Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 77(4): 517-526, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with a high rate of events after acute coronary syndrome. It was recently reported that once-daily aspirin might not provide stable biological efficacy in patients with diabetes. AIMS: We sought to compare the biological efficacy of aspirin given once a day versus aspirin divided twice per day in a population of diabetic patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) as assessed by the thrombin generation test. METHODS: We performed an open-label single-blind randomized study including 59 consecutive diabetic patients admitted for NSTE-ACS. Patients were randomly treated with aspirin 100 mg once a day (GA100; n = 20), aspirin 160 mg once a day (GA160; n = 19) or aspirin 100 mg twice a day (G2A100; n = 20). The primary endpoint was endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) at discharge and after 6 months. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 61.5 ± 9 years, and 73% were male. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the three groups. In the GA100 group, there was no significant effect on ETP variation at 6 months (1150.46 ± 504.84 vs. 1087.63 ± 454.18; p = 0.794). An increase in aspirin dose with a second daily administration of 100 mg was associated with a significant reduction in ETP at 6 months (1004.87 ± 196.2 vs. 1233.63 ± 333.5; p = 0.003). A nonsignificant decrease in ETP was seen in the GA160 group (from 1173.8 ± 388.07 to 1053.64 ± 269.93 at 6 months, p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: Only the twice-daily aspirin regimen led to better control of hypercoagulability in NSTE-ACS diabetic patients. However, no thrombin generation normalization was reported.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Método Simple Ciego , Trombina/metabolismo
2.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 54: 47-56, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37150642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of drug-coated balloon in the management of true bifurcation lesions appears to be an attractive option to reduce the rate of stent thrombosis and restenosis particularly at the level of the side branch ostium. We aim to assess the safety and the efficacy of a hybrid approach combining a drug-eluting stent in the main branch and a drug-coated balloon to treat the side branch ostium in patients with de novo true bifurcation. METHODS: From September 2020 to March 2022, 45 patients with a de novo true bifurcation lesion Medina (1.1.1) or Medina (0.1.1) were enrolled. All patients underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with the hybrid approach. Clinical assessment with functional stress imaging test was scheduled at 6 months. In case of documented ischemia, coronary angiography was performed. The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure at 6 months including cardiac death, target vessel MI or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were technical success, defined by performing the percutaneous coronary intervention without an additional drug-eluting stent at the level of the side branch ostium, and clinical success, defined by a technical success associated with the absence of severe complications during in-hospital phase. RESULTS: The immediate results show a technical success of the procedure in the majority of cases (88.9 %) with a low rate of bailout side branch stenting (11.1 %). The clinical success was obtained in 86.7 % and only one patient experienced a severe in-hospital complication. A side branch ostial lesion length > 10 mm was the only independent predictor of clinical failure of the procedure (OR 12.49, 95 % CI 1.17-133.6; p = 0.037). At 6 months, the TLF was low and occurred in 1 patient (2.2 %). No cardiac death was observed. No TVMI was observed. Importantly, at 6 months, no side branch thrombosis was observed. CONCLUSION: The use of a hybrid approach combining a drug-eluting stent in the main branch and a drug-coated balloon in the side branch to treat true bifurcation lesions appears to be safe and efficient with few immediate complications and with satisfactory results at mid-term follow up.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Humanos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA