The role of surgery in weaning patients from home parenteral support - A cohort study.

AIM: Some patients with intestinal failure requiring home parenteral support (HPS) may be weaned. This study considered all abdominal surgery in a cohort of HPS patients over a 25-year period. Our aim was to identify how many patients can be weaned from HPS and by what means, and to identify what makes weaning more likely. METHOD: A prospectively collected database of HPS patients to December 2018 was analysed for outcomes of care. RESULTS: At 5 years 56% of 205 patients remained on HPS. Fifty eight patients (28%), who had 68 operations, stopped HPS after surgery. Patients stopping HPS had a longer median final small bowel length (155 cm, range 45-350 cm) and were more likely to have colon in circuit (84%) than patients who had reconstructive surgery but did not stop HPS (median small bowel length 50 cm, range 15-135 cm; 50% colon in circuit). The median period between HPS discharge and reconstructive surgery was 238 days. There were no deaths, but 18 Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications occurred within 30 days. Ninety per cent of patients who stopped HPS survived for 5 years from the start of HPS in comparison with 53% of those who remained on HPS. CONCLUSIONS: No previous study has examined surgery in an entire cohort of HPS patients. More than a quarter of HPS patients can be weaned after reconstructive surgery. The length of bowel available for recruitment at surgery is the main determinant of the ability to stop HPS. The possibility of reconstruction should be considered, since patients who stop HPS appear to have a survival advantage.

Analysis of lesion localisation at colonoscopy: outcomes from a multi-centre U.K. study.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is currently the gold standard for detection of colorectal lesions, but may be limited in anatomically localising lesions. This audit aimed to determine the accuracy of colonoscopy lesion localisation, any subsequent changes in surgical management and any potentially influencing factors. METHODS: Patients undergoing colonoscopy prior to elective curative surgery for colorectal lesion/s were included from 8 registered U.K. sites (2012-2014). Three sets of data were recorded: patient factors (age, sex, BMI, screener vs. symptomatic, previous abdominal surgery); colonoscopy factors (caecal intubation, scope guide used, colonoscopist accreditation) and imaging modality. Lesion localisation was standardised with intra-operative location taken as the gold standard. Changes to surgical management were recorded. RESULTS: 364 cases were included; majority of lesions were colonic, solitary, malignant and in symptomatic referrals. 82% patients had their lesion/s correctly located at colonoscopy. Pre-operative CT visualised lesion/s in only 73% of cases with a reduction in screening patients (64 vs. 77%; p = 0.008). 5.2% incorrectly located cases at colonoscopy underwent altered surgical management, including conversion to open. Univariate analysis found colonoscopy accreditation, scope guide use, incomplete colonoscopy and previous abdominal surgery significantly influenced lesion localisation. On multi-variate analysis, caecal intubation and scope guide use remained significant (HR 0.35, 0.20-0.60 95% CI and 0.47; 0.25-0.88, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lesion localisation at colonoscopy is incorrect in 18% of cases leading to potentially significant surgical management alterations. As part of accreditation, colonoscopists need lesion localisation training and awareness of when inaccuracies can occur.

The revised ACPGBI model is a simple and accurate predictor of operative mortality after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) risk-adjustment model for colorectal cancer surgery has been recently revised. The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of the revised ACPGBI model, the original ACPGBI model, P-POSSUM, and CR-POSSUM, in the prediction of operative mortality after resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 423 patients who underwent potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer at a single institution (1997-2007) were included. Data used in the construction of the ACPGBI model was collected prospectively. The models were compared by examining observed to expected (O:E) ratios, the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 4%. The performance of the models was as follows: revised ACPGBI model (O:E ratio = 1.05, AUC = 0.73, H-L = 11.02), original ACPGBI model (O:E ratio = 0.58, AUC = 0.76, H-L = 14.23), P-POSSUM (O:E ratio = 0.87, AUC = 0.79, H-L = 10.63), and CR-POSSUM (O:E ratio = 0.63, AUC = 0.84, H-L = 15.84). In subgroup analysis, the revised ACPGBI model performed well in both elective cases (O:E ratio = 1.06) and emergency cases (O:E ratio = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The revised ACPGBI model is simple to construct and accurately predicts operative mortality after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Changes in adult home parenteral nutrition practice over 25 years.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) is the established treatment of intestinal failure. This study considers the changes in practice in a single UK centre over the past twenty-five years. METHODS: Data was culled from a database used for clinical care and maintained prospectively. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were included from 1993 to 2018. Patient numbers increased from 22 during 1999-2003 to 158 during 2014-2018. The median age at discharge increased from 52 years during 1999-2003 to 59 years during 2014-2018. Thirty percent of patients discharged during 1999-2003 had Crohn's disease, reducing to 14% during 2014-2018. Fifteen percent of patients discharged during 1999-2003 had small bowel fistula or obstruction in comparison to 44% during 2014-2018. Only 18 patients were treated with palliative intent, the majority in recent years. An increasing number of patients required help with HPN care over the years. Survival in non-palliative patients was 85% at 1 year, 67% at 3 years, 53% at 5 years and 42% at 10 years. The majority of deaths were due to underlying disease and only 5 of 55 deaths were attributed to HPN alone. HPN dependence in non-palliative patients was 73% at 1 year, 59% at 3 years, 56% at 5 years and 43% at 10 years. Fifty eight patients stopped HPN after reconstructive surgery. Patients experienced 5.1 admissions/1000 HPN days (64.7 admission days/1000 HPN days). Admission rate did not change over the years though the percentage due to catheter problems fell from 52% to 40% while the percentage due to underlying disease or unrelated cause rose. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in numbers, age and dependency of HPN patients requires increasing resource and consideration of new models of service. Many patients with short bowel syndrome now survive to old age and the care needs of the HPN patient who has become elderly can be complex. A significant proportion of patients are being referred for HPN as a bridge to reconstructive surgery after surgical complication and this requires close involvement of gastrointestinal surgeons in HPN teams. The need for hospital admissions remains a burden for HPN patients and there is scope for changes in service provision to try to reduce hospital days.

Relationship between emergency presentation, systemic inflammatory response, and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Emergency presentation is recognized to be associated with poorer cancer-specific survival following curative resection for colorectal cancer. The present study examined the hypothesis that an enhanced systemic inflammatory response, prior to surgery, might explain the impact of emergency presentation on survival. METHODS: In all, 188 patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer were studied. Of these, 55 (29%) presented as emergencies. The systemic inflammatory response was assessed using the Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), which is the combination of an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L). RESULTS: In the emergency group, tumor stage was greater (P < 0.01), more patients received adjuvant therapy (P < 0.01) more patients had an elevated mGPS (P < 0.01), and more patients died of their disease (P < 0.05). The minimum follow-up was 12 months; the median follow-up of the survivors was 48 months. Emergency presentation was associated with poorer 3-year cancer-specific survival in those patients aged 65 to 74 years (P < 0.01), in both males and females (P < 0.05), in the deprived (P < 0.01), in patients with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage II disease (P < 0.01), in those who received no adjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), and in the mGPS 0 and 1 groups (P < 0.05) groups. On multivariate survival analysis of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for TNM stage II colon cancer, emergency presentation (P < 0.05) and mGPS (P < 0.05) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that emergency presentation and the presence of systemic inflammatory response prior to surgery are linked and account for poorer cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colon cancer. Both emergency presentation and an elevated mGPS should be taken into account when assessing the likely outcome of these patients.