Long-term outcome after segmental colonic resection for slow transit constipation.

PURPOSE: Colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is the most common surgical procedure for slow transit constipation (STC). A hemicolectomy has been suggested as an alternative to IRA with good short-term results. However, long-term results are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results after hemicolectomy as a treatment for STC. METHODS: Fifty patients with STC were selected for right- or left-sided hemicolectomy after evaluation with colonic scintigraphy from 1993 to 2008. Living patients (n = 43) received a bowel function questionnaire and a questionnaire about patient-reported outcome. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 19.8 years, 13 patients had undergone rescue surgery (n = 12) or used irrigation (n = 1) and were classified as failures. In all, 30 were evaluable for functional outcome and questionnaire data for 19 patients (due to 11 non-responding) could be analysed. Two reported deterioration after several years and were also classified as failures. Median stool frequency remained increased from 1 per week at baseline to 5 per week at long-term follow-up (p = 0.001). Preoperatively, all patients used laxatives, whereas 12 managed without laxatives at long-term follow-up (p = 0.002). There was some reduction in other constipation symptoms but not statically significant. In the patients' global assessment, 10 stated a very good result, seven a good result and two a poor result. CONCLUSIONS: Hemicolectomy for STC increases stool frequency and reduces laxative use. Long-term success rate could range between 17/50 (34%) and 35/50 (70%) depending on outcome among non-responders.

Randomized clinical trial comparing collagen plug and advancement flap for trans-sphincteric anal fistula.

BACKGROUND: The role of a collagen plug for treating anal fistula is not well established. A randomized prospective multicentre non-inferiority study of surgical treatment of trans-sphincteric cryptogenic fistulas was undertaken, comparing the anal fistula plug with the mucosal advancement flap with regard to fistula recurrence rate and functional outcome. METHODS: Patients with an anal fistula were evaluated for eligibility in three centres, and randomized to either mucosal advancement flap surgery or collagen plug, with clinical follow-up at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the fistula recurrence rate. Anal pain (visual analogue scale), anal incontinence (St Mark's score) and quality of life (Short Form 36 questionnaire) were also reported. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included; 48 were allocated to the plug procedure and 46 to advancement flap surgery. The median follow-up was 12 (range 9-24) months. The recurrence rate at 12 months was 66 per cent (27 of 41 patients) in the plug group and 38 per cent (15 of 40) in the flap group (P = 0·006). Anal pain was reduced after operation in both groups. Anal incontinence did not change in the follow-up period. Patients reported an increased quality of life after 3 months. There were no differences between the groups with regard to pain, incontinence or quality of life. CONCLUSION: There was a considerably higher recurrence rate after the anal fistula plug procedure than following advancement flap repair. Registration number: NCT01021774 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Role of icodextrin in the prevention of small bowel obstruction. Safety randomized patients control of the first 300 in the ADEPT trial.

AIM: Adhesions are the most common cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO). The costs of hospitalization and surgery for SBO are substantial for the health-care system. The adhesion-limiting potential of icodextrin has been shown in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological diseases. A randomized, multicentre trial in colorectal cancer surgery started in 2009 with the aim of evaluating whether icodextrin could reduce the long-term risk of surgery for SBO. Because of some concerns about complications (especially anastomotic leakage) after icodextrin use, a preplanned interim analysis of morbidity and mortality was conducted. METHOD: Patients with colorectal cancer without metastasis were randomized 1:1 to receive standard surgery, with or without instillation of icodextrin in the abdominal cavity. For the first 300 patients, the 30-day follow-up data were collected from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Pre-, per- and postoperative data, morbidity and mortality were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 300 randomized patients, 288 had a data file in the SCRCR. Twelve patients did not have cancer and another five did not have a resection, leaving 283 for analysis. The authors were blinded to the randomization groups. Demographic data were similar in both groups. The overall complication rate was 24% in Group 1 and 23% in Group 2 (P = 0.89). Four cases of anastomotic leakage were reported in Group 1 and five were reported in Group 2 (P = 1.0). Mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and re-operations did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The pre-planned safety analysis of the first 300 patients enrolled in this randomized trial did not show any differences in adverse effects related to the use of icodextrin. All data were gathered from the SCRCR, giving us a strong message that we can continue to include patients in the trial.

Efficacy and quality of life 2 years after treatment for faecal incontinence with injectable bulking agents.

BACKGROUND: Stabilized non-animal hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA Dx) gel as injectable bulking therapy has been shown to decrease symptoms of faecal incontinence, but the durability of treatment and effects and influence on quality of life (QoL) is not known. The aim of this study was to assess the effects on continence and QoL and to evaluate the relationship between QoL and efficacy up to 2 years after treatment. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (5 males, mean age 61, range 34-80) were injected with 4 × 1 ml NASHA Dx in the submucosal layer. The patients were followed for 2 years with registration of incontinence episodes, bowel function and QoL questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients reported sustained improvement after 24 months. The median number of incontinence episodes before treatment was 22 and decreased to 10 at 12 months (P = 0.0004) and to 7 at 24 months (P = 0.0026). The corresponding Miller incontinence scores were 14, 11 (P = 0.0078) and 10.5 (P = 0.0003), respectively. There was a clear correlation between the decrease in the number of leak episodes and the increase in the SF-36 Physical Function score but only patients with more than 75 % improvement in the number of incontinence episodes had a significant improvement in QoL at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal injection of NASHA Dx gel induces improvement of incontinence symptoms for at least 2 years. The treatment has a potential to improve QoL. A 75 % decrease in incontinence episodes may be a more accurate threshold to indicate a successful incontinence treatment than the more commonly used 50 %.

Long-term functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and to compare symptoms over time. METHODS: In all, 188 patients were operated with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Short-term functional outcome has previously been evaluated with a symptom questionnaire. The same questionnaire was sent to the 162 patients who were alive and had an intact pouch. A symptom index was studied over time and in relation to early complications and pouchitis. RESULTS: The response rate of the questionnaire was 139/162 at a median of 12.5 (9.5-21) years postoperatively. Overall, the symptom index remained unchanged over time but both the frequency of night-time defaecation and episodes of night-time incontinence increased. Patients' global assessment was unchanged with approximately 80% stating an excellent or a good result. Frequency of pouchitis doubled in 10 years. Symptom index for patients with episodic pouchitis [median 40 (8-89), P = 0.018] and recurrent/chronic pouchitis [71 (8-136), P < 0.001] was higher than in patients without pouchitis [29 (0-105)]. Early complications did not affect the symptom index. CONCLUSION: The overall functional outcome of ileal pouch-anal surgery for ulcerative colitis is stable over time. Patients' satisfaction with outcome remains high. Pouchitis is a determinant of functional outcome.

The influence on treatment outcome of structuring rectal cancer care.

Clinical trials and registers data for quality assurance have been mandatory to achieve the good results and the enormous evolution which has been involved in rectal cancer surgery during the past 20 years. The whole business came into focus when local recurrences were considered as a matter of tumour biology and radiotherapy was introduced in many countries as a standard treatment in rectal cancer patients to reduce the local recurrence rate and to improve survival. During the last 30 years more than 8000 patients have been randomized in trials using pre- or post-operative radiotherapy. Those data are summarized in two good meta-analyses. In short, a summary of those meta-analyses has shown that radiotherapy reduces the local recurrence rate with 50%. Moreover, it has been revealed that pre-operative radiotherapy is better than post-operative radiotherapy in attempt to reduce the local recurrence rate and finally that there is a survival benefit with this reduction of the local recurrence rate.

Results after sacral nerve stimulation for chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation is an established treatment for fecal incontinence and initial reports describe successful results also in subjects with chronic constipation. METHODS: Consecutive patients with slow transit or outlet obstruction type constipation were offered external stimulation through a test electrode inserted in a sacral foramen during a 3-week period. The symptomatic evaluation was based on the number of bowel movements and a validated obstructed defecation score (ODS). A permanent implant was performed provided an overall 50% decrease in symptoms was observed. KEY RESULTS: In total, 44 patients with chronic constipation were treated with a 3-week test stimulation. Fifteen experienced a 50% reduction of symptoms and received a permanent implant. Four of the 15 with permanent implants were explanted during the course of the study. Five subjects (11% of original group) reported sustained symptom relief at final follow-up after a mean of 24 months (range 4-81). Mean ODS score did not change during the treatment. Patients with predominantly slow transit constipation or outlet obstruction did not differ concerning success rate. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Sacral nerve stimulation has limited efficacy in unselected patients with chronic constipation and cannot be recommended for treatment on routine basis.

Nitric oxide regulation of migrating motor complex: randomized trial of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine effects in relation to muscarinic and serotonergic receptor blockade.

AIM: The migrating motor complex (MMC) propels contents through the gastrointestinal tract during fasting. Nitric oxide (NO) is an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the gastrointestinal tract. Little is known about how NO regulates the MMC. In this study, the aim was to examine nitrergic inhibition of the MMC in man using N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) in combination with muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine and 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers underwent antroduodenojejunal manometry for 8 h with saline or NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NMMA randomly injected I.V. at 4 h with or without atropine or ondansetron. Plasma ghrelin, motilin and somatostatin were measured by ELISA. Intestinal muscle strip contractions were investigated for NO-dependent mechanisms using L-NMMA and tetrodotoxin. NOS expression was localized by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: L-NMMA elicited premature duodenojejunal phase III in all subjects but one, irrespective of atropine or ondansetron. L-NMMA shortened MMC cycle length, suppressed phase I and shifted motility towards phase II. Pre-treatment with atropine extended phase II, while ondansetron had no effect. L-NMMA did not change circulating ghrelin, motilin or somatostatin. Intestinal contractions were stimulated by L-NMMA, insensitive to tetrodotoxin. NOS immunoreactivity was detected in the myenteric plexus but not in smooth muscle cells. CONCLUSION: Nitric oxide suppresses phase III of MMC independent of muscarinic and 5-HT3 receptors as shown by nitrergic blockade, and acts through a neurocrine disinhibition step resulting in stimulated phase III of MMC independent of cholinergic or 5-HT3 -ergic mechanisms. Furthermore, phase II of MMC is governed by inhibitory nitrergic and excitatory cholinergic, but not 5-HT3 -ergic mechanisms.

Anorectal manovolumetry in the decision making before surgery for slow transit constipation.

BACKGROUND: Colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation (STC) is being challenged by other operations, such as segmental resections. The importance of preoperative anorectal physiology testing may therefore be increased. The aim of this study was to identify anorectal abnormalities in patients with STC, which may influence the surgical approach. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with STC (43 women; median age, 49 years) and 28 controls (23 women; median age, 50 years) were examined with anorectal manovolumetry. Anal pressures and rectal volumes were recorded, at stepwise rectal distension. RESULTS: Anal resting pressure was lower in patients (median, 54 cm H(2)O; range, 22-130) than in controls (median, 68 cm H(2)O; range, 35-100) (p<0.05). Squeeze pressure tended to be lower in patients (median, 147 cm H(2)O; range, 53-382) than in controls (median, 177 cm H(2)O; range, 65-423) (p=0.09). Rectal sensory thresholds did not differ significantly between patients and controls, although 10 patients had a threshold for filling above the 95(th) percentile of controls. Rectal compliance was increased in patients in the pressure interval 5-35 cm H(2)O (p<0.05-0.01). The threshold and amplitude of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex did not differ significantly, but the recovery of resting pressure after eliciting the reflex was lower in patients than in controls in the pressure interval 10-50 cm H(2)O (p<0.05-0.001). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients with STC deviated in some parameter. An impaired internal sphincter function and increased rectal compliance were seen. One fifth of the patients had impaired rectal sensation.

Segmental colonic transit studies: comparison of a radiological and a scintigraphic method.

OBJECTIVE: Colonic transit studies are used to diagnose slow transit constipation (STC) and to evaluate segmental colonic transit before segmental or subtotal colectomy. The aim of the study was to compare a single X-ray radio-opaque marker method with a scintigraphic technique to assess total and segmental colonic transit in patients with STC. METHOD: Thirty-one female patients (median age 46 years) with severe constipation and a prolonged or borderline prolonged colonic transit time on radio-opaque marker study were included in the study. They were subsequently investigated with (111)Indium-DTPA colonic transit scintigraphy, with a median time between the investigations of 4(range 1-27) months. Normal values of healthy female controls were used for comparison. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two methods in terms of prolonged or normal total colonic transit time. Twenty-nine of 31 female patients had a prolonged transit time only in one or two segments on the marker study. On scintigraphy, the transit time was prolonged for patients in the left (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), but not in the right colon. With respect to prolonged or normal segmental transit time, there was a significant difference between the two methods only in the descending colon (P = 0.02). However, the results varied considerably for individual patients. CONCLUSION: Segmental colonic delay was a common finding. The two methods gave similar results for groups of patients, except in the descending colon. The variation of the results for individuals suggests that a repeated transit test may improve the assessment of total and segmental transit.

Relationships between defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time in constipated patients.

The relations between defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time were analysed in 80 constipated patients (median age 49 years, range 22-87). Patients were classified into three clinically defined groups (slow transit, outlet obstruction, and a mixed group). Rectal evacuation was evaluation was evaluated by computer-based area calculation. There were no differences in defecographic findings except that evacuation was less efficient in the slow transit group compared with the mixed group (p < 0.01) and with the outlet obstruction group (P < 0.05). Transit time was prolonged in the slow transit and mixed groups compared with the outlet group (p < 0.001). Prominent impression of the puborectalis muscle during straining and the size of a rectocoele correlated with rectal emptying (p < 0.01). Perineal descent, anorectal angles, enterocoele, or intussusception were not significantly related to emptying. Prominent impression of the puborectalis muscle (p < 0.05) and impaired rectal emptying (p < 0.05) were more frequent in patients with prolonged transit time (six or more days). There was no significant correlation between transit time and rectal evacuation in the total study population. There was, however, an inverse relation between these variables (r = 0.40, p < 0.02) when all patients who claimed infrequent defecation (two or fewer/week) were analysed separately. These results did not confirm a direct relation between rectal evacuation and colonic transit time in constipated patients overall. The results are consistent with the suggestion that impaired colonic function may develop secondary to outlet obstruction in some patients.

Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects.

PURPOSE: To validate a computer-based area calculation method of quantification of rectal evacuation by using defecography videotapes and to use that method to compare evacuation in constipated patients with that in control subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For validation of the method, simultaneous defecography and weight measurements were compared in 36 patients with constipation or incontinence. Evacuation was calculated as the rate of change of the contrast medium-covered rectal area (percentage per second) or of the evacuated amount of contrast medium (percentage per second [relative] and grams per second [absolute]). After method validation, from a series of 215 consecutive constipated patients, individuals with an isolated radiologic diagnosis of intussusception greater than 0.6 cm (n = 27), rectocele greater than 2 cm (n = 19), enterocele (n = 12), or paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction (n = 12) were selected. Rectal evacuation in these groups was compared with that in 30 control subjects. RESULTS: Rectal evacuation rates measured at defecography correlated well with weighed amounts of evacuated contrast medium during the initial and total evacuation periods in 21 patients without contrast medium leak (r = 0.92, P < .001). Constipation overall, a rectocele greater than 2 cm, or paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction were associated with impaired evacuation (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Area calculations of rectal evacuation reflect rectal emptying. A rectocele greater than 2 cm or a paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction may be associated with obstructed defecation.

Anorectal physiology in relation to clinical subgroups of patients with severe constipation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate anorectal physiology in relation to clinically defined subgroups of patients with idiopathic constipation and to analyse relationships between anorectal physiology and rectal evacuation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation were clinically categorized as slow transit (n=19), outlet obstruction (n=52) and a group with mixed symptoms (n=29). They were examined by recording anal pressures and also rectal volumes in response to stepwise increases in rectal pressure (5-60 cm H2O). The manovolumetric results were compared with 28 sex and aged matched controls. Rectal evacuation was measured by computer-based image analysis of rectal emptying rate in defaecography. RESULTS: The rectal pressure thresholds for filling, urge and pain did not differ between the groups but there were proportionally more patients in the slow transit and mixed group with thresholds for filling exceeding 25 cm H2O (P=0.04). In total, 18% of patients had impaired sensitivity which was associated with long duration of symptoms (P < 0.05). Patients with grossly impaired rectal sensitivity (filling threshold > 40 cm H2O) had impaired rectal evacuation (P < 0.05). The rectal compliance was increased in the slow transit and mixed group (P < 0.01-0.05) in the pressure interval 5-15 cm H2O. Anal resting and squeeze pressures did not differ between the groups although 7/19 in the slow transit group had values around the lower limit of controls. Slow wave frequency was lower in all patient groups (P < 0.001 vs. controls). Rectal evacuation was not related to sphincter function or to rectal compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical categorization of constipated patients defines groups where altered anorectal physiology is not uncommon. Constipation with symptoms of infrequent defaecation may be associated with impaired rectal sensitivity and increased rectal compliance whereas outlet obstruction symptoms are not clearly related to changes in anorectal physiology.

