RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignancy in children. Although new chemotherapeutic approaches have improved ocular salvage rates, novel therapies are required for patients with refractory intraocular and metastatic disease. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells targeting glypican-2 (GPC2) are a potential new therapeutic strategy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: GPC2 expression and its regulation by the E2F1 transcription factor were studied in retinoblastoma patient samples and cellular models. In vitro, we performed functional studies comparing GPC2 CAR T-cells with different co-stimulatory domains (4-1BB and CD28). In vivo, the efficacy of local and systemic administration of GPC2 CAR T-cells were evaluated in intraocular and leptomeningeal human retinoblastoma xenograft models. RESULTS: Retinoblastoma tumors, but not healthy retinal tissues, expressed cell surface GPC2 and this tumor-specific expression was driven by E2F1. GPC2-directed CARs with 4-1BB co-stimulation (GPC2.BBz) were superior to CARs with CD28 stimulatory domains (GPC2.28z), efficiently inducing retinoblastoma cell cytotoxicity and enhancing T-cell proliferation and polyfunctionality. In vivo, GPC2.BBz CARs had enhanced persistence that led to significant tumor regression compared to either control CD19 or GPC2.28z CARs. In intraocular models, GPC2.BBz CAR T-cells efficiently trafficked to tumor-bearing eyes after intravitreal or systemic infusions, significantly prolonging ocular survival. In central nervous system (CNS) retinoblastoma models, intraventricular or systemically administered GPC2.BBz CAR T-cells were activated in retinoblastoma-involved CNS tissues, resulting in robust tumor regression with substantially extended overall mouse survival. CONCLUSIONS: GPC2-directed CAR T-cells are effective against intraocular and CNS metastatic retinoblastomas.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the prevalence of high-risk histopathologic features (HRFs) in patients with unilateral retinoblastoma who undergo enucleation and to evaluate the role of chemotherapy in preventing recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children newly diagnosed with enucleated unilateral retinoblastoma were enrolled prospectively. After central histopathology review, patients with specific HRFs received chemotherapy; others were observed. Primary end points were event-free survivals (EFS). RESULTS: Of the 331 patients enrolled during 2005 to 2010, 321 eligible patients had central histopathologic review. Discordance between central review and contributing institutions occurred in 23% of patients with HRFs and in 17% of patients without HRFs. Postlaminar optic nerve involvement was present in 53 patients; 42 had massive posterior uveal invasion (≥ 3 mm); 15 had concomitant peripapillary 3 mm or greater choroid and postlaminar optic nerve involvement; and 15 had focal (< 3 mm) choroidal concomitant with lamina or prelamina optic nerve involvement. Two-year EFS for patients with HRFs requiring adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.98), and 2-year EFS for patients without HRFs for which observation was indicated was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.0). The 2-year EFS for all patients was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: Adequate handling and interpretation of histopathology of eyes with retinoblastoma is necessary to assign metastatic risk. Concomitant less than 3 mm choroidal and any prelaminar/laminar optic nerve invasion show no recurrence and may warrant no adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, concomitant greater than 3 mm peripapillary choroidal invasion and 1.5 mm or greater of postlaminar optic nerve invasion have the poorest outcomes, supporting the need for a more intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for this subgroup. Strict criteria for adjuvant therapy may improve outcomes of children who undergo enucleation at diagnosis and may avoid unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy for those who are not at risk for recurrence.