Postoperative radiotherapy may not be necessary for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a case-match multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Some head and neck cancer surgeons found that many patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) also have a good prognosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PORT on survival in patients with LA-HNSCC. METHODS: A case-match cohort analysis was performed at two institutions on patients with LA-HNSCC. Patients who received surgery alone were case-matched 1: 1 with patients treated by surgery plus PORT based on pT, pN, tumor subsite etc. RESULTS: 114 patients were matched into 57 pairs, with a median follow-up period of 40.2 months. No difference in overall survival (OS, HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.50-1.58; P = 0.79) or disease-specific survival (DFS, 0.86; 95% CI 0.50-1.50; P = 0.76) was observed with no PORT. CONCLUSIONS: PORT isn't necessary for patients with LA-HNSCC who are treated for the first time as long as the head and neck cancer surgeon adhere to appropriate surgical concepts. The indications of PORT for patients with LA-HNSCC need to be further discussed.

Prediction of Flap Compromise by Preoperative Coagulation Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Studies on coagulation parameters (including activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen [FIB], platelet count, and D-dimer) in flap compromise are limited. The aim of the present study was to compare coagulation parameter variables in patients with and without flap compromise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Second Xiangya Hospital (Changsha, Hunan, China) from July 2016 through July 2017. The primary predictor variable was a set of coagulation parameters. The primary outcome variable was flap compromise. The other variables were age, gender, tumor stage, smoking, and prior radiotherapy. Descriptive, bivariate, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and regression statistics were computed. Statistical significance was set at less than .05 with 95% reliability. RESULTS: A total of 503 patients with 42 compromised flaps were identified in this study. Venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, or no confirmed reason for compromise was observed in 28, 5, or 9 compromised flaps, respectively. Only FIB was associated with flap compromise or venous thrombosis at adjusted analyses, although the predictive values were low at ROC analysis. For patients with D-dimer lower than 0.4 µg/mL, the likelihood of venous thrombosis was greater than that for patients with D-dimer of at least 0.4 µg/mL (P = .0414). For patients with FIB lower than 3.5 g/L, the likelihood of venous thrombosis was greater than that for patients with FIB of at least 3.5 g/L (P = .0336). CONCLUSION: Decreased FIB was associated with a higher rate of flap compromise. In patients with D-dimer lower than 0.4 µg/mL or FIB lower than 3.5 g/L, the risk of venous thrombosis was higher.