Evaluation of a questionnaire in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence and constipation.

BACKGROUND: A self-reported questionnaire may be a useful instrument in assessing patients with faecal incontinence and constipation. METHODS: Reliability, discrimination, validity, and sensitivity were evaluated in 16 control subjects 36 patients with faecal incontinence, and in 38 with constipation. The reliability was measured by a test-retest procedure (kappa (kappa) statistics or Spearman rank test), and validity by comparing the questionnaire and a diary. Discrimination was assessed by comparing the patient groups with the controls, and sensitivity by comparing selected answers before and after treatment. RESULTS: Overall reliability (faecal incontinence group, mean kappa = 0.57; constipation group, mean kappa = 0.60; controls, mean kappa = 0.95) and validity were judged acceptable. In the incontinence group occurrence of faecal incontinence per se was reproducible (kappa = 0.66), as was the need to wear a pad (kappa = 0.85). Stool frequency, percentage toilet time spent straining and digitation was reproducible in patients with constipation (kappa = 0.80, r = 0.56; p < 0.001, kappa = 0.83 respectively). Several items distinguished both patient groups from healthy controls (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Sensitivity to surgical treatment was seen in several items in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire appears to be a valid measure of symptoms in faecal incontinence and constipation with sufficient discriminatory capacity.

Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying?

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess results of surgical repair of rectocele and to identify possible determinants of outcome from patient's history and preoperative defecography. Another aim was to evaluate how surgery affects rectal evacuation. METHOD: Thirty-four women with constipation and rectal emptying difficulties underwent surgery with a transanal technique. A preoperative defecography was performed in each patient. They were followed up after a median of 10 (range, 2-60) months with a questionnaire (n = 34) and a defecography (n = 31). Computer-based image analysis of defecographies was used to evaluate rectal evacuation. RESULTS: In 27 patients (79 percent), the result of surgery was good with subjectively improved emptying. The need for vaginal or perineal digitation preoperatively was related to a good result (P < 0.05), whereas a previous hysterectomy (P < 0.01) and a large rectal area on defecography (P < 0.01) related to a poor result. Preoperative use of enemas, motor stimulants, or several types of laxatives also related to a poor outcome (P < 0.05). Surgical treatment resulted in reduction of the rectocele (P < 0.001), an elevated position of the anorectal junction (P < 0.05), and improved rectal evacuation on defecographies (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair reduces the size of the rectocele and improves rectal emptying. These changes are accompanied by a symptomatic improvement in the majority of patients. Preoperative patient data and defecography may help in selecting patients for surgery.

Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation.

BACKGROUND: The standard surgical treatment for slow-transit constipation (STC) is subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. A segmental resection may serve the same purpose, but with a reduced risk of side-effects such as diarrhoea or incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results following segmental resection in a consecutive series of patients with STC. METHODS: Selection criteria included prolonged segmental transit on oral 111In-labelled diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid scintigraphic transit study, and disabling symptoms resistant to medical therapy and treatment of outlet obstruction. Twenty-eight patients (26 women, median age 52 years) were treated with segmental resection and followed prospectively with a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: After a median of 50 (range 16-78) months, 23 patients were pleased with the outcome. The median (range) stool frequency increased from 1 (0-7) to 7 (0-63) per week (P < 0.001). The number of patients passing hard stools and straining excessively decreased (P = 0.016 and P = 0.041, respectively). The median incontinence score was unchanged. Rectal sensory thresholds were higher in patients in whom the treatment failed (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With a symptomatic relief comparable to that after ileorectal anastomosis and less severe side-effects, segmental colectomy may be a better alternative for selected patients with STC. Thorough preoperative evaluation is important and impaired rectal sensation may predict a poor outcome.

Proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch--is a diverting stoma dangerous for the patient?

OBJECTIVE: A diverting loop ileostomy was previously considered mandatory for minimizing the effects of septic complications in pelvic pouch surgery. During the past decade there has been a trend towards omission of the loop ileostomy without obvious signs of increased numbers of pouch complications or impaired long-term function. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk of complications associated with the construction and closure of the loop ileostomy itself. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Complications following diverting loop ileostomies in 143 patients subjected to restorative pelvic pouch surgery during the period 1983-97 were studied retrospectively by evaluation of case records. RESULTS: In the period between discharge after pelvic pouch surgery and closure of the loop ileostomy, 20 (14%) patients were hospitalized because of excessive stoma flow and 19 (13%) patients were treated for other surgical complications, of whom 10 (7%) required surgical intervention. In the early postoperative period (within 30 days) after closure of the loop ileostomy, 18 (13%) patients suffered complications necessitating surgery. Another 12 (8%) patients were hospitalized because of intestinal obstruction that could be treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: The proportion of complications associated with diverting loop ileostomies in pelvic pouch surgery was considerable. A randomised controlled multicentre study is ethically defensible and is recommended.

A group-based patient education programme for high-anxiety patients with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) affect a person's health-related quality of life (HRQOL). IBD patients report high levels of anxiety, which correlates with the degree of perceived dissatisfaction with the information on disease-related themes provided in routine health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in anxiety after participation in a group-based educational intervention for IBD patients screened for high anxiety. METHODS: The programme consisted of 8 sessions, and 49 patients participated. Anxiety was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale at baseline and 6 months after intervention. HRQOL was assessed with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and the SF-36 health survey. Participant satisfaction with education was measured using a study-specific questionnaire. RESULTS: No significant change on the HAD anxiety score was found at the 6-month follow-up for those who participated in the education programme despite the fact that the participants reported they had gained better knowledge of disease-related items. Furthermore, there were no significant changes over time regarding bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional functioning and social functioning of the IBDQ or generic HRQOL (SF-36). CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients with a high anxiety level reported improved satisfaction with information about disease-related items, but did not indicate any benefits in terms of reduced anxiety or improved HRQOL after participating in the education programme, not at least in the short-term perspective. In this selected group of patients, psychosocial problems other than disease-related concerns were found that warrant other approaches.

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction is associated with impaired rectal evacuation.

The role of paradoxical puborectalis contraction in the aetiology of constipation and how to best diagnose this condition is controversial. The aims of this study were to investigate whether absolute or relative paradoxical electrical activity during electromyography (EMG) are related to rectal emptying and to compare EMG, defecography and digital examination in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Included in the study were 171 consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation; 136 of these cases were also classified as paradoxical or unclear or not paradoxical at digital examination. Absolute amplitudes and a strain/squeeze index were used to grade the EMG activity in the puborectalis and external sphincter muscle. Rectal evacuation was analysed by defecography with image analysis of rectal area. The results showed that 142 patients had paradoxical EMG activity during straining. There was a correlation between rectal evacuation and amplitudes (r = -0.20 to -0.03, P < 0.01) and between evacuation and index (r = -0.34 to -0.39, P < 0.0001). Forty-two patients with an index of > 50 had impaired rectal evacuation compared with those with an index < or = 50 (P < 0.0001). Thirty-three of 34 cases (n = 136) with an index of > 50 also were paradoxical at defecography whereas 19 were diagnosed digitally. In conclusion, paradoxical puborectalis contraction is associated with impaired rectal evacuation. The activity seems to be best reflected by a strain/squeeze index. The best correlation in diagnostic methods was between EMG and defecography.

Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the functional outcome after suture rectopexy in patients with rectal prolapse or intussusception. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 33 patients with rectal prolapse and 19 patients with intussusception treated by abdominal suture rectopexy 1969-1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel function evaluated by a questionnaire a median of 97 months after operation. RESULTS: 10/33 patients (30%) reported less constipation after rectopexy in the prolapse group compared with 3/19 (16%) in the intussusception group (p = 0.33). Rectal emptying improved in 14/33 (42%) and 1/19 (5%), respectively (p = 0.005), and incontinence in 12/33 (36%) and 3/19 (16%), respectively (p = 0.20). Seventeen patients (52%) with prolapse and 3 (16%) with intussusception described the result of operation as excellent or good (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: There is a reasonable chance of improved rectal emptying and continence in patients undergoing suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse, whereas bowel symptoms commonly worsen postoperatively in patients treated for intussusception.