Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 38(3): E177-E185, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730992

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity scales for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury (TBI) include the 5-component modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), the 11-component modified Frailty Index (mFI-11), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes in TBI of mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) was utilized to study patients with isolated TBI for the years of 2017 and 2018. After controlling for age and injury severity, individual multivariable logistic regressions were conducted with each of the 3 scales (mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI) against predefined outcomes, including any complication, home discharge, facility discharge, and mortality. RESULTS: All 3 scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency throughout their individual components (0.63 for mFI-5, 0.60 for CCI, and 0.56 for mFI-11). Almost all studied complications were significantly more likely in frail patients. mFI-5 and mFI-11 had similar areas under the curve (AUC) for all outcomes, while CCI had lower AUCs (0.62-0.61-0.53 for any complication, 0.72-0.72-0.52 for home discharge, 0.78-0.78-0.53 for facility discharge, and 0.71-0.70-0.52 for mortality, respectively). CONCLUSION: mFI-5 and mFI-11 demonstrated similar accuracy in predicting any complication, home discharge, facility discharge, and mortality in TBI patients across the NTDB. In addition, CCI's performance was poor for the aforementioned metrics. Since mFI-5 is simpler, yet as accurate as the 2 other scales, it may be the most practical both for clinical practice and for future studies with the NTDB.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Fragilidad , Humanos , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Alta del Paciente , Comorbilidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
J Emerg Med ; 22(1): 9-13, 2002 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11809550

RESUMEN

We performed a structured retrospective chart review to describe clinical characteristics of Emergency Department (ED) patients diagnosed by history, physical examination, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with epiploic appendagitis (EA). EA is a disease caused by inflammation of the appendix epiploica, subserosal adipose tissue along the colon. It may mimic surgical causes of acute abdominal pain, but is treated conservatively with pain management. There were 19 patients diagnosed with EA, with follow-up performed on 85%. All had focal, nonmigratory symptoms. Common findings included left lower quadrant pain and guarding, and a normal temperature and white cell count. No patient required operation. This preliminary work characterizes some common clinical features of ED patients diagnosed with EA. As use of emergency CT scan for abdominal pain increases, clinicians will encounter this more often. These features should also prompt the clinician to consider CT scan in patients with similar signs and symptoms. Accurate diagnosis may avoid unnecessary surgery.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Tejido Adiposo , Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Adulto , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Peritoneales/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA