Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Allergy ; 63(7): 810-9, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18588546

RESUMEN

The prevalence of allergies, asthma and other respiratory diseases in large populations has increased in recent decades. Among other factors, this phenomenon has been connected to adverse health effects of air pollution. Although some causal links between occupational exposures and their health effects are shown, still little is known about the health risks of lifelong exposure to indoor air pollutants. To assess the health risks of indoor air pollutants at prevailing concentration levels in Europe, the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission carried out a project called "Critical Appraisal of the Setting and Implementation of Indoor Exposure Limits in the EU" (INDEX). The aims of the project were: (1) to assess health risks of indoor-originated chemical pollutants that might be regulated in the EU and (2) to provide suggestions and recommendations on potential exposure limits or other risk management measures. The results of the INDEX project should contribute to the development of an EU strategy for the management of indoor air quality. The highest priority was given in this study to: formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, benzene and naphthalene. Exposure limits, recommendations and management options were also given to minimize the health risks for these compounds.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Exposición por Inhalación , Asma/epidemiología , Benceno/toxicidad , Monóxido de Carbono/toxicidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Unión Europea , Formaldehído/toxicidad , Humanos , Naftalenos/toxicidad , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Incertidumbre
2.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 29(3 Suppl): 368-70, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18409729

RESUMEN

The European INDEX project was finalised to identify priorities and to assess the needs for an European Community strategy and action plan in the area of indoor air pollution. A list of 5 chemicals, with potential of high indoor concentrations, uncontested health impacts, and effective risk management, were selected to be regulated with priority: Formaldehyde, Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Benzene and Naphtalene. For each compound, guideline values and management options were suggested.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Benceno/toxicidad , Monóxido de Carbono/toxicidad , Formaldehído/toxicidad , Naftalenos/toxicidad , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
3.
Noise Health ; 7(28): 41-50, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16417704

RESUMEN

Different scientific groups have studied and continue to study the health impacts of physical and chemical agents in the environment. In most cases, every study group has considered the health effect as being solely due to the air pollutant(s) under investigation, for example air pollution without due regard for the simultaneous presence of noise pollution whereas both have an impact on the cardiovascular system. Or in the case of noise studies the contribution of solvent, asphyxiant or metal exposures has not been considered, which can have an impact on hearing impairment. One can, therefore, question the stringency of the available evidence of epidemiological studies in both fields to warrant the consideration of air pollutants as confounding or aggravating factors in studies of specific effects due to noise (and vice versa). In this paper we weigh the existing evidence on the association of noise and air pollutant exposure and associated health impacts. In forthcoming publications, the authors will consider the influence of other factors, which can confound noise studies but are currently not included in the analysis.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Sustancias Peligrosas , Ruido/efectos adversos , Monóxido de Carbono/análisis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Salud Global , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Humanos , Dióxido de Azufre/análisis
4.
Sci Total Environ ; 536: 903-913, 2015 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277440

RESUMEN

In the framework of the EU EPHECT project (Emissions, Exposure Patterns and Health Effects of Consumer Products in the EU), irritative and respiratory effects were assessed in relation to acute (30-min) and long-term (24-h) inhalation exposure to key and emerging indoor air pollutants emitted during household use of selected consumer products. A detailed Health Risk Assessment (HRA) was performed for five selected pollutants of respiratory health relevance, namely acrolein, formaldehyde, naphthalene, d-limonene and α-pinene. For each pollutant, the Critical Exposure Limit (CEL) was compared to indoor air concentrations and exposure estimates for the use of 15 selected consumer products by two population groups (housekeepers and retired people) in the four geographical regions of Europe (North, West, South, East), which were derived previously based on microenvironmental modelling. For the present HRA, health-based CELs were derived for certain compounds in case indoor air quality guidelines were not available by the World Health Organization for end-points relevant to the current study. For each pollutant, the highest indoor air concentrations in each microenvironment and exposure estimates across home microenvironments during the day were lower than the corresponding acute and long-term CELs. However, considerable contributions, especially to acute exposures, were obtained in some cases, such as formaldehyde emissions resulting from single product use of a floor cleaning agent (82% CEL), a candle (10% CEL) and an electric air freshener (17% CEL). Regarding multiple product use, the case of 30-min formaldehyde exposure reaching 34% CEL when eight product classes were used across home microenvironments, i.e. all-purpose/kitchen/floor cleaning agents, furniture/floor polish, combustible/electric air fresheners, and perfume, needs to be highlighted. Such estimated values should be evaluated with caution, as these may be attributed to the exposure scenarios specifically constructed for the present study, following a 'most-representative worst-case scenario' approach for exposure and health risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Contaminación del Aire Interior/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Europa (Continente) , Sustancias Peligrosas , Productos Domésticos , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 160(1-3): 14-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24748489

RESUMEN

Results from epidemiological studies on lung cancer and radon exposure in dwellings and mines led to a significant revision of recommendations and regulations of international organisations, such as WHO, IAEA, Nordic Countries, European Commission. Within the European project RADPAR, scientists from 18 institutions of 14 European countries worked together for 3 y (2009-12). Among other reports, a comprehensive booklet of recommendations was produced with the aim that they should be useful both for countries with a well-developed radon programme and for countries with little experience on radon issues. In this paper, the main RADPAR recommendations on radon programmes and policies are described and discussed. These recommendations should be very useful in preparing a national action plan, required by the recent Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/prevención & control , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Guías como Asunto , Monitoreo de Radiación/normas , Protección Radiológica/normas , Contaminantes Radiactivos/efectos adversos , Radón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Contaminantes Radiactivos/análisis , Radón/análisis
6.
Indoor Air ; 9(2): 103-16, 1999 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10390935

RESUMEN

Eighteen laboratories from 10 European countries participated in a comparison organized as part of the VOCEM project, a 2.5-year research collaboration among 4 research institutes and 4 industrial companies. The scope of the project was to improve the procedure used to measure volatile organic compounds (VOC) emitted from building materials and products in small test chambers. The interlaboratory comparison included the GC-MS determination of 5 target compounds from carpet, 8 from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cushion vinyl and 2 from paint; for the first time, chamber recovery (sinks), homogeneity of solid materials and possible contamination during transport were tested. The results show that the intralaboratory variance (random errors) is much smaller than the interlaboratory variance (systematic errors). Causes of the largest interlaboratory discrepancies were: (i) analytical errors; (ii) losses of the heaviest compounds due to sorption on the chamber walls; and (iii) non homogeneity of the materials. The output of this work concerns both the objective of labelling materials with regard to their VOC emissions and the pre-standard drafted by the European Commitee for Standardization (CEN) for this type of determination.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Compuestos Orgánicos/análisis , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Ensayo de Materiales , Valores de Referencia , Volatilización
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA