Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(2): 319-325, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34931912

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Children with cancer may be one of the most vulnerable groups to drug-related adverse events because they possess characteristics of patients with cancer as well as pediatric patients. To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of pharmacists' intervention on the care of pediatric hematology and oncology patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings of a children's hospital. METHODS: The pharmacist-intervention records from 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Intervention rate, type of drug-related problems, acceptance rate, and frequently involved drugs in pharmacist interventions were analyzed. One physician and one pharmacist evaluated the clinical significance of each intervention. A cost-benefit analysis was conducted from hospital and patient perspective. The benefit from cost savings by reducing the number of prescribed drugs that are disposed was estimated as the benefit from hospital perspective. The benefit from cost avoidance based on the potential to avoid an adverse drug event (ADE) was estimated as the benefit from patient perspective. The cost of reviewing prescriptions was estimated based on the pharmacists' salary and the time involved. RESULTS: In 2017, 2361 interventions were performed in 381 pediatric patients with cancer. The acceptance rate was 97.2%. More than half of the interventions were regarded as clinically "significant" (58.8%) and "very significant" (14.6%). The cost-benefit of US$28,705 was determined from hospital perspective, with a cost-benefit ratio of 1.45:1. The cost-benefit of US$35,611 was calculated from patient perspective, with a cost-benefit ratio of 1.55:1. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists' intervention in the care of hematology and oncology pediatric patients was effective in preventing clinically significant ADEs and had a positive economic impact on the health-care budget from both hospital and patient perspective.


Asunto(s)
Hematología , Neoplasias , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Humanos , Niño , Farmacéuticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Internos
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 46(5): 1045-1053, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk of selenium deficiency increases for infants receiving long-term parenteral nutrition (PN). This study analyzed selenium deficiency in neonates and infants requiring long-term PN and evaluated the effect of intravenous (IV) selenium provision. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study of neonates and infants who were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit from January 2010 to December 2019, received PN for ≥2 weeks, and had their serum selenium concentration measured. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on their serum selenium concentration, a deficient group (n = 55) and a nondeficient group (n = 47). RESULTS: Of the study participants, 53.9% (55 of 102) were deficient in selenium. No difference in demographic and clinical characteristics existed except bronchopulmonary dysplasia. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients (n = 29). The average dose of IV selenium administered to patients was 2.7 ± 1.0 mcg/kg/day. The average initial serum selenium concentration was 36.5 ± 18.0 mcg/L, and the serum concentration significantly increased to 52.5 ± 19.1 mcg/L after IV selenium administration (P < .001). The correlation between the average IV selenium dose and the change in serum selenium concentrations was statistically significant (r = .423; P = .022). CONCLUSION: Selenium deficiency is common in neonates and infants receiving long-term PN. Serum selenium concentration increased proportionally as the IV selenium dose increased. Therefore, it is recommended to supply a proper dose of IV selenium depending on the degree of selenium deficiency.


Asunto(s)
Selenio , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nutrición Parenteral , Nutrición Parenteral Total/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246754, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556128

RESUMEN

Despite the high prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in pediatric intensive care units, their clinical relevance and significance are unclear. We assessed the characteristics and risk factors of clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions to facilitate their efficient monitoring in pediatric intensive care units. This retrospective cohort study reviewed the medical records of 159 patients aged <19 years who were hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit at Seoul National University Hospital (Seoul, Korea) for ≥3 days between August 2019 and February 2020. Potential drug-drug interactions were screened using the Micromedex Drug-Reax® system. Clinical relevance of each potential drug-drug interaction was reported with official terminology, magnitude of severity, and causality, and the association with the patient's clinical characteristics was assessed. In total, 115 patients (72.3%) were exposed to 592 potential interactions of 258 drug pairs. In 16 patients (10.1%), 22 clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions were identified for 19 drug pairs. Approximately 70% of the clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions had a severity grade of ≥3. Exposure to potential drug-drug interactions was significantly associated with an increase in the number of administrated medications (6-7 medications, p = 0.006; ≥8, p<0.001) and prolonged hospital stays (1-2 weeks, p = 0.035; ≥2, p = 0.049). Moreover, clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions were significantly associated with ≥8 prescribed drugs (p = 0.019), hospitalization for ≥2 weeks (p = 0.048), and ≥4 complex chronic conditions (p = 0.015). Most potential drug-drug interactions do not cause clinically relevant adverse outcomes in pediatric intensive care units. However, because the reactions that patients experience from clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions are often very severe, there is a medical need to implement an appropriate monitoring system for potential drug-drug interactions according to the pediatric intensive care unit characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Tiempo de Internación , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Int J Med Inform ; 94: 123-33, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27573320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are very few studies reporting the impact of providing intravenous (IV) preparation information on quality use of antimicrobials, particularly regarding their reconstitution and dilution. Therefore, to improve these processes in IV antimicrobial administration, an IV preparation information system (IPIS) was implemented in a hospital. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of improving reconstitution and dilution by implementing an IPIS in the electronic medical record (EMR) system. METHODS: Prescriptions and activity records of nurses for injectable antimicrobials that required reconstitution and dilution for IV preparation from January 2008 to December 2013 were retrieved from EMR, and assessed based on packaging label information for reconstituting and diluting solutions. We defined proper reconstitution and dilution as occurring when the reconstitution and dilution solutions prescribed were consistent with the nurses' acting records. The types of intervention in the IPIS were as follows: a pop-up alert for proper reconstitution and passive guidance for proper dilution. We calculated the monthly proper reconstitution rate (PRR) and proper dilution rate (PDR) and evaluated the changes in these rates and trends using interrupted time series analyses. RESULTS: Prior to the initiation of the reconstitution alert and dilution information, the PRR and PDR were 12.7 and 46.1%, respectively. The reconstitution alert of the IPIS rapidly increased the PRR by 41% (p<0.001), after which the PRR decreased by 0.9% (p=0.013) per month after several months. However, there was no significant change in the rate or trend of the PDR during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the provision of reconstitution alerts by the IPIS contributed to improving the reconstitution process of IV antimicrobial injection administration. However, providing passive information on dilution solutions was ineffective. Furthermore, solutions to ensure the continuous effectiveness of alert systems are warranted and should be actively sought.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intravenosa , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Composición de Medicamentos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Registros de Enfermería
5.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0132916, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26172050

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical manifestations and causative drugs associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) spontaneously reported by community pharmacists and to compare the ADRs by age. METHODS: ADRs reported to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of the Korean Pharmaceutical Association by community pharmacists from January 2013 to June 2014 were included. Causality was assessed using the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre system. The patient population was classified into three age groups. We analyzed 31,398 (74.9%) ADRs from 9,705 patients, identified as having a causal relationship, from a total pool of 41,930 ADRs from 9,873 patients. Median patient age was 58.0 years; 66.9% were female. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal system (34.4%), nervous system (14.4%), and psychiatric (12.1%) disorders were the most frequent symptoms. Prevalent causative drugs were those for acid-related disorders (11.4%), anti-inflammatory products (10.5%), analgesics (7.2%), and antibacterials (7.1%). Comparisons by age revealed diarrhea and antibacterials to be most commonly associated with ADRs in children (p < 0.001), whereas dizziness was prevalent in the elderly (p < 0.001). Anaphylactic reaction was the most frequent serious event (19.7%), mainly associated with cephalosporins and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Among 612 ADRs caused by nonprescription drugs, the leading symptoms and causative drugs were skin disorders (29.6%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (16.2%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the community pharmacist reports, the leading clinical manifestations and causative drugs associated with ADRs in outpatients differed among age groups.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacias , Farmacéuticos , Farmacovigilancia , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA