Pediatric Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: A Translational Perspective for the Clinician-Scientist.

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a rare and potentially lethal inherited arrhythmia disease characterized by exercise or emotion-induced bidirectional or polymorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The median age of disease onset is reported to be approximately 10 years of age. The majority of CPVT patients have pathogenic variants in the gene encoding the cardiac ryanodine receptor, or calsequestrin 2. These lead to mishandling of calcium in cardiomyocytes resulting in after-depolarizations, and ventricular arrhythmias. Disease severity is particularly pronounced in younger individuals who usually present with cardiac arrest and arrhythmic syncope. Risk stratification is imprecise and long-term prognosis on therapy is unknown despite decades of research focused on pediatric CPVT populations. The purpose of this review is to summarize contemporary data on pediatric CPVT, highlight knowledge gaps and present future research directions for the clinician-scientist to address.

An international multicenter cohort study on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the treatment of symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without an ICD. METHODS: We compared the risk of SCD in patients with RYR2 (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without an ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope. RESULTS: The study included 235 patients, 73 with an ICD (31.1%) and 162 without an ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3-13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40-10.09; P < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50-4.34; P = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications. CONCLUSION: SCD events occurred only in patients without an ICD and mostly in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with an ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.

Medical Management of Infants With Supraventricular Tachycardia: Results From a Registry and Review of the Literature.

Background: Several medication choices are available for acute and prophylactic treatment of refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in infants. There are almost no controlled trials, and medication choices are not necessarily evidence based. Our objective was to report the effectiveness of management strategies for infant SVT. Methods: A registry of infants admitted to hospital with re-entrant SVT and no haemodynamically significant heart disease were prospectively followed at 11 international tertiary care centres. In addition, a systematic review of studies on infant re-entrant SVT in MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. Data on demographics, symptoms, acute and maintenance treatments, and outcomes were collected. Results: A total of 2534 infants were included: n = 108 from the registry (median age, 9 days [0-324 days], 70.8% male) and n = 2426 from the literature review (median age, 14 days; 62.3% male). Propranolol was the most prevalent acute (61.4%) and maintenance treatment (53.8%) in the Registry, whereas digoxin was used sparingly (4.0% and 3.8%, respectively). Propranolol and digoxin were used frequently in the literature acutely (31% and 33.2%) and for maintenance (17.8% and 10.1%) (P < 0.001). No differences in acute or prophylactic effectiveness between medications were observed. Recurrence was higher in the Registry (25.0%) vs literature (13.4%) (P < 0.001), and 22 (0.9%) deaths were reported in the literature vs none in the Registry. Conclusion: This was the largest cohort of infants with SVT analysed to date. Digoxin monotherapy use was rare amongst contemporary paediatric cardiologists. There was limited evidence to support one medication over another. Overall, recurrence and mortality rates on antiarrhythmic treatment were low.

Contexte: De nombreux choix de médicaments existent pour le traitement aigu et prophylactique de la tachycardie supraventriculaire (TSV) réfractaire chez les nourrissons. Or, il n'y a presque pas d'essais contrôlés à ce sujet, et les choix de médicaments ne sont pas nécessairement fondés sur des données probantes. Notre objectif était de faire état de l'efficacité des stratégies de prise en charge de la TSV chez les nourrissons. Méthodologie: Un registre des nourrissons admis à l'hôpital pour une TSV par réentrée, sans cardiopathie d'importance hémodynamique, a été tenu de façon prospective dans 11 centres de soins tertiaires à l'échelle mondiale. De plus, une revue systématique des études sur la TSV par réentrée chez le nourrisson a été effectuée dans MEDLINE et EMBASE. Des données sur les caractéristiques démographiques, les symptômes, les traitements aigus et d'entretien, et les résultats ont été recueillis. Résultats: Un total de 2 534 nourrissons ont été inclus : n = 108 du registre (âge médian de 9 jours [0-324 jours], 70,8 % de sexe masculin) et n = 2 426 de la revue de la littérature (âge médian de 14 jours; 62,3 % de sexe masculin). Le propranolol était le traitement de soins aigus (61,4 %) et d'entretien (53,8 %) le plus fréquent dans le registre, alors que la digoxine a été utilisée occasionnellement (respectivement dans 4,0 % et 3,8 % des cas). Dans la littérature, le propranolol et la digoxine étaient fréquemment utilisés en soins aigus (31 % et 33,2 %) et en traitement d'entretien (17,8 % et 10,1 %) (p < 0,001). Aucune différence n'a été observée entre les médicaments au chapitre de l'efficacité du traitement de soins aigus ou du traitement prophylactique. Le taux de récurrence était plus élevé dans le registre (25,0 %) que dans la littérature (13,4 %) (p < 0,001), et 22 (0,9 %) décès ont été signalés dans la littérature, mais aucun dans le registre. Conclusion: Il s'agit de la plus grande cohorte de nourrissons atteints de TSV analysée à ce jour. De nos jours, les cardiologues pédiatriques prescrivent rarement la digoxine en monothérapie. Peu de données probantes favorisent l'utilisation d'un médicament par rapport à l'autre. Dans l'ensemble, les taux de récurrence et de mortalité sous traitement antiarythmique étaient faibles.