESULTS: Any system level gap was associated with a greater length of stay (ß: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.15-1.91) and specifically the gap related to procedure/testing (ß: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.62-2.47) resulted in a two-fold increase in length of stay. There was no association between 90-day readmission and any of the gaps in care. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong association between those who had any gap in their care and increased length of stay. Mitigating gaps in care may decrease length of stay and, in turn, result in less risk of infection and could potentially lead to reduced healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/normas , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Desnutrición/terapia , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Trop Med Int Health ; 23(7): 724-737, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29779260

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mother and infant outcomes in the largest prevention of mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) programme in Haiti in order to identify gaps towards elimination of HIV and syphilis. METHODS: Based on retrospective data from HIV+ pregnant women and their infants enrolled in PMTCT care from 1999 to 2014, we assessed maternal enrolment in PMTCT, receipt of antiretrovirals before delivery, maternal retention through delivery as well as infant enrolment in PMTCT, HIV testing and HIV infection. Four PMTCT programme periods were compared: period 1 (1999-2004, mono ARV), period 2 (2005-2009, dual ARV), period 3 (2010-2012, Option B) and period 4 (Oct 2012-2014, Option B+). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess retention in PMTCT care. RESULTS: Among 4665 pregnancies, median age was 27 years and median CD4+ was 494 cells/µl (IQR 328-691). A total of 75% of women received antiretrovirals before delivery, and 73% were retained in care through delivery. Twenty-two percent of women were lost before delivery, <1% died and 6% had stillbirths or abortions. Ninety-four percent of infants who were born alive enrolled in PMTCT, of whom 92% had complete HIV testing. One hundred and sixty-one infants were HIV+, giving a 5.4% HIV transmission rate (9.8%, 4.6%, 5.8% and 3.6% in periods 1-4). Retention among women through 12 months after PMTCT enrolment did not significantly differ across periods. However, among women who received antiretrovirals at the time of enrolment, retention 12 months later was lower in the Option B+ period (83%) than in periods 2 and 3 (94% and 93%) (P < 0.001). Syphilis infection among women decreased from 16% in period 1 to 8% in period 4, whereas syphilis testing of infants increased from 17% to 91%. CONCLUSION: Despite dramatic reductions in MTCT in Haiti, interventions are needed to improve retention to achieve MTCT elimination of HIV and syphilis.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal/normas , Sífilis/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/mortalidad , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Haití/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/normas , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/mortalidad , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sífilis/epidemiología , Sífilis/mortalidad , Sífilis/transmisión , Adulto Joven
18.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 1269, 2018 Nov 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30453995

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: HIV programs are often assessed by the proportion of patients who are alive and retained in care; however some patients are categorized as lost to follow-up (LTF) and have unknown vital status. LTF is not an outcome but a mixed category of patients who have undocumented death, transfer and disengagement from care. Estimating vital status (dead versus alive) among this category is critical for survival analyses and program evaluation. METHODS: We used three methods to estimate survival in the cohort and to ascertain factors associated with death among the first cohort of HIV positive patients to receive antiretroviral therapy in Haiti: complete case (CC) (drops missing), Inverse Probability Weights (IPW) (uses tracking data) and Multiple Imputation with Chained Equations (MICE) (imputes missing data). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for adjusted models for death at 10 years. The logistic regression models controlled for sex, age, severe poverty (living on <$1 USD per day), Port-au-Prince residence and baseline clinical characteristics of weight, CD4, WHO stage and tuberculosis diagnosis. RESULTS: Age, severe poverty, baseline weight and WHO stage were statistically significant predictors of AIDS related mortality across all models. Gender was only statistically significant in the MICE model but had at least a 10% difference in odds ratios across all models. CONCLUSION: Each of these methods had different assumptions and differed in the number of observations included due to how missing values were addressed. We found MICE to be most robust in predicting survival status as it allowed us to impute missing data so that we had the maximum number of observations to perform regression analyses. MICE also provides a complementary alternative for estimating survival among patients with unassigned vital status. Additionally, the results were easier to interpret, less likely to be biased and provided an alternative to a problem that is often commented upon in the extant literature.


Asunto(s)
Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Perdida de Seguimiento , Adulto , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Haití , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Análisis de Supervivencia
19.
J Community Health ; 42(5): 903-910, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28321648

RESUMEN

Within the United States, alternative tobacco product (ATP) and varies by geographic region, gender and age. Few articles have been published on the usage of these products among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer (LGBTQ) population. A web-based anonymous survey administered through Google Forms, was used to collect data on current tobacco usage, knowledge and beliefs from adult heterosexuals, homosexuals, bisexuals and transgendered persons residing in New York City from May 2014 to July 2014. Sixty-four individuals completed the survey; 30 were heterosexual and 32 identified as either lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer. Heterosexuals were found to have tried cigarettes, on average, almost a year before the LGBTQ respondents. Social networks were influential to LGBTQ respondents for an introduction to smoking; 48.00% were introduced by friends, 28.00% by family, 12.00% by a significant other and 9.09% by someone else. For heterosexuals, 73.68% reported that friends introduced them to smoking. More heterosexuals reported trying hookah (N = 10), snus (N = 4) and roll your own cigarettes (N = 5). On average respondents knew of eight different tobacco products, regardless of sexual identity. To our knowledge, we present for the first time a comparison of people who tried, current and former users of ATPs, beliefs and knowledge about ATPs, and sources of knowledge of ATPs by sexual identity from NYC. More research is needed to examine the impact of social networks and the upcoming FDA regulations on ATPs have on the overall prevalence of usage among the LGBTQ community.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicología , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Salud Pública , Sexualidad , Apoyo Social , Adulto Joven
20.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA