Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 181(5): 983-991, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31049932

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: All organ transplant populations are predisposed to increased rates of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC). Since this increased risk was first appreciated, immunosuppressive regimens have changed and organ transplant recipients (OTRs) have been aggressively screened for KC. There is a perception that these measures have impacted on KC incidence but there is a paucity of population-based studies on post-transplant rates of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). OBJECTIVES: To identify trends in incidence rates for KC following solid organ transplantation over the past two decades. METHODS: This nationwide, population-based study included all solid OTRs transplanted between 1994 and 2014. Patient data were matched to national cancer registry data to determine the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of KC in solid OTRs compared with the general population. RESULTS: In total 3580 solid OTRs were included. The total follow-up time was 28 407 person-years (median follow-up 7·11 years). The overall SIRs for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and BCC were 19·7 and 7·0, respectively. Our study documents a progressive fall in the SIRs for SCC and BCC from peak SIRs (95% confidence intervals) in 1994-1996 of 26·4 (21·5-32·4) and 9·1 (7·4-11·3) to 6·3 (2·3-16·7) and 3·2 (1·4-7·1) in 2012-2014, respectively. The ratio of SCC to BCC has remained at 3 to 1 over the last two decades. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to demonstrate a significant reduction over the past two decades in the incidences of both SCC and BCC following solid organ transplantation. The SCC-to-BCC ratio was maintained, demonstrating that both are reducing equally. This trend coincided with temporal changes in immunosuppressive protocols and the introduction of skin cancer prevention programmes. What's already known about this topic? Prior studies have shown that the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has declined over recent decades following solid organ transplantation. It is not known whether the risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has reduced in line with this. What does this study add? Our study documents a progressive fall in the risk of SCC and BCC following solid organ transplantation over the last two decades. The SCC-to-BCC ratio was maintained, demonstrating that both are reducing equally. The trends observed in our study coincided with temporal changes in immunosuppressive protocols and the introduction of cancer prevention programmes, suggesting that these factors have positively impacted on the risk of keratinocyte carcinoma in this cohort.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Basocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/prevención & control , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Incidencia , Lactante , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
4.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(4): 686-691, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27790753

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fumaric acid esters (FAE) have been used for over 30 years in the management of psoriasis. There have been a number of case reports linking the use of FAE with nephrotoxicity, including acute renal injury and Fanconi syndrome. However, one large multicentre retrospective trial showed no evidence of renal dysfunction with FAE. OBJECTIVES/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the number of patients in our institution being treated with FAE who developed significant proteinuria or renal dysfunction. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study assessing all patients on FAE who attended for follow-up during an 18-week period between February and June 2015. Demographics, comorbidities, duration and dose of treatment with FAE, proteinuria, renal function and other biochemical serum abnormalities were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included in the study. Eighty-two patients had proteinuria detected at some stage during treatment with FAE, and 18 of these had persistent proteinuria (positive in at least three consecutive specimens, 12 weeks apart). Six patients (five female) developed proximal tubular dysfunction (PTD). The risk factors for the development of PTD appear to be lower bodyweight (P = 0.03), higher dose per weight (P = 0.03) and longer duration of treatment (P = 0.03). Renal dysfunction improved on discontinuation or dose reduction in FAE. CONCLUSION: Fumaric acid esters are frequently associated with transient or persistent proteinuria. Significant renal dysfunction is rare and usually reversible on dose reduction or discontinuation of FAE. This study highlights the importance of screening for proteinuria. Higher doses per weight of treatment and longer duration of FAE therapy are likely risk factors for PTD.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Fanconi/inducido químicamente , Fumaratos/efectos adversos , Proteinuria/inducido químicamente , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Peso Corporal , Creatinina/sangre , Creatinina/orina , Estudios Transversales , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Síndrome de Fanconi/fisiopatología , Femenino , Fumaratos/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteinuria/orina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
5.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(6): 978-985, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28045204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Concurrently, paediatric IBD incidence is rising, with more patients now exposed to immunomodulators from a younger age. OBJECTIVES: To investigate NMSC incidence and to examine the risk associated with immunomodulators in the development of NMSC in patients with IBD. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Patients with IBD attending a tertiary adult hospital from 1994 to 2013 were included. Skin cancer incidence was compared with population data from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI) to calculate standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Logistic regression was utilized for risk factor analysis. RESULTS: Two thousand and fifty-three patients with IBD were studied. The SIR for NMSC in patients with IBD taking immunomodulators overall was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.0-2.7) with age-specific rates significantly elevated across certain age categories. Exposure to thiopurines (OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 2.15-12.93, P < 0.001) and in particular thiopurines and/or tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (OR: 6.45, 95% CI: 2.69-15.95, P < 0.001) was significantly associated with NMSC. The majority (82%) of those exposed to a TNF-α inhibitor also had thiopurine exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with skin cancer preventative measures should be highlighted to all patients with IBD. There should be a low threshold for dermatology referral for immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with a history of exposure to dual immunomodulators from a young age.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Melanoma/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Melanoma/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Br J Dermatol ; 171(2): 397-402, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24471408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) have been used for over 30 years in the management of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine drug survival of FAEs in patients with psoriasis, treatment-limiting adverse drug events and the range of effective drug doses. METHODS: A retrospective, single-centre study assessing all patients commenced on FAEs between October 2003 and July 2012. Demographic data, length of treatment, reasons for discontinuation of FAEs, side-effects and range of doses were recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-nine patients [160 (64%) male] were included. The mean age at which FAEs were commenced was 44·5 years (range 17-82 years). The mean length of treatment was 28 months (range 1 week to 106 months). In patients who were commenced on FAEs ≥ 4 years before inclusion in this study, the 4-year drug survival was 60% (64/107). FAEs were discontinued in 146/249 patients (59%); this was due to lack of efficacy in 59/146 (40%) and gastrointestinal upset in 39/146 (27%). A very low dose of FAEs (< 240 mg daily) was successful in maintaining control of psoriasis in 26 (10%) patients. The mean treatment duration of these patients was 64 months (range 32-106 months). CONCLUSIONS: Fumaric acid esters have a 4-year drug survival rate of 60%, which compares favourably with reported 4-year survival rates of 40% for etanercept and adalimumab and 70% for infliximab. Longer drug survival is more likely in the significant subgroup of patients in whom a very low dose of FAEs is sufficient to control disease. The reasons for this are unclear.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fumaratos/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Esquema de Medicación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
9.
Br J Dermatol ; 169(6): 1319-21, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24032395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) prior to the commencement of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-α therapies for dermatological disease is recommended for all patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of HCV infection among dermatology patients who were screened for HCV infection prior to commencing anti-TNF-α therapies. METHODS: We reviewed the HCV infection status of all patients attending our dermatology department who had been tested for evidence of HCV infection between January 2005 and November 2012. We identified patients who had been tested as part of routine screening prior to commencing anti-TNF-α therapy using dermatology departmental records. RESULTS: In total, 215 patients were screened for HCV infection prior to commencing anti-TNF-α therapies. Among this group, 143 patients (66·5%) were male and 72 (33·5%) were female. None of these patients tested positive for active HCV infection. One patient tested positive for HCV antibody with negative HCV antigen and HCV RNA. This indicated previous HCV infection that had cleared. This patient had abnormal liver function tests and a history of alcohol excess. CONCLUSIONS: There were no cases of active HCV infection diagnosed through pretreatment anti-TNF-α screening in our department, which is located in a low-prevalence area for HCV infection. In view of the lack of evidence of harm associated with anti-TNF-α use in HCV-infected patients, we propose that screening for HCV infection in low-prevalence areas should be targeted to those with pre-existing risk factors. This is consistent with current guidelines from the Royal College of General Practitioners. Targeted screening rather than universal screening may be a safe and cost-effective option among patients being evaluated for anti-TNF-α therapies.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
15.
Skin Health Dis ; 2(3): e97, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941939

RESUMEN

Targeted ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy has been used in the management of a wide variety of dermatological clinical conditions including moderate to severe psoriasis unresponsive to topical therapies, vitiligo, severe atopic dermatitis and lymphoproliferative disorders. To date there are no uniform, standardised guidelines for the selection and decontamination process for UV personal protective equipment (PPE) and facial shields used in phototherapy. In the current climate, Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, standards regarding all decontamination and disinfection processes are under significant scrutiny. In terms of the UV-PPE and facial shields used in phototherapy, careful disinfection procedures need to be implemented to ensure that the decontamination practice is effective enough to neutralise the virulent virus whilst maintaining maximal protection to the user from UV-rays and safeguard the equipment from damage during the cleaning process. The aim of this report is to provide an evidence based review of the current and international practice standards guiding the selection, use and decontamination processes of UV facial shields in phototherapy. The complications and concerns that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on this practice is highlighted. As such, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the literature to provide recommendations as to the most effective, time efficient and safest practices for disinfection and decontamination of UV facial shields used in phototherapy during these unprecedented times.

16.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 25(4): 462-70, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20738465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The burden of malignant and benign cutaneous disease among renal transplant recipients (RTR) is substantial. Little attention is given to non-malignant skin problems in the literature despite their potential impact on quality of life or on aesthetics - which may contribute to poor compliance with immunosuppressive medications post-transplantation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine prevalence of benign cutaneous disease in a group of RTRs and identify risk factors for individual cutaneous conditions. METHODS: All cutaneous findings were recorded in a single full body skin examination of 308 RTRs. Data on medical, transplant and medication history were obtained from questionnaire and medical records. Odds ratios were calculated to look at associations between benign cutaneous diseases and various potential risk factors after controlling for gender, age, time since transplantation and skin type. RESULTS: Cutaneous infections such as viral warts (38%), fungal infection (18%) and folliculitis (27%) were common and usually chronic. A range of pilosebaceous unit disorders were observed with hypertrichosis being strongly associated with ciclosporin (P<0.0001). Other iatrogenic cutaneous effects included gingival hyperplasia (27%) and purpura (41%). We identified seborrhoeic warts and skin tags in 55% and 33% respectively. Inflammatory dermatoses were rare (<2%) apart from seborrhoeic dermatitis (9.5%). DISCUSSION: In this first comprehensive study on prevalence of benign cutaneous diseases in a UK transplant population, a wide range of skin disorders was identified. It is therefore important that RTRs have access to dermatology services post-transplantation for appropriate management of benign cutaneous conditions as well as early detection of cutaneous malignancy and education regarding risks of sun exposure.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Adulto , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 24(5): 561-4, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19888944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seborrheic dermatitis is an inflammatory dermatosis with a prevalence of 1-3% in the general population. It is recognized more commonly in those infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). No studies have looked at Seborrheic dermatitis in the context of immunosuppression secondary to organ transplantation. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of Seborrheic dermatitis in a renal transplant population and characteristics of those affected. METHODS: A prospective study of 308 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) was carried out. All participants were examined for Seborrheic dermatitis. Descriptive statistics were employed and associations with Seborrheic dermatitis were examined using Fisher's exact test to calculate P-exact values, and Student's t-test was used to compare mean ages and time since transplantation. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 14.0 for Windows. RESULTS: Seborrheic dermatitis was identified in 29/308 (9.5%) patients and was more common in males (P-exact = 0.004) and in those who had been transplanted for longer (P = 0.02). The disease was mild-moderate severity in the majority but an unusual flexural appearance was recorded in 7/29 patients. Seborrheic dermatitis was less likely in those taking prednisolone (P-exact = 0.006) or tacrolimus (P-exact = 0.008). Seborrheic dermatitis was significantly associated with cutaneous malignancy, in particular squamous cell carcinoma (P-exact < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Seborrheic dermatitis is more common than other inflammatory dermatoses in immunosuppressed RTRs, but is not as frequent as in those immunosuppressed secondary to HIV. Degree and duration of exposure to immunosuppression and increased colonization with Malassezia yeast genus are likely be important in the aetiology of Seborrheic dermatitis in RTRs. Further studies are required to clarify this.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 24(3): 302-7, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19732252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have a well recognized increased risk of cutaneous malignancy. A clinical observation that RTR with skin cancer often had multiple seborrhoeic warts prompted an investigation in RTR into the relationship between seborrhoeic warts and skin cancer and an exploration into potential risk factors for seborrhoeic warts in this population, including infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS: This was a case control study involving 308 RTR. Clinical examinations identified seborrhoeic warts. Histological records reviewed to look for evidence of prior cutaneous malignancy. Seroprevalence of antibodies to 34 different HPV types tested using multiplex serology. Odds ratios (OR) calculated using unconditional logistic regression analysis to look for associations between skin cancer, HPV infection and seborrhoeic warts, controlling for potential confounding factors of gender, age and time since transplantation. RESULTS: Seborrhoeic warts were associated with non-melanoma skin cancer [OR = 3.7; 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from 1.6-8.9; P = 0.002] when confounding factors of gender, age and time since transplantation were controlled for. There was also an association between seborrhoeic warts and viral warts (OR = 3.0, CI: 1.6-5.4; P < 0.0001), but no association between seborrhoeic warts and infection with single or multiple HPV types. CONCLUSIONS: Seborrhoeic warts are associated with cutaneous malignancy, but not with any of the HPV types tested. The reasons for this association are unclear. RTR with multiple seborrhoeic warts may require more regular cutaneous examination to monitor for early signs of skin cancer.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Seborreica/complicaciones , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Verrugas/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Intervalos de Confianza , Dermatitis Seborreica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Papillomaviridae/genética , Papillomaviridae/inmunología , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Verrugas/epidemiología , Verrugas/patología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA