RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report one-year anatomical and functional real-world outcomes of treatment intensive neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients switched to faricimab DESIGN: Retrospective multi-centre cohort study SUBJECTS: Consecutive nAMD patients on 4-weekly treatment interval with either ranibizumab or aflibercept 2mg in the last three visits within a treat and extend protocol (high treatment burden) prior to switch to faricimab at Moorfields Eye Hospital between 5/9/2022- 5/12/2022. METHODS: Total number of nAMD patients switched to faricimab were identified from electronic medical records and those who met criteria of high treatment burden were included. Data collected included pre and post-switch visual acuity (VA), treatment intervals, length of follow-up, baseline macular morphology, changes in central subfield thickness (CST), macular fluid status and adverse events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: VA, CST, presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF) and injection intervals over one-year following switch to faricimab. RESULTS: A total of 130/ 286 (45.5%) eyes met inclusion criteria of being switched due to high treatment burden and 117 were included in analysis. Prior to switch to faricimab, these eyes received mean total number of injections of 33.4±19.6 over mean of 51.3±34.9 months. Mean number of injections in 12 months preceding switch was 10.1±1.6 and mean interval of the preceding three injections was 4.2±0.3 weeks. Mean VA, CST and percentage of patients with dry macula prior to switch were 66.0±11.9 ETDRS letters, 259.6±76.0µm and 18.3% respectively. Following switch, there was no statistical difference in mean VA after each visit and at 12 months. Mean CST statistically significantly reduced following the 3rd faricimab injection and at 12 months by 20.0µm (p=0.035) and 22.1µm (p=0.041) respectively. Mean treatment intervals increased to 6.9±2.3 weeks (p<0.005) at 12 months with 42.9% and 11.4% of patients being on ≥8 weekly and ≥12 weekly treatment intervals respectively. CONCLUSION: At 12 months, patients with nAMD with previous record of high treatment burden when switched to faricimab maintained visual acuities and improved anatomical outcomes on extended treatment intervals. Physician bias is inherent in these types of observational studies so a prospective randomised controlled trial is recommended to validate these findings.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the 1-year outcomes of treat-and-extend and pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimens with aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), by the means of visual acuity (VA), frequency of recurrence of polypoidal lesions and developed fibrosis, and the number of intravitreal injections, and thus to determine which one is preferable in the maintenance phase in PCV. METHODS: In our prospective study, only naive and previously untreated PCV patients were included. Initially one session of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and three monthly intravitreal injections of 2.0 mg aflibercept (IAIs) were applied in 38 eyes. After this loading phase, they were re-examined and 30 PCV eyes with no exudative phenomena were included in the study. They were divided in two groups; in the first one (16 patients) the PRN treatment modality of IAIs was applied, while in the second one (14 patients) the treat-and-extend regimen was applied. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, VA significantly improved in treat-and-extend group (logMAR BCVA 0.41 ± 0.15 vs 0.57 ± 0.24 at baseline, p = 0.044), while in the PRN group VA remained stable (logMAR BCVA 0.70 ± 0.36 vs 0.65 ± 0.18 at baseline, p = 0.61). During the maintenance phase, the patients of treat-and-extend group did not encounter development/progression of fibrosis or any recurrent episodes, whereas the patients of PRN group had significantly more recurrent episodes (0 vs 1.37 ± 0.5, p < 0.001) and the frequency of development/progression of fibrosis was significantly higher (0% vs 44%, p = 0.02). However, the treat-and-extend treatment regimen was accompanied by significantly more administered IAIs (6 ± 0 vs 5.13 ± 1.08, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: We highlighted the superiority of treat-and-extend regime with IAIs, which seems to yield better functional outcomes by preventing recurrence and subfoveal fibrosis, although a greater number of injections is required.