Effect on endometrial histology and pharmacokinetics of different dose regimens of progesterone vaginal pessaries, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo.

STUDY QUESTION: Which progesterone vaginal pessary dose regimen induces adequate secretory transformation of the endometrium, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo? SUMMARY ANSWER: The best secretory transformation of the endometrium was observed during treatment with 400 mg progesterone vaginal pessaries, administered twice daily. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Vaginally administered progesterone is widely used for luteal phase support (LPS) in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Although several vaginal formulations using various doses are available, little is known on the impact of formulation and doses at the endometrial level. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study had a randomised, observer-blind design and comprised two parts. The participants used study medication during two or three treatment periods, separated by washout periods. Subjects in Part 1 (n = 61 treated) received 200 mg progesterone vaginal pessaries twice daily (bid), 400 mg pessaries bid and the comparator 90 mg progesterone vaginal gel once daily (od) in a 3-way crossover design. Subjects in Part 2 (n = 64 treated) received 100 mg pessaries bid in one period and 400 mg pessaries od in the other period in a 2-way crossover design. A subgroup of these subjects (n = 22 treated) received placebo vaginal pessaries bid in a third period in a non-randomised manner. The study was performed from May 2012 until April 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study was performed at a clinical research centre in healthy female volunteers of reproductive age. The subjects used 2 mg estradiol bid for 24 days in each treatment cycle. Progesterone or placebo was administered vaginally from Day 15 onwards during 10 days. In each treatment period, an endometrial biopsy for histological evaluation was performed on Day 23 and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after the first progesterone dose on Day 15 and after the last dose on Day 24. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Frequencies of (early and late) secretory transformation of the endometrium, i.e. adequate responses, during treatment with 200 mg and 400 mg vaginal pessaries bid were comparable with those during 90 mg vaginal gel treatment (90-94%), whereas lower secretory transformation rates were observed during treatment with 100 mg bid and 400 mg od (64-75%). At the time of the endometrial biopsy in the cycle the late secretory state of the endometrium, which is characteristic of adequate luteal support, was observed more often with 400 mg pessaries bid (90%) than with vaginal gel (82%) and with lower pessary doses (64-78%). Pharmacokinetic parameters after repeated dosing of vaginal pessaries showed a dose-dependent, but not dose-proportional, increase of plasma progesterone levels. The lowest incidence of bleeding and spotting was reported during treatment with 400 mg pessaries bid. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The primary outcome parameter, rate of secretory transformation of the endometrium, is a surrogate for endometrial receptivity and for the actual clinical efficacy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Delivery of progestesterone through 400 mg pessaries bid is an effective alternative method for luteal support in ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by Actavis Group PTC ehf., Iceland, part of Teva Pharmaceuticals, and L.D. Collins. I.D. and C.K. are directors of Dinox, a contract research organisation. I.K. is Managing Director of Pharmaplex and M.W. is Managing Director of M.A.R.C.O., service organisations involved in organisation/supervision and evaluation/reporting of clinical trials. All received funding for the conduct of the study from Actavis. S.H. and Th.M. are employees of Actavis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number 2012-001726-95.

A two-centre, open-label, randomised study of ovulation inhibition with three transdermal contraceptive patches, each containing different amounts of ethinyl estradiol and gestodene in healthy, young women.

Here we report the findings of a two-centre, open-label, randomised, Phase IIa study designed to investigate whether an ethinyl estradiol (EE)/gestodene (GSD) patch that has been developed (referred to herein as the 'EE/GSD patch') reliably inhibits ovulation in comparison with patches delivering lower doses of these hormones. The study rationale was to provide justification of the doses of EE and GSD selected for the EE/GSD patch. Healthy women, aged 18-35 years, were randomised to receive treatment with either the EE/GSD patch, a 'reduced-GSD patch' (delivering similar amounts of EE and approximately half the amount of GSD) or a 'reduced-EE/GSD patch' (delivering half the amount of EE and GSD). Treatment was administered for three 28-day cycles (three × 7 patch-wearing days, plus a 7-day patch-free interval). The primary pharmacodynamic variable was the percentage of women with ovulation in at least one of Cycles 2 and/or 3, as indicated by Hoogland score. Pharmacokinetic parameters for EE and GSD were also measured. Results indicated that the EE/GSD patch effectively suppressed ovulation, while patches delivering lower doses of EE and GSD were less effective for this purpose. All three patches showed comparable tolerability.

The effects on ovarian activity of ulipristal acetate when 'quickstarting' a combined oral contraceptive pill: a prospective, randomized, double-blind parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the effect on ovarian activity of a preceding intake of ulipristal acetate (UPA) when starting a combined oral contraceptive (COC) in the mid- to late-follicular phase of the cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER: This study shows that UPA does not affect the ability of the COC to induce ovarian quiescence. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: UPA is a progesterone receptor modulator that is available for emergency contraception (EC). In theory, UPA could alter the effectiveness of hormonal contraception started immediately following it and vice versa. Current guidelines regarding quick starting a COC following UPA are based on expert opinion only. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at three separate sites, Edinburgh (Scotland), Stockholm (Sweden) and Groningen (the Netherlands), over a 5-month period in 2012. Healthy female volunteers were randomized to take either UPA or an identically packaged placebo, at mid-cycle (once a lead ovarian follicle was determined to be >13 mm on transvaginal ultrasound imaging). Participants were randomized by a computer-generated randomization schedule, allocated by sequential, sealed envelopes. All women then started 21 days of the same COC the following day. The study was designed to show non-inferiority of UPA compared with placebo in terms of the proportion of women attaining ovarian quiescence, as measured by the Hoogland scoring system, while taking COC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 76 women were recruited over the three sites, Edinburgh (n = 18), Stockholm (n = 13), Groningen (n = 45) and received either UPA (n = 39) or placebo (n = 37). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics of women in the UPA and placebo groups. Among the 76 participants treated, 47 (61.8%) reached quiescence and 25 (32.9%) ovulated. There were no significant differences between the groups in the odds ratio (OR) of reaching ovarian quiescence or not; OR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.39-2.46). All women who reached quiescence had done so after taking COCs for 14 days. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitations of the study were that measurements of follicle size and blood tests were performed every 2-3 days and so it was not possible to determine the actual day that follicle rupture occurred for the women who ovulated. Furthermore, the ultrasonography was conducted by a number of investigators at the sites which may introduce error in the form of inter-observer variability in measurements of follicle growth. Finally, the findings of the study cannot be extrapolated to other combined hormonal methods of contraception such as the patch or ring, nor to progestogen- only methods of contraception. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study provides evidence to suggest that UPA does not affect the ability of the COC to induce ovarian quiescence. However, this study design cannot determine whether the COC affects the ability of UPA to delay ovulation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding was provided by HRA Pharma Paris, France. C.K., S.T.C. and K.G.D. have received funds for conducting research studies and lectures for HRA Pharma. C.K. is director of a contract research organization (Dinox). The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01569113.

A prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic study of quick-starting a desogestrel progestin-only pill following ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a pharmacodynamic interaction between ulipristal acetate (UPA) 30 mg for emergency contraception and a daily progestin-only contraceptive pill, desogestrel (DSG) 0.75 mg, when initiated the next day? SUMMARY ANSWER: In this study, DSG impaired the ability of UPA to delay ovulation, but UPA had little impact on the onset of contraceptive effects due to DSG. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: UPA is a progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraceptive (EC) at the dose of 30 mg. UPA delays ovulation by at least 5 days when administered in the mid to late follicular phase. In theory, potent progestins could reactivate progesterone signaling that leads to follicle rupture, thereby impacting the effectiveness of UPA as EC. In addition, UPA could alter the onset of the contraceptive effect of progestin-containing contraceptives started immediately after UPA. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single-blind (for observer), placebo-controlled, partial crossover study was conducted in two sites [Dominican Republic (DR) and the Netherlands (NDL)] over 11 months from October 2012 to September 2013. Healthy female volunteers participated in two of the three treatment cycles separated by a washout cycle. Treatment combinations studied were as follows: (i) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days, (ii) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 20 days of placebo matching that of DSG (PLB2) or (iii) one tablet of placebo-matching UPA (PLB1) followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days. Participants were randomized to one of the three treatment sequences (UPA + DSG/UPA + PLB2, PLB1 + DSG/UPA + DSG and UPA + PLB2/PLB1 + DSG) when a lead follicle was ≥ 14 to <16 mm diameter on transvaginal ultrasound imaging (TVU). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 71 women were included, and 49 were randomized to a first treatment combination of the three period sequences (20 in the DR and 29 in the NDL); 41 of the 49 continued and completed two treatment combinations (20 in the DR and 21 in the NDL). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Initiating DSG treatment the day after UPA significantly reduced the ovulation delaying effect of UPA (P = 0.0054). While ovulation occurred in only one of the 29 UPA-only cycles (3%) in the first 5 days, it occurred in 13 of the 29 (45%) UPA + DSG cycles. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a small, descriptive, pharmacodynamic study in which some findings differed by study site. Distinguishing between a cystic corpus luteum and a luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) by TVU was difficult in some cases; however, the investigators reached consensus, when the study was still blinded, regarding ovulation based on hormone levels and careful review of daily TVU images. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Initiating the use of a DSG progestin-only pill (POP) immediately after UPA reduces the ability of UPA to delay ovulation and thus may decrease its efficacy as EC. If starting a DSG POP after using UPA for EC, and possibly any progestin-only method, consideration should be given to delaying for at least 5 days after UPA intake in order to preserve the ovulation delaying effects of UPA.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of cetrorelix, an LH-RH antagonist, after subcutaneous administration in healthy premenopausal women.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was the development of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for the luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression and subsequent shift in LH surge and follicle-stimulating hormone by cetrorelix in women. BACKGROUND: Cetrorelix is a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist and is used for the prevention of the premature ovulation indicated by an LH surge in in vitro fertilization. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship for the suppression and the shift in the LH surge has not yet been established. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled study, single subcutaneous doses of 1, 3, and 5 mg of cetrorelix were given to 36 subjects on day 8 of the natural menstrual cycle. Cetrorelix, LH, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, and progesterone were determined. RESULTS: Cetrorelix pharmacokinetics were described by a 2-compartment model with a terminal half-life of 56.9 +/- 27.1 hours. Mean shift in LH surge was by 4.1, 7.5, and 9.3 days with the 1-, 3-, and 5-mg doses, respectively. An indirect response sigmoid Emax model was developed for the suppression of LH and the shift in the LH surge. The inhibitory concentration of 50% (for LH suppression) and median effective concentration (for surge shift) estimates were 3.6 ng/mL and 1.6 ng/mL, respectively. The suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone was described by a similar Emax model, with an inhibitory concentration of 50% of 7.25 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model was developed for the transient initial suppression of LH and the subsequent shift in the LH surge after 3 single subcutaneous doses of cetrorelix without ovarian stimulation. A separate model was developed for the suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone by cetrorelix. The shift in the LH surge could be adequately described by the model.

Relationship between free and total 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in conditions of modified binding.

OBJECTIVE: A novel assay was employed to study the free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) concentrations in various populations with different levels of 1,25(OH)2D and vitamin D binding protein (DBP). DESIGN: In 12 healthy women before and after 3 months of oral estrogen/progestagen treatment, 10 pregnant women, and 16 patients with a nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function, the concentrations of total and free 1,25(OH)2D, DBP and albumin were assessed. METHODS: The total concentration of 1,25(OH)2D in serum was assessed using a radioreceptor assay. The free fraction of 1,25(OH)2D was measured using symmetric dialysis. DBP was assessed using single radial immunodiffusion. Serum albumin concentrations were measured on an automated analyzer. RESULTS: In healthy women, the concentrations of total 1,25(OH)2D, free 1,25(OH)2D and DBP were 132+/-19 pmol/l, 92+/-30 fmol/l and 5.59+/-0.43 micromol/l. After 3 months of estrogen/progestagen treatment, total 1,25(OH)2D and DBP levels rose significantly to 175+/-51 pmol/l and 8.32+/-1.59 micromol/l (P< or =0.05 and P< or =0.001); the free 1,25(OH)2D remained unchanged (105+/-39 fmol/l; not significant). Pregnant women had significantly higher levels of total 1,25(OH)2D and DBP (239+/-68 pmol/l and 11.32+/-1.77 micromol/l; both P

Pharmacodynamic effects and plasma pharmacokinetics of single doses of cetrorelix acetate in healthy premenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacodynamic effects and plasma pharmacokinetics of single subcutaneous doses of cetrorelix acetate in healthy premenopausal women. SETTING: Phase I clinical research unit. PATIENT(S): Healthy, premenopausal women aged 19 to 35 years. INTERVENTION(S): Single subcutaneous morning doses of cetrorelix acetate (1, 3, or 5 mg peptide base) were investigated in a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. After a control cycle, 36 women received cetrorelix acetate (12 per dose) and 12 received placebo on the eighth individual cycle day. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed, and blood samples for LH, FSH, E2 were collected during both cycles and for pharmacokinetics up to 168 hours after dosing. The serum hormone levels were determined by electrochemicoluminescence immunoassay and plasma cetrorelix concentrations by radioimmuno assay. RESULTS: Cetrorelix acetate administration led to a rapid, marked, and reversible suppression of serum LH, E2, and to a lesser extent FSH concentrations. The median intra-individual shifts between treatment and control cycle were -1.0, 4.0, 8.0, and 9.5 days for serum LH maximum and -1.0, 4.5, 7.0, and 10.0 days for ovulation following placebo or 1, 3, and 5 mg cetrorelix acetate, peptide base, respectively. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak cetrorelix concentrations in plasma (Cmax) increased proportionally with dose. CONCLUSIONS: Cetrorelix acetate showed pronounced and reversible LH and E2 suppression and a dose-dependent postponement of LH surge and ovulation after single subcutaneous administrations to healthy premenopausal women. Dose proportionality over the range of 1 mg to 5 mg cetrorelix acetate, peptide base was demonstrated.

Group comparison of serum ethinyl estradiol, SHBG and CBG levels in 83 women using two low-dose combination oral contraceptives for three months.

Serum ethinyl estradiol (EE2), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) concentrations were studied in healthy young women randomly allocated to one of two low-dose combination oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms EE2 and either 75 micrograms gestodene (F) or 150 micrograms desogestrel (M) per unit. There was either no (formerly non-pill users) or one (pill users) wash-out cycle before the study started with a pill-free pretreatment cycle in which the hormone status and basal SHBG and CBG levels were measured. Treatment was for three months. During treatment cycles 1 and 3, there were three test days each. Seven serum samples were obtained up to four hours and one sample 24 hours after intake of the first, tenth and the last (21st) pill. Additional samples were taken prior to morning ingestion of pills 5 and 15. For each individual and each test day, a representative serum pool has been constructed for SHBG and CBG analysis. EE2 concentrations were analyzed in all individual samples by means of a specific and sensitive RIA using anti-EE2-6 beta-CMO-BSA antiserum. Area under the curves (AUC) up to 4 and 24 hours, Cmax and tmax were evaluated and compared between the two treatment groups (n = 40 for F, n = 43 for M). SHBG and CBG concentrations were measured using commercially available immunoassay kits. Groups were large enough to detect a difference in group means of 75% of one standard deviation (alpha = 0.05, 1-beta = 0.9) of target variables, which is equivalent to 28 pg EE2/ml for Cmax, 69 pg.h.ml-1 for AUCEE2 0-4h, 257 pg.h.ml-1 for AUCEE2 0-24h, 39 nmol/l SHBG and 13.4 micrograms CBG/ml. Results clearly demonstrate that there were no differences between the two treatment groups in any of the target variables at any of the six test days distributed over a three-month period. Mean SHBG and CBG pretreatment levels of about 70 nmol/l and 37 micrograms/ml, respectively, increased to about 210 nmol/l and 88 micrograms/ml during the first treatment cycle and to about 230 nmol/l and 93 micrograms/ml during the third treatment cycle. Whereas the time of maximum EE2 serum levels did not differ significantly between test days, Cmax, AUCEE2 0-4h and AUCEE2 0-24h values increased by 30-35% or 40-50%, respectively, when test days 10 and 21 were compared to test day 1. Similar results were found for the third treatment cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

An open label, comparative study of the effects of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg levonorgestrel on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables.

In this open label, randomized study we compared the influence of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 100 microg levonorgestrel (20 EE) with a reference preparation containing 30 microg EE and 150 microg levonorgestrel (30 EE) on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables. Data from 48 volunteers were obtained. The direction of the change (increase or decrease) in most of the hemostatic variables were similar in both treatment groups. In particular, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 increased during treatment, reaching a median percent change of 40% in the 20 EE group and of 17% in the 30 EE group after one year. D-Dimer fibrin split products remained virtually unchanged, with no change at Cycle 13. The median HDL2 cholesterol levels decreased by 26% in the 20 EE group and by 39.8% in 30 EE group (p = 0.0045 for group difference) after one year. The median one year change for LDL cholesterol was 3.23% in the 20 EE group, compared to 25% in the 30 EE group, for VLDL 11.1% compared to 38.8%, respectively, and for total triglycerides 10.0% compared to 37.5%, respectively. The median absolute change for the area under the curve (AUC)(0-3h) for glucose at treatment Cycle 13 was 41.25 mmol/L x min in the 20 EE group and 73.50 mmol/L x min in the 30 EE group. The AUC(0-3h) insulin at treatment Cycle 13 decreased in the 20 EE group by 1635.0 pmolL x min and increased in the 30 EE group by 11797.5 pmolL x min (p = 0.0491 for group difference). Both study treatments were safe and well tolerated by the volunteers. In conclusion, the balanced one-third dose reduction in this new oral contraceptive evoked similar effects on the hemostatic variables, but favorable results for the lipid and carbohydrate profiles.

A double-blind comparative study of the effects of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene and a 21-day regimen with 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene on hemostatic variables, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism.

In this double-blind study we compared the influence of two oral contraceptives, a 23-day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene (23-day 20/75) and a 21-day regimen with 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene (21-day 30/75), on hemostatic variables, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism. The volunteers received the preparations daily for six 28-day cycles. Hemostatic variables and lipids were measured at baseline and after six treatment cycles. Carbohydrate metabolism was assessed by determination of the area under the curve (AUC) of carbohydrate parameters after oral glucose tolerance tests performed at baseline and after three treatment cycles. Data from 33 volunteers in each group were obtained. No significant differences between the effects of both treatments on the hemostatic system were detected. Neither the overall change of all hemostatic variables from baseline to treatment Cycle 6 [defined as primary target variable in the study] nor the change of any of the individual hemostatic parameters differed significantly between the treatment groups. Likewise, no significant nor clinically relevant differences in the effects of both treatments on the volunteers' lipid profiles were detected. The data on carbohydrate variables suggested a slightly more favorable influence of the 23-day 20/75 regimen. The increase of the glucose AUCs after three cycles tended to be stronger with the 21-day 30/75 regimen than with the 23-day 20/75 regimen. In addition, the AUCs for insulin and C-peptide were slightly reduced after three cycles with the 23-day 20/75 regimen but slightly increased with the 21-day 30/75 regimen. Both study treatments were safe and well tolerated by the volunteers as shown by the nature and frequency of adverse events, the routine laboratory examinations, and the physical and gynecological examinations. Both preparations provided adequate contraceptive reliability. The only pregnancy during treatment was attributable to intake errors. In conclusion, the prolongation of the treatment phase of an oral contraceptives with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol does not evoke more pronounced metabolic effects than a conventional 21-day regimen with 30 microg ethinyl estradiol.

