Fluoxetine bioequivalence study: quantification of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

In this study, the authors assessed the bioequivalence of two fluoxetine tablet formulations in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single 20 mg dose of each fluoxetine formulation, and a new sensitive method for the quantification of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in human plasma was developed. The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 4-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained over a 672-hour period. Plasma fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations were analyzed by combined liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using selected ion recording (SIR). Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test, histograms, probit plots, and the correlation between norfluoxetine AUC(0-infinity) and fluoxetine AUC(0-infinity) were used to analyze the population distribution. The limit of quantification was 0.15 ng.ml-1 and 0.50 ng.ml-1 for both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, respectively. Within- and between-run imprecision was less than 13% and 17%, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine after the administration of each formulation included AUC(0-672 h), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Cmax/AUC(0-672 h), tmax, t1/2, and Ke. The AUC values for fluoxetine were not consistent with a normal distribution, reflecting the existence of two different populations (poor and extensive metabolizers). The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for extensive fluoxetine metabolizers were 27.0 ng ml-1 for Cmax, 2064.0 ng h ml-1 for AUC(0-infinity), and 85.4 h t1/2. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for norfluoxetine (in extensive metabolizers only) were 2532.0 ng h ml-1 for AUC(0-infinity) and 8.4 ng ml-1 for Cmax. For fluoxetine bioequivalence, the 90% CI of the individual ratio geometric mean for Psiquial/Prozac (including both extensive and poor metabolizers) was 101.6% to 121.1% for AUC(0-672 h) and 86.1% to 102.6% for Cmax. For norfluoxetine, the 90% CI of the individual ratio geometric mean for Psiquial/Prozac (including both extensive and poor metabolizers) was 90.3% to 108.3% for AUC(0-672 h) and 84.5% to 106.3% for Cmax. The new method developed (LC-MS) presented high sensitivity, specificity, and short chromatographic run for the quantification of both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in human plasma. Since both 90% CI for AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios were included in the 80% to 125% interval proposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Psiquial was considered bioequivalent to Prozac according to both the rate and extent of absorption. The finding that there were no significant differences in the bioequivalence assessed by either fluoxetine or norfluoxetine pharmacokinetic parameters indicates that future bioequivalence trials may be performed by quantifying fluoxetine only.

Clarithromycin bioequivalence study of two oral formulations in healthy human volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of clarithromycin (Clamicin 500 mg from Medley Indlistria Farmaceutica, Brazil, as the test formulation, and Biaxin 500 mg from Abbott Industries, USA, as the reference formulation). METHODS: A single 500 mg oral dose of each formulation was administrated in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes (12 males and 12 females). The study was conducted open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 7-day interval between doses. The plasma concentrations of clarithromycin were quantified by reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method. 14-hydroxyclarithromycin concentration was estimated semiquantitatively as equivalent of clarithromycin/ml. The precision of the method was evaluated using calibration curves and plasma quality control samples. The pharmacokinetic parameters calculated for both compounds included: AUC(0 - 48h), AUC(0 - infinity), Cmax, Cmax/AUC(0 - 48h), Tmax, T1/2 and Ke. RESULTS: Standard curves of clarithromycin in plasma were linear in the range of 0.05 microg x ml(-1) to 10 microg x ml(-1) (r > 0.999). The limit of quantification was 5 ng/ml. Within- and between-run plasma quality control CV were 5.8% and 15.7%, respectively. Inaccuracy within- and between-runs were 14% and 17%, respectively. 90% CI for clarithromycin geometric mean AUC(0 - 48h), AUC(0 - infinity) and Cmax ratios (test/reference) were: 8.7% - 103.1%, 89.4% - 103.7% and 85.4% - 99.6%, respectively, and for hydroxyclarithomycin were 80.3% - 108.6%, 80.1% - 110.1% and 85.4% - 112.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The method described for the quantification of charithomycin and its main metabolite is accurate and sensitive. Clamicin was considered bio-equivalent to Biaxin based on the rate and extent of absorption. Since these were no significant differences in the bioequivalence determined using the pharmacokinetic parameters of either clarithromycin or 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, we suggest that future bioequivalence trials of this drug may be performed by quantifying clarithromycin only.

Comparative bioavailability of two sertraline tablet formulations in healthy human volunteers after a single dose administration.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of 2 sertraline tablets formulations (Tolrest from Laboratórios Biosintética, and Zoloft from Laboratórios Pfizer, Brazil) in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes (12 male and 12 female) who received a single 50 mg dose of each sertraline formulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted open with randomized two-period crossover design and a 14-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 96-hour interval and sertraline concentrations were analyzed by combined reversed phase liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using selected ion monitoring method. From the plasma sertraline concentration vs. time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUC(0-96h), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Cmax/AUC(0-96h), Tmax, ke, and t(1/2). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters presented normal distribution according to Probit' s plot and Kolmogorov Smirnov's test, and the variance of AUC(0-96h), AUC(0-infinity) or Cmax were homoscedastic. Geometric mean Tolrest/Zoloft individual percent ratio was 95.22% for AUC(0-96h), 99.87% for Cmax, 100.4% for AUC(0-infinity), 103.6% for Ke, 96.0% for t(1/2) and 93.7% for Tmax. CONCLUSION: Since the 90% CI for both Cmax and AUC(0-96h) mean ratio were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that Tolrest was bioequivalent to Zolof for both extent and rate of absorption in a single dose administration.

Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of bromazepam in healthy volunteers.

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of two bromazepam (CAS 1812-30-2) formulations in 24 healthy volunteers. An open, randomised clinical trial designed as two-period crossover with 14-day washout between doses was employed. Plasma samples for assessments of their bromazepam concentration by HPLC-UV were obtained over 96 h after administration. No adverse effect was reported for any of the formulations administered. The following pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated: AUC(0-96 h), AUCinf, Cmax, Tmax, Ke and T1/2. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the mean test/reference individual ratios were 81-109 for AUC and 84-116 for Cmax. Since the 90% CI for both, AUC and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it is concluded that the new bromazepam slow-release formulation is therapeutic equivalent to the conventional formulation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.

Comparative bioavailability of two fluconazole capsule formulations in healthy volunteers.

This work reports the bioavailability of two fluconazole (CAS 86386-73-4) capsule formulations in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single oral dose (150 mg). The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with two-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained up to 168 h after drug administration and fluconazole concentration were analyzed using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluconazole after the administration of each formulation included the area under the curve (AUC)(0-168 h), AUC(0-infinity), maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), elimination constant (Ke) and half-life (T1/2). The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test formulation/reference formulation were 97.18-108.60% for AUC0-168 h), 90.87-111.11% for AUC(0-infinity), 104.88-114.88% for Cmax 90.38-136.79% for Ke, 91.87-108.93% for T1/2 and (-)1.5-(-)0.10 for Tmax (for individual differences). Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% CI are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the test formulation (Zoltrix) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption after single dose administration.

Fluconazole bioequivalence study: quantification by tandem mass spectrometry.

To develop a new method for quantifying fluoconazole in human plasma and to compare the bioavailability of two fluconazole capsule formulations, an open, randomized, two-period crossover study with a one-week washout interval was conducted in 24 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were obtained up to 168 hours after drug administration and the serum fluconazole concentrations were analyzed using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography using multiple reaction monitoring mode. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluconazole after the administration of each formulation included the Area under the curve (AUC)(0-168h), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Cmax/AUC(0-168h), Tmax, elimination rate constant (Ke), and half-life (T1/2). Within- and between-run imprecision was less than 2.3% and 8.2%, respectively. Inaccuracy within and between runs was -1.5% and -9.7%, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters for bioequivalence showed a normal distribution, and the variance of AUC(0-168h), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax were homoscedastic. The geometric mean for the Fluconal/Zoltec (Fluconal; Libbs Farmacêutica Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil; Zoltec; Laboratórios Pfizer Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil) individual percent ratio was 94.9% for AUC(0-168h), 94.7% for AUC(0-infinity), 80.1% for Cmax, 102.6% for Ke, 97.5% for T1/2, and 0.93 for Tmax (arithmetic mean of individual differences). We have developed a method in which liquid chromatography is coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry to improve the pharmacokinetic analysis of fluconazole. Because the 90% CI AUC is within the interval proposed for the Food and Drug Administration, we concluded that Fluconal is bioequivalent to Zoltec in terms of absorption. The CV was 27.5% for the Cmax parameter, indicating that fluconazole's absorption rate is highly variable. The European Union Regulatory Agency accepts an interval of 70-143%, and because the 90% CI for Cmax is within the interval proposed for the European Union agency, we conclude that Fluconal is bioequivalent to Zoltec for the rate of absorption.

Comparative bioavailability of two different diclofenac formulations in healthy volunteers.

The aim of the study was to assess the bioequivalence of two different diclofenac (CAS 15307-86-5) formulations (diclofenac free acid suspension as test formulation and diclofenac resinate suspension, Cataflam, as reference formulation) in 24 healthy volunteers. After an overnight fast, the volunteers received a single oral dose (50 mg) of each formulation, following an open, randomized, two-period crossover design, with a fourteen-day washout interval between doses. Serum samples were obtained over a 24-h interval post-dosing, and were analysed for their diclofenac content by HPLC-UV. No adverse effect was reported for any of the formulations administered. Geometric mean test/reference individual ratios were: 92.8% for AUC(0-24 h), 93.2% for AUC(0-infinity), 117.2% for Cmax, 131.0% for Ke and 76.2% for T1/2. The variability of Cmax parameter expressed as CV was greater than 25%. Since the 90% CI for AUC(0-24 h) mean ratio were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it can be concluded that diclofenac free acid formulation is bioequivalent to diclofenac resinate formulation for the extent of absorption. Since the European Community Agency accepts a 90% CI for Cmax of 70-143%, it can be concluded that diclofenac free acid formulation is bioequivalent to diclofenac resinate formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption after single dose administration.