Cardiopulmonary bypass and renal cell carcinoma with level IV tumour thrombus: can deep hypothermic circulatory arrest limit perioperative mortality?

OBJECTIVE: • To review experience with nephrectomy/thrombectomy for a renal cell carcimoma (RCC) with a level IV tumour thrombus and to evaluate the benefit of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPBP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • A multi-institutional retrospective database was created to assess the outcomes of surgery for RCC and associated level IV tumour thrombus from 1983 to 2007. Patients were identified based on radiographic records/operative findings. • Only cases using CPBP were analysed. Clinicopathological and operative characteristics including use of DHCA were recorded. • Overall survival (OS) for all patients and by use of DHCA was assessed. Comparisons of clinical and operative characteristics by use of DHCA were performed. • A Cox regression model determined predictors of perioperative/in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: • In all, 63 patients underwent resection with CPBP; overall perioperative mortality was 22.2%. • There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics, operative duration, estimated blood loss, transfusions, and hospital stay by use of DHCA. • Perioperative mortality rate was lower in patients undergoing DHCA (8.3% vs 37.5%, P = 0.006). • The median OS was longer for the patients undergoing DHCA (15.8 vs 7.7 months); however, this failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.357). • On multivariate analysis, age of > 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 6.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-31.1, P = 0.015) and the use of DHCA (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.036-0.51, P = 0.003) were independent predictors of perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: • Radical nephrectomy and level IV tumour thrombectomy is associated with significant mortality. • The use of DHCA does not appear to adversely affect operative characteristics and may limit perioperative mortality. • Further prospective studies should be performed to confirm the benefit of DHCA.

Neoadjuvant targeted therapy and advanced kidney cancer: observations and implications for a new treatment paradigm.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate our early experience with neoadjuvant therapy (sunitinib or sorafenib) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), to explore the effect on both tumour biology and potential for downstaging advanced tumours, as systemic therapy for RCC has historically resulted in little if any primary tumour response, but recent experience with targeted therapy suggests otherwise. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The preliminary experience with neoadjuvant therapy for the surgical management of RCC was reviewed at two large referral centres. Several unique patients were identified who had a novel response to systemic therapy that altered the surgical strategy. RESULTS: Four patients who had targeted therapy before surgery are described and in whom there were effects on tumour biology not seen previously with chemotherapy and cytokine therapy. The selected patients who had neoadjuvant targeted therapy had shrinkage of a tumour thrombus in the inferior vena cava, nodal involvement, renal fossa recurrence and tumour within a solitary kidney. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of new molecular agents has revolutionized the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC. Responses to targeted therapy within the primary tumour, tumour thrombus, renal fossa recurrence, and lymph node metastases are novel findings not seen during treatment with immunotherapeutic-based strategies. This might be a signal for urological surgeons to re-evaluate the paradigm for the surgical management of advanced RCC. Potential applications are presented to encourage further investigations with targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting.