Iliac Fenestration-An Alternative Endovascular Option for Common Iliac Aneurysms.

We report the use of manufacturer-customized fenestrated iliac stent grafts to treat common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) in patients with challenging iliac anatomy, unsuitable for iliac branched devices (IBDs). A 71-year-old woman presented with bilateral CIAAs measuring 44 mm and 29 mm and a perivisceral abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The second patient, a 72-year-old male, had a 42-mm CIAA and an AAA, which expanded to 50 mm during the short-term follow-up. The contralateral internal iliac was occluded. Both patients were deemed high risk for open repair, and endovascular repair was recommended. The aneurysm anatomies were unsuitable for isolated CIAA repair. Suitable sealing zones for endovascular repair were the visceral segment proximally and the external iliac arteries. Preservation of both internal iliac arteries (IIAs) was important to reduce the risk of spinal cord ischemia, but due to distal CIA narrowing, neither patient had sufficient "space" for the branches used in conventional IBD deployment. Three fenestrated Vascutek Anaconda™ iliac limbs were successfully deployed. All three IIAs were preserved with no endoleak, and the patients were discharged after an uneventful postprocedural course. To our knowledge, this is the first successful report of iliac aneurysm repair with manufacturer-customized fenestrated iliac limbs.

Practical uses of the BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 in the road less travelled: Guide catheter comparison for radial access in neurovascular intervention.

BACKGROUND: Radial arterial access has gained interest for neurovascular procedures in recent years. Although there are no randomized control trials for neurointervention procedures using radial access, there is growing literature demonstrating its feasibility and favorable outcomes. Equipment technical improvements, like the recently introduced BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 System, have made radial navigation safer, with improved maneuverability and support for a variety of procedures. We present a multicenter case series highlighting our institutional radial access experience comparing the BMX®81 with alternative catheters. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of 80 patients who underwent neurovascular procedures through a radial approach. In half of the cases a BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 System was used. The comparison group consisted of the BENCHMARK™071 and 96, Neuron MAX®088 and BALLAST™ systems. Procedures included endovascular thrombectomy, carotid and brachiocephalic artery stenting, middle meningeal artery embolization, flow diverter stenting, vertebral artery sacrifice, aneurysm coiling, and WEB™ device deployment. RESULTS: In our series, the BMX®81 was successful in the navigation of the anatomy to the target location in 95% of cases. No radial access or BMX®81 related complications were identified. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the BMX81 and the comparison group. Four patients in the comparison group had catheter-related complications due to vasospasm. Eighty-six percent of BMX®81 cases had satisfactory outcomes and no technical difficulties. The remainder presented technical difficulties, but none of these were considered secondary to the puncture site or support structure. CONCLUSIONS: The BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 System is a recently developed guiding catheter which has design and size features supporting radial access for a variety of neurovascular interventions. Early multicenter experience highlights the ease of use and versatility of this new catheter as an alternative to transfemoral access as well as other catheters used for radial access.

Implantation of Large Diameter (5.5-6 mm) Derivo Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of flow diverters is dependent upon robust wall apposition in the parent artery. Usage in large caliber cerebral vessels has therefore been limited as few implants with diameters > 5 mm exist. We present our initial experience in treating cerebral aneurysms using the 5.5 mm and 6 mm diameter implants of the Derivo embolization device (DED). METHODS: Our prospectively maintained institutional database was reviewed to identify patients in whom a > 5 mm DED was implanted between November 2016 and February 2021. The primary efficacy outcome was complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months (O'Kelly-Marotta, OKM, C-D, adapted for magnetic resonance angiography). Safety outcomes included 30-day major morbidity defined as modified Rankin Score (mRS) 3-5, mortality, serious adverse events and procedural complications. RESULTS: A total of 21 large diameter DEDs were deployed in 18 patients (age 59.5 ± 14.1 years), harboring 19 unruptured aneurysms. Of the aneurysms 14 (73.7%) were saccular in morphology (sac diameter 10.9 ± 5.5 mm, neck diameter 6.8 ± 3.1 mm), 3 (15.8%) aneurysms were dissecting, 1 (5.3%) iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm and 1 (5.3%) fusiform. Aneurysm locations were: ICA (internal carotid artery) (n = 17); (7 cavernous, 4 paraophthalmic, 2 paraclinoid, 1 petrous, 2 communicating, 1 cervical); vertebrobasilar (n = 2). Adjunct stenting to optimize proximal wall apposition was undertaken in 5 (27.8%) patients. At 6 months 75% of patients followed-up met the primary efficacy endpoint (OKM C-D). There were no serious adverse events, 30-day major morbidity (mRS 3-5) or mortality. CONCLUSION: Implantation of large diameter (5.5 mm and 6 mm) DEDs into capacious cerebral vessels to treat a range of complex aneurysms is safe and technically feasible but may require adjunct stenting to optimize proximal wall apposition. Short-term efficacy of this device subset is comparable to previous DED and other flow diverter studies. Long-term follow-up and comparative studies are required for further assessment.

Duplication of the internal maxillary artery: Anatomical and clinical considerations.

Duplication of the internal maxillary artery (IMAX) results from a failed regression of either the embryological superficial or deep ring and is reported to be exceedingly rare. We present a patient with this rare anatomical variant who was treated by endovascular technique in the clinical context of an acute oropharyngeal hemorrhage.