Discussion on early clinical drug development in the target population with respect to the field of reproductive endocrinology.

The study populations taking part in early clinical drug development of reproductive endocrine treatments are discussed. After having compared subjects in phase I studies with subsequent target populations, the question was posed as to whether the inclusion of the later target population could accelerate the developmental process. This applies only to certain specific clinical questions that are posed in phase I studies. From the authors' perspective, the key goal of rapid and well-structured early drug development is to be attained by using reliable surrogate markers that are able to reflect the clinical effects.

Ultrasonographic assessment of endocervix and cervical mucus in ovulatory menstrual cycles.

OBJECTIVE: In addition to the routinely used methods to evaluate the menstrual cycle, a new method will be described, assessing the aspect of the endocervix and the presence of cervical mucus by transvaginal ultrasonography. STUDY DESIGN: 36 healthy female volunteers with regular menstrual cycles participated in the study. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed every other day until ovulation was observed, assessing the diameter of the largest ovarian follicle, endometrial thickness, the aspect of the endocervix, and the presence of cervical mucus. On the same days serum hormone concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Changes in the echodensity of the endocervix were observed in 35 volunteers, from 7 (1-19) (median and range) days before ovulation onwards. The presence of cervical mucus could clearly be observed in the preovulatory phase in 25 volunteers, from 3 (1-7) days before ovulation onwards. CONCLUSION: Preovulatory changes in the aspect of the endocervix and cervical mucus can be observed by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasonography of the cervix may offer an additive diagnostic tool in fertility disorders and will, in many cases, make visual inspection of the cervix unnecessary.

The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and bone mineral density in healthy pre-menopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Hormonal contraceptives have been associated with various effects on the bone mineral density (BMD) of pre-menopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a vaginal contraceptive ring on BMD in pre-menopausal women and compare them with those of non-hormonal contraceptive use. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre study used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure BMD in the lumbar spine (L(2)-L(4)) and femoral neck regions. Subjects were assigned 3:1 to receive a contraceptive ring (n = 105) or a non-hormonal contraceptive control (n = 39) and were assessed after 13 and 26 cycles of contraceptive ring treatment or 12 and 24 months of control treatment. RESULTS: No change from baseline in BMD (Z-scores) was seen in contraceptive ring users (n = 73) at either time-point. In the control group (n = 30), BMD increased slightly from baseline resulting in significant differences (P < 0.0001) between the two groups at cycle 26/month 24. These differences are not clinically relevant, although some degree of acquisition of peak bone mass might have been prevented in the contraceptive ring group. The contraceptive ring was generally well tolerated; a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events was observed in the contraceptive ring group compared with the non-hormonal contraceptive control group. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy pre-menopausal women, 2 years of contraceptive ring use produced no changes in BMD.

Combined ethinylestradiol/gestodene contraceptive patch: two-center, open-label study of ovulation inhibition, acceptability and safety over two cycles in female volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Determination of the ovulation inhibition efficacy of a new, transparent, transdermal, combined hormonal contraceptive patch (area 10 cm2) containing 0.9 mg ethinylestradiol and 1.9 mg gestodene in an open-label study of healthy, female volunteers (aged 18-35 years). METHODS: A total of 199 volunteers from two centers were requested to use the contraceptive patch (one patch/week for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week of no treatment), throughout two menstrual cycles. Ovarian activity was monitored by transvaginal ultrasonography and serum hormone determinations, and classified according to the Hoogland score. RESULTS: Ovulation inhibition was achieved in all participants (Hoogland score < 6). Secondary efficacy measures, including suppression of serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone, and of the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone surge, confirmed ovulation inhibition. Ovulation returned in 85.7% of participants during the first cycle after cessation of treatment. There were no abnormal changes in safety parameters. A large majority of users rated the contraceptive patch as 'very convenient'. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the new, combined ethinylestradiol/gestodene contraceptive patch was highly effective in reversibly inhibiting ovulation, well tolerated and regarded as 'very convenient' by the majority of users. This new, transparent, transdermal matrix patch is an attractive alternative form of contraception.

A comparative study of the effects of gestodene 60 microg/ethinylestradiol 15 microg and desogestrel 150 microg/ethinylestradiol 20 microg on hemostatic balance, blood lipid levels and carbohydrate metabolism.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label study was conducted to compare the effects of gestodene (GTD) 60 microg/ethinylestradiol (EE) 15 microg and desogestrel (DSG) 150 microg/EE 20 microg (Mercilon) on selected metabolic measurements during six cycles in 124 healthy women. METHODS: GTD/EE subjects received a single pill once daily from days 1 to 24 of a 28-day cycle, followed by placebo pills daily for the last 4 days of the cycle. DSG/EE subjects received a single pill daily from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by a 7-day pill-free interval. Safety was assessed from changes in hemostatic measurements, lipid profile, glucose tolerance and adverse events. RESULTS: Both GTD/EE and DSG/EE groups exhibited minimal effects on the lipid profile. An increased glucose response was noted with both treatments and an increased insulin response was noted with GTD/EE. Hemostatic activity was increased in both groups but a counteracting increase in fibrinolytic activity occurred together with an increase in coagulatory activity. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups, and no significant differences in cycle control were observed between groups. No pregnancies occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-day GTD 60 microg/EE 15 microg formulation and DSG/EE produced similar effects on hemostatic balance, lipid metabolism and glucose tolerance, and exhibited comparable efficacy and tolerability.

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix in healthy female volunteers.

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix is in advanced clinical development for the control of endogenous gonadotrophin secretion during the course of a fertility programme. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Cetrorelix following single and multiple s.c. administration of different doses. Thirty-six healthy female volunteers received either 0.25, 0.50 or 1.00 mg Cetrorelix, in a first menstrual cycle as single dose and in a second cycle as multiple dose (daily between cycle days 3 and 16). Frequent blood samples were collected for determination of Cetrorelix, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. Follicular growth was measured by transvaginal ultrasonography. After single administration of each dose, maximum Cetrorelix concentrations (Cmax) were reached after 1 h, and Cmax and area under curve (AUC) increased linearly with the dose. The median terminal half-life ranged from 5 to 10 h in the three different dose groups. FSH, LH, oestradiol and progesterone concentrations were suppressed, with a nadir at 6-12 h after Cetrorelix administration. During multiple administration, Cmax and AUC also showed dose-linearity. The median terminal half-life of Cetrorelix varied between 20 and 80 h. A dose-dependent suppression of FSH, LH and oestradiol concentrations was observed during treatment. After multiple administration, ovulation was delayed for 5, 10 and 13 days in the 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00 mg dose groups, respectively. In conclusion, Cetrorelix showed linear pharmacokinetics, and effectively delayed the LH surge.

Adverse events and discomfort in studies on healthy subjects: the volunteer's perspective. A survey conducted by the German Association for Applied Human Pharmacology.

OBJECTIVE: The various good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines do not define the volunteering subject as an active party. The present survey addresses the volunteer's perception of study-related inconvenience and risk and its impact on their decision to enroll. METHODS: The survey consisted of a questionnaire to be filled out voluntarily and anonymously by healthy subjects who volunteered for enrollment in human pharmacology studies and who had participated in at least one previous study. Twenty-five categorised multiple-choice questions covered previous study experience, motives for volunteering, perception of and compliance with study directives and restrictions, past experience with adverse events, impact of the study environment on perceived well-being and the nature of adverse events likely to discourage them from enrollment. RESULTS: Seven centres contributed by providing at least 30 (range 30-100) evaluable questionnaires. The database consists of a total of 440 healthy subjects (30.5% females, 69.5% males), from 18 to over 60 years of age. Two hundred and seven subjects (47.1%) were company employees and 233 (52.9%) were external volunteers. Eighty nine percent only participated in studies at one particular centre. Some 53.3% indicated financial motives, 27.8% 'contribution to an improvement of pharmacotherapy', 12.7% 'social responsibility', while 6.2% indicated other motives, mainly the opportunity of a free medical check-up. Thirteen subjects (3%) admitted to not answering correctly to the recruitment questions; this limited reliability is suspected to be even larger when the answer might preclude enrollment. From the volunteers' perspective, the environmental study conditions clearly appeared to have a highly relevant impact on their personal well-being. Some 17.1% of the subjects reported to have suffered adverse events occasionally and 2.7% frequently; but 14% admitted not reporting adverse events promptly and about 20% indicated that, with respect to previous adverse events, they first sought advice from other volunteers rather than from the investigator. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events and inconveniences are inherent to nontherapeutic studies in healthy subjects. From the volunteer's perspective it appears that the incidence of adverse experiences in such studies exceeds the reported frequencies from investigators considerably. This finding suggests that investigators are usually not aware or able to ascertain the true incidence of adverse events. The present survey also confirms that pertinent information on the personal history may be unreliable. Volunteers are reluctant to answer questions regarding, in particular, their smoking habits, caffeine and alcohol consumption. Regarding the matter of informed consent, a noteworthy contradiction between the volunteers' attitude and behaviour became apparent. Although the volunteers admit that even rather minor adverse events ordinarily would discourage them, they still consent to enrollment. In view of this apparent contradiction, there is no alternative to the investigator's personal responsibility to counsel and protect the subject. Surveys such as this one may contribute to the awareness that the explicitness of GCP guidelines merely define the format, but not the content quality of these fundamental ethical values, which remain the unique burden and challenge of the investigator.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics after repeated subcutaneous administration of three gonadotrophin preparations.

Recently, several new urinary gonadotrophin preparations have been developed, containing less luteinizing hormone (LH) activity than human menopausal gonadotrophin. Normegon is a gonadotrophin preparation with a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/LH ratio of 3:1; Follegon and Metrodin-HP are purified FSH preparations. The aim of the present randomized study was to compare pharmaco-dynamics, -kinetics and local tolerance of these preparations after repeated s.c. administration. Thirty-six healthy female subjects were treated with Lyndiol contraceptive pills for 5 weeks to suppress endogenous gonadotrophin concentrations. After 3 weeks of Lyndiol treatment, 150 IU of Normegon, Follegon or Metrodin HP were administered once daily, s.c. for 7 days. Blood samples were collected once daily during the fourth and fifth weeks of the study and assayed for FSH and oestradiol. After the last gonadotrophin injection, blood samples were collected more frequently to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of FSH. During the fourth and fifth study weeks, daily ultrasound measurements of follicular growth were performed. Endogenous FSH and LH values were extremely suppressed during Lyndiol treatment. Serum FSH values showed similar patterns in the three groups. The maximum FSH concentration was reached 9-11 h post-injection, the terminal half-life was 43-47 h. The preparations were bioequivalent with respect to FSH immunoreactivity. The number of follicles tended to be larger after Normegon than after Follegon and Metrodin HP treatment, though this was not statistically significant. Serum oestradiol concentrations were significantly higher after Normegon treatment. In general, s.c injections were well tolerated. In conclusion, the three preparations were bioequivalent with respect to FSH immunoreactivity. Nevertheless, the biological activity of Normegon tended to be higher than that of Follegon and Metrodin HP in Lyndiol-suppressed